Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A New Kind of Celebrity Journalism

Posted by Monica Mehta at 11:46 AM on August 22, 2005.


Sean Penn is writing a series of dispatches from Iran for the San Francisco Chronicle.
Sean Penn

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Monica Mehta in your
mailbox!

 

Sean Penn is writing a series of foreign dispatches for The San Francisco Chronicle, again.

The first time he served as foreign correspondent for the paper, his three-part series on Iraq -- which included a photo slideshow, mostly of him -- was the source of many annoyed letters from readers, like this one from Merle Divens: "Just want you to know that no one gives a damn what Sean Penn thinks or does. He only makes films filled with violence. Who made him a journalist anyway? What are his credentials to do anything? What is his education?"

This time, he's in Iran, where's he's making such observations as the following:

Iran is not an unsophisticated country. These are not unrefined people.

His articles are also often focused on himself, instead of on the country.

I noticed that many Iranians were freely smoking cigarettes in line, certainly no signs prohibiting it, and immediately joined them. I was quickly singled out by a uniformed customs agent who instructed me to put out my cigarette. Only me. Not the Iranian passengers.

But that’s the point of the pieces: Let’s see what happens when a well-known Hollywood actor goes to an enemy land! The result is rather chaotic: a video on the Chronicle site shows him being beseiged by photographers during a museum visit.

Maybe his pieces will get people who wouldn't otherwise read an article on Iran to learn something about the country. Some readers may get a kick out of having an Oscar-winning celeb double as a journalist.

What do you think? Should Sean Penn stick to acting, or should we give celebrities the room to stretch their creative muscles and try reporting, even on serious topics like American-Iranian relations?

Digg!

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet.


The worst lesson to learn
The war on terror is right here, at home.
August 25, 2005.
Pat Robertson unleashed
Somebody get a muzzle.
August 23, 2005.
POTUS' Summer Book List
What Bush is and isn't reading during his five-week summer vacation.
August 18, 2005.
The most useless warning sign in the world
What's the point of warning people that an area contains chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects?
August 17, 2005.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Celeb Journalists
Posted by: KLKinVa on Aug 22, 2005 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am all for concerned celebrities using their clout to draw attention to issues that people might otherwise ignore. However, they should leave their egos behind and make sure the issue is the focal point, not themselves. I am dissapointed to see that Sean Penn doesn't realize this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Celeb Journalists Posted by: jcarol
» RE: Celeb Journalists Posted by: spyderbaby
jannahanna
Posted by: jannahanna on Aug 23, 2005 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allow celebrities the room??? Mr. Penn has every right to his observations - and why should those be other than in the first person? That he was the only one who had to put out his cigarette was very telling of the conditions. Would you have preferred if he had written that one of his companions was told to extinguish his cigarette? Sour grapes? Jealous, are you? Seems to me that you made this into something about you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Concerned TR I Conservative
Posted by: Oliver's Owner on Aug 23, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A mind is like a parachute...it works better if it is open. Reading what ANY celebrity or journalist has to say ought to be one's own choice and helpful to one's self education on issues.

What disturbes me about the BUSH II administration and many of their public supporters is that anyone elses opinion that disagrees with the BUSH/CHENEY/ROVE mantra triggers a personal attack on the integrity and character of the messenger...thus avoiding any serious debate on any issue, and without any willingness to listen and maybe learn that they just might be, ...or are, WRONG.

Were are the WMD's for instance? Why not come clean about the real reason for the Bush/CheneyHalliburton Oil moves on IRAQ. (Read their own manifesto...the Plan for a New American Century (PNAC) that they wrote in the late 90's long before 9/11...in which they urged President Clinton to attack Iraq, DEPOSE OR KILL SADDAM HUSSIEN, so THEY could control Iraq's oil. THEIR WORDS!)

Surely the educated citizen can sort the truth from fiction...if we cannot...then reports that our education system is in serious trouble are true...and the "No Child Left Behind" is a disaster.

AND IF WE DO NOT RAISE OUR VOICES, NO MATTER WHAT OUR OPINION, WE ARE HEADED DOWN THE ROAD OF ALL OTHER PLUNGES INTO GOVERNMENT FOR AND BY THE GOVERNMENT.

“That we are to stand by the president, right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

-President Theodore Roosevelt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]