Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fred Thompson - K Street's Presidential Candidate

Posted by David Sirota at 8:11 AM on June 9, 2007.


David Sirota: The presidential candidate who has spent one third of his life as a corporate lobbyist in Washington, D.C.

USA Today finally breaks the national media silence about the one-third of Fred Thompson's life that he spent as a high-paid corporate lobbyist in Washington, D.C. Thompson's campaign, which is being run by his fellow K Street lobbyists, responded by saying only that being a K Street lobbyist "is an honorable endeavor that goes back to the beginnings of this republic." I love this pathetic attempt to liken corporate lobbying right up there on the "honorable" scale with George Washington heroically crossing the Delaware. What's funny is that you could say a lot of things "go back to the beginning of this republic." Prostitution, as just one example, "goes back to the beginning of this republic." But that doesn't mean you want a prostitute - sexual or corporate - running the nation.

Not surprisingly, the National Association of Manufacturers has a post on its blog trumpeting Thompson's first major policy declaration: His decision to make enacting new corporate tax breaks the centerpiece of his campaign.

Here's what he declared on CNBC:

"We have, you know—if you include state taxes—the highest corporate tax rate in the world. That makes us less competitive. All those things have to be looked at. And all those—especially as far as the corporate tax rate is concerned, need to be clearly reduced."

The claim that America has "the highest corporate tax rate in the world," of course, is a lie handed to Thompson from corporate-backed front groups like the Cato Institute. Here's what I documented in Hostile Takeover:

"Groups like the Cato Institute and Americans for Tax Reform, which are funded by some of America's wealthiest corporations, have for years pushed to eliminate all corporate taxes. They claim 'the federal government takes 35 percent' of corporate income for taxes, that such a rate is the fourth highest in the industrialized world, and therefore oppresses U.S. companies and hurts the economy. Yes, it is true, the official corporate tax rate in America is 35 percent. It is also true, however, that because of lax enforcement, loopholes and evasion, most corporations never come close to paying that rate. As the Government Accountability Office reported in 2004, 94 percent of corporations pay less than 5 percent of their income in taxes, and corporate tax payments are at their second lowest level in 60 years – lower than in every other industrialized country other than Iceland."

But then, why should we expect a lifelong corporate lobbyist like Thompson to push anything other than more corporate tax breaks? That's what he's been getting paid a nice fat paycheck to do most of his life. And no record-setting deficit or lack of funds for protective equipment for our soldiers in harms way is going to stop him from pushing to get his corporate cronies as many giveaways as possible.

Digg!

David Sirota is a veteran political strategist and author of Hostile Takeover, a New York Times bestseller about the corruption of both political parties.


Fox News Spins History (Again)
The New Deal was responsible for extending the Great depression, according to the "fair and balanced" propaganda channel.
December 25, 2008.
Maddow Busts Morgan Stanley Board Member for Lack of Transparency
Last night, Rachel Maddow did something I never thought I'd see a journalist do ...
December 24, 2008.
Obama Backs Off Promise to Pass Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil
Between this move and the move to wait to repeal the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, it looks like Obama is breaking some promises.
December 3, 2008.
Scathing Editorial in the NYT Critiques Obama's Economic Team
Will progressives now start claiming the New York Times "hates" Obama?
November 25, 2008.
Study Shows 'Center-Right Nation' Narrative Spiked Immediately After Election Day
We're not talking about theory anymore -- we're talking about empirical fact.
November 22, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But he has a beat-up red pickup!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 9, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can he not be one of the "common men"? He also wears blue jeans?

Look, how could a good ol' tobbaco chewin', pickup-drivin feller in blue jeans be a K street lobbyist? Those guys always wear the power suits, you know.

I just don't buy it - there's too much cognitive dissonance - can't understand - can't think straight - must watch more FOX news now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» F Thompson Posted by: A. Burr
Chris Matthews loves this guy...
Posted by: lessbread on Jun 10, 2007 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... so look to Chris Matthews if you want to know what K-Street thinks.

For examples of Matthews gushing over Thompson, consult the Daily Howler and Media Matters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once a lobbyist, always a lobbyist?
Posted by: MountainMike on Jun 10, 2007 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A former lobbyist for a Railroad company was recently elected to Congress. One of the first things he did as a legislator was to advance a proposal for a huge loan for his "former" bosses that would have given taxpayers the bill if the company couldn't maintain the conditions of paying it back. The proposal was voted down, but I am appalled at sheeple voters electing an "ex" lobbyist and expecting anything other than the same old, same old lobbyist weasel stunts.

Yes, Fred has appeal to the good ol' boy crowd of Southerners. But then they try to sell him as a traditional conservative. Disciplined spending is a part of that traditional conservative definition. That means cutting the pork lard off of bills. Would he be willing to do what Bush has never been willing to do, VETO bills and send them back to Congress to lose all the earmarks?

The is the infamous "revolving door." Today you are a legislator talking to lobbyists and tommorow you are a lobbyist talking to legislators. I expect we will all see Tom DeLay back soon as the superhuman lobbyist outdoing even his buddy Jack Abramoff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But he looks so Prezidential, and can act like Saint Ronald
Posted by: james2021 on Jun 11, 2007 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corptocracy loves this man, he lies like Saint Roanld, and will allow the Corporate Free For All that has been in effect for the last 6 years to continue. The Repugwicans will bankrupt this country to line their allready overstuffed pockets. Strict enforcement of the tax laws for corporations is what is required. Special tax on Corporations to finance Bu$h & Company, War on Terror, would end that war in a hurry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]