Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Media Uses Rev. Wright as Excuse for Racist Remarks About Black Pastors

Posted by Scarecrow , Firedoglake at 12:08 PM on March 17, 2008.


Let us be clear. Barack Obama does not have a "pastor problem."

If you wondered how the nation's mainstream media would ensure that racism and religious militarism influence the next election, just watch MSNBC and ABC stage endless faintings about "Obama's pastor problem." America's DC pundits are bullying a black candidate while making racist attacks on black pastors and churches, thinly disguising them as a defense of American civility and patriotism.

MSNBC spent Friday evening's political commentary probing the adequacy of Obama's renunciation of statements made by his Pastor Jeremy Wright, including those following 9/11. Obama has categorically rejected those sentiments, but that will not stop the Republicans and Fox News from replaying Wright's comments to maliciously brand Obama as secretly anti-white and anti-American. But MSNBC was hardly better, running the headline banner, "Obama's Pastor Problem" throughout the discussion.

Let us be clear. Barack Obama does not have a "pastor problem." There is a problem, but it's being framed as "Obama's Pastor Problem" only because he lives in a country whose irresponsible media pretends that America does not have a "racism problem" and a "religiously driven militarism problem" neither of which can be honestly discussed in a Presidential campaign because we have a "corrupt media problem."

As expected, Fox News obsessed over Reverend Wright , but ABC and ABC's This Week, were not to be outdone. And who better to pontificate on what constitutes acceptable political speech by black pastors than the self-righteous team of Ruth Marcus, George Will and Mark Halperin, arrayed against the ever polite Donna Brazile. You can guess the rest.

Will asserted that Obama was probably lying because Will knows that anyone who sits in a black church will hear unpatriotic, un-American views. Halperin announced the litmus test for Presidential eligibility that if it can be proved that Obama personally heard views that might offend George Will, then Obama is [black] toast. When Donna Brazile tried to explain to her white panelists that it's not unusual for black ministers to preach against the evils of racism and militarism in America, George Stephanopoulus ignored her and ask whether Obama should condemn Wright even further. Ms. Marcus happily added that he should.

NBC's Meet the Press then repeated this sorry spectacle, with David Broder wondering why Obama didn't do a better job of selecting a black church. Couldn't Obama have found an "acceptable" black church whose paster refrained from uttering statements that David Broder would find offensive? Heavens, isn't it obvious that all potential Presidential candidates should clear their religious affiliations with the Dean of Washington morality? What was Obama thinking?

And just as Brazile was unable to be heard by her all white panelists at ABC, so NPR's Michele Norris (yep, similar pattern: 3 white men; one non-white woman) could not make the same point about black churces to the hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil team of Tim Russert, David Gregory and Broder.

Washington's self-appointed elite punditry is suffering from a severe case of historical obtuseness and amnesia. They've forgotten that we fought a civil war because black people were kidnapped, kept and sold as slaves, and that the hatred about that conflict and it's aftermath still manifests itself nearly 150 years later. Our arbiters of civil discourse cannot recall that white Americans lynched black Americans for decades, and nooses still show up every week; that Jim Crow was the law in much of the nation; that whites murdered Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, and dozens of others. It just slipped their minds that even today blacks have been systematically denied equal protection and opportunity, including the right to vote, and that the Republican Party still uses every ruse to disenfranchise blacks, while Bush appoints to the Federal Election Commission a man who specialized in such crimes while holding a key position in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

It does not seem to have occurred to the white DC pundit class that blacks have every right to be angry at America -- and that condemning them for this anger is racist. Black and white pastors have every right to preach against these evils, even as they preach the Christian gospel of forgiveness and redemption. They carry an obligation to make sure this history is understood, contrasted against one's moral/religious beliefs and against official denials and proclamations of piety, and not forgotten.

And they are justified in preaching against the militarism that has seen far too many blacks, whites and others killed and to rail against the jingoism and false patriotism that condone aggressive wars, torture, killing civilians as "collateral damage," and worse. Pastors should denounce the religious fanaticism, bigotry and hatred preached by John Hagee and his fellow right-wing extremists, men whose screeds openly call for religious wars/crusades against Islamic nations and Islam itself, or who advocate for holy wars because they are deluded into thinking killing other people leads to personal salvation. If our religious leaders are not damning America for enabling these moral failings, why not? We all should.

To be continued . . .

More: New pastor defends Wright against attacks. For more on Wright vs Hagee, see Archpundit; Media Matters here and here.

Digg!

Scarecrow is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


Pentagon Manual: OK to Destroy Gitmo Interrogation Notes
At Gitmo, destroying evidence is standard operating procedure.
June 9, 2008.
81% of Americans Dissatisfied with Our Country's Direction -- the Highest Level Ever
How do you know when government has abysmally failed and driven the country into a ditch? Just ask the American people.
April 4, 2008.
Al Gore Launches $300 Million Climate Change Initiative, Meanwhile Bush Keeps Torturing
Two contrasting stories on CBS' 60 Minutes illustrated for the hundredth time why selecting the right person for President matters.
March 31, 2008.
McCain Gets Remedial Economics Lesson
McCain's advisers had to explain that he really did want to help deserving homeowners and really would consider regulatory remedies.
March 28, 2008.
Hillary Wants to Let Greenspan Decide Whether to Rescue Home Owners
I wonder what Paul Krugman, who has pointed to Alan Greenspan's role in fostering the current financial crisis, would think of this.
March 25, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
background noise and a distraction from real issues
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 17, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the economy

iraq

the future of our democracy

christ! 'mericans are so easily distracted by shiny objects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted by: jebpgh on Mar 17, 2008 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is spot on - but it falls on our ears like water in the desert. Long ago, Thomas Merton observed our inability to see the terror that is sponsored by the state, particularly our own state but we can pin point the victim's response as being violent and irrationale. I did read some of Rev. Wright's sermons and found myself saying "amen". You don't have to go to far in civil rights history - be it King's letter from Birmingham Jail to his brothers in the black church who had opposed non-violent direct action as "violent" or even the reaction of society to young men and women arming themselves as the Black Panther Party for self-defense. Thousands of people - innocent people - have lost their lives in Iraq but there are no consequences to the men and women who led the killing. It is im-politic to suggest that Bush and his pals should be subject to war crime prosecution for blatantly violating the UN Charter on pre-emptive wars. It almost is enough to make you lose hope altogether -- almost.

The tougher part of all this is the way the media can push an otherwise thoughtful and brilliant mak like Barack Obama into the corner and make him deny the inherent wisdom of his pastor's words - or even the inherent cause of such words in the face of suffering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who would Jesus bomb? Posted by: desidid
Heck, I AGREE with Pastor Wright,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 17, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I am a middle aged white woman!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its not that Obama has a pastor problem
Posted by: Cwood on Mar 17, 2008 3:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its that America has a pastor problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real deal!
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 17, 2008 6:37 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets call it like t is.. If this were a white pastor making similar comments about blacks EVERYONE would be all over this and NO ONE would be defending it. The fact that liberals are defending this hateful person amazes me - maybe it shouldn't. He hasn't really said anything different than most on the far left have been saying.

Obama has a problem not so much because of what a supporter has said, but because he hung in that church for 20 years while this was being said - and denys it.

We know how that works.,Clinton never inhaled and didn't have sex with that women and Nixon is not a crook! Please

A Racist church spewing hate - and we want this for our President?

Obama needs to be held to the same standards that a white person would be!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real deal! Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: The real deal! Posted by: bbfmail
» RE: The real deal! Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: The real deal! Posted by: ncdemmom
» RE: The real deal! Posted by: desidid
Black History
Posted by: solrev on Mar 18, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember when I was five and went to kindergarten, I met a little five-year-old black kid and we became friends. We played together over the years. Now to fast forward, we are sophomores in high school. We were at an out of town wrestling tournament, he was the 103lb and I was the 112lb wrestler for our school. We got finished with our afternoon round and would not wrestle again until the evening round. The 95lb wrestler who was also white decided to join us for a walk around the town we were in, since we had time to kill and girls to check out. We came upon a pool hall and decided to go in and play a game of pool. My black friend said that they would not let him in there. I asked him how he knew, no one in this town knew us. We no sooner stepped inside the door than the man behind the bar said, you boys can come in but he can’t. We left and outside I asked him how he knew that would happen. He said, it was like that everywhere. I then asked him even in Springfield. He said, why do you think so many blacks go to the after school functions compared to whites. I said, I thought you did not have money to do anything else just like me. He said, we do not have anywhere else to go. In Springfield Ill. the capital of the state of Illinois, two little kids grew up. But we did not grow up in the same world. I knew what racism was, but it did not matter to me because racism was what people said. It mattered to my friend because racism was what people did. I will never forget the hurt look in his eyes as we stood outside that pool hall, not because they would not let him in, he was used to that. He was hurt because his friend had to see it. For a white born again pagan like Hannity, to bad mouth a black preacher speaking to a black church about the black condition is racism at its best. For seeking a splinter in his brother’s eye and ignoring the telephone pole in his own. If I were God, I would give Hannity a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. Why does he need eyes, since he will always be a blind racist deceiver?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Black History Posted by: Gracews
» RE: Black History Posted by: CJC
But ... The Rev is so dern right !
Posted by: rafey on Mar 18, 2008 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although it is hardly the politically corect thing to agree with the Reverand, I was saying the identical thing for years prior to the predictable attack. My only question at the time was ... what took them so long? I believe many thousands of others (in Europe and elsewhere) also made statements in a similar vain. If we just listened and understood, we would be able to make the necessary corrections and heal the terrible wounds we have created, the folks we have made so miserable, all of these many decades !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America has a problem with racism.
Posted by: revjmike on Mar 18, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The response of the press to a fine pastor is proof of that racism.

BTW, I am white.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Media Portrayal
Posted by: lbancke on Mar 19, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am reading through this blog and realized that everyone is focusing on the race issue, however we must take a closer look into how the media is portraying what is going on. They are making a mountain out of a molehole. They are making links between two individuals and assumptions and only airing what they feel is important. The media is able to portray exactly what they want their reader/view to see. It is unfortunate that the media holds panels to discuss the issues and shuns the individuals who have a difference of opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here We Go
Posted by: lamac66 on Mar 21, 2008 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, the right wing loves to play the guilt by association game with a double standard twist. However, when it's flipped on them they want to say, "no, it's different'"

Since Hannity thinks Obama has the same belief system as his Pastor, that means Hannity has the same belief system as Hal Turner, the racist caller to his show whose career the racist says he owes to Hannity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]