Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Conservatives Preparing for Franken Victory

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 6:40 AM on December 31, 2008.


Some conservatives are beginning to envision life without Norm Coleman.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sam Stein in your
mailbox!

 

As the window closes on Norm Coleman's chances for retaining his seat in the Senate, some conservatives are beginning to envision life without the Minnesota Republican.

In a filing on the conservative website, NewsMax.com, author David A. Patten looked at the numbers and saw in them a Coleman-less Senate.

The counting of improperly rejected absentee ballots will probably increase Democratic challenger Al Franken's lead over incumbent GOP Sen. Norm Coleman according to a new analysis of voting trends, effectively relegating Coleman to filing lawsuits considered unlikely to reverse the outcome of the election.

Others on the right are not ready to accept defeat. National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair John Cornyn released a statement on Tuesday indicating that some GOP senators would resist seating Franken before the courts have their say, even if the Democratic challenger is declared the winner of the recount. "I expect the Senate would have a problem seating a candidate who has not duly won an election," Cornyn claimed.

In private, meanwhile, GOP officials have begun to contemplate Al Franken -- whose lead stands at a scant 50 votes and with largely favorable absentee ballots left to count -- ending up in Washington D.C.

By and large, such discussion has not surfaced in public. Coleman's hopes hinge on uncovering enough wrongfully rejected absentee ballots to overcome his current deficit but also the possibility of legally challenging the results.

And yet, it is not difficult to imagine how some in the GOP could rationalize a Coleman defeat. Weeks before the actual election, NBC's Chuck Todd reported about anxiety among Democrats over a possible Franken win -- over the potential fodder it would give Republican opponents and the possibility that it would persuade other celebrity candidates to make their own runs for elected office.

But the shoe also fits on the other foot. Coleman is mired in ethics scandals surrounding his alleged failure to report $75,000 in payments his family received from a prominent GOP financier and close friend. The FBI is reportedly investigating the matter and it stands to reason that the Senate Ethics Committee will follow suit. The last thing Republicans in the Senate want is a corruption controversy hounding one of its members, especially after the party's image suffered terribly from such matters in '06 and '08.

Digg!

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Senators Urge Progressives To Keep Targeting Dems On Health Care
"We should encourage people to participate in the process."
July 8, 2009.
Bernie Sanders Demands Democrats Commit To Stopping Health Care Filibuster
Sanders' calls for simply taking the parliamentary hurdles out of the process.
July 1, 2009.
Pawlenty Whacks Sanford: "Troubling And Hypocritical"
Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) offered one of the harshest rebukes from within the Republican Party of Mark Sanford.
June 29, 2009.
McCain Hits Obama On Iran, Joe Klein Tells Him "Be Quiet" (VIDEO)
The line pushed by McCain has become the de-facto Republican criticism of Obama since the crisis in Iran began.
June 23, 2009.
Daschle's Firm And Group Have Ties To Private Health Care Industry
The firm has been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobby on behalf of key players in the health care industry.
June 19, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"celebrity" candidate?
Posted by: wwittman on Dec 31, 2008 2:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...and the possibility that it would persuade other celebrity candidates to make their own runs for elected office..."

you mean, like, for example, Arnold Schwarzenegger?
or it's only a "problem" when he's a liberal?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "celebrity" candidate? Posted by: motamanx6
My Two Faces
Posted by: armorypk on Dec 31, 2008 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all the outraged Repugs out there, my rational face would like to point out that if Al wins, it will be the result of an honest vote count.

My irrational, juvenile face just wants to say, "Payback's a bitch, ain't it?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

coleman is dead weight
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 31, 2008 9:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
look for the repugs to abandon him

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are the conservatives upset?
Posted by: StillStanding on Jan 1, 2009 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all, they have Obama in the White House and it's now clear from his cabinet picks he'll unflaggingly pursue their agenda. Cheer up, conservatives!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ironic
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Jan 1, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I expect the Senate would have a problem seating a candidate who has not duly won an election," Cornyn claimed.

I wonder, did Cornyn express similar feelings after the Supreme Court appointed Bush as our President even though he had not duly won election?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ironic Posted by: motamanx6
» RE: Ironic Posted by: pkricker
Go Al, Go! Minnesota needs you.
Posted by: pauldd on Jan 1, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the US needs him and more like him. From following Franken over the past several years including listening to his positions when he was on Air America, it seems he will make an excellent progressive legislator. He'll be a great heir to Mr. Wellstone and his progressive record. His background as a comedian is largely irrelevant. And besides, Coleman is a kook. If you want a laugh, look up his exchanges with George Galloway several years back in senate hearings. He's an ignorant fool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» George Galloway vs Norm Coleman Posted by: Prairie Waif
Why is it even close?
Posted by: Brez on Jan 1, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am continually amazed that there is even one republican left in America. Well, except for the religious nuts who think god is blowing in their ears and anointing sociopaths like Bush, Cheney, et al.

All any Democrat should have to do is play a tape of Video Doc Frist standing up on the Senate floor telling the world how healthy Terri Schiavo was during that exemplary show of insanity (among so many) that the crazy republicans (that would be all remaining republicans) put on.

Anyone who or still a republican, or a conservative, or anything but a democrat or an independent is either a moron, a religious nut (as opposed to the rationally religious), or a vicious fanatic warmonger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why is it even close? Posted by: CaliJim
» RE: Why is it even close? Posted by: pauldd
The amazing Republicans in 2009
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Jan 1, 2009 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the great majority of the American people embrace a new found sanity, those of us who hang on for dear life to their Republican dreams of world domination are gradually losing the power, once stolen, over the governance of this country. Wake up dolts! It's time to use your cunning ways in service of We the People in place of We the Annointed...Your days of Regannomics and trickle down morality are over. Advance the country forward or welcome to the scrap heap of political oblivion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP Image
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jan 1, 2009 11:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The parties image suffered so horribly in 2006 and 7", "so?" as the VP would say. When has that ever been a problem? The image says it all doesn't it? The GOP is corrupt, the fact that you might find one or two GOP congressmen or senators (well maybe not senators) who are honest does not take away from the reason for the horrible image, the absolute corruption of the party as a whole. If they want to clean up their image they had better start with cleaning up their congressional caucus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Expect Coleman to take the fight over this seat
Posted by: bettyn on Jan 1, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all the way to the US Supreme Court...and we ALL know what will happen then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Norm Coleman
Posted by: Hankbrilliant on Jan 2, 2009 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
loses the election for Senator from Minnesota against Al Franken, his loss couldn't happen to a more deserving Republican. Why? Because his lack of ethical behavior regarding the $75,000 "payoff" that he got is gonna bury him. The Republicans are on the outs, and he's one of them. Good!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Good" Republicans
Posted by: Urgelt on Jan 3, 2009 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe Ron Paul. Some of his platform strikes me as one aisle over from insane, but I'm convinced he's honest. The rest... I'm sorry, I just can't see any light. They're all on the payroll of the industrialists and financial kingpins, and they show very little, if any, shame about it.

Unfortunately, about two-thirds of the Democrats in Congress appear to be just as corrupt; they are just corrupted by slightly more diverse special interests than the Rethugs.

As for Obama, I guess we'll see. But thus far he sure looks like a friend to Wall Street and the industrialists. He supported expanding the government's powers to spy without warrants on Americans. He had no qualms about handing money over to Wall Street without strings, with predictable results (most seems to have gone to executive bonuses and dividends to stockholders). These aren't good signs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money
Posted by: frank69 on Jan 6, 2009 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a Money Party, and a People's Party.
The People's Party hasn't won an election since...I don't know...Thomas Jefferson?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]