Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is This the Iraq Recession?

Posted by Matt Stoller, Open Left at 11:10 AM on January 23, 2008.


Highlights from the New America Foundation forum on the economic crisis, the closest any of us will get to the conference going on in Davos.
20080115t160830z01nootrrtridsp2businessusaeconomydc
recession

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Matt Stoller in your
mailbox!

 

I just got back from the New America Foundation forum on the economic crisis, with presenters from the McCain, Edwards, Obama, and Clinton. Apparently the Romney, Paul, and Huckabee campaigns were going to send reps, but did not. I wanted to test out the 'Iraq Recession' frame, which Moveon put out in an email a few days ago when discussing the stimulus.

Basically, this is the closest any of us are going to get to Davos, the exclusive global elite conference going on in Switzerland right now where the freakout du jour is the credit crunch and coming recession. Multiple Democrats made the point that this is not a 'subprime' mortgage crisis, it's a credit crisis reflecting many sectors of the economy. Leo Hindery from the Edwards campaign said it's a crisis involving regulatory neglect combined with trade, current account, Federal, state, and consumer deficits and debt. He was by far the most radical in his diagnosis of the problem, which coheres with the politics of the Presidential campaign.

Gary Gensler of the Clinton campaign spoke, and I found his speech interesting for the way that he framed Clinton's thinking about policy. Gensler said that Clinton is an extremely thorough policy-maker, and won't put out policy unless she has personally ensured that it is rigorously done. But he also added that she is listening to voters on the campaign trail (he spoke of her 'conversation' with the country that she announced upon the start of her campaign), and she is hearing that middle income voters are suffering because of housing and energy costs. This explains why her plans are targeting these areas, and why she's become much more liberal in her rhetoric. Gensler also mentioned Clinton's embrace of 'smart trade' instead of simply free trade.

Kevin Hassett of the McCain campaign also spoke, and he gave a remarkably uninspiring and status quo argument for tax cuts for corporations as well as entitlement reform (ie. gutting Social Security). Hassett basically doesn't see anything particularly problematic in our current predicament except that the long-term crises of Medicare and Social Security are going to cause the markets to 'punish' us, and that corporate tax rates have stacked the deck against companies that invest in America due to lower tax rates abroad. In an unwitting nod to Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine, he spoke of the current economic crisis as a great opportunity that we should not squander to fix our longer term problems, as well as lauding Bill Clinton's record on free trade and attacking Hillary's recent move away from it.

Obama's advisor, Austan Goolsbee, an economist at the University of Chicago, discussed the need for immediate stimulus in the form of disbursements of cash to low and middle income wage earners through existing channels. He stressed the need for speed in moving a stimulus package that gets money out quickly, and used the traditional Keynesian argument that a stimulus that moves to slowly will hit the economy during the recovery, leading to inflationary pressures instead of help for a sagging economy. In the question and answer session, someone analogized our current predicament and certain policy options to the Weimar crisis, and Goolsbee dismissed this notion out of hand, but I was impressed with his answer on trade. He pointed out that existing free trade agreements are 900 pages long and full of loopholes, and that they aren't in fact helping to open markets in any particularly consistent manner. He'd like free trade, but we don't have it.

After the session, I asked both Gensler and Goolsbee about the frame 'Iraq Recession', and Gensler brushed it aside. "It's not broad enough", he said. He then noted that this recession has deeper causes than just Iraq, that while Iraq is constraining our options (a Steve Clemons phrase) circles in with housing, credit, and oil prices. Goolsbee was much more open to the idea, though he agreed with Gensler that Iraq did not cause our current economic problems. I learned during our chat that the Chicago school economist Goolsbee is friendly with David Sirota. In an argument about free trade, Sirota actually encouraged Goolsbee to read a trade agreement, who was then horrified at what he found. I can see why elite liberals love Obama, since his advisors seem sincerely open-minded about policy ideas, in contrast to a much more lowest common denominator voter and poll-driven top-down approach from Clinton. Both approaches have their strengths and their weaknesses.

During the conversation, I brought up the FISA legislation and swing liberals with Goolsbee, and someone else mentioned that Obama is going to be in DC on Monday afternoon for a fundraiser. The arguments I've gotten from the Obama camp on FISA are that he has scheduling problems with coming to DC, so we'll see, if it's accurate he'll be in town, whether he can make time to help Dodd protect the Constitution. After Saturday in South Carolina, the contest goes national, and this is when Obama could shine and bring home some of those swing liberals with a clear fighting spirit against Bush's top priority.

In my final observation, I'll note that the topic of Iraq did not come up during the forum, and that no one touched on the military budget and its huge imprint on the American economy. It eats up something like 53% of discretionary spending, money that would be useful in dealing with a massive credit crunch and recession. But that money is apparently untouchable and not part of fiscal responsibility. Funny how the Blue Dogs never whine about the military budget in all their harping about excess government spending.

During the forum, I got an email from a super smart financial analyst who pointed out that there is probably very little experience with stagflationary policy-making. I'd feel a lot better about our bumpy road if any of the people who staffed the forum were policy-makers in the 1970s and knew how to deal with something other than the Goldilocks economy of the 1990s.

Digg!

Matt Stoller is a political activist/blogger in DC, and was an editor at MyDD from November 2005 until June 2007. He also consults for the Sunlight Foundation, FreePress.net, and Working Assets as well as proactively networking other progressive bloggers/internet activists and progressive professionals.


Caroline Kennedy's Voting Record
"City Board of Elections records show Kennedy has failed to vote in many elections since she registered in the city in 1988."
December 19, 2008.
A Good Pick: Obama Taps Hilda Solis to Be His Labor Secretary
This is a very good pick. Solis might turn out to be an excellent ally.
December 18, 2008.
Evan Bayh Forming Blue Dog Caucus in the Senate
I suppose they should formalize it.
December 15, 2008.
Why the Right Will Oppose Getting Us Out of Recession
People that have money would prefer that they remain on top, and will oppose attempts to restart spending from a broad base.
December 4, 2008.
So ... There's An Election in Georgia Today
Jim Martin is up against Saxby Chambliss in Georgia today, and there just is not that much enthusiasm for this race on the Democrati side.
December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Experience with stagflation, anyone?
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jan 23, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been a lot of experience with stagflation; the Pre-Nazi German Republic had it. And, it was used very effectively by Adolph Hitler. He used it to propel himself to the pinnacles of power.
It makes me wonder. Because, the sub-prime fiasco seems so manufactured. I have been assuming that the investment moguls did it because they believed that the politicians would bail them out. But, maby they have other motives besides monetary self-gratification. Maby they really intend to resurrect Hitler.
But, that doen't really make sense. Because, if a pro-corporate national socialist empire is what they're looking for, all they have to do is turn to China. It's ready made.
Satori! The neocons, the investment moguls, and Rupert are all working for the RCP!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Serfs Up! Anybody goin' in? Posted by: Itsthewater
Once again
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 24, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton, McCain and Obama are given full paragraphs of coverage and only a cursory mention of John Edwards.

Edwards has been running on the boringly complex, highly relevant issue of the economy since the inception of his campaign until the two "frontrunners" (whose names are mentioned interminably for any reason whatsoever) have been forced to include it in their own. Now that the chickens have come home to roost and he should be applauded as visionary he is almost completely left out of the conversation.

The alternative media is selling out America in lock-step with the mainstream media.

It just shows that we the people are going to get the best president money can buy.

I wouldn't want any of you "alternative" trust-fund journalists to lose a penny by speaking out against the corporate-backed neo-fascist agenda that has ruined the great experiment that was the United States of America.

What a joke!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE EISENHOWER ADMINISTRATION CREATED THE RECESSION-DEPRESSION OF
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 24, 2008 10:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1958. It was followed by years of stagflation. The stock market went nowhere.

Businesses failed here and abroad. We lost Packard, Studebaker, Hudson, and, really Nash. Nash just took longer to die. It took a Romney to kill it, George. Had we saved these car companies, would we see half of our market provided by the Japanese?

Republicans are destroyers. They are not builders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]