Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Watching the Senate Rot in Slow Motion

Posted by Matt Stoller, Open Left at 8:44 AM on February 16, 2008.


Staffers have no choice but to adopt a defensive and insecure posture, their limited range of motion gets constrained by those at the top.

First of all, I'm really glad we elected Jim Webb a Senator from Virginia. He has worked on some essential topics, including military contracting, Iran and prisons, that few politicians will touch. And he's far better than the racist and somewhat sadistic George Allen, who in his youth apparently used to beat people with pool cues.

That said, Webb has been incredibly underwhelming as a Senator; his response to the State of the Union last year was stunningly good, with a promise that Democrats would show Bush a different path if he refused to change policies on Iraq. Unfortunately, there was no follow-through whatsoever, and Webb's credibility has been shot full of holes, with bad votes on FISA, tax policy, and censuring Moveon members like me (AliceDem in the comments reminds us of his poor votes on the Peru Free Trade agreement and his letter asking the FCC to allow more media consolidation). He has in some ways become a sad joke of a figure, a heroic figure neutered by his own deference to the authoritarians he ran against and at one point in his life, worked for. He endorsed George Allen and George Bush in 2000, and in some ways, he still does.

I expect him to be a great Senator one day, but as of yet, this environment is designed precisely around his weaknesses, not his strengths. Though he is willing to take on tough issues, he is unable to make any progress. Military contracting, Iran, the Webb amendment on Iraq - all have been stymied, with record disapproval from the public against Democrats for their failures. It's as if he cannot bring himself to use actual leverage against the Commander-in-Chief, because that's not how one does business.

What I find especially interesting is how his failed leadership has had such a devastating impact on his staff. Mark Levine details a conversation he had with a Webb staffer on the FISA legislation. It's a long and interesting conversation, and it shows how frustrated this staffer really is at the pressure received about his vote on this and other matters. As it happens, I have worked a bit with this staffer, and I like her very much, but it is clear that the lack of dialouge from Webb with the liberals who got him elected has created a tense and difficult environment and filtered down.

Levine's post is worth a read to see how staffers tortuously try to handle the moral inconsistencies of their bosses. It's like watching a slow motion real of how bad habits and a fear of honest dialogue with constituents gets embedded into the culture of the Senate as an institution. But what is clear is that staffers and advisors have no choice but to adopt a defensive and insecure posture, as their limited range of motion does get constrained by those at the top.

Digg!

Matt Stoller is a political activist/blogger in DC, and was an editor at MyDD from November 2005 until June 2007. He also consults for the Sunlight Foundation, FreePress.net, and Working Assets as well as proactively networking other progressive bloggers/internet activists and progressive professionals.


Caroline Kennedy's Voting Record
"City Board of Elections records show Kennedy has failed to vote in many elections since she registered in the city in 1988."
December 19, 2008.
A Good Pick: Obama Taps Hilda Solis to Be His Labor Secretary
This is a very good pick. Solis might turn out to be an excellent ally.
December 18, 2008.
Evan Bayh Forming Blue Dog Caucus in the Senate
I suppose they should formalize it.
December 15, 2008.
Why the Right Will Oppose Getting Us Out of Recession
People that have money would prefer that they remain on top, and will oppose attempts to restart spending from a broad base.
December 4, 2008.
So ... There's An Election in Georgia Today
Jim Martin is up against Saxby Chambliss in Georgia today, and there just is not that much enthusiasm for this race on the Democrati side.
December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don,t Cross Out Web
Posted by: JonA on Feb 16, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As to Jim Webb. If you look beyond Webb, you will find that Congress has done little to stop the corrupt Republicans.... even if we do have Finegold, Webb and a few others that show great promise. In fact, there should be more relationship establised between Finegold and Webb. They have such limited power as it is now. Rather than picking on the few that are trying, let us talk about all the bad apples that are the real problems ...there are so damn many of them.
We must vote out of office Replublicans and about 15 to 20 Democrats.... to obtain a better government. Let's be critical on those that (should be) brought to light to the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlwaysAskWHY
Posted by: AlwaysAskWhy on Feb 16, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our whole congress has a bad case of STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Congress has been reduced to a bunch of "good Germans" covering for Bush's Reichstadt (9/11).

There is so much proof of horrific HIGH CRIMES by this administration, that congress seems to have put themselves in a trance...a coma...so they don't have to think about the horror of it all.

They seem to think that they are accomplishing important legislation, when the truth is just the opposite. They are unable to admit to themselves that Bush either vetoes everything, or inserts a signing statement defying congress, or under funds everything. So their efforts go to NAUGHT and they are wasting precious time and precious lives. America and the world are laughing at them, if not sticking pins in voodoo dolls. All the while the death and destruction continue unabated by an intervention of sanity.

Congress thinks that whatever they mistakenly believe they are accomplishing is more important than stopping the river of lies that we and the world are drowning in. More important than stopping the mass murder for profit, the torture, the looting of our nation and Iraq, the illegal surveillance (the police state), the international chaos. IMPEACHING BUSH, CHENEY AND GETTING RID OF THEIR HENCHMEN ADMINISTRATION will accomplish the same thing, and will save this democracy, to boot.

NOTHING is more important to very survival of this democracy (maybe the world), and to our Constitution (now almost destroyed) than to IMPEACH immediately. The Bush Mafia should then be tried for their crimes in the U.S., then again in an international war crimes tribunal. Everything else can and should wait.

IMPEACHMENT says, "We're sorry!" - probably the ONLY apology the world will accept from an indifferent, greedy, self-absorbed American People.

IMPEACHMENT writes their crimes into our official history and our history books... to learn from into the future. IF IT ISN'T WRITTEN, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. Their their crimes will be left to mere debate and supposition in the many books that have been written by experts documenting their crimes and outlining the required Articles of Impeachment.

IMPEACHMENT reverses the overreaching executive power precedent set by this administration and a corrupt congress. The Democrats can and might be just as big tyrants and dictators with these powers.

IMPEACHMENT is the sunlight and the truth that disinfects...and this country is rotting. Tell the American People the TRUTH, re-educate them about what a HIGH CRIME is... and the Dems WILL have the votes. The American People will see to it! To believe anything less is to insult the intelligence, patriotism and sense of justice of the American People.

ONE MILLION MURDERED IRAQIS, 4,000 OF OUR DEAD SOLDIERS, THOUSANDS OF THE PERMANENTLY MAIMED HUMAN BEINGS, MILLIONS OF DISPLACED IRAQIS, ALL DEMAND IMPEACHMENT NOW!

Psychiatrists are posting that Bush and Cheney are exhibiting signs of psychosis -- congress can't see it and doesn't understand the imminent danger of leaving these people in charge of this nation.

IF WE DO NOT ACT NOW TO REMOVE THESE PEOPLE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, LIKE THE GERMANS DID, WILL SUFFER FROM SHAME AND HUMILIATION FOR GENERATIONS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wellstoned
Posted by: magistre on Feb 16, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that most in Congress are afraid if they start telling the truth and start opposing the Republicans they will be "Paul Wellstoned"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wellstoned Posted by: AlwaysAskWhy
» Or "Kuciniched" Posted by: truthteller
Do these guys remember their "oath"???
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 16, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They said it when they were sworn in. It says that they will protect and defend the Constitution, from all threats, both foreign AND DOMESTIC... and why do you suppose the founders worded it in that way??? Because they forsaw the ability of our own government to be just as big a threat to our Constitution as any foreign army! There is a reason it was written that way!

I would venture to guess that most of the current legislators in Washington DC haven't even read the Constitution, much less understand what it is. They were given the power they have because they are SUPPOSED to be a body "representative of the People." They are SUPPOSED to be a CO-EQUAL branch of government! They are there to keep an overreaching Executive or Judicial branch in check!

I swear, they're clueless. The ones that don't "get it" shouldn't be there. Remember that when you cast your votes this November!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Say what??? Posted by: gregii
» RE: Say what??? Posted by: Quannah
Government tyranny
Posted by: Pop on Feb 16, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter whether it's cowardice or they're getting paid off. Our representative refused to do their sworn duty. Unless the people step in masses and require action against those involved in the destruction of Sep 11, 2001 as well as the official cover-up there can be no getting back any democracy at least thought we had before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best string I've seen in months
Posted by: mclemens on Feb 16, 2008 7:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are wonderful comments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dem Congresspeople
Posted by: Interested on Feb 16, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was optimistic(and so naive) when the Dems took over Congress, only to find they are part of the problem, not the solution. Sen. Reid,(from my state) has turned out to be Caspar Milquetoast-what can you expect from a Democratic Mormon, an oxymoron to be sure. The only solution is a complete housecleaning, which will never happen. Our once great country is in a free fall, and no parachute in sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Reread the Blog and as I Suspected it WAS About Senate......
Posted by: Turiye on Feb 16, 2008 9:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...one preceding poster said "Some of the posts are the best I've read." If only we were talking about the House!
Everyone was Congressperson this, Rep. that, my Congressperson, except the author was talking about the Senate!!! Snap out of it!
One of my Senators is concerned ; spying......ABOUT FOOTBALL! The other imbecile voted 'YEA', actually both for S.2248, hate them badly...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How threatened are they?
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Feb 16, 2008 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To read that Jim Webb, a seemingly independent, strong-willed, intelligent guy, who was a beacon of hope when elected, is already capitulating to the powers that be is a sad commentary indeed on the state of our country.

Sometimes I think it must be a bigger threat than we the peons can comprehend for these elected officials. They are SO timid in the face of these thugs that I wonder if their very lives have been threatened. Or the lives of their children. Maybe they know the gulags will soon be filled with Americans and they want to make sure and keep their butts safe.

Either that or Karl Rove has video of the dems having a mass orgy with sheep, camels and young children.

I can not fathom any other reason why they are being SO GROTESQUELY wimpy. When Bush was popular, it was dangerous to stand up to him, but now for Christ sake, the people are demanding action and they still refuse to act.

For any politician, their main goal is to get reelected so they (generally speaking) do what the people want. For them to blatantly ignore the obvious will of the people on so many important issues means they have something that motivates them more than being popular with the people. Especially when they RAN on a platform from which they have now backed away from! They've changed their minds? Of course not. Maybe they're petrified... for good reason.

If I thought a Blackwater thug was going to harass my family maybe that would make me give in to the SOB's too.

I'm old enough to realize Mr. Smith never really went to Washington other than on faded celluloid, but I would think someone like Jim Webb would have the guts to last more than such a brief time. Or hell, maybe they just ALL want to line their pockets and get their dicks stroked. I'm actually giving the jokers the benefit of the doubt by postulating that they have been mortally threatened. Perhaps the real answer is they are nothing but greedy lying pigs who do not give a shit about anyone on the planet except themselves and they assume a strong PR machine can overcome inconvenient details like the truth of their terrible performance and they'll get reelected regardless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How threatened are they? Posted by: Doubtom
Is he recently infected, or was he a carrier from the start?
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on Feb 18, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It's as if he cannot bring himself to use actual leverage against the Commander-in-Chief, because that's not how one does business."

There you have it. As we natter about walls of separation between church and state, we distract ourselves from the fact that EVERY money-driven aspect of society and culture -- every institution that takes money for profit or has no obligation to disclose its finances -- should be walled off.

Our Gub-mint has been operated in the business paradigm for so long that a large number of us actually believe that such is the stuff of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]