Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jagger backpedals on slamming Bush

Posted by Monica Mehta at 5:45 PM on August 10, 2005.


So then who were his lyrics meant for?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Monica Mehta in your
mailbox!

 

Mick Jagger is denying that a song on his upcoming album, called "Sweet Neo Con," refers to George W.

"It is not really aimed at anyone," Jagger said on the entertainment news show "Extra." "It's not aimed, personally aimed, at President Bush. It wouldn't be called 'Sweet Neo Con' if it was."

But what about the lyrics?

The song is from the new album, "A Bigger Bang," set for release Sept. 6. There is no mention of Bush or Iraq. But it does refer to military contractor Halliburton, which was formerly run by Vice President Cheney and has been awarded key Iraq contracts, and the rising price of gasoline.
"How come you're so wrong? My sweet neo-con, where's the money gone, in the Pentagon," goes one refrain.
The song also includes the line: "It's liberty for all, democracy's our style, unless you are against us, then it's prison without trial."
Jagger claimed the song is "certainly very critical of certain policies of the administration, but so what! Lots of people are critical."

Oh yeah? Then who are these lyrics supposed to refer to:
"You call yourself a Christian, I call you a hypocrite.
You call yourself a patriot. Well I think you are full of s**t!"
Could his butt-covering statement have anything to do with the fact that the Rolling Stones are teaming up with the National Football League and ABC to promote "Monday Night Football"? Methinks I smell an attempted last-minute save....

Digg!

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet.


The worst lesson to learn
The war on terror is right here, at home.
August 25, 2005.
Pat Robertson unleashed
Somebody get a muzzle.
August 23, 2005.
A New Kind of Celebrity Journalism
Sean Penn is writing a series of dispatches from Iran for the San Francisco Chronicle.
August 22, 2005.
POTUS' Summer Book List
What Bush is and isn't reading during his five-week summer vacation.
August 18, 2005.
The most useless warning sign in the world
What's the point of warning people that an area contains chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects?
August 17, 2005.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sir Mick(y)
Posted by: Neotexan on Aug 10, 2005 8:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I 'm so glad he apologized for his remarks about me. I am a Christian and I love music. Unfortunately I cannot afford to buy a ticket to see his concert. Not all neocons are rich. I just have a worldview that is different from his. He is always entitled to his opinions. I know he loves the US because he loves and probably worships our money.

Thanks,
Dave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

russian blue
Posted by: russianblue on Aug 11, 2005 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think I saw an "I'm sorry".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jagger is right, does that count?
Posted by: fairleft on Aug 12, 2005 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why criticize Jagger for singing the obvious: he believes, like a lot of people, that probably Cheney is the main evil neo-con. And he pulls Bush's strings. This fits with the facts we know and the impression that Bush is a mediocrity uninterested in his job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]