Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

White House Indicates Obama Willing to Circumvent Republicans on Health Reform

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 5:15 PM on August 6, 2009.


Is there an increased willingness on the part of Democrats to openly discuss how to marginalize the role of Republicans in reform?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sam Stein in your
mailbox!

 

The White House insisted on Thursday that it was open to the use of a parliamentary procedure that would prevent health care reform from being filibustered by Republicans in the Senate.

Speaking minutes after President Barack Obama met with a group of bipartisan lawmakers from the Senate Finance Committee, spokesman Robert Gibbs stressed that the administration's preference was to get a health care bill passed through normal measures. But, in one of the strongest indications to date that the president is willing to circumvent Republicans, Gibbs affirmatively stated that the use reconciliation (a move that allows bills to be considered on an up-or-down basis) was on the White House's mind.

"Obviously, the President meeting with Democrats and Republicans means the President is interested in doing this first and foremost through regular order," he said. "Obviously the option for reconciliation was contained in the budget and we will certainly cross that bridge when we get there."

"It is certainly out there," Gibbs added.

The remark reflects an increased willingness on the part of Democrats to openly discuss how to marginalize the role of Republicans in the health care process. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) began the process earlier in the week when he argued that the party should have "contingencies" should the Senate Finance Committee not be able to produce a bipartisan bill by September 15.

The administration's view of reconciliation for health care has evolved since late June, when Gibbs punted on the idea.

"Again, I think that gets a great deal ahead of where we are in the process," he said during a briefing on June 30. "I think the president has confidence in the system working."

Senate Majority Leader Harry was less open when asked about reconciliation at a Thursday press conference. "We're not even discussing it. We believe health care will be bipartisan," he said.

A reporter noted that Sen. Schumer had said that it's an option.

"Well, I've never known Schumer to have said anything wrong," Reid quipped.

"Get that down!" Schumer exclaimed.

"Seriously, reconciliation," said Reid. "We know it's back there. We don't want to use reconciliation unless we have to. We hope we won't have to."

Digg!

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Obama and DNC Try Turning Angry Mobs Into Benefits
Town hall disruptions can be used as a rallying point for proponents of reform.
August 5, 2009.
GOP Congressman Wants Obama to Apologize to Cambridge Police Dept.
His state drowning in economic woes, one GOP congressman is crafting legislation calling on Obama to apologize to police.
July 27, 2009.
Senators Urge Progressives To Keep Targeting Dems On Health Care
"We should encourage people to participate in the process."
July 8, 2009.
Bernie Sanders Demands Democrats Commit To Stopping Health Care Filibuster
Sanders' calls for simply taking the parliamentary hurdles out of the process.
July 1, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Of course Pres. Obama will circumvent Republicans, I never doubted it
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 6, 2009 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't be mistaken by his affable ways, or his gentle manner, or his good humor, or his worthy efforts to gain bi-partisanship and bring our country together. Those are the reasons among many others I voted for him. Don't underestimate him. He will indeed circumvent Republicans if he must do that to get the important work of gov't accomplished. Our country has been in stall mode way to long.

What choice do dems have but to shut out or circumvent republicans? Anyone? What choice are republicans giving us? What choice are they giving our elected democratic representatives in Congress?

This country is in the hands of the Democratic Party and I thank God mightly for that. Facists rule the republican party now. We must stop them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Absolutely Encino! Posted by: foreverhope
70% of Americans
Posted by: mattwoolery on Aug 6, 2009 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the GOP won't listen to 70% of Americans (90% of Democrats), why should he do otherwise? Because we know who they are listening to. The ones who made the failed healthcare system. That rations healthcare today if you have a preexisting condition, or if the corporation just decides you are too sick to be profitable for them.
Reconciliation. It has a nice sound to it today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow! I don't know. These are such seriously flawed, weak leaders put in charge of major reform.
Posted by: Paul_C on Aug 6, 2009 10:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nancy "Deer-in-the-headlights" Pelosi, Harry "Wake-me-up-inside" Reid, Barak "Back-stabber" Obama.

Bejeezus, with friends like that...

So the word is out - the Dem leadership is not totally ignorant or spaced out - they now know about the word "reconciliation". Not real sure what it means, though.

"What? Is it time for afternoon tea? Will those lovely Republicans be attending? What about my nap?"

Grrrrr! Sick 'em, tiger!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama needs to reign in the Blue Dogs!
Posted by: Quannah on Aug 6, 2009 11:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republics aren't the problem. They don't have the votes. Plain and simple. It's the DINOs who are the real obstructionists.

What's the plan to deal with them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 7, 2009 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... he has to announce that he is willing to pass legislation without the support of the minority????

No wonder they can get so little done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow... Posted by: VZEQICVA
BIPARTISANSIP IS A MYTH
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 7, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans and Democrat hold-outs have had long enough to do something other than conduct public shouting matches. That have contributed nothing to the debate. Protecting Insurance Companies, corporate proftis, dividends and bloated payrolls is not the responsibility of the American Public. There's enough evidence to prove that the system as it operates presently is a failure. It only succeeds in making the chosen few, very, very rich. But it's done at a very high cost to the public. Not just dollars, but lives. I think it's time for Obama to bring down the axe, let the Health Insurance Companies' stock sell off, and it will and then move on. Profiting from others' misfortune, such as illness is not an acceptable way to get rich. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]