On a trip to Europe last fall I was driven around in a well specified Peugeot with a 2.7 ltr diesel twin turbo engine that attained 55 mpg (imperial).The performance of the vehicle was very good.
Another friend drove me around in a Citroen,diesel, again with good performance that attained 65 mpg (imperial.
We had to drive about five miles to find a gas station! The gas station sold regular gas (92 octane) & diesel ;two pumps! thats it!
Interestingly there were few 'Smart cars' & few Hybrids.
Even on the motorways(freeways) many gas stations had closed likley through lack of business. Altogether a different & more fuel efficient world. My friends were aghast when I said my Chev 1/2ton could achieve 24 mpg / highway. I would like to see a Chevvy truck with a turbo diesel engine at a reasonable price but I won't hold my breath. the sad thing is that in Europe the Dodge Caravan & Jeep are available with turbo diesel engines!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is just another sign that 'murica has some very hard lessons ahead.

One would assume that something as logical as the fact that unlimited growth cannot happen on a finite planet would be commonplace, but many still foolishly think this consumption party will never end. For the time being more is better and bigger is still better... while we dig a deeper hole to climb out of.

The science clearly indicates we are destroying our ecosystem and that the days of cheap energy are now behind us. One wonders how dire things will need to get before selfish, greedy, brain dead 'muricans wake up to the wisdom of living lean and green?

Interesting times....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wonder if the cars they manufacture themselves meet the standard? And what is their standard, anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'No worries, though, our TV and movie sales overseas still kick butt'

But I thought they just illegally copied all our media (movies, music) and sold it anyway? So they're not really paying us for much of anything! But I hear the Chinese are sure buying a lot...of formerly American-owned companies...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oil companies and car companies make more money when they push big gas guzzlers.
The former head of GM made it very clear, "we're not here to make cars, we're here to make money".
You want to help them make more money then keep buying those gas guzzlers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

car companies bought up Light rail transit & closed it to ensur that the CAR market expanded with teh urban & suburban footprint over farmland.

this from the same ethics that brought us the US Foreign & Domestic Policies desihned to support exporting slavery,post Civil War industries protections
(cotton, tobacco, sugar - all slave industries that were exported)

On Ethics, Culture & Intention...




~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This may be true, but this does say--'manufacturing'--much of what China manufactures is exported, and seldom used withinn China. Much of the manufacturing is Western owned--China is but a Export platform for the West. That being said, I do hope they are implementing this technology--but I don't see near me yet! China is the most polluted country on earth--i dont care what any polls and obscure statistics say--live here, witness the destruction. Despite what I have just said, they did recently improve fuel standards and I applaud them--it is very much needed. The sad thing is--does America need to reach the kind of environmental degredation that China has in order to affect change? If so, it will be far too late!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's not forget that, though China's automobile fuel efficiency standards make us look backward, they are building dozens and dozens of new coal-fired power plants AND adding 5 MILLION new cars to their roads (and the world's atmosphere) every year. I'm not sure what level of fuel efficiency would offset their hell-bent-for-leather charge to U.S.-style consumerism, but I'd bet it's more than 45 miles per gallon.

However, while they position themselves to become the supplier of alternative energy hardware for the REST of the world, we'll continue to do what we do best: export, through our various media outlets, uniquely american qualities, such as religious fundamentalism, trailer-trash "reality" shows, pop culture, crass consumerism, violent video games, rap music, and gang culture.

It's nice to know that there are still a few things left in the world that we do better than anybody else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes people just can't not look beyond the fact that they have been brainwashed to demonize others, in this case China, in order to gloss over their own mistakes.

So many people question and doubt the efficacies of China's green plan but misses out on the argument entire. It isn't about what they can do better than you but what WE should ALL do to help alleviate the problems of climate change.

This finger pointing exercises are just like the white house pointing finger at China while continuing screwing the environment in their own backyard. Affluenza is a problem for many countries and more sincerely so for the states.

I say stop pointing your fingers and wake up to your mistakes soon before you screw the entire planet up for all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We noted that the article said OUR fuel efficiency requirements are @35 miles per gallon, but the article did NOT say what a comparable car sold on mainland China would have in miles per gallon compared to what Detroit sells and we can now buy. Why can't "these" automobiles made for the Chinese market be imported AS IS and sold here in the USA? If the American people were aware that a better fuel efficient alternative existed and was commercially available, would this place economic pressure on US automakers to offer similar vehicles to us? As to possible further increases in fuel efficiency, look on the US Patent Office website at Patent Class 123(Carburettors) subclass 122(Heat Exchange Vapourisers) An example of such a patent is USP#4611567.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]