Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

So Much for Clean Politics: McCain's Latest Attack Ad Ignores Facts

Posted by Matt Stoller, Open Left at 11:57 AM on July 21, 2008.


McCain's latest ad blames Obama for rising gas prices and claims drilling is the answer. Both those assertions are false.

Here's the script:

ANNCR: Gas prices - $4, $5, no end in sight, because some in Washington are still saying no to drilling in America.

No to independence from foreign oil.

Who can you thank for rising prices at the pump?

CHANT: Obama, Obama

ANNCR: One man knows we must now drill more in America and rescue our family budgets.

Don't hope for more energy, vote for it. McCain.

JOHN MCCAIN: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

I spent Netroots Nation obsessed with gas prices, chatting with various operatives and politicians about polling on the subject. The best framing came from Van Jones, who said that we can't 'drill and burn' our way out of this problem. The public is there with us; they don't believe that gas prices are coming down, even if we open everything to oil company leases. Yet the most of the public -- even some liberals -- supports drilling anyway for three reasons:

1. Calling for drilling looks like leadership. Someone is doing something, finally.

2. Calling for drilling is understandable. Put drill in ground, oil comes out.

3. Calling for drilling has an enemy, the environmentalists.

I don't think McCain's attack will work on Obama, since it is saying something that Americans fundamentally don't believe. The ad suggests that prices are rising because of insufficient drilling, and that more drilling will lower prices. That isn't true, and polling suggests people know it isn't true. An ad that says something along the lines of 'this isn't a total solution, but it's a start' would be much more credible as an attack on Obama.

The energy question is the question of our generation. If you drilled everything there is in the US tomorrow and oil started coming out of the ground tomorrow, gas prices would drop by about three cents. Gas prices went up one cent a day last month. Van Jones made the following critical point about the oil economy versus the renewable economy: When more people use oil, the price goes up. When more people use solar, the price goes down.

The environmentalists have their big moment right now, and it's time to begin organizing around a new economy. There's a lot of education to do on energy.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!


Caroline Kennedy's Voting Record
"City Board of Elections records show Kennedy has failed to vote in many elections since she registered in the city in 1988."
December 19, 2008.
A Good Pick: Obama Taps Hilda Solis to Be His Labor Secretary
This is a very good pick. Solis might turn out to be an excellent ally.
December 18, 2008.
Evan Bayh Forming Blue Dog Caucus in the Senate
I suppose they should formalize it.
December 15, 2008.
Why the Right Will Oppose Getting Us Out of Recession
People that have money would prefer that they remain on top, and will oppose attempts to restart spending from a broad base.
December 4, 2008.
So ... There's An Election in Georgia Today
Jim Martin is up against Saxby Chambliss in Georgia today, and there just is not that much enthusiasm for this race on the Democrati side.
December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The source of the oil has little to do with the price.
Posted by: wildbill on Jul 22, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in southern Idaho. All of our gasoline here comes from a Chevron refinery in Utah, which gets all its oil from Chevron oil fields in Utah. We generally pay more per gallon for gasoline than the U.S. average. So much for the idea that domestic oil will save us money.

The price of oil is determined somewhat by worldwide demand but also by the commodities markets, where a lot of men (maybe some women, too) spend all day shouting prices at each other, trying to get rich on oil speculation. We blame the oil companies or the Arabs, but at this point in history, they mainly just sit back and enjoy the profits rolling in.

Drilling within U.S. territory would not lower prices, even if there were no oil traders. We have lots of oil sealed in oil shale, we have undetermined amounts offshore, and we might or might not have lots in the Alaska National Wildlife Reserve. Exploiting any of these will be very expensive, will take years before it affects the market, and will have serious environmental consequences. And oil will still be a nonrenewable resource. Fossil fuels are not the long-term answer and aren't even a very good short-term answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how about this one?
Posted by: Vik on Jul 22, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard yesterday that McInsane said that Obama "didn't know anything about winning a war." I thought, "Mister, neither do you."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'The biggest environmental crime in history
Posted by: warrior woman on Jul 22, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should understand what drilling means, an excerpt:

'The biggest environmental crime in history' http://environment.independent.co.uk/article3239364.ece
By Cahal Milmo
Published: 10 December 2007
BP, the British oil giant that pledged to move "Beyond Petroleum" by finding cleaner ways to produce fossil fuels, is being accused of abandoning its "green sheen" by investing nearly £1.5bn to extract oil from the Canadian wilderness using methods which environmentalists say are part of the "biggest global warming crime" in history.
The multinational oil and gas producer, which last year made a profit of £11bn, is facing a head-on confrontation with the green lobby in the pristine forests of North America after Greenpeace pledged a direct action campaign against BP following its decision to reverse a long-standing policy and invest heavily in extracting so-called "oil sands" that lie beneath the Canadian province of Alberta and form the world's second-largest proven oil reserves after Saudi Arabia.
Producing crude oil from the tar sands – a heavy mixture of bitumen, water, sand and clay – found beneath more than 54,000 square miles of prime forest in northern Alberta – an area the size of England and Wales combined – generates up to four times more carbon dioxide, the principal global warming gas, than conventional drilling. The booming oil sands industry will produce 100 million tonnes of CO2 (equivalent to a fifth of the UK's entire annual emissions) a year by 2012, ensuring that Canada will miss its emission targets under the Kyoto treaty, according to environmentalist activists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Canada's Highway to Hell
Posted by: warrior woman on Jul 22, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another excerpt:

Canada's Highway to Hell
Page 3 http://www.nrdc.org/onearth/07fal/alberta3.asp
David Schindler, a University of Alberta biologist and water ecologist, says he was "rather horrified" to learn that the oil industry withdraws nearly 8 percent of the water in the Athabasca during low- to medium-flow periods. This puts industry on a collision course with climate change, he says. Since 1945 temperatures in the region have climbed by 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and that increase will soon double. Schindler calculates that global heating has reduced the volume of water running into the basin by 50 percent in the last three decades.
He predicts that projected tar-sands development won't leave enough water in the Athabasca to protect its fish or the waterfowl dependent on the Athabasca Delta. Navigation on the river could come to a standstill too. He charges that neither the Canadian federal government nor Alberta's provincial authorities have collected adequate data on the river. Yet an industry stakeholder group, the Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program, recently reported that "changes in the condition of the Athabasca River up to and including 2005 have been minor."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pretzel logic
Posted by: Quannah on Jul 22, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How McStain can blame Obama for high gas prices is INSANE. The ad, to me, only proves that McStain is DESPERATE.

I wish they would all leave Bizarro World and join the rest of us in the REAL world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Winning a war
Posted by: modeler on Jul 22, 2008 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain knows nothing about that either. Shot down at the start of his assignment and being a POW does not make a military leader. What about his statement of linking the borders of Irak and Afghanistan? He does not seem to know much about geography either, almost like Bushits closing the harbours of Afghanistan. LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Winning a war Posted by: Quannah