Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Margins of Terror: Just How Unsafe Is Our Food Supply?

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 7:01 AM on February 11, 2009.


It's a shame when avarice overcomes basic decency.
cowface

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Christy Hardin Smith in your
mailbox!

 

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations has a doozy of a hearing scheduled for today beginning at 10 am ET on the "Salmonella Outbreak: The Continued Failure to Protect the Food Supply."  

C-Span will have coverage.  C-Span3 has a hearing with TARP-recipient bank CEOs at the same time.  Ought to be a doozy of a morning.

From the committee release yesterday, the following witnesses "have been invited":

-- Jeffrey Almer
-- Lou Tousignant
-- Peter K. Hurley
-- Stewart Parnell, President, Peanut Corporation of America*
-- Sammy Lightsey, Plant Manager, Peanut Corporation of America
-- Stephen Sundlof, D.V.M., Ph.D., Director of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration
-- Oscar Garrison, Consumer Protection Division, Georgia Department of Agriculture
-- Darlene Cowart, President, J. Leek Associates, Inc.
-- Charles Deibel, President, Deibel Laboratories 

* The Committee voted on February 10, 2009 to compel the testimony of Stewart Parnell.

Interesting line-up, isn't it?  Should provide quite a few testimonial fireworks, and not an inconsequential amount of "Representative Waxman, I decline to answer that question on advice of counsel" responses.

This hearing is a continuation of a series of hearings (YouTube) that the committee has held over the past few years on the increasing worries of taint, infestation and other problems within the nation's food chain.  And with products coming from outside our borders -- you'll likely remember the melamine scares from a few months ago as one example.

One other witness not listed above will be Bill Marler, whose interview with an online cattle publication on food safety reforms was one I quoted on Monday.  

Marler has popped up a copy of proposed written testimony (PDF) on his own blog, which he will submit to the subcommittee today.   It is blunt and gets right to the point on needed reforms.

I wanted to highlight this (PDF):

The time has come to act and not continue simply to react. Consumers, Farmers, Suppliers, Manufacturers, Retailers, Regulators and Politicians need to work together to make our food supply safe, profitable and sustainable. When a quarter of our population is sickened yearly by contaminated food, when thousands die, we do not have the “safest food supply in the world.” We should, must and can do better. In closing, none of this will stop bacterial and viral illnesses entirely. These invisible poisons have been around a long time. However, these eight steps will enable us to help prevent it, help detect it far more quickly, to alert stores and families, and to keep our most vulnerable citizens - kids and seniors - out of harm's way.

Amen. It's a shame when avarice overcomes basic decency, and when the risk of poisoning the elderly and children isn't enough to keep rats, feces, bugs and other hazards out of your manufacturing facility. But here we are.

Digg!

Christy Hardin Smith is a former attorney, who earned her undergraduate degree at Smith College, in American Studies and Government, concentrating in American Foreign Policy. She then went on to graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania in the field of political science and international relations/security studies, before attending law school at the College of Law at West Virginia University, where she was Associate Editor of the Law Review.


Judge in Stevens Case Starts Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against DOJ Officials
Reversing this internal mindset of "ends justifies the means" will not be easy after years of it being shoved into place.
April 7, 2009.
Unemployment Rises to 8.5%. . . and Then There's the Bad News
"Over the past 12 months, the number of unemployed persons has grown by about 5.3 million."
April 3, 2009.
Sick Around America: Half-Assed Health Insurance Doesn’t Work
This infuriates me. And not just because I have a pre-existing condition that would likely have me on the "insurance blacklist."
March 30, 2009.
Smile: Obama Family to Plant Organic Garden at White House
This is awesome news.
March 20, 2009.
AIG Scrutiny: Basic Questions for Media and Congress Alike
On the off chance that the media and Congress have no clue what to scrutinize, here are some basics.
March 16, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hesitantly, I'd say our food supply is one of the safest in the world, on average.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 11, 2009 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the food scooped out of the sea on the beach at Phuket was much, much tastier. Tiger prawn the size of your hand, cockroaches (lobsters) bathed in lemon and butter and naught else... :)

Prosecute criminal folks who intentionally do bad things to our food through malice, neglect, or dereliction.

Give the frankenfood/creationist scaremonger types their say, too. Free country and all, and even the whacko's pay taxes. They deserve to air their opinion, and science needs to understand what its up against in this country.

'Twill be interesting!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are not nearly as safe as we think we are.
Posted by: mygirlboo on Feb 12, 2009 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to think that our food supply was safe, thanks to the consumer movement of the 70's and the good work of the FDA. What I didn't know is that over the years, the FDA has been steadily and systematically gutted of money and manpower. Our politicians of both parties have bowed down to the will of corporations and special interests, even when it is clearly against the interest of the American people.

I am grateful to anyone who will bring this issue to our attention. Another good source of consumer safety when it comes to food and drugs is Lou Dobbs. He has been covering this issue for at least five years and was on top of the salmonella outbreak in peanuts and tomatoes long before any of the other major media outlets covered it. (The tomato problem turned out to be a cilantro problem.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice to see
Posted by: TheLimit on Feb 13, 2009 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that someone else has noticed that it's an ongoing problem, and not a one-off incident.

Time to go for locally produced foods, preferably organic when possible, and leave Big Ag in the dust. Not only would that give us more reliable and cleaner food, but finally, accountability, which no arm of the government, much less any corporation will stoop to.

That'll save fuel, too. There was an article a couple of days ago in our local paper by some twit who said he'd abandoned his 9 month long effort to eat only locally produced foods, because it cost him so much in gas money running around to find them. From this experience he concluded that the idea of locally produced foods to safe fuel costs is invalid, and we might just as well go on flying our food in from southern SA.

Apparently it didn't occur to him that if 90% of the food in his local market was produced locally, it would save a LOT of fuel, not only his personal stock, but every drop that was saved in transporting produce from every corner of the world.

We will never be able to produce everything we consume locally, but we should certainly aim for the greatest portion - 85 to 90% - to be produced locally. This is not an unreasonable goal. Most places could produce nearly all their produce, for instance, and much of the balance of their diets. Things like coffee, tea, chocolate, which have more limited growth requirements will have to be imports for a lot of locations, some places will have to import at least some grains probably. But most places could produce most of what they need to eat.

We have gotten used to the idea that only AgriBiz and it's square mile fields of monoculture can produce enough food to feed this 'over populated' world, but it's just not true. Square miles of monoculture are a criminal waste of resources, and they encourage waste at all other levels of the food distribution chain. Local production is possible almost everywhere, is practical almost everywhere, and necessary if we wish to maintain any kind of food security at all.

Eat locally. Eat seasonally. Be healthier. Be kinder to the land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where Is Basic Decency?
Posted by: CharAnn on Feb 16, 2009 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It's a shame when avarice overcomes basic decency" ... that's the first line just after the title.

We aren't overcome with avarice in just our food system. In almost every facet of our lives we can see how avarice has overcome basic decency -- and it happens over and over and over. Look at the banks gutted by loans to people the bankers knew could not pay the mortgages. Look at Bernie Madoff. Look at our politicians who are indebted to big business, not their constituents, so they can win the next election. Look at doctors who appear to care more for the drug companies than for their patients. Look at some TV preachers who rake in big bucks from poor people so they can live obscenely wealthy life styles.

It's not just the food industry that is overcome with greed. We're surrounded by it. When are we going to say "enough"? How can we stop what has been accepted and approved practice for too long?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Government Isn't The Solution
Posted by: hilly7 on Feb 16, 2009 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problem, Reaction, Solution. They have created a problem. The public is having the expected reaction. And They have a pre planned Solution.

You are going to see tighter laws on food, ones that will drive the family farms that are left, out of business. The problem is Corporate farms and Agri-Business giants like Monsanto. Stopping these people rather than depending upon people that can't even add and subtract a balance book to regulate themselves is stupid. Sorry, but to save a few words, stupid.

Drive out the Monsanto and Corporate farms and return the world's food to the Family farmers...if there are enough left. They actually put safety and quality 1st instead of profits.

Who do you think is in DC on the FDA and Organics Boards? Wake up while your children still have time. It is too late for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]