Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

John McCain: Eco-Warrior

Posted by John Nichols, The Nation at 8:19 AM on May 13, 2008.


In a swing through the Pacific Northwest, the candidate attempts to green wash his record and his environmental policies.

Yikes, it's really true. John McCain is running for president as a tree-hugging liberal.

No, not an all-the-time environmentalist -- rather, as a swing-state-savvy, targeted-message-peddling, hoping-to-pick-up- the-votes-of-lifestyle-liberals-who-want-to-address-climate- change-on-the-cheap murky-shade-of-green Republican.

So, today, in the battleground state of Oregon, where a reverence for the outdoors requires that Republican contenders greenwash their appeals, McCain's campaign will begin airing a new television commercial that essentially says: "Look, I'm not like George Bush and Dick Cheney. I don't live in la-la land when it comes to global warming. I actually believe in something I like to call 'science.'"

The senator -- who broke a little bit with Bush and Cheney on environmental issues, but who never really lined up with the serious Republican environmentalists who were isolated by the administration and burn-the-planet GOP leaders like Tom DeLay -- is reinforcing the message with a major campaign swing through the northwest, where he hopes to put the sometimes swinging states of Oregon and Washington in play by presenting himself as John McCain: Eco-Warrior.

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee swept into Portlandon Monday to deliver a major address outlining his plan to "re-establish America's environmental leadership in the world." Here's a hint about how he'll do it: The McCain campaign says the candidates wants to "mobilize market forces."

That may sound good, but as Gene Karpinski, the president of the bipartisan League of Conservation Voters, says, "To his credit, Senator McCain wants to do something serious about global warming, but his proposal falls far short of what the science says we need to do today. He has not substantively improved his plan over the bill he introduced years ago -- legislation that the science now shows is out of date."

Of particular concern is McCain's determination to mobilize the wrong market forces. "[It] is troubling that he continues to support taxpayer subsidies for a mature industry like nuclear which has yet to resolve its waste disposal problem," says Karpinski. "It would be far more cost-effective to invest in renewable energy like the wind energy plant he is visiting today. Better still would be a call for a renewable electricity standard, something he has voted against time and time again."

On Tuesday, McCain will be in Seattle, where his campaign says the candidate will "solicit the views of environmentalists, conservationists and the business community on the most effective strategies for meeting this challenge."

Don't be fooled. The senator's not listening. He's campaigning, as McCain's greenwashing ad confirms.

The script opens with an announcer acknowledging that:

Our environment in peril,

Oil and food prices out of control,

Climate change wreaks havoc with deadly weather.

One extreme thinks high taxes and crippling regulation is the solution.

Another denies the problem even exists.

There's a better way.

Then, McCain does his best to deliver the I'm-no-Bush line that is central to his appeal to voters who think of the environment as something more than a place to search for oil:

I believe that climate change is real.

It's not just a greenhouse gas issue.

It's a national security issue.

We have an obligation to future generations to take action and fix it.

I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

Of course, as perhaps befits the oldest-ever serious contender for the presidency, McCain has embraced an outdated dichotomy: the suggestion that the climate-change choice is between "One extreme (that) thinks high taxes and crippling regulation is the solution" and "Another (that) denies the problem even exists."

In fact, there are smart green solutions that are good for responsible businesses, consumers and taxpayers. McCain could learn about them by studying what European conservatives and even a few American Republicans, like California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, have been saying -- and doing -- for years.

But, as McCain's ad establishes, he's not really serious about climate change. What he's serious about is neutralizing the environment as an issue in a presidential campaign season that will see millions of American voters -- including a great many wavering Republicans -- treat climate-change as an exceptionally serious election issue.

Digg!


McCain's VP Pick: A Sarah Palin Head-Fake?
Reports say it's not Romney or Pawlenty; whether or not it turns out to be Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the networks are over Obama's DNC speech.
August 28, 2008.
Will Hillary Clinton Release her Delegates?
This may be the only drama in an otherwise thoroughly-scripted TV show.
August 25, 2008.
VEEPWATCH: Obama Winning High-Stakes Expectations Game
But the GOP nominee is watching Obama's pick carefully.
August 22, 2008.
Ron Paul Gets Best Primary Finish Yet
The gadfly candidate is still pulling heavy support away from McCain
May 30, 2008.
Obama Claims Delegate Victory; Clinton Stays In
Last night, Senator Obama secured a majority of pledged delegates in the Democratic contest.
May 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
MORE GREAT THINGS ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!
Posted by: Pennyhead on May 13, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since McCain is such an amazing person and is now taking charge of the environment (before it gets any worse!!), I found this on YourThreeCents.com and thought you'd want to read it too...enjoy!!



What's wrong with the Democrat Party?
May 13, 2008, 11:00 am
Rating: : 1
Posted by Kozlo in Election2008

Here are a few problems with the Democrat Party and their candidate for president of the United States.

1. Barack "Hussein" Obama was endorsed by Hamas (a Terrorists Group).


2. Jimmy (the Peanut Farmer) Carter visits Hamas.


3. The soon to be Democrat nominee has called for the closing of Gitmo.


4. The members of the Democrat Party voted to authorize the use of force against Saddam based on the evidence they saw from the various intelligence committees; then, after we (the US) toppled Saddam and his country, the Democrats quickly attacked our armed forces and the Commander in Chief trying to turn the war into political points that could be scored at the polls. They cried that they were misled, yet they saw the same intell Bush did. Can you say CONSPIRACY?


5. The Speaker of the House Nancy (Stretch) Pelosi talked to a terrorist country (Syria).


6. Barack has said that he is willing to talk to Iran - even though it is Iran that has killed some of our soldiers in Iraq. Traitor!


Why is it that the Democrats feel comfortable in talking to terrorists, and yet have no problems in hating their own troops or country. But, it is OK to go to the terrorists backyard and kiss their ass even though they have said that their stated goal is the destruction of Israel. Can you believe it that Osama Obama gets endorsed by Hamas. Even our Speaker of the House went to Syria to be used in a propaganda piece against our own nation. What an idiot - typical Liberal Democrats. Oh, that's right. The Dems want to be seen as strong on the war on terror and strong on National Security. Right.



Comments
Posted by Jack Chides
on May 13, 2008, 12:08 pm

oh for the love of god


Posted by RuarriS
on May 13, 2008, 1:46 pm

Most of those seem like good qualities to me.

Talking to enemies is diplomacy kozlo, it's why we have a State Department and ambassadors.

Closing Gitmo is also a good thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]