Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Michigan Democratic Do-Over Caucus Very Likely, Florida May Re-Vote Via Mail

Posted by Paddy , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 7:00 AM on March 7, 2008.


A caucus favors Obama, and Clinton was hoping for just seating the delegates she already won in an unfair primary.

This isn't going to make Gov. Granholm or Senator Clinton happy at all. A caucus favors Obama, and Clinton was hoping for just seating the delegates she already won in an unfair primary.

A member of the DNC's Rules And Bylaws Committee--the committee that stripped Florida and Michigan of its delegates for moving their primaries before February 5th--told me that Michigan plans to get out of its uncounted delegate problem by announcing a new caucus in the next few days.

"They want to play. They know how to do caucuses," the DNC source said. "That was their plan all along, before they got cute with the primary."

Michigan Democrats had originally planned on caucuses after the legally permissible Feb. 5 date, but then went along with top elected Democrats, including Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who pushed for an early primary.

UPDATE: Fla. Dems weigh redoing presidential primary by mail

Everyone wants back in the game!!!

WASHINGTON -- With pressure to resolve the Florida Democratic primary's renegade status intensifying, the state party is looking at the possibility of giving voters a chance to cast a second ballot in the presidential primary -- by mail.

The party has all but ruled out as too costly holding an election in which voters would go to the polls, but is looking at a mail-in contest that could give Florida Democrats a say in the presidential nominating contest.

(snip)

"We're going to do what have to do to have our delegates represented,'' said Florida Democratic Party spokesman Mark Bubriski. "But the money is pretty much out of the question.''

BTW, Bill Nelson is pretty much dead to me now, not that he was more than a DINO before, but now.....

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Paddy is a regular contributor to Cliff Schecter.com.


Bush Shortchanges US Police
Bush wants $600 million for Iraq police; but cuts aid to U.S. cops.
May 28, 2008.
Bill Clinton Stuns Superdelegates with Angry Tirade Behind Closed Doors
Take it with a grain of salt, since it's anonymous, but wow.
April 2, 2008.
Libby Is Disbarred
Scooter might have to give up his country club membership!
March 20, 2008.
Hillary Apologizes to Black Voters for Bill Clinton and Ferraro's Racial Insensitivity
"We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama," said Hillary Clinton.
March 13, 2008.
KBR Supplied Water Makes US Troops Sick
If they supported the troops any better, they'd be killing them
March 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Michigan fiasco
Posted by: John Edward on Mar 7, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the idiot move of the century Grandholm and the other Democratic leaders moved the primary date ahead so Michigan would be important. As it was only one name and no preference were on the ballot. I took Move Ons advice and voted for Milt since he would spend millions of his own money saying bad things about McCain. If they had left things alone it would have been better and we would have counted. We went into the vote knowing it would not count. The ringleaders in Michigan should be punished by the voters next chance we have. A replay to correct their blunder should not cost the state anything at all.

Is Hillary running for McCains VP choice or what? If Fall comes and I have a choice between
McBush and A female Joe Lieberman clone, maybe Ralph will look good then?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Clintons are mentally deranged
Posted by: foreverhope on Mar 7, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The past few weeks have shown me EXACTLY what The Clintons are, it has nothing to do with R or D, it has to do with integrity, character, and common human decency.

A few weeks ago I could have given Hillary my vote, not with a light heart but I could have done it.

Each day she gets worse, she is disgusting, a liar, a cheater, destroying her own party to win the primary. Now alluding to Barack being her running mate, another manipulation. All she does is lie.

The Clintons aren't good enough to clean Barack Obama's shoes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are caucuses elitist?
Posted by: arieden on Mar 7, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Voting happens all day long and voters can pop in any time of the day that suits them. Caucuses take place at a very specific time - which may not be convenient for a lot of working people. I have heard many times that caucuses favor Obama. Why is that? What exactly happens at a caucus that would favor one candidate over another? And is that a good thing?
Could some people especially the less educated or sophisticated or just plain timid be intimidated by the caucus propcess? I am mystified by this process as I have never participated in it. The little bit I've seen on the news makes them appear like pandemonium.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton-Bashing
Posted by: epd071148 on Mar 8, 2008 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How will some people fill their empty lives when they can't blame the Clintons for all of society's woes? Asking that delegates from the Michigan primary be seated at the Democratic Convention was a bargaining position, not an indication that Clinton is the anti-Christ.

Notice that the Democratic Party has done her no favor in sanctioning another caucus. Why is it that caucuses, such as in Texas, yield entirely different results than the primaries in that same state, where everyone has an opportunity to have their voice heard? Caucuses are open during restricted hours, at selective locations. This is NOT democracy.

Obama is ahead in the delegate count because of caucuses. If Clinton had a lead under the same circumstances, the hypocrites now calling for her to drop out of the race, would not be making the same demand of Obama.

Given the method in which delegates have been awarded based on the results of both caucuses & public vote, I don't see how anyone can make the argument that a brokered convention is unfair. The whole process has been skewed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clinton-Bashing Posted by: weequash