Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Kucinich to Force Cheney Impeachment House Vote Next Week

Posted by John Nichols, The Nation at 12:00 PM on November 2, 2007.


John Nichols: Kucinich will face an uphill fight in a chamber led by Nancy Pelosi, who continues to say that impeachment is "off the table."

This post, written by John Nichols, originally appeared on The Nation

Broadcast media's gate-keeping "stars" have done just about everything in their power to keep the matter of presidential accountability off the radar of the American people. That was evident during the most recent Democratic presidential debate, when NBC anchors Brian Williams and Tim Russert meticulously avoided following up on Congressman Dennis Kucinich's three references to impeachment but somehow found time to grill the contenders on UFOs and what costume Barack Obama would be wearing on Halloween.

Pollsters are almost as bad. Rarely are questions about impeachment included in statewide or national surveys.

Despite the lack of media coverage, however, when citizens are asked what they think about holding members of the Bush administration to account, they respond with an enthusiasm far greater than that displayed for impeaching Richard Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal. It is this reality -- as opposed to the state of denial fostered by so much of the media and the political class -- that Congressman Dennis Kucinich will act upon next week, when he offers a privileged resolution on the House floor to bring articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney.

Kucinich will face an uphill fight in a chamber led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat who continues to say that impeachment is "off the table."

The Ohio congressman and long-shot presidential contender may not be following the rules of engagement as dictated by major media and his party leaders. But when Kucinich raises the issue of impeachment, he will be speaking for a great mass of Americans who agree with his argument that, "Congress must hold the Vice President accountable."

How great?

A fresh poll conducted for Vermont's WCAX television station finds that citizens of that state enthusiastically believe that Congress beginning impeachment proceedings against President Bush.

Sixty-one percent of the Vermonters surveyed favor taking steps to impeach the president, while just 33% oppose doing so.

The numbers are even higher for impeaching Cheney. Sixty-four percent of Vermonters favor beginning the process of holding the vice president to account, where only 31 percent are opposed.

The greater level of support for impeaching Cheney parallels the few nationwide figures that have been ascertained. When the American Research Group conducted a national survey in early July of this year, it found that 54 percent of American adults wanted the House to begin impeachment proceedings against Cheney -- with 76 percent of Democrats, 51 percent of independents and a striking 17 percent of Republicans favoring the step.

Forty-six percent of Americans surveyed backed impeachment proceedings against Bush -- with support for impeachment at 69 percent among Democrats, 50 percent among independents and 13 percent among Republicans.

What is notable is that, when Time magazine surveyed Americans in the late spring of 1974, after the Watergate scandal had evolved into a full-scale crisis of confidence in Nixon's presidency, only 43 percent favored impeachment.

A media that actually had a sense of history, not to mention reality, would focus on the fact that Americans are more supportive of a congressional intervention to thwart Bush and Cheney's wrongdoing than they were of moves to hold Nixon to account just months before the former president resigned in disgrace.

Now, it falls to Kucinich to speak the reality that, "The momentum is building for impeachment. Millions of citizens across the nation are demanding Congress rein in the Vice President's abuse of power."

Says the congressman, "Despite this groundswell of opposition to the unconstitutional conduct of office, Vice President Cheney continues to violate the U.S. Constitution by insisting the power of the executive branch is supreme... The Vice President continues to use his office to advocate for a continued occupation of Iraq and prod our nation into a belligerent stance against Iran. If the Vice President is successful, his actions will ensure decades of disastrous consequences."

Kucinich introduced articles of impeachment against Cheney several months ago, and his H. Res. 333 has attracted almost two dozen co-sponsors. All Democrats, they are Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Robert Brady (D-PA), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA), Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA), Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Rep. Henry Johnson (D-GA), Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), Rep. James Moran (D-VA), Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-NY), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Diane Watson (D-CA), Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) and Rep. Albert Wynn (D-MD).

Frustrated by the refusal of Democratic leaders to set up a process for holding hearings on his proposal, Kucinich will use an arcane House rule allowing for the prodding of the process with privileged resolutions to try and force consideration. Once introduced, a privileged resolution must be addressed within two legislative days.

Kucinich is expected to offer his privileged resolution on Tuesday. He expects to continue pushing it until the House acts. That action is likely to be a successful move by Democratic leaders to table the measure. Such a vote could be instructive, however, in that it would provide a rare measure of the willingness of at least some House members to respond to the popular will -- which is that Dick Cheney be held to account.

Digg!

John Nichols writes about politics for The Nation magazine as its Washington correspondent.


McCain's VP Pick: A Sarah Palin Head-Fake?
Reports say it's not Romney or Pawlenty; whether or not it turns out to be Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the networks are over Obama's DNC speech.
August 28, 2008.
Will Hillary Clinton Release her Delegates?
This may be the only drama in an otherwise thoroughly-scripted TV show.
August 25, 2008.
VEEPWATCH: Obama Winning High-Stakes Expectations Game
But the GOP nominee is watching Obama's pick carefully.
August 22, 2008.
Ron Paul Gets Best Primary Finish Yet
The gadfly candidate is still pulling heavy support away from McCain
May 30, 2008.
Obama Claims Delegate Victory; Clinton Stays In
Last night, Senator Obama secured a majority of pledged delegates in the Democratic contest.
May 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This b...h Pelosi is blocking everithing
Posted by: Nick on Nov 2, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
her only job, she belives, is to rub shoulders
with this scum BUSH and constantly show
everibody her false teeth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kucinich is doing the right thing.
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 2, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats need to defend the Constitution. They took an oath to do so.

The Nancy and Harry show just isn't getting the job done. Both should be replaced with people who will fight Bush tooth and nail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Email campaign
Posted by: dayenta on Nov 2, 2007 3:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was an email campaign recently to let Pelosi know how the people feel about impeachment. I wrote & then accidentally deleted it. She needs to know that she will NOT be relected any time in this century for sitting around with her thumb up her ass. If anyone could provide the email address, I would appreciate it.
Thanks! Dorothy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mail campaign Posted by: weslen1
IMPEACH!!!!
Posted by: Turkiye on Nov 2, 2007 4:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Rep. Kucinich.
You are my HERO!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeach
Posted by: robmikejas on Nov 2, 2007 4:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeach and flog...add imprison to the list and maybe you'll come close to passing on to Dick Cheney what he deserves for all his crimes against the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeach Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Impeach Posted by: Chirico
At least one candidate
Posted by: Jeanne on Nov 2, 2007 8:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for president is putting money where his mouth is. Kucinich may be the only candidate truly trying to do good and he's certainly the only one who is making meaningful efforts. He is my choice and I'll vote for him even when he's not on the ballot officially. The process of impeaching Cheney would bring so much to the surface and force light to shine on the deep dark deeds that are the underlying fabric of this administration. This nation needs to impeach these criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Force Them to Say NO, Out Loud
Posted by: disgustedandamused on Nov 2, 2007 10:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is how you draw a line in the sand.
If Pelosi and company don't want to impeach, fine. Make them say it, out loud, on the record, over and over again. Keep introducing measures on this, and keep forcing them to say no. Let them then explain to thier constituencies why they have voted to NOT impeach, not once, but multiple times.

Either they'll tire of it, and vote to impeach... or whover opposes them will have all the necesary ammo handed to them in a copy of the Congressional Record.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment's just the beginning
Posted by: clarence on Nov 2, 2007 11:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A charitable view of Pelosi's unwillingness to impeach is that she's being coy. If Bush and Slimey Dick were impeached, she would be the first woman POTUS. She might see it as unseemly to be leading the charge herself. I have absolutely no hint of a suspicion that Gingrich would have been similarly reticent if there'd been any possibility of geting rid of Gore with Clinton. Americans don't want coy in their political "leaders", and that's why Congress's standing in the polls is even lower than Bush-Cheney's.
Google: usalone.com to vote on whether to impeach Cheney or not. (Sorry I haven't figured how to put links here yet.)
Once Pelosi is prez, we need to pressure her to join the World Court. Bush and Cheney should both be grateful when we do. If they're tried there, they won't be subject to the death penalty,as they would be in Baghdad or the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A SECOND PARTY!!!
Posted by: clarence on Nov 3, 2007 12:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for Kucinich, he must know he's playing in a rigged game. Although he's the only one I can support, (I sent him the first political contribution I've ever sent in my life) I don't really think he has a chance in hell of getting the Dem nomination. The question is, when does he cop to it and join or start a second party?
In the 2006 elections, Americans tried to change things by voting for the wing of the Corporate Party that was out of favor. They found that that didn't really change much. Now, they're ready to look somewhere else.
When people are polled on the issues (the occupation, health care, the environment, taxes) without reference to the candidate and their "winnability", Kucinich wins in a walk.
The Corporatist Partys' candidates won't commit to ending the occupation before 2013, Kucinich starts bringing troops home tomorrow.
The Corporporatist Partys' candidates keep the health of the American public hostage to the health of the insurance company corporations. Kucinich makes sure that every American receives the health they need.
The Corporatist Party's candidates assure us that the health of the corporations won't be compromised by petty concerns about the health of the forests, the water or the air. Kucinich puts corporate interests at the bottom of the lis of priorities.
We've been told this is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people" long enough. It's time to call their bluff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment
Posted by: Schroeder on Nov 3, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do admire Dennis Kucinich and appreciated him having the courage to state several times during the debates that Impeachment needed to happen. I think we all need to give him as much support as we can as he has been consistent in trying to hammer this point home.

I think Nancy Pelosi's leadership is destructive. It is not her place to take impeachment off the table and if she doesn't know that, then she should talk to the experts, Fein and Nichols. This is what they had to say about Impeachment on Bill Moyers:

"The founding fathers expected an executive who tried to overreach and expected the executive would be hampered and curtailed by the legislative branch... They [Congress] have basically renounced — walked away from their responsibility to oversee and check." — Bruce Fein

"On January 20th, 2009, if George Bush and Dick Cheney are not appropriately held to account this Administration will hand off a toolbox with more powers than any President has ever had, more powers than the founders could have imagined. And that box may be handed to Hillary Clinton or it may be handed to Mitt Romney or Barack Obama or someone else. But whoever gets it, one of the things we know about power is that people don't give away the tools." — John Nichols

The one thing I would add to this is that this power could be handed off to Rudy. Now Nancy, if that doesn't scare you enough to take action, I don't know that anything would and I think you should just go home and let somebody take over who will act!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMPEACH THEM ALL!!!
Posted by: AZLBRAX07 on Nov 3, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeach Cheney? At this late date? This is "all sound and fury signifying nothing"! Hell, the criminal and traitor, Bush, along with his ENTIRE MISadministration should have been forcibly removed from office, tried and convicted of treason against the U.S. and, then, lined up against a wall and shot! This should have happened the minute it was discovered that Saddam didn't have those WMDs…and that Bush had lied to the American people to make his "case" for war on Iraq.

Trying to impeach Cheney now will only drag on-and-on and he'll be out of office before this "impeachment" comes to anything.

Then again, since Cowboy Georgie has been a blatant desecrater of The Constitution, all along, don't hold your breath waiting for the elections to happen in '08.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IMPEACH THEM ALL!!! Posted by: blitzmesser
Cheney First
Posted by: taureandevi on Nov 3, 2007 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kucinich is the only sane and humane choice for President. Even my six year old son get's it. "Koocinitch" would fix what stupid Bush has done."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you okay with that?
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 3, 2007 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that many administration and war policy insiders from Alan Greenspan to General Richard Sanchez are acknowleging that the invasion and occupation of Iraq is and was essentially about oil, the American public is faced with a simple question. Are you okay with that?

Certainly there are many who opposed the invasion before it even took place, but many others believed the stories about "weapons of mass destruction, a mushroom shaped cloud, liberating an oppressed people and the war on terror". If you still believe them, I suggest you read more. Pay attention to what former generals and administration insiders are now saying about why we have troops in Iraq.

Then ask yourself again, "Is it okay that 4,000 American troops and over 100,000 iraqi citizens have been killed, 4 million have been made refugees and their country has been laid to waste?". It's not okay with me, and I want the people responsible to be held to account. And I want the obscene profits that some have gleaned from the now 2 TRILLION spent to be withheld or recovered. I'd rather the money went toward rebuilding bridges and levees and providing health care to the poor here in America.

We all know who created this atrocity, and we know what needs to be done. IMPEACHMENT Study it, understand it and demand it. Unless this is all okay with you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you okay with that? Posted by: blitzmesser
Dennis - YOU ROCK!
Posted by: zipper696 on Nov 4, 2007 3:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For sure, your bid for POTUS will crash and burn thanks to the weak sisters in the party, but your brave and good humoured fight against Bushco will be long remembered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

poe
Posted by: janiepoe on Nov 5, 2007 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
kucinich is the only man to correct the crimes committed against the american people and the crimes on the world..he is honorable and has true american values..he is the only one to save america.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment
Posted by: Urgelt on Nov 6, 2007 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've had about enough of Democratic leaders like Pelosi who are afraid of their own shadows - or afraid of the wrath of the corporations who contribute to their campaigns. I want Congress to fear us, the electorate.

Impeachment is a good idea. Let the hearings sort out whether criminal statutes have been violated, and let the elected Congresspersons take a stand, vote by vote, on whether to allow violations to stand unpunished. Let's have a good clear look at who stands for what.

But let's face facts, the Democrats do not have the votes for a conviction, no matter what the offense. The Republicans have circled their wagons. Impeachment won't reign in an administration run amok.

That's why I'm not satisfied with only impeachment. It's not going to save our democracy and restore the Constitution.

Democrats really ought to get serious about taking off the gloves and fighting this corrupt, illegal adminstration with every weapon in their arsenal - especially including the budget ax. They don't need a super-majority to pound a stake into this criminal administration's heart. All they need to do is unfund its more extreme and criminal activities - starting with the illegal pre-emptive war on a nation which had no intention or capability of attacking us.

They can also kill funds for extraordinary rendition, dismantle the emergency prison camps Halliburton built and Blackwater has a contract to staff before they start filling them up with American dissenters, slash funds for Justice until they purge all of their partisan political nonsense and do their damn jobs with respect to enforcing the nation's laws, punish regulatory agencies who are staffed by industry cronies and refuse to act to protect the public interest or enforce the law.

Money gets the attention of the right wing like nothing else. It's time and past time to cut 'em where it hurts until it produces responsible government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]