Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The WWIII Meme (video)

Posted by Danny Schechter at 9:09 AM on July 17, 2006.


Cheerleaders in the TV punditocracy seem to have decided that what the world needs now is another world war.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Danny Schechter in your
mailbox!

 

There are screws loose in high places.

Elements of the intelligence "community" which have done such a fine job in Iraq, and their Israeli counterparts, along with the cadre of paid and unpaid cheerleaders in the TV punditocracy, seem to have decided that what the world needs now is another world war.

And they are not shy about saying so.

First, last week, David Twersky, the Tel Aviv correspondent for the New York Sun, a mouthpiece for the Israeli hardliners, compared the kidnapping of a corporal in Gaza to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo, the incident that triggered World War 1.

The parallel was planted.

Then, just yesterday Sunday June 16, New Gingrich, former House Speaker and still a darling of the GOP right, stated as a matter of fact on Meet that Press that a new war is already underway in the Middle East. It is, he insists, already a world war. "THIS IS, IN FACT, WORLD WAR 3," he said for emphasis, with no regrets and an apparent longing to "bring it on."

Columnist Dave Postman elaborated on his message in his Seattle Times blog...

"Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich says America is in World War III and President Bush should say so. In an interview in Bellevue this morning Gingrich said Bush should call a joint session of Congress the first week of September and talk about global military conflicts in much starker terms than have been heard from the president.

"We need to have the militancy that says 'We're not going to lose a city,'" Gingrich said. He talks about the need to recognize World War III as important for military strategy and political strategy.

"Gingrich said he is "very worried" about Republicans facing fall elections and says the party must have the "nerve" to nationalize the elections and make the 2006 campaigns about a liberal Democratic agenda rather than about President Bush's record."

Mmm…, a world war to save the Bush Administration? How convenient.

But there is more. The always aggressive and often obnoxious Prince of Darkness, Richard Perle, a leading booster of war on Iraq, is now lobbying the Administration to finish off the "axis of evil." In print pieces and TV appearances, he is calling for a wider war now.

Hold on. Also on Meet The Press, Martin Fletcher, the NBC veteran Israel correspondent revealed that the Israeli war plan that is now being carried out is not simply a response to current risks or attacks, and that it has been FIVE years in the making. It was a plan just looking for a pretext.

"I think they will never say that publicly," he added, explaining that this war plan that was not made by this current Israeli government but earlier by his Kadima Party mate Ariel Sharon & his generals. Fletcher says Tel Aviv calls it a "work plan." He says it is being implemented "step by step."

He added, "It will go on until someone steps in and stops them."

The United States is not currently that "someone"--not now. President Bush is backing Israel although with an unheard PR appeal asking that they be gentler in their attacks. He, like, Israel, is blaming Hezbollah which insists it is acting defensively and reactively, not offensively.

Retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner, who appears in my film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception) has been running war games Vis a Vis Iran. He wrote to me on the weekend after talking to Pentagon insiders. His conclusion: "It would be hard to overestimate the danger of a major war," he says. They say the Israeli soldiers they captured were fighting illegally in Lebanon.

He says be believes the US and Israel are coordinating their strategies. While he believes that Iran is orchestrating Hamas and Hezbollah through Syria, he also says: "That does not mean that Israel is not taking advantage of the events. They have decided on regime change in Gaza and on punishing Hezbollah while establishing a buffer zone to prevent rocket attacks. As closely as the US and Israel have been coordinating, one has to assume coordination."

Former Israeli independence fighter and now peace activist Uri Avnery goes further contending: "As in 1982, the present operation, too, was planned and is being carried out in full coordination with the US. As then, there is no doubt that it is coordinated with a part of the Lebanese elite."

And who wants this war? The Toronto Star's Linda McQuaig challenges the dominant view in DC that it is only the Iranians.

"Is it really Iran that is pushing for war? Think about it. Why would Iran want to provoke a war with Israel and the U.S. -- both heavily armed nuclear powers -- when it has no nuclear weapons itself?"

Summer is often called the silly season. While the Bush Administration is losing one war in Iraq, and another with public opinion here at home, it seems to be opting for more conflicts as its backers bang the drum for a new world war.

Years ago, Che Guevara called for "I, 2, 3" Vietnams. The Busheviks today may be moving toward '1, 2, 3' world wars.

Sound crazy? In our Orwellian political climate, a new generation of Dr Strangelove's are in command. Only this time, they don't act like loonies but have mastered the art of the TV interview and can, with selective facts and ideology packaged as information, make insanity sound oh so sane.

They have convinced themselves, and now want to convince us, to join a new hegemonic adventure to expand their failed "GWOT," (Global War on Terror), whatever the costs.

And where is the media in all this, to rein them in, to connect the dots, to offer the missing context and background, to make vital distinctions between the aggressor and those agressed upon, and to stand up for international law, human rights, and sanity? NBC is giving the Gingrichs and Pearls of the world a platform to advocate more killing with no one to challenge them effectively.

We need more critics like Cenk Uygur who challenges William Kristol on Huffington Post in these terms:

"Bill Kristol has never seen a war he didn't like. No, that's too soft. A war he didn't love and lust after. Here's a wolf in sheep's clothing pretending to be serious, sober minded analyst on television when in reality he is trying to get us sucked into horrific wars that other people will die fighting."

Why didn't Tim Russert have the guts to say something similar to Newt Gingrich?

Has mainstream media devolved so far that a world war is now considered a legitimate subject to advocate? Doesn't this new "mission" add up to more madness?

Has it come to this? Is the summer heat corroding our senses? Is global warming melting our brains?

Digg!

Danny Schechter is "blogger in chief" of Mediachannel.org. His latest film seeking distribution is In Debt We Trust. (Indebtwetrust.com) Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org



Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Typical
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 17, 2006 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start a war in Afghanistan and when that doesn't go well, Start one in Iraq. When that one doesn't go well, pick on Venezuela and Mexico, when that is poorly received, punt it and declare World War III.

The Firesign Theater used to seem bizarre. But now that they've predicted that when the government and business merged, the name Bush would be right in the middle of it, they seem to be more on target than Nostrodamus. They also predicted a dictatorship that sustained itself by maintaining a stance of constant warfare. And they predicted that in 1970. That's shoes For industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Typical Posted by: rockpicker
It is the way of the dominionist imperailists - perpetuity of WAR.
Posted by: CovertRage on Jul 17, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the White House to the out house, you hear it everywhere - WAR and rumors of war! The White House needs to muscle nations and tribes with something globally coveted to make the dollar the currency of global trade. The right-wing christian dominionists need global war to usher in the rapture. The media gets paid by the scandal, making war and its various rumors big ticket ratings builders. Corporations need the profits only garnered through the commodification of bloodshed. With war, no matter how collapsed the economy, the military promises job opportunities in exotic places doing jobs you won't be doing at McDonalds, unless you reside and work in one of those hostile inner city environments where war is sustained between the police and the marginalized citizenry. Yes, war is good for more than we earlier thought. War equals money, money, money. Since we're greedier than hell is hot, we will ever sustain war. After all, peace is boring, and leaves us little to do with all our well amassed weaponry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bigger The Lie
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 17, 2006 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joseph Goebbels, head of propoganda for Nazi Germany, said "the bigger the lie the more people believe it." The Republicans, especially those grandiose personalities such as Newt, have used this and other methods well in the past decade. The problem, I perceive, is that they now believed their own lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, we are about to see
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Jul 17, 2006 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how naïve and sheeplike the Unitedstatesian people are in reality. Will they listen to all the mainstream news outlets as they beat the war drums, offering no alternative analysis of what is going on in the Middle East? Will they fall into line like good sheep, or will they feel a sense of déjà vu, and wake up from their ignorant, blissful slumber and say “Enough is enough”? It’s certainly looking scary at this point, as we have seen how impressionable and war-loving the Unitedstatesian people are, and we’re seeing how intertwined the influential corporate press is with the administration. And the Unitedstatesian people have got to be really sweating right now, as their SUV-fuel prices are rising, god forbid. It just might be time to take action, for the “American” way of life is non-negotiable.
I’ve watched a little bit of mainstream press out of curiosity these days and I can’t help but think there is a plan guiding them from up above, that the mainstream press is basically the government press and they are washing the brains of the masses, preparing them for the big one they so earnestly desire. Not one mention in the press that perhaps Israel hasn’t been extremely cruel to their neighbors and there is a reason for the aggression and resentment towards them. I also didn’t hear any mention that what Israel is doing might be considered to be extremely heavy-handed, or that a lot of innocent people are suffering. I only hear that “They (Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and Syria) started it” and that they must “Fight the Terrorists” and that they are doing the right thing. Oh, and to really drive the ball home, they interview the “moderate” Republican, presidential hopeful (God forbid!) McCain who instantly starts beating the war drums, carrying on about how Iran and Syria are behind all this and we must confront them and that if we don’t help the Israel fight the terrorists now, we will eventually be fighting them here, blah, blah, blah…To really drive the point home, he also stated with all confidence, as pure fact, that we must stop Iran, who we know without a shadow of a doubt is actively pursuing nuclear weaponry. Well, it appears he has been studying the fine art of lying and deception from our fearless (snarff, gag!) leader, as I got déjà vu hearing this. Either that or somebody needs to fill me in…When did we obtain the irrefutable evidence that Iran has anything but nuclear-energy intentions for their nuclear program? If Unitedstatesians weren’t so gullible, I’d laugh, but as is, I fear.
Another fearful thought. Could they have planned all this? Watching the behavior of the press, it looks like a well-choreographed play. Perhaps Israel was told to go bezerk as soon as the next conflict from across the border occurred. Perhaps the plan was to then start pointing the fingers at the countries who we feel are big threats to our supply of SUV fuel, convincing the naïve public that those other countries are terrorists who sponsored the conflict and must be stopped at all costs. Perhaps the plan was for the corporate press, with the help of jackal McCain (who the foolish public perceives as moderate and therefore trusts) and other neocons, to start beating the war drums, drive the public into a state of fear, and get them into attack mode. Then the attack…hmmm…nuclear, or just some innocent cluster bombs and spent-uranium munitions?!? Well, I hate to be negative and pessimist, but we certainly have the congress and president for the worst-case scenario to occur.
Peace is the real answer. Why can’t we see that? Why do my fellow citizens listen to fear and fools? It’s all just a dream…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Powerless to Stop the Machine
Posted by: thehousedog on Jul 17, 2006 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give up! - I feel powerless to stop this machine that I live in. I'm going to sell my house and move to a private island in the south pacific and become a plantation owner. I can't live in the country formerly known as the USA, nor can I find a way to effectively protest what that country is doing to itself and the rest of the world (or not doing as the case may be). Short of armed insurrection we are all just along for the ride so just bend over and take what comes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Powerless to Stop the Machine Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
» RE: Powerless to Stop the Machine Posted by: sirossisofliver
The Timing of All This (The World Cup!)
Posted by: cielo on Jul 17, 2006 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like ages ago I was coming across various mentions of a planned attack of Iran in June 2006. With the Day of the Beast that month (06/06/06 ... a little humor here), and that internet conspiracy of the Iranian Oil Bourse (supposedly still on its way after not happening with the Iranian New Year in March), that didn't seem too far-fetched.

But alas, mentioners of this June 2006 invasion date, along with the brilliantly effective chaos-creating "clueless" American neo-con strategizers, were overlooking something very very big. THE WORLD CUP...the world's biggest party that happens only every four years, and lasts for a month.

Typical for isolated American strategizers to overlook. The macho, steak-eating guys who think Football is a game a bunch of big ugly guys wearing unsexy body armor play with their hands. (Sorry Handball fans...but in the non-gun-toting "civilized world" as well as most everywhere else Football is played with THE FEET, by beautiful beings of many colors and creeds who plainly look like Humans and not mis-shapen refrigerators.).

So conveniently, and perhaps even predictably (don't the Israelis love Football?), about a week after the Cup, after everyone has had a chance to settle back into non-Football-obsessed life, here we get our slightly postponed but also well-planned war.

Just a kooky thought...or perfect sense? Didn't mean to poke too much fun, this is deadly serious, but somehow it's a bit too depressing to face the humorless reality....

That reality being that oil is the water of modern economies, which will quickly collapse without it. Oil that runs our cars, our bombs ("Islamic" ones on one side, "Christian" ones on the other), and makes our PLASTIC.

Running out of oil is the biggest threat to the national security of "Allied nations" (and everyone else not currently hunter-gathering), and it's a good enough reason for those Whiny Euros to stay mum. And it's a really good reason to fight WW3.

Right after the world's biggest party is as good of a time as any. Here goes Hell...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israel's Pre-emptive War
Posted by: keenekarl on Jul 17, 2006 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we are witnessing is Israel's pre-emtive war against Palestinians which they say is "justified" because some of their soldiers were kidnapped - and because they fear worse things.

It sounds like they are copying our own fearful leader! More likely, our own fearful leaders have been encouraging them to follow the same criminal polices they have been using in Iraq.

When will the rest of the world rise up and demand that these war criminals be stopped and held accountable? It clearly is criminal to punish innocent civilians due to the acts of the terrorists/criminals in their midst.

Our leaders and the Israelis continue to give proof that they are no better than the terrorists who destroyed the World Trade Center or committed other terrorist acts on Israeli soil.

Those terrorists, the leaders of this country, and Israel have all resorted to punishing innocent civilians because they wanted to exact justice for wrongs committed - instead of seeking justice against those who ACTUALLY committed the crimes.

I guess "guilt by association" has become the way of exacting justice in this perverted world created by extremist "Muslims", "Jews" and "Christians".

I use those terms loosely because none of those extremists truly represent the religions thay claim to follow.

Islamic terrorists are not true Muslims! Revenge-seeking Israelis are not true Jews! And alas, war-mongering neo-cons supported by the Christian right (like our fearful leader who claims to be a Christian) are not true Christians!

(Just read the Holy books of each of these religions and you will find this to be true).

True wisdom knows that being nasty back to your enemies only makes them a worse enemy. True wisdom knows that doing good to others will eventually make them your friend.

As the old song goes: "What the world needs now is love, sweet love".

Where are the truly wise? Where have all the good people gone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get thee to prison or secure psychiatric facility, Newt!
Posted by: andyc on Jul 17, 2006 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, Newt, but no.

I believe that I am with the vast majority of the World's population in that I do NOT want World War III, now or ever.
You, and anyone who does, are either evil or deeply sick. You should be in prison or in a secure hospital. So when are the citizens of your poor abused country going to put you there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WW3 PNAC
Posted by: liberazi on Jul 18, 2006 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC WW3 PNAC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WW3 PNAC Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: WW3 PNAC Posted by: willymack
World War IV?
Posted by: michaelo on Jul 18, 2006 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a counterpoint argument that WW III began with the atomic bombing of Japan --- that rather than ending WWII, as popular belief would have it, the Imperialist Anglo duolopoly (Truman-Churchill) strategy was to launch the so called “cold war” with a “hot war” preemptive strike.

Leaving aside the needs of science to test its innovations and the salvation of hundreds of thousands of US armed forces from an invasion of Japan (that nation was already suing for peace visa via the Soviet Union,) WWIII began with the use of those weapons and immediately engaged in Korea, Southeast Asia and little China on Formosa.

WWIV can be arguably attributed to the launch of the next Imperialist Anglo duopoly (Bush-Blair) strategy of preemption, intervention, invasion and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan, (and elsewhere) founded on both determinist and Conevangelical ideology and its counterpoint in the development of contemporary Islamic fundamentalism.

Allowing Imperialism to define the world is always a mistake. Bush calls it freedom - we know it as military imperialism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: World War IV? Posted by: willymack
Newt's singing their song
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Jul 19, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newt's banking points with AIPAC, nothing more. He knows that nothing he says has any ramifications, so he can say what he wants, much like Robertson can call for the assassination of Chavez because Robertson personally could not have that carried out.

Gingrich probably thinks he can make a run of it in 2008. Who knows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]