Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama-Backing Edwards Elbows Aside Clinton

Posted by John Nichols, The Nation at 3:52 AM on May 15, 2008.


Sen. Clinton's victory in West Virginia was overshadowed by Sen. Edwards endorsement of her opponent.

It was a weary and wistful Hillary Clinton who sat down with CNN's Wolf Blitzer and other network anchors for extended interviews in the middle of the day Wednesday. She knew that, no matter what she said, and how well she said it, it would not be enough.

Like the coronation march that her 2008 campaign was supposed to be, her latest gambit would be trumped by Barack Obama's juggernaut.

Yes, she had just been handed a face-saving landslide win by West Virginia Democrats, beating Obama by more than 2-1 in an honest-to-goodness swing state. But Clinton did not seem to be fighting very hard on a day when her senior campaign adviser, Harold Ickes, was disptached to Capitol Hill to reassure congressional supporter that the former frontrunner would remain in the race through June 3.

Clinton used her precious spotlight time to defend Obama as a friend of Israel, describe his supporters as people who thought he would be the best president and promised to "work my heart out for whoever our nominee is." Indeed, if she made news Wednesday, it was with a seeming show of openness to an as-yet-unoffered place on an Obama-led ticket. Clinton did not dismiss the vice-presidential talk – and she certainly did not resort to the old dig of suggesting she might have a place on her ticket for the senator from Illinois – she simply it was "premature" to talk about what she would be doing after her campaign was done.

Perhaps it was. But only by a few hours.

As Clinton's interviews were supposed to be dominating the evening news and talk programs on the cable networks, Barack Obama was again stepping on her moment.

Television screens filled with live images from Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Bruce Springsteen was singing "The Rising."

The crowd was cheering, "Yes we can!"

No one was thinking about West Virginia.

No one was thinking much about Hillary Clinton.

They were listening to John Edwards.

"The reason I am here in Grand Rapids tonight is that Democratic voters in America have made their choice and so have I," shouted the man who almost beat Barack Obama in the campaign-opening caucuses of Iowa and who, long after he quit campaigning, still pulled 7 percent of the vote in West Virginia.

Echoing the themes of a campaign that did not win him the nomination but that secured him a credibility – especially with the blue-collar voters who may well define the fall race – that made his the most sought-after endorsement of a campaign that is now done in all but the formalities.

Delivering that endorsement, and a dose of the populist appeal Obama still needs, Edwards came not to finish the primary race but to open the fall campaign. "There is one man who knows in his heart that it is time to create one America, not two, and that man is Barack Obama," shouted Edwards.

Edwards stood next to Obama Wednesday night, basking in the applause of thousands of Michigan Democrats who were, for all practical purposes, cheering the end of the Clinton campaign. (And reminding the pundits that a Michigan delegation will be seated at the Democratic National Convention and will likely join in the "by-acclamation" nomination of Obama.)

Of course, John Edwards praised Hillary Clinton in Grand Rapids. "We are a stronger party because Hillary Clinton is a Democrat," the 2004 Democratic nominee for vice president told a crowd that did not really want to hear it but offered a reasonable measure of tepid applause.

"What she has shown is strength and character… She cares deeply about the working families in this country," said Edwards. "She is a woman who in my judgment is made of steel. And she is a leader in this country not because of her husband but because of what she has done…"

But the truth is that Edwards was in Michigan to bury Hillary Clinton, at least as a presidential candidate.

"When this nomination battle is over, and it will be over soon, brothers and sisters, we will have a united Democratic party," Edwards declared.

The Edwards endorsement, delivered not in an upcoming primary state such as Kentucky or Oregon but in the contested former-primary state of Michigan, was not a primary endorsement. It was a positioning moment for a November race in which everyone – including the savvy senator from New York – knows that Barack Obama will be carrying the Democratic banner into competition with Republican John McCain.

"I will do whatever it takes" to elect the Democrat, said Clinton. Would Clinton like to be on that ticket? Probably.

Might she have some new competition? Absolutely.

No one missed the fact that Barack Obama and John Edwards looked right together. "They looked fantastic together," gushed Jill Zuckman, the Chicago Tribune's able political writer. "They looked like a ticket."

Even Obama seemed to notice.

"I haven't been seeing John as much," said the Illinois senator. "I forgot how good he is."

The soon-to-be nominee won't forget again.

Neither will Hillary Clinton.

UPDATE: Video of Edwards' speech below.

Digg!


Ron Paul Gets Best Primary Finish Yet
The gadfly candidate is still pulling heavy support away from McCain
May 30, 2008.
Obama Claims Delegate Victory; Clinton Stays In
Last night, Senator Obama secured a majority of pledged delegates in the Democratic contest.
May 21, 2008.
Kennedy's Fight and the Democratic Void
Today Sen. Kennedy was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor.
May 20, 2008.
John McCain: Eco-Warrior
In a swing through the Pacific Northwest, the candidate attempts to green wash his record and his environmental policies.
May 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on May 15, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama/Edwards! Now that is a real dream team!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: oldfreedomdude Posted by: ZenQuixote
» RE: Posted by: sui_generis
The Ticket
Posted by: LeslieGem on May 15, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I heard Edwards speech on NPR yesterday, I thought, here's a VP choice -- he's a great, inspiring speaker like Obama with a similar message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That would be a shame!
Posted by: drmflorida on May 15, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully, when Barack Obama is elected, the office of VP will no longer be the shadow president that it is today. In such a case, John Edwards talents would be wasted in that office. I say John Edwards for Attorney General, or Secretary of Labor (lets also hope that becomes a more powerful position).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: That would be a shame! Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: That would be a shame! Posted by: Basenjis
Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on May 15, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I ALLWAYS THOUGHT THE VP SHOULD BE YOUNGER THAN THE PRESIDENT BUT THATS NOT ALLWAYS THE
ERANGMENT...........LYNDON JOHNSON WAS 8 YEARS
OLDER THAN JFK.......SAME AGE GAP AS OBAMA -EDWARDS ......SO IT WOULD PROBALLY PLAY OUT OK
PLUS EDWARDS WAS THE 2004 VP PICK AND HAS EXPERENCED RUNING FOR PRESIDENT TWICE.....I WOULD THINK HE COULD GREATLY HELP WITH PICKING UP OHIO
AND MAYBE SOME OF THE SOUTHERN STATES
BILL CLINTON CARIED .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bobby Decker Posted by: Longdream
The Real Deal
Posted by: Southern Gal on May 15, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards would make a great Vice President or Attorney General. He is the real deal. I hope that he continues his focus on poverty and his populist approach, whatever position he might be offered or not offered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How will the Edwards endorsement impact Kentucky?
Posted by: jimidee on May 15, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the "non-educated white voters" in West Virginia have spoken, and it wasn't pretty. The state with the lowest educational attainment in the country gave Hillary Clinton a 41 point victory over Barack Obama. According to the exit polls, 81% of those who voted admitted that the race of the candidate was "very important" to their choice. I saw one fat WV white woman being interviewed on CNN and she said, "I don't want nobody named Hussein, we have had enough about Hussein around here". That about sums up WV.

Despite the fact that she cannot win the nomination, Hillary has spent a lot of time (and a lot of her own money) in my state of Kentucky, spreading her message of fear, racial division and rancor...the very things that blue-collar America responds to. She has swift-boated Barack Obama's best qualities of confidence, unity and reason as a means for governing as "elitist" and therefore, undesirable.

I have been working for the Obama campaign here and talking to a lot of folks on the phone. Hillary's message has been connecting to them here, and I hope the John Edwards endorsement helps to negate some of her attacks, but I doubt it. Our non-educated white voters are a lot more like their WV cousins (literally, they are genetically their cousins) than we like to admit. They are all from the same shallow end of the gene pool.

I, for one, am sick and tired of Hillary appealing to the lowest common denominator mentality in this country in an attempt to steal the election. Blue collar (or red-necked...'splain to me what the difference is again...) voters seem unable, or at best unwilling, to grasp the salient issues necessary to select a President. It sure the heck isn't picking the guy that your gut tells you that you would like to have a beer with. The last 8 years taught us how that works out.

We recently had a Letter to the Editor in our Frankfort (capital city) paper that spewed fear and rancor about Senator Obama. The writer said the Senator was a "secret Muslim" who is planning "to destroy America from the inside out". He launched into his own (or was it something he copied from a right-wing web site) fictional biography of Obama, which somehow tied Tennessee basketball coach Bruce Pearl being Jewish into it! I can't make this stuff up, folks. Hillary Clinton has been pandering to guys like him in this primary election.

Will the Edwards endorsement make much difference around here? I hope so...it would be about time something did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards is brilliant!
Posted by: 2dogarage on May 15, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By generously describing not just Obama but both the candidates in glowing terms he restores respect to the Democratic Party and helps define their platforms and the action Americans should be empowered to demand if either becomes president. (And comes out looking like a true gentleman, what a breath of fresh air in this protracted and ugly election cycle!)

John Edwards should have been our next president.

But short of that he is the obvious choice for VP with an expected run in 2012 for another 8 years in the executive branch of government. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Some people think his talents are better demonstrated as Attorney General and that might be true but I'm hoping that Edwards as VP will be as influential (in the opposite way) as Dick Fuckin Cheney who is widely regarded as the one that holds most of the strings to the puppet in office.

Not that I think Obama would (want to) allow himself to be a puppet, but I'm guessing that Edwards will be just the guy to help him extricate himself from the corporations that have contributed so generously to his campaign, and Hillary's as well...

This is the first time I've even been remotely interested in the presidential race since Edwards dropped out prematurely months ago. Back then I thought that Edwards-Obama was the ticket but I'll settle for Obama-Edwards, an unbeatable team that is sure to bring some fresh idealism and the hope for change in this country.

Yes we can have a Democrat in office, especially if Edwards balances the ticket.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I like the way Obama wields the dagger
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 15, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody who thought he couldn't fight back when attacked just got schooled even more than Hillary did.
Obama just earned a lifetime Detroit pass.;)

Seriously, the timing of the Edwards endorsement was downright poetic. :D

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe--
Posted by: Longdream on May 15, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards has always spoken eloquently about poor and disenfranchised Americans. I'm overjoyed that he, above all other people, will play a key role in Obama's administration. It should be a key domestic role, as that is where Edwards' strength lies, and I think his heart, too.

Maybe Edwards can speak to the white folks that didn't want to vote for Barack in West Virginia, and Pennsylvania, and Indiana. I'm hoping that Edwards, who is as wonderful a speaker as Barack is, can make sense to them.

It's a fortunate pairing indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards did it for the money
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on May 16, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same day he endorsed Obama, The Edwards office sent out e-mail solicitations for his charity. He figures to get more money for his cause by backing Obama than he will endorsing Clinton.

Obama is not what people want to believe that he is. This is Placebo Politics that will result in an Empty Election.

Read the book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dwards did it for the money Posted by: riotoustanpdx
Nosing Up to the Trough
Posted by: epd071148 on May 16, 2008 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rats are deserting what they perceive to be a sinking ship, and cozying up to Obama. What a gutless bunch, Edwards included, they are, to eschew any principles that they may have had, and opportunistically court Obama's favor to improve their position at the trough.

For his part, Obama has shown himself to be a typical politician, refusing any compromise to allow the voters in Florida & Michigan to have their say in the nominating process. The fact that he only withdrew his name from the ballot in Michigan, where his prospects were dim, but not in Florida, is one example of this.

His campaign & the media consistently played the race card, explaining away his failures as resulting from white racism. The media never attributed any of Obama's successes to sexism. They also never considered that racists come in all colors.

The media has done a better job of selling us the Obama phenomenon, without any serious critical analysis of his policies, than they did in assisting the Bush administration in selling the Iraq War. Their zeal to be king-makers has been all-consuming, deeply repressing any effort to provide clear, rational analysis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]