Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Guantanamo detainees will be released...

Posted by Onnesha Roychoudhuri at 3:22 PM on May 2, 2006.


just as soon as we can be sure their home countries won't abuse them the way we do.

Just last week, we heard that the Pentagon was planning to release 141 prisoners who were determined to "pose no threat"

But now, the NY Times reports this:

"The Pentagon has no plans to release any detainees in the immediate future," said a Defense Department spokesman, Lt. Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon of the Navy. He said the negotiations with foreign governments "have proven to be a complex, time-consuming and difficult process."

The negotiations are in regards to assurances that detainees will not be tortured when repatriated. The sudden concern for human rights is apparently based on State Department pressure:

According to a State Department human rights report released in March, the Saudi authorities have used "beatings, whippings and sleep deprivation" on Saudi and foreign prisoners. The report also noted "allegations of beatings with sticks and suspension from bars by handcuffs."

Hunh. That sounds familiar. Guantanamo detainees have been enduring this and worse while being held at the base in Cuba. But as the State Department wrings its hands over human rights, many Guantanamo prisoners are in such a dire condition psychologically that they are repeatedly trying to commit suicide.

The State Department is calling for "clear assurances that the prisoners will not be tortured and will be treated in accordance with international humanitarian law, and that those pledges can be verified." That has led to a stalemate in terms of "how those commitments should be formalized and monitored." (Note that there is no such concern about the assurances that the CIA supposedly gets on those it sends to "black sites" around the world.)

It looks like the State Department is trying to flex some muscle here, and the Pentagon is happily dragging its feet. What incentive do they have, after all, to allow detainees (the majority of whom are innocent judging by the DoD's own stats) illegally held and tortured for over four years, to speak freely?

"My Guantanamo Diary," written by law student Mahvish Khan, ran the same day as the NY Times article. It's a great first-person account of her experience as a translator for lawyers in Guantanamo, and brings some humanity to the all-too abstract notion of the war on terrorism.

Some excerpts:

I've now been down a total of nine times. And each time, I'm struck by the ordinariness of Guantanamo Bay, the startling disconnect between the beauty of the surroundings and the evil they mask…I've listened to Wali Mohammed protest that he was just a businessman trying to get along in Taliban-run Afghanistan. I've watched Chaman Gul, crouched in his 7-by-8-foot cage, weep for fear that his family will forget him. I've marveled at the pluck and wit of Taj Mohammad, a 27-year-old uneducated goat herder who has taught himself fluent English while in Cuba.

No matter the age or background of the detainee, our meetings always leave me feeling helpless. These men show me the human face of the war on terrorism. They've been systematically dehumanized, cast as mere numbers in prison-camp fashion. But to me, they've become almost like friends, or brothers or fathers. I can honestly say that I don't believe any of our clients are guilty of crimes against the United States. No doubt some men here are, but not the men I've met.

At 80, Haji Nusrat -- detainee No. 1009 -- is Guantanamo Bay's oldest prisoner. A stroke 15 years ago left him partly paralyzed. He cannot stand up without assistance and hobbles to the bathroom behind a walker. Despite his paralysis, his swollen legs and feet are tightly cuffed and shackled to the floor… He has a long white beard and grayish-brown eyes that drift from Peter's face to mine as we explain his legal issues to him. In the middle of our meeting, he says to me: " Bachay." My child. "Look at my white beard. They have brought me here with a white beard. I have done nothing at all. I have not said a single word against the Americans."

During our meeting, Nusrat's emotions range from anger to despair. In his desperation, he begins to promise Peter that he will make him famous if he helps him get home. "Everyone in Afghanistan will know your name," he says. "You will be a great, famous lawyer."As I interpret, I feel a lump growing in my throat. Suddenly, I can't speak. Peter and Nusrat pause as the tears flood down my face and drip onto my shawl.

The old man looks at me. "You are a daughter to me," he says. "Think of me as a father." I nod, aligning and realigning pistachio shells on the table as I interpret. As the meeting ends and we collect our things to go, the old man opens his arms to me and I embrace him. For several moments, he prays for me as Peter watches: "Insha'allah, God willing, you will find a home that makes you happy. Insha'allah, you will be a mother one day. . . "

He lets me go and asks me to say dawa, prayers, for him. "Of course," I promise. "Every day." And until the next time I see him, I will.

Digg!

Onnesha Roychoudhuri is an assistant editor at AlterNet.


How Phone Companies Team Up With Bush to Spy On You
Onnesha Roychoudhuri: A new investigative piece explores American telecoms complicity with the Bush administration’s data mining program.
August 14, 2007.
Making Justice Moot
The Bush administration releases Guantanamo detainees -- just in time to keep their case from the Supreme Court.
May 6, 2006.
Dirty words in politics
A proposal to banish the f-word (freedom) and the s-word (security) from political campaigns.
May 5, 2006.
Enron still wreaking havoc
Even with Lay and Skilling standing trial, Enron creditors and lobbyists are working hard to cover up evidence and exploit consumers.
May 3, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Huh?
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on May 2, 2006 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, let me get this straight.

Round up a bunch of people, subjecting them to arbitrary seizure; summarily lock them up without any due process; finally decide that a few of them really shouldn't have been subject to this detention and the associated tortures and mental cruelty that went along with it after three years of same; announce you are going to repatriate those few -- BUT -- decide to keep them incarcerated because you are concerned about how they are going to be treated by somebody besides you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are the innocents still not free?
Posted by: placid on May 3, 2006 12:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have heard that as many as 25% of those at Guantanamo were mistakenly rounded up in error. Then taken to their Cuban homes. The mistakes were discovered and the announcement that errors were made and the "prisoneers" or "detainees",it ws promised would be set free. Stories swirled that we (U.S.) did not have a way to get them home (What? try the reverse route they were brought in!) . Next, a concern for their safety in their homelands? (you're kidding). The truth woul be so refreshing.All these people would be able to bear witness to the torture, name names, name who was there (Top Brass), and many of these errors saw plenty and worse were subjected to torture themselves with evidence of long lasting disabilities ordered by the captors, guards, psychiatrists. That is why the admitting of mistakes and mistakes leaving so-called "GITMO".And ,yes, it is now out we have or had other nice quaint spots around the word.And the WIND OF WAR are blowing again. Not published, is the poking and proding of Iran has been going on with the U.S. instigating Iran into saying something that this tyrannical and untrue "W" administration stands for WAR. Understand that mow please before the same game of lies is used again. I am an American who believes in diplomacy. Condi is no diplomat,her ideologies are like the reat, AS for her running for President PLEASE remember she has been in sight a bit but she is an idealogue as the rest.Study, find the truth, resist! for these are not people of peace. It is oil and allegience to corportations that are their gods.Bush is reading and interpreting the Constitution as he sees fit. We, as most at this site know we are not spreading democracy but are horror and terror (AND TERROR!) via fear, Divine bombs.This evil , not the America I was brought up to believe to believe in. We are doing horrible things we were told the Soviet Union did.DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT SAID ABOUT THEM? WE ARE THE AGGRESSIVE BUTCHERS. Do we want our country back? Yes!! PLEASE LOOK AT US COLLECTIVELY IN THE MIRROR. NO MORE DENIAL, It will kill us.Mary Basombrio aka PLACID

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somebody had better hurry
Posted by: Longdream on May 3, 2006 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and write that "no civil recourse" clause into the US PATRIOT *spit* Act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]