Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush personally stopped eavesdropping probe

Posted by Rachel Neumann at 11:34 AM on July 18, 2006.


Gonzales points the finger at the President.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rachel Neumann in your
mailbox!

 

There really is something in the Justice Department called the Office of Professional Responsibility, unfortunately, it seems to be on an extended margarita vacation. After all, it announced earlier this year it could not pursue an investigation into the blatantly illegal wiretapping of American citizens. Why couldn't it? According to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it's because the President wouldn't grant investigators "security clearance" to investigate.

It was pretty clear from the beginning that Bush had personally authorized the National Security Agency to monitor — without court warrants — the international communications of people on U.S. soil. But why no one from the Justice Department challenged that authorization, on the grounds of is blatant illegality, can only be explained by blatant cowardice.

But hey, it's all water under the bridge, right? Bush has realized that with this Congress, he can just get them to pass a new law that says he doesn't need any authorization to spy on U.S. citizens. So let me get this straight. If the President says so, then he can do whatever he wants. If Congress says so, the President can do whatever he wants. Funny thing is, if you look at the Office of Perfessional Responsibility's Website, it's clear they are a few attorneys short. They's got the job posting right here. Any takers?

Digg!

Rachel Neumann is Rights & Liberties Editor at AlterNet.


No "Roe v. Wade for Men"
Turns out men don't have a "right to procreate," although they do have a right to prevent procreation.
July 24, 2006.
Just two questions
Does testing high schoolers for drugs make them do more drugs? Does being on the list of potential terrorist targets insure you'll be visited by terrorists?
July 12, 2006.
Belated anti-hybrid hype
What's the deal with marriage and isn't there a cheaper way for us to use less gas?
July 6, 2006.
Death=innocence
When is a criminal conviction not a criminal conviction?
July 5, 2006.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?