Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Parsing the Drunken Jezebel Trainwreck

Posted by Amanda Marcotte, Pandagon at 9:35 AM on July 9, 2008.


Gawker bloggers Tracie Egan and Moe Tkacik slur rape jokes on TV, feminists cringe.

Because I’ve been doing D.C. stuff all day and thus have only had time to follow this blow-up.  I’ll admit; when I first read the quotes Lizz put up at HuffPo, I was appalled at Moe and Tracie.  But then I actually got some decent wi-fi speed and watched the videos and felt, okay, they were trying to be outrageous and funny.  And considering the fact that alcohol was flowing freely, it’s hard for me to get upset that they weren’t dazzling wits and instead going for shock value.  Tracie affirms as much.  I can’t even get upset that they failed to be sober on a TV show, which strikes me as a bare minimum thing to do, because the show is about drinking.  The jokes about pulling out especially didn’t deserve the moralistic shaming, because when you watch the videos, it’s clear that they’re jokes that only work because it’s so wrong. 

The joking about rape was an attempt at more of the same, but even more inept. It’s easy to wave your hands and say that jokes about rape are categorically wrong, but I refuse on principle to believe that jokes about anything are categorically wrong, if told correctly.  They just failed.  But they didn’t fail, I think, from a baseline of cruelty that characterizes the offensive jokes about rape, and so I think the rending of garments is a bit misplaced.

Look, I can tell when watching it that what’s going on is two women who are at odds with a hipster culture that plays at men and women being equals, but still makes women tap dance and submit like performing monkeys begging for cookies.  The jokes about pulling out?  The denial (from Tracie) and joking around (Moe) about rape?  These were all coming from that place that I know so well.  It reminds me of the jokes that women back home would make about living under their male lords and masters, though those jokes were often more about housekeeping and more mundane sexual topics.  There’s a tendency, when one thinks of one’s self as a spicy and bold woman, to exhibit a lot of bravado when you have to reconcile that with the ugly fact that dudes are pushing you around.  If you’ve ever seen a cat lose its cool, you know what I mean.  Like it falls in the toilet while trying to drink from it, and walks away sopping wet like, “Yeah, I meant to do that.” Letting a guy come in you without a condom because he whined and you wanted him to like you is a lot like that, I guess.  You say, “Oh, I meant to do that.  It was sexier.  Yeah.  For me.  Really.  Ha.” Women make excuses for bending to their own oppression all the time.  I’ve done it.  We all do it.  And sometimes we make really dark jokes about it, as Moe and Tracie did. 

Still, I feel Lizz’s disappointment.  I’m not mad at Moe and Tracie.  I’m not even disappointed in them, exactly.  I am to the extent that they’re very privileged young women who have a lot of influence by virtue of being a part of a coddled middle class that can even afford to live in the hip parts of of New York, which to me means that they should own more responsibility to use their glamorous images for the good of young women who look up to that, instead of coddling the men who roam around taking advantage of their even greater advantages to guilt women into having sex with them against their will, or not using condoms, or doing whatever other thing you can get a woman to do by disdaining her with the full knowledge that your penis gives you more right to say what’s cool and what’s not than she has.  I’m not mad at them; I’ve definitely seen the same game play out in hip scenes in Austin, and I’ve felt the sharp pain of knowing that even though we’re all supposed to be liberated and shit, men just have more social capital in hipster circles.  Or any circles that women have to jockey for status, and men can often hurt that by saying all sorts of things about you if they ever got you in a vulnerable position, such as fooling around.  Things are better than they used to be---I suspect the scene of selling a groupie for a 6 pack of beer in the movie “Almost Famous” was no exaggeration, and now you get to be in your own band and everything, where you may even get more social capital than some men.  But we’re still far away from that day, and we’re still where a lot of women feel that they have to roll with routine degradations and laugh them off in order to stay on the inside. 

No, I’m just disappointed in the whole fucking world when I see something like this.  To me, that hip, rock and roll world out there was an escape hatch.  Of course, when I was plotting my escape, Kim Gordon and Kathleen Hanna were greasing the path for me, and they really didn’t seem to have any desire to bend over for any man.  Then again, we also had hot mess Courtney Love, so I shouldn’t put on rose-colored glasses.  But while I learned that things were far from perfect in the world I reached out for, I felt grounded in the images of feminist anger that initially attracted me.  If in fact Moe and Tracie are that to young women in Podunk now---images of urban glamor and sexual liberation to emulate---then it’s worrying that they’re sending out a positive message about just rolling over to men’s petulant demands out of fear of men’s social power to disgrace your reputation by not liking you enough. I mean, I laughed sometimes during their performance.  But I found myself questioning their exalted irreverence.  It’s one thing to be irreverent about male power while accepting it, and another to be irreverent about it while pulling a riot girl and throwing the finger at it.  But it’s also worth noting that the latter might feel like a pipe dream when you get into the real world and find yourself compromising with men all the time on the basic issue of your dignity because they have certain outside powers to bring into the situation.

It’s never as easy as it sounds to just liberate yourself is all I’m saying.  I’m often asked when I speak in public why young women don’t call themselves feminists that much. And I say honestly, young straight women are afraid that they’ll never get laid again, that their fragile dependence on men’s good will is threatened by the word “feminism”.  And that’s actually true. Young women aren’t stupid when they perceive this.  What they don’t perceive, and where older feminists can step in and offer reassurance, is that there are good men out there if you clear out the ugly ones by getting a spine.  But it’s hard to see the good apples when bad ones clutter the room.

[Image from Jezebel's introduction post for Tracie Egan when she joined the site in 2007. Photo by Nikola Tamindzic.]

Digg!


The Subtle Ways in Which Conservatives Play the Race, Gender Cards
They always maintain plausible deniability.
August 5, 2008.
Limbaugh: China May be Full of Commies, But at Least They Love Their SUVs
Limbaugh wants you to know: that Chinese dude is totally packing more in the pants than you.
July 31, 2008.
The Anti-Choice Movement Is also Very Anti-Rubbers
"The anti-choice movement opposes contraception, the number one way the vast majority of fertility-age American women avoid abortion."
July 29, 2008.
The New York Times' Latest Trend Article isn't Fluff, It's Offensive
God forbid anyone looks their age these days.
July 25, 2008.
Does Time Magazine Believe Women's Bodies Should be Owned by Men?
Time helps push retrograde patriarchal agenda with article about "purity balls."
July 22, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wow, I had a different spin.
Posted by: Lauren on Jul 9, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw two girls describing two different worlds. i believe them both. Why should anyone be surprised the little blond girl gets raped and the bigger, assertive brunette doesn't. Some women give off a DO NOT RAPE ME signal and she was doing it. look at her body language.

The blonde is giving off signals of vulnerability many men find irresistible.

It is interesting the interviewer is reacting with negative judgments instead of asking questions meant to open up a dialogue to explore WHY they have a different experience.

Her crossed knees show us how uncomfortable she is with the topic, and her several attempts to shut it down, some as failed humor, other more like criticism.

She wants to educate them with her opinion rather than learn something new. This is too bad too, because their body language tells the whole story. If they explored it the blond could learn to protect herself.

They should not laugh at her about her feeling protected by her rapist, but think how that works in the subconscious human female mind. Don't judge, understand. Then, choice is easier to understand.

They all have some learning to do, I am glad to see them doing it with each other. God bless them and protect them from diseases.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow, I had a different spin. Posted by: Hopscotch123
Disturbed
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 9, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not disturbed by the sad, drunken girls, they were not women in any way, I am referring that they are mentally deficiant in a Psychological pathology and in dire need of help. Rape is an act of Power of the Rapist over the woman not a sex act. To joke or make light of this is sickening. They appear not to be a few gals with a drink under their belts they are Addicts. It would be funny if not for the sadness of the entire conversation and situations.
How tragic to even know that they feel that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Startles/Frightens Me More Than Anything . . .
Posted by: kwfryatl on Jul 9, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . no mention anywhere - even in the blogs - of the possibility of HIV and other STDs as a consequence of their behavior.

But I guess I'm just missing the point of all the "fun" . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I like...like...uh...like...uh...like...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 9, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, is this tool even proficient in English?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I read this whole article...
Posted by: lexicon on Jul 9, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I have to say, I have not even the slightest idea what it's about.

Apparently, there's some TV show somewhere in which some people were talking about sex 'n stuff.

And apparently the people discussing sex 'n stuff should be held to the author's moral and ideological standard, like that's sort of important 'n stuff.

I'm not even sure what TV show it is. Apparently I"m not a hipster.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bisexual
Posted by: john110 on Jul 9, 2008 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rape is an act of Power of the Rapist over the woman not a sex act. To joke or make light of this is sickening. They appear not to be a few gals with a drink under their belts they are Addicts....★BIGBISEXUAL.C O M★...come you will find more !@@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These women are idiots
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jul 10, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What lousy TV show is this?

They didn't even mike the guests correctly but good grief, who wants to sit around and listen to these bimbos?

If this is what passes for intelligent discussion, I'm putting my ear plugs back in.

I'm just an old curmudgeon I guess.

Luv,
Granny

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The presenter called them "role models"??
Posted by: intrigued on Jul 10, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a feminist from the late sixties, when even getting contraception was difficult. What is going on here? The blonde girl says she regrets all the "years" she has spent drinking, and she thinks the only place girls have sexual problems is in "countries that don't accept sex" and these 'problems' never happen in New York?

What weird alcoholic zone is she living in? Did I hear her right? And she shrugs off date rape as something the just kinda happened, and is no big deal?

These girls are role models for NO ONE.

And as for the above 'article', I don't know why it was ever written. I don't know what it's attempting to say, it's waffling on about everything being men's fault, when it's clear that the two women on the program haven't an ounce of respect for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anything for more page views.
Posted by: 113121 on Jul 10, 2008 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thats how they make their living, sort of like hookers but with Gawker as their pimp.
Remember when they "agreed" with Ann Coulter that Elizabeth Edwards was using her cancer for politicial gain? If either attractiveness or intelligence was really any basis for getting raped they should have nothing to fear.
Pulling out for birth control? The last woman I know who used that method was Catholic and had 5 kids. She stopped getting pregnant when she locked her bedroom door and her husband got a mistress. Stop giving them attention before they turn up on TV with Ingram,Malkin, Coulter and the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intimacy Virgins
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Jul 11, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who have had "lots and lots of sex with a lot, I mean a lot of people," it is no wonder that there has not been a rape. If it is always freely given, who would force it?

But most important: The chances are that those prolific sexual appetites may be sated without the slightest taste of intimacy that makes the whole experience worthwhile.

I'd rather have the intimacy than the drunken sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intimacy Virgins Posted by: intrigued
Cringing Feminists and Drunken Role Models
Posted by: Urgelt on Jul 15, 2008 3:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I, for one, can understand why these bubbleheads make feminists cringe.

They make me cringe, too.

Neither skinny-and-blond nor plus-sized-and-brunette seem to know what dignity is.

That's a clue. Perhaps what we're seeing here is nothing more than the usual dysfunction of alcoholics and drug addicts. No dignity. No inhibitions. So long as the drinks and drugs are flowing, the party life - and the sleazy men encountered in it - are a great big joke.

A shame that they are role models for girls, but then, there's never been a shortage of drunken role models. It's why there are always more drunks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]