Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Would a Nobel Prize Victory Spark An Al Gore '08 Presidential Run?

Posted by John Nichols at 12:00 PM on October 10, 2007.


John Nichols: The "Draft Gore" movement suggests it's not that great a leap from the awards stage in Stockholm to the presidential campaign trail.

This post, written by John Nichols, originally appeared on The Nation

Al Gore may well win a Nobel Peace Prize this week, which is no small accomplishment. But the more relentless of the former vice president's political proponents are saying, "Why stop with an trophy when can have it all?"

After all, the "Draft Gore" movement suggests, it is not that great a leap from the awards stage in Stockholm to the presidential campaign trail in Iowa and New Hampshire.

The peace prize winner -- or winners, if deserving Canadian Inuit environmentalist Sheila Watt-Cloutier shares the honor with Gore -- will be announced on Friday.

Then there will be headlines, broadcast reports, interviews with Gore about his Global Marshall Plan to address climate change, and the inevitable flurry of speculation about whether it wouldn't make more sense for Democrats to nominate an internationally acclaimed thinker and activist than a cautious-and-calculating former First Lady or a cautious-but-somewhat-more-inspiring junior senator from Illinois.

Conveniently, the speculation would probably reach a crescendo around the time of the November 2 deadline for entering the New Hampshire primary competition. Imagine the drama of days prior to that deadline, as America awaits the decision of a former congressman, senator, vice president and Democratic presidential nominee to enter the race for an office that -- had only the American political process been structured to accept the popular will of the people rather than the determination of an archaic and undemocratic Electoral College and its Supreme Court manipulators -- he should have held for the past eight years.

"We feel that if he wins the Nobel Prize... then he can't not run for president," chirps Roy Gayhart, a California "Draft Gore" organizer.

Perhaps. But, just in case the reluctant runner needs a push, his line coaches are yelling at the top of their lungs, "Run Al Run."

The crusading campaigners of a "Draft Gore" movement that is decidedly better organized and focused than at least a few of the declared Democratic presidential campaigns operate a sharp website at Draft Gore.com have active organizations in a number of states and are now capitalizing with some skill on the Nobel moment.

On Wednesday in the front section of the New York Times--the town square of American political discourse--is a full-page advertisement featuring a particularly trim and youthful image of the former vice president presented as "An Open Letter to Al Gore."

"You say you have fallen out of love with politics, and you have every reason to feel that way," the letter from the Draft Gore campaigners suggests. "But we know you have not fallen out of love with your country. And your country needs you now--as do your party and the planet you are fighting to save."

Suggesting that Gore must be president if he wants to tackle global warming, the letter prods him, "Only from the Oval Office can you wield the kind of influence needed to move countries, policies and corporations to bring about meaningful change."

The Draft Gore movement, which is seeking petition signatures urging their man to run, is hitting the former vice president where it counts. It is certainly true that the presidency would afford Gore an unrivaled opportunity to realize what for him are moral imperatives. And it is also true that the presidency is within his grasp.

The New York Times advertisement follows radio advertising in Iowa and Florida, as well as an ambitious "op-ed" campaign by Gore proponents such as Ben Barber. Already, Gore backers in Michigan are busy gathering the 12,396 signatures that must be obtained by October 23 to qualify their man for a place on the primary ballot in a state where an August poll by the Detroit News had Gore accomplishing what Barack Obama, John Edwards, Bill Clinton and the other Democratic contenders have not been able to do: leading Hillary Clinton.

Digg!

John Nichols writes about politics for The Nation magazine as its Washington correspondent.


Why Eric Holder is an Alarming Pick for AG
For starters, he called for the firing of any "petty bureaucrat" who might dissent from the expansion of government powers after 9/11.
November 18, 2008.
Another Election Victory: Anti-Muslim Rep Goes Down in VA
Virgil Goode, the creepy congressman who launched an ugly campaign following the election of Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison, was defeated Tuesday.
November 9, 2008.
McCain's VP Pick: A Sarah Palin Head-Fake?
Reports say it's not Romney or Pawlenty; whether or not it turns out to be Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the networks are over Obama's DNC speech.
August 28, 2008.
Will Hillary Clinton Release her Delegates?
This may be the only drama in an otherwise thoroughly-scripted TV show.
August 25, 2008.
VEEPWATCH: Obama Winning High-Stakes Expectations Game
But the GOP nominee is watching Obama's pick carefully.
August 22, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
get used to it.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 10, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saint Gore isn't running. Even if he did and even if he won... once he is back in politics he wouldn't DARE take anything near the stances he has taken since he got out of politics. You'd get the same old political insider.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: get used to it. Posted by: LinneaH
» Uh, yeah.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: get used to it. Posted by: trampoline
And really....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 10, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could you make that poster or flier or whatever it is any more like soviet propaganda art???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And really.... Posted by: particle
» RE: And really.... Posted by: Suz
Oh, Happy Day
Posted by: Rosasharn on Oct 10, 2007 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the only candidates who speak the truth are those that caint win, why, we need a candidate who speaks the truth who CAN WIN. People, it's Al Gore. He not only deserves it , as a retroactive win, he IS the voice of our collective future, that is ifin we want a future. But maybe all you naysayers just don't want a future atall, maybe you can't see past your own greed, maybe perpetual war is your double layer scuba suit. I want to speak for all the unborn children of the future in sayin that they have a right to a planet which is INTACT, not one which won't be able to sustain life as we are so priviledged to have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stealth is wealth
Posted by: survivor2 on Oct 11, 2007 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why settle for the figurehead post when he could enter late and take the big prize, where the power (now) is: VP, and have the best of all worlds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Clinton/Gore ticket?
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 11, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually think Gore could win and I believe he would be a better President now than he would have in 2000. Unfortunately for him it's getting kind of late to jump in now. He would be seriously behind the power curve. Besides the Democratic powers that be have already annointed Hillary. They are just waiting till after we vote let us know who we voted for. Perhaps, as another poster suggested, he will shoot for VP but I doubt corporate America would allow an environmentalist in the White House even as VP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Clinton/Gore ticket? Posted by: trampoline
» RE: Another Clinton/Gore ticket? Posted by: walldodger1969
Nobel Prize, what's the big deal?
Posted by: Nugeman on Oct 11, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even a known terrorist thug like Arafat got a Nobel Prize. Hey even Rush Limbaugh has a nomination for this year. Yea, it's true. Check it out. You can hear about it on his radio show or check out the website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am saying Gore shouldn't run
Posted by: chaoslegs on Oct 11, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His bungling in Florida recount is partially to blame for all this.

As a stand for democracy he should have demanded that all the votes be recounted, not the piece meal effort. Yes the right wing machine, its co-opting MSM, the Supreme Court were all very important too. But VP Gore deserves some of the blame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Roy
Posted by: trampoline on Oct 11, 2007 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a good point, Roy. I can't think of any Nobel Peace Prize Winner who hasn't run for President. It's clearly a cause-and-effect thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

in his words we might need nuclear power for a while
Posted by: BobbieP on Oct 11, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have you any idea how dangerous nuclear anything is for us and the environment? Do you know what ties Gore and his family have to the industry? How about the other candidates?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who would you compare Al Gore with favorably?
Posted by: Christie on Oct 11, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the primary, if Al Gore is not on the ticket in my state, I will write him in. An “internationally acclaimed thinker and activist” is needed in the White House to save our planet and restore our Constitution. Al Gore was the first political figure to oppose the Iraq war, Al Gore is also the lead champion in the fight against global warming, a passionate defender of our Constitution, and an unyielding voice against the Bush Administration's abuse of power. Who would you compare him with favorably?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If he DOES run.....
Posted by: Voicedude on Oct 11, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....(which I have been hoping for since 2003), then there goes the Environental Movement! There's no way he can put the time and effort (or even time for thought) into the environent when he gets back into politics.

As President he CAN:

* make sure the right people are in the right positions.
* NOT veto important legislations.
* make eloquent national addresses on the subject.
* can set a national agenda to get off fossil fuels and the like the way Kennedy did for the space program (btw, he didn't check with NASA first!)

....but that's about all he'll have time for. Sure, it's a LOT more than we have now, but face it: we'll have to make a choice over who is more important - President Gore or Environental Activist Gore.

We won't be able to get both, though.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Manufacturing Consent
Posted by: efficacy on Oct 11, 2007 11:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al Gore and other global warming enthusiasts are fond of reciting that 2,611 scientists have signed a letter stating that global warming poses a serious and real threat. Yet, only about one in ten of the so-called 2611 scientists had scientific expertise. And only 5 out the 2,611 so-called scientists had training in climate, weather or other atmospheric sciences. That is less than 1/2 of one percent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just another neoliberal, folks
Posted by: indradawn on Oct 11, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just look at his interview with Larry King several months ago, where when asked said that yes, he would still support NAFTA and other free-trade policies if he had it to do over again. WTF?? Despite the detrimental effect these policies have had on American and Mexican workers, fueling the illegal immigration problem? Funny, I don't recall hearing that much about global warming when he was Veep or when he was running; it became is raison d'etre only after he was denied the presidency and was no longer beholden to the corporate interests that put him in office with Clinton and on the presidential ticket. I would bet that as president, his talk about the global warming issue (which I do see as extraordinarily important) would wane significantly. I don't trust this corporate DLC neoliberal as far as I can throw him. He's just another Clinton if you ask me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gore Isn't Running, Period.
Posted by: Urgelt on Oct 11, 2007 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al Gore is not a stupid man.

There just isn't enough time remaining in the pitiful mockery we call the primary season for him to get into it. He's missed the debates. He doesn't have the organization. He doesn't have the cash. He doesn't have time to turn any of that around or to establish himself as a front-runner.

And he'd be up against the Clinton Machine. He knows what that's like. He's been there before, remember? If anything, the Machine is slicker than it was in 1992.

Al Gore already made his decision, and he's going to stick to it. He's focused now on policies, not politics. And maybe that's where we need his attention most.

See, the reason the neocons came to power is attention to policies. They had a clear, unambiguous set of policies in mind. They worked out every detail: what to say, who to say it to, how to cover their real agenda with rhetoric that polls told them would sell. And they knew exactly what they wanted to do when they got in power, too. It was all mapped out. It's called strategic thinking.

By contrast, the Democrats have been a big floppy tent of diverse and contradictory viewpoints. Little coherence. Little agreement. Little strategic planning.

That's what Al Gore is attempting to bring to the Democratic Party. These are our issues; these are the things on which we agree, and our opponents do not. These are the things we need to do after the Democrats regain the White House: actions that will be needed to turn policy into reality.

He's made progress, too. But let's not mistake just how much progress. The Democrats still vascillate about business. They aren't quite sure they have the guts to stand up to monopolies or corporate interests. They are afraid of evangelicals. And a lot of them are just plain corrupt.

Still, Gore has reframed the energy and environmental picture in a way which makes it a winner, finally, for Democrats. I'm not sure he could have done that as a candidate, just one more ambitious rascal fighting it out with the other rascals for the brass ring.

Gore is not running. But I would be surprised if he turned down an appointment. I think he genuinely cares about the policies he's helped to formulate, and the cabinet is a pretty good place to get some of them implemented.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Gore won the piece prize so now perhaps we will find out. I hope he does run.
Posted by: johngary66 on Oct 12, 2007 2:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gore/Kucinich 2008. Sounds great. It would drive the trolls up the wall too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]