Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

US Medical System: The Worst in 19 Industrialized Nations

Posted by Evan Robinson, Group News Blog at 6:40 AM on January 10, 2008.


One hundred thousand extra deaths per year. That's roughly one every five minutes, around the clock, 24/7/365 -- every year.
frankburns
patient

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Evan Robinson in your
mailbox!

 

Reuters reports on a study from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, authored by Ellen Nolte and Martin McKee, published in Health Affairs, a peer-reviewed journal:

France, Japan and Australia rated best and the United States worst in new rankings focusing on preventable deaths due to treatable conditions in 19 leading industrialized nations, researchers said on Tuesday.
The study abstract:
We compared trends in deaths considered amenable to health care before age seventy-five between 1997 - 98 and 2002 - 03 in the United States and in eighteen other industrialized countries. Such deaths account, on average, for 23 percent of total mortality under age seventy-five among males and 32 percent among females. The decline in amenable mortality in all countries averaged 16 percent over this period. The United States was an outlier, with a decline of only 4 percent. If the United States could reduce amenable mortality to the average rate achieved in the three top-performing countries, there would have been 101,000 fewer deaths per year by the end of the study period.
One hundred thousand deaths per year. You'd think Mike Huckabee would be all over this, after his statement about requiring immigrants for labor because we've been aborting people for 35 years:
Sometimes we talk about why we're importing so many people in our workforce," the former Arkansas governor said. "It might be for the last 35 years, we have aborted more than a million people who would have been in our workforce had we not had the holocaust of liberalized abortion under a flawed Supreme Court ruling in 1973.
One hundred thousand deaths per year. We need immigrants because of aborted fetuses, but there's no need to stop killing 100,000 people unnecessarily because we don't have universal health care:
"I think health care in the U.S. is pretty good if you have access. But if you don't, I think that's the main problem, isn't it?" Nolte said in a telephone interview.
I have a little experience with universal health care, because I've lived in Canada for four years. It's taken me almost that long to stop asking people, "Have you seen a doctor for that?" when they talk about a health problem. Canadians look at you funny if you ask them that.

Last month I was visiting a dojo in Bellingham and one guy tweaked his knee when his foot didn't pivot on the mat (nobody hit him, he just went one way and his foot didn't follow) -- and I was confused when he talked about whether or not he could visit the doctor. Then I remembered where I was: the United States, land of trillion dollar wars and between 47 million and 58 million uninsured.

Regardless of insurance status, nearly 20 percent of Americans lack a regular source of health care, a "strong indication many Americans may not be receiving needed care", according to the CDC. Dr. Amy Bernstein, chief of the CDC's analytic studies branch at the Office of Analysis and Epidemiology (and director of the study) notes that "research shows having a usual source of care results in improved care."

One hundred thousand extra deaths per year. That's roughly one every five minutes, around the clock, 24/7/365 -- every year. Where are the Right to Lifers when you need them? From the National Right to Life mission statement:

The ultimate goal of the National Right to Life Committee is to restore legal protection to innocent human life.
In a logical world, the Right to Lifers would be blockading insurance companies as well as abortion providers.

Digg!


Does the Right Want a Civil War?
People are being shot dead at the rate of several per month now. And it's figures on the Right that are putting the killers up to it.
June 13, 2009.
More Clarity About Abuse, Intermarriage, Child Breeders, and the Fundamentalist Church of Later Day Saints
Getting past the titillation of government raids.
April 25, 2008.
Are FLDS Women Brainwashed?
What drives a woman to submit to a fundamentalist Mormon cult?
April 18, 2008.
A Rundown Of Our Economic Woes
One stop shopping on various economic woes.
April 15, 2008.
The Real McCain on Race and Immigration
It's not a pretty picture.
April 10, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We're Number 19! We're Number 19!
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 10, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, the US is again at the worst end of yet another survey of industrialized nations. When will this stop?
And to think, many many lives would be saved if only those on the Right (especially President Bush) would shut the f*** up about how access to health-care for all is "socialism".

I thought Bush needed to take away our rights to privacy so as to "keep Americans safe". Hey, Bucko! You want to keep Americans safe? You want to save Americans' lives FOR REAL!? Then stop vetoing every COMMON-SENSE piece of legislation that would do just that!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're # one, say the GOP contenders
Posted by: bookie on Jan 10, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We watched the NH debates earlier this week and listened to several of the Rethugs declare that "the US has the best healthcare system in the world". I didn't hear any one of them object to that statement. Must be nice to live in a pink fantasy world shielded from all those nasty realities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You got that right n/m Posted by: bookie
And the nutjobs think we have no problem!
Posted by: Intellect on Jan 10, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that the repugnanticans keep spewing that "we have the best healthcare" in the world, when obviously we do not.

Aside from the fact that we have 47,000,000 people who are uninsured, millions and millions more who are insured are at risk when they need serious and very expensive procedures, for example, transplants, and their for-profit insurance companies abrogate their responsibility to pay, as happened recently to a young lady who needed a liver transplant.

The insurance company initially refused to approve coverage for the surgery because they claimed it was "experimental", even though this procedure has become commonplace for the last twenty years, and after a long fight by her father, the miserable and criminal insurance company finally approved the surgery and so informed the young lady's father. The problem was the girl had died a few hours before the insurance company approved the surgery.

To evade their responsibility to provide the coverage that was contracted for by virtue of the purchase of the health insurance policy, these criminal scumbags refused surgery which would have saved the young girl's life in order to make obscene profits!

We need a single payer government healthcare plan that covers all citizens! We should riot in the streets if our useless Congress and president do not enact this and enact this quickly!

Coming in dead last compared to all other civilized industrialized nations is not acceptable!

Additionally, a couple of medical schools have been closed within the last few years, not because there weren't enough qualified applicants who wanted to become physicians, but to limit the number of physicians graduated so the money pot doesn't get diluted!

This is outrageous! And it took government complicity to close the schools!

Big Pharma, which spends untold millions of dollars advertising their overpriced drugs on TV and claiming it cost billions to research new drugs (most research is paid for by the fed) only introduced 18 or 19 new drugs last year. The federal government pays for most of the research and then awards patents to the drug companies for free - and then they gouge the government selling these drugs to private insurance companies who bill Medicare.

Our system is very, very broken, corrupted in every way and full of greed - and it costs lives - probably more lives than the war in Iraq does yet our politicians think it's ok!

What must we do to fix this? A Boston Tea Party type demonstration? - Nah - that would pollute Boston Harbor, but something must be done!
The America I was born to love is slipping away, and almost gone.
Doesn't anyone care?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» salaries not that much different Posted by: quinndiesel
The candidates want to continue the status quo
Posted by: rosweed on Jan 10, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis Kucinich is the only presidential candidate who advocates socialized medicine in the US. I know socialized is a dirty word here in the US, so he calls it single payer. I would vote for any candidate, left or right, who would say unequivocally that the US needs a national, taxpayer paid health care system. None of them has the cajones to tackle big health and many happily accept big health's cash. Why can't Americans understand that even though their taxes would increase, the increases would be less than what they pay now for health care. I'd love to hear a candidate give a rational explanation of why they think national health care won't work in the US. Maybe because there isn't one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I got it, I got it!!!! eurika!!!!!
Posted by: ellie on Jan 10, 2008 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
possible game plan... lifers want all born and if healthy can live, healthy herd for exploitation labor, the weak, sick and old die off, perfect system in the hopes of 'improving' the herd of sheeple, workers who won't expect anything except a meager, below subsistence paycheck... no longer productive or become cranky, then cull the herd...

no ill people = no need for health care payments, just required premiums due with no return...

doncha love it, sheesh!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Less For More
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 10, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some other comments touch on this, but it should be stressed.
Even though Americans get worse medical care than all other nations in the survey, the US public pays MORE for the little care we do get than the citizens of other countries pay.

That's right. Less for more.

I would think that TRUE conservatives, who perhaps don't care that much about saving lives, would at least care a little bit about saving money. Why the opposition to universal health-care, then, from those on the Right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well said.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 10, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our current crop of Republican presidential candidates (and some Democrats) are falling over each other to care about the unborn – yet, they do not give a DAMN about people once they are here. They seem to think that a woman's place is to be barefoot and pregnant, and that a working adult's place is to be an indentured peasant.

While the people of EVERY OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED NATION ON THE PLANET have access to government-sponsored healthcare at less half the total cost of ours, and with that lower cost spread over the entire population, my family of four with ordinary medical needs, for example, paid out over SEVENTEEN THOUSAND DOLLLARS last year for healthcare!! That's more than the entire yearly income of someone working for minimum wage. (Oh, and by the way, America's unemployment insurance is vastly inferior to that of all other industrialized nations as well.)

Thanks to pure greed on the part of private health insurers, aided and abetted by our worthless government, even families with ordinary healthcare needs are being financially ruined by outrageous healthcare costs – and our politicians actually brag that this is the best of all systems?!?!

We hear our political candidates rail against that evil "socialized medicine." Would somebody please explain to me what is wrong with an "evil" system that is endorsed by every other industrialized, democratic nation, in which their peoples are both healthier and happier?

The real question is: why do we have to put up with OUR truly evil system – and why do we have to put up with candidates who refuse to support a decent, affordable healthcare system that americans so badly need?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well said. Posted by: AussieGeoff
CHANGE: IS SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE...!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jan 10, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All else is bullshit..!

Simple as that..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Critique of the US Healthcare System
Posted by: matiasklein on Jan 11, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice article... here is another good article outlining what is wrong with the US healthcare system:

Link to Article

http://www.instantgoodness.com/page/show/115

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corpocracy is the Problem!
Posted by: skcalanderson on Jan 11, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country has allowed corporations to become defacto persons with, in many cases, more rights than real people, and less responsibility. If a person breaks the law, if found guilty they go to jail. A corporation just shuttles its wealth somewhere else and things go on. I live in Montana where there is lots of irresponsible corporate behavior. There are polluted rivers and land from mining. We are told by the politicians that it brings jobs. But in reality it brings 15 low paying jobs and all that wealth goes out of state and to some local pockets.

The problem is that we all want to be rich. Face it America, we are a bunch of fat, whining, unhealthy, greedy, consumed with consumption, lazy people. Yes lazy too. I teach college, IT and Computer Engineering. More and more students just don't want to do the hard work to learn this stuff. They just want the degree and some fancy words so they can go make a bunch of money. Nothing about contributing to their fellow man or to the good of the society. I guess that is the current society, all for me and me for none.

On health care the mantra is "Let the market sort it out". Except the market has all the politicians in its pocket, nice and cozy. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Wo HOOO Look at me money$! I have a boat load of cash and I go to church every Sunday to show it off.

I am very sad for my children. This country is going to hell. We got a big army though, so don't mess with the bull or you'll get the horns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MY FIRST WIFE WOULD HAVE LIVED ONE MORE
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 12, 2008 11:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
year if "treatment" had not been limited by the "system".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the correct link to the artice
Posted by: davidcockrell_tx on Jan 15, 2008 7:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mentioned before linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]