Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Cops Acquitted in 50-Bullet Killing of Unarmed Black Man on His Wedding Day

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 1:45 PM on April 25, 2008.


New York City police officers get away with murder. Again.
seanbellprotester

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Liliana Segura in your
mailbox!

 

This morning in New York, three police detectives were found "not guilty" in the murder of Sean Bell, a 23-year old African-American man who was shot to death on his wedding day, November 25, 2006. His death sparked outrage in a city that is no stranger to police brutality; the list of police killings of unarmed black men over the years is long and familiar.

But the details in this case were grotesque. Fifty shots were fired at Bell and his friends, who were celebrating his bachelor party at a Queens strip club; one of the plainclothes officers -- himself responsible for 31 shots -- stopped to re-load.

Bell died after being hit four times in the neck and torso. But not before being handcuffed.

"Mr. Bell, mortally wounded and not speaking, and Joseph Guzman, despite wounds from his head to his feet, were put in handcuffs after the gunfire ceased," the New York Times reported. The case was shocking enough to elicit a strong response from Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who called the shooting "inexplicable" and "unacceptable."

Of the five police officers involved in the shooting, three would be indicted by a grand jury. When it came to the trial, the defense opted for a judge rather than a jury, after attempting, unsuccessfully, to get the venue moved out of Queens. "Eighty-three percent of black potential jurors think the shooting was unjustified," defense attorneys argued. "Many have already decided that there is nothing more to consider and that the police are necessarily guilty of some crime."

As CNN aired images of the scene following the verdict this morning, it was not hard to see why. The anger and the pain on the faces of those gathered outside the courtroom spoke to years of seeing sons, brothers, and husbands brutalized by law enforcement officers apparently programmed to see black bodies as dispensable.

"There's no evidence that race had anything to do with it," Mayor Bloomberg concluded in November 2006. Really? Did race also have nothing to do with the case of Khiel Coppin? Timothy Stansbury? Amadou Diallo?

As much as people like to treat police shootings as "tragic" isolated incidents, the reality is that police officers inflict violence on black communities on a regular basis. And they get away with it -- again and again and again.

Reporters this morning took pains to remind viewers that for the police officers involved, their lives were forever changed. "With this case there's no winners, there's no losers," said the president of the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association. Spare us. Bell had two young daughters with his fiancée, Nicole, who took his name to honor her would-be husband's memory. This morning, she fled the courtroom immediately after the verdict was read.

"I think it's not right, because they shot him 50 times," said one young man named Kamau, who came to the courthouse with his dad. "They knew he was hurt, and they kept shooting him. He didn't even have a gun."

Digg!

Liliana Segura is an AlterNet staff writer.


Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime
A new report finds the Air Force is spending counterterrorism funds on luxury in-flight seating for military and civilian leaders.
July 24, 2008.
Send Karl Rove to Jail
On Friday's inaugural episode of Meet the Bloggers, the issue at hand is why Turdblossom should be in jail -- and how it could happen.
July 18, 2008.
Canada to Deport U.S. War Resister Today
In an affront to Canadian public opinion, American war resister Robin Long will be turned over to U.S. authorities.
July 15, 2008.
U.S. Gov't to Re-Try Suspects in So-Called Sears Tower Plot. Again.
The Bush Administration won't let the facts get in the way in its desperate attempts to convict six men on terrorism charges.
April 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Couple Thoughts
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 25, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been reading the comments to an article about the ruling over at the NY Times website. At least half of the comments AGREE with the decision. Some posters have even gone so far as to say that Bell deserved what he got, since he had previous arrests -- as if: 1) the police knew that he had a criminal history. 2) Bell's previous troubles rose to the level of him being worthy of being killed.
EVEN IF the police officers didn't act based on Bell's race (a couple of the officers were African American, which does NOT necessarily mean race was not a factor), the decision by the judge seems to me to be at least somewhat racist. I read, and cannot vouch for the truthfulness of this info, that the judge had a history of racist rulings. (Could someone who knows confirm this?)
In any case, even if Bell was White, the police probably would have gotten off (although they may not have shot him in the first place).
The police can do NO wrong, in the eyes of the courts, it seems.
Tell that to the Bell family, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Couple Thoughts Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: A Couple Thoughts Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: A Couple Thoughts Posted by: Frank J. Burris
unbelievable...
Posted by: writer7 on Apr 25, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's all I can say about it now...unbelievable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "unbelievable"? Really? Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: "unbelievable"? Really? Posted by: donl51
Judge Got it Right
Posted by: EncinoM on Apr 25, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I folowed this case, the prosecution had to prove two things, first, that the cops DID NOT identify themselves and second that they were unreasonable in their belief that the moving car was not aimed at them, and put them at risk.

The witnesses killed the case. They had little creditbility on the stand, and contradicted each other. The Judge had no other choice but to find that the Prosecutor failed to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt.

The racism charge is bogus on its face as the majority of cops invovled in the shooting were not white. The amount of bullets is irrelevent and just adds gasoline on an emotionally charged situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: AtomicNYC
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: EncinoM
» wrong about the number of bullets Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: Purple Girl
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: notmom
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: desidid
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Judge Got it Right Posted by: EncinoM
Morally justifiable on what grounds?!?
Posted by: ariaria on Apr 25, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What frustrates me is the nonchalance with which some readers leave every sense of moral and ethical principle out the door. *How is shooting an unarmed man 50 - let me try again - FIFTY times justifiable?* One of the officers, responsible for 31 shots even stopped to reload! Why do we feel the need to defend every public servant for their deeds - no matter good or bad? How about we try to raise their salaries and then hold them more accountable to their actions, instead of a few bad apples embarrassing every public servant, and frankly every person in the country.

Also, why would the prosecution only have to prove that the cops did not identify themselves? What about having the cops try and justify why 50 bullets, a reload, and handcuffing two wounded and dying African Americans were required before they felt safe?

Despite the charismatic and beguiling speech by Obama a month ago, crimes, and subsequent VERDICTS such as today remind us again and again how wicked the internal state of American life really is.

I'd be intrigued to see just how Fox has responded to this. Probably blaming Bell and holding a fundraiser for the cops. Jeez

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» street corner thugs? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Some More
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 25, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After reading many more of the comments on this topic over at the NY Times site I am truly saddened by how many were posted by obvious racists, whatever the truth is regarding how much race played into the shooting and the verdict.
I am a White man who says, yes, America still has a lot of racism to deal with;
It certainly does.

Remember:
Despite the skin,
we're all kin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 25, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One man dead another shot 16 times and nobody did anything? First degree murder, no. But excessive and unecessary gunfire without a cause can't be acceptable. "Emotionally charged"? What does that mean? I'd like to read the rules set down for the police and the use of their weapaons. And I don't buy the car story. Did they think that the car would die and stop if they shot it? A real shocker. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Above the law
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 25, 2008 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you pay attention to this and other cases which involve cops shooting unarmed people, the real problem is not how judges and juries rule, it's how the statutes are slanted in favor of the cops. Law enforcement officers always complain they're held to higher standards, but in truth they're held to much lower standards than the rest of us.

Say for instance that I, a law abiding person with a licensed handgun, see this car full of black guys driving toward my general direction and someone exclaims "They've got guns!" If I shoot and it turns out that 1. they didn't have guns, 2. they weren't trying to drive over me, or both, I am always going to be charged with involuntary manslaughter. But cops can't be charged with manslaughter as long as they can prove to a judge or review board that thought they saw a gun or thought they were in danger.

These rulings do not show a problem with the courts. They show a problem with laws which make it legal for officers to do what it would be illegal for the rest of us to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corrupt Cops
Posted by: warriornation on Apr 25, 2008 7:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, this is the second time I'm posting about this blog bug Alternet deleted my first post. So a hint to y'all..don't quote the NWA.

These cops are corrupt with power and the judge solidified their power. Certainly there was an impossible burden of proof on the prosecution. 50 gunshots?! 50 gunshots?! The judge did not find that in the least bit outrageous. I don't get it.

Free Mumia!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corrupt Cops Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Corrupt Cops Posted by: desidid
» RE: Corrupt Cops Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Corrupt Cops Posted by: desidid
» RE: Corrupt Cops Posted by: EncinoM
» I think "murderous cops" Posted by: hurricane hugo
The Criminal Justice System
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Apr 25, 2008 10:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why they call it The "Criminal" Justice System..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

50 Bullets + Unarmed= Racist Murder
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 26, 2008 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't even need to hear what their excuses were - the basic facts speak Loud & clear.
Racism is stil alive and Thriving into the 21st century.
I am a white Female and have felt the prejudice of sexism first hand- so wel ingrained in males they don't even realize when tey are doing it. I will grant many woman still suffer & die at the hands of men who still hold the thought that women are property.
But Racism is far more prevalent, more Deadly and far more Ignored.
I am Outraged, disgusted (again ) with the 'legal system'. The idea our system is control by the "jury of Your peers' is BS. It starts wiht which crimes are prosecuted, what charges are levied, what punishments are available for that charge, What is allowed in to court & what is not, And the Judges Instructions. Stop Lying to average Americans that our system is Just, far too much 'legal' BS is layered on top of the case long before the Jury hears the case - and while the sham of "justice' (circus) is being conducted.
My heart went out to his new Bride the minute I heard about this Blanant Crime by the "law enforcement" mercenaries. My heart goes out to not only the Black community , but the entire Nation- Our Legal Systems has been usurped from the streets to the Supreme Court. "God Damn America" is Right- this conviction was a No Brainer- Like so many before it.
God Save AmericaNs from this Institutionalized Oppression. When One man faces Inequality - we All are the Victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Crime is this "War on Drugs" crap!!!
Posted by: xvictor on Apr 26, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sean Bell was killed not by cops bullets but by the slavish adherance to the wasteful and stupid drug laws on the books in this country. It serves no justifiable purpose except to increase misery, exact untold amounts of money from citizens, and increase the body count.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Many Times Does a Person Need to be SHOT?
Posted by: pana on Apr 26, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless police officers themselves act with reason, then how will they gain respect? How many times does a person need to be shot? Police action in this situation is just downright shameful.

Someone who cares about our FRAGILE democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saddness/ Forgiveness
Posted by: nahikurain@mac.com on Apr 26, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so sad to hear about this scenario. I only hope that the women and children left behind will be able to find a way to forgive the rest of us. I wouldn't blame them for hating everyone... How can we let this happen? How can restore someone's loving husband to them?
We have so much environmental Crimes happening, we really need to ban strongly together to fight the people who are destroying our earth. Shit like this is just put into place to make us hate each other.
Our America stands for Liberty, Justice For All, and we need to hold onto this ideal, and if that means staying persistent in appealing this strange happenstance, then so be it. With Hope and Love, Love for the Memory of a man, not with hate agaisnt a corrupt and idiotic machine.

that's all I know for certain. Just try to eat right, don't feed them with your diet, breath right, sleep sound, think peace, and keep love in your heart and we will keep putting Justice and Liberty into the collective Consciousness and try to change it with mere being.

I am sending hugs and healing rainbows to the children and women of Queens for the next month, morning and evening, and Oh OH!! plant some food in the vacant lot, don't let the global food crisis touch you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Saddness/ Forgiveness Posted by: Longdream
New Justice?
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Apr 26, 2008 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be interesting to see if the same interpretation that resulted in this verdict will apply to the next Black that shoots an unarmed Cop or two.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ms.
Posted by: Rosemary on Apr 26, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, please. Never mind that Bell was about to run over the policemen in question. Or that his friends were armed and shooting at the police. Or that someone in the heat of the moment yelled that Bell had a gun. Really!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ms. Posted by: Quannah
Was it racist?
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 26, 2008 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like every white person in America to ask himself or herself this question:

If this tragedy had happened in a tavern in a white neighborhood, and a young white man was killed by the police in this manner on his wedding day, would public reaction be the same?

The evidence in this case most definitely points to police over-reaction, and unjustified shooting.

The judge said that he didn't like the demeanor of the witnesses, that there were inconsistencies in their statements, and that they had a special interest in seeing the police convicted.

There are ALWAYS inconsistencies in testimony. When witness statements agree in all respects, the witnesses are accused of collusion. There are NO rules regarding demeanor on the stand that would allow a judge to disavow testimony, and every witness for the victim in a prosecution has an interest in the conviction of the perpetrators.

To quote Ron Kuby, a respected civil rights attorney in his statement to Dan Abrams: It always comes down to black, blue and white. Black is the color of the person killed, blue is the color of the uniforms that did the killing, and white is the color of the people who let them go free.

Abner L. Hunt, 2008, Unarmed, shot in the back at a Baltimore shopping center, no charges filed.

Ron Pettaway, III, 2007, Unarmed, killed by a shot to the back of the head by police officers, no charges filed.

Amadou Diallo - 1999 Unarmed, killed by 41 shots by police officers, all officers acquitted of wrongdoing.

Malcolm Ferguson, Patrick Bailey, Tyrone Hawkins, Nathaniel Jones, Timothy Thomas, Marquise Hudspeth, dozens, hundreds more, all across the country.

I'll now quote Mark Thompson, who runs a talk show I never miss on SIRIUS Left: "If there is no justice for African-Americans in this country, there is no justice for anyone, anywhere."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Violence begets Violence...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Apr 27, 2008 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and US gun rights trumps common sense...

I'm definitely not a gun control advocate but some guns are made to specifically do only one job...
and thats to "KILL PEOPLE"... it's what they're specifically made to do...

Guns that are used for sport I have no problems with!
all others should be registered and access to their purchase needs to be monitored and screened to ensure that the mentally unstable or a serious criminal element do not "EVER" get access to them...

Far to many people in the US are killed by guns!
the US is by far the most violent country on the planet...
strong justice doesn't make a compassionate and empathic people,
only compassionate and empathic laws can contribute to these peoples creation.

All I'm saying is, to just think about harm reduction techniques,
in order to reduce the harm thats is done daily by the law and the lawless!

because thinking about harm reduction is at the very least... a start...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Awww shit Don: Please don't hold this against me but . . . .
Posted by: Nightstallion on Apr 27, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fuck these black shirted mother thumpers , fuck these black shirted mother fuckers I MEAN F U C K these B L A C K S H I R T E D M O T H E R F U C K E R S RIGHT THE FUCK UP! While we are at it put liens on that Judges property all of it even his dog or cat if he's got one. Issue complaints of inhumane activities, demand he be investigated for drugs and or paraphernalia. Put liens on all his wife’s holdings too, do not let this quivering blob of protoplasm shit without being subject to interference by the Public Sanitation Authorities.

Get this bastard (The Judge) investigated by the FBI, the ASPCA, the American Churches Association, the Daughters of this or that Revolution. And the Pope’s private hit squad. Follow that asshole around with hand held DVD cameras, and tape recorders. Do not let this bastard fart without someone making a major incident out of it.

Do not let the Mayor of New York sleep in his own office till the bastard retries these above the law chicken shit twits who shot that kid, ON HIS WEDDING DAY FOR CHRIST FUCKING SAKE! YOU INANE PENIS OSCULATING COWARDLY MOTHER BITERS! YOU SHOT AN UN ARMED MAN BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they'd had an aversion to shooting, they could have done something else.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 27, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe shoot out the tires.

Maybe DUCK.

Standing their ground in a phalanx and shooting so many times speaks about a mind-set of WAR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unacceptable reactions from the defense team
Posted by: cyr3n on Apr 28, 2008 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw the coverage of this live, and what sickened me more than the verdict itself was the reaction of the defense team.

Union leader - up there like a smug balding cheerleader spelling out NOT GUILTY and commending the union's validity. (at what cost sir?) what a schmuck.

The "white" cop - no remorse. saying thanks to his family and buddy in the judicial system. (nice that you have friends in high places -- murderer) lets hope your kids dont get raped and murdered with the kind of system you're suporting.

The black cop - domo arigato mr roboto. maybe you should take a trip to Oz (or hell) and ask for your soul back after robbing a family of their father and standing up there thanking 'jesus' and your family for support??

--

The only guy with half a heart was the last black cop that went to the podium. He was the ONLY one with any remorse or feeling for what this verdict meant for the community at large.. not just his own hide.

--

which stooge reloaded their gun? These taser-maids have no business working in law enforcement. They killed an unarmed citizen, thats a direct breach of "to serve and protect" is it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SERIOUSLY???
Posted by: ksl_moore on Apr 29, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay...first of all, the cops had no reason to shoot bell in the first place, second of all, 50 shots, talk about overkill. was that much force really necessary. was any force at all really necessary. that just goes to show how messed up the judicial system is. because they're cops, they get away with ruthless murder? WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD???
and another thing, who says that just because some of the cops were black doesn't mean that the shooting wasn't racially motivated. who took the first shot??? Bet you ten to one it was a white cop. How's that for a "fair" legal system???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Face it, It's de facto legal for police
Posted by: pangolin on Apr 29, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to shoot black men in the U.S. and they don't have to prove anything at all about.

They just invoke the "South Park" rule: "He was coming right at me!!!"

The police are not there to help you; they are an occupying force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO WHAT?
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Apr 29, 2008 10:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good Decision

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE WORSHIP MONEY AND POWER
Posted by: socrates2 on Apr 30, 2008 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frantz Fanon in his _The Wretched of the Earth_ said that when a people are _colonized_ and oppressed they turn on each other.
Do you print _your_ money? Does our government?
Does our government determine the value of the money in your pocket? Do you?
No, we are at the mercy of those with the power to make _those_ decisions. And those with the power to make those decisions know that at some level people are angry about that situation.
So, they take the advise of that 19th century plutocrat who said, "We hire half of the poor to kill the other half."
And those who referee the use of the police power shall be called judges. And they will be appointed by an executive who determines how much police power will be used in any given situation. And the instructions on how this police force will be used will be "discretionary and reasonable." And the judge, again, determines what is "reasonable."
Is there some kind of cyclical, "common law" logic at work here?
So the downtrodden and just as oppressed white racists, in obedience to Fanon's psychological tenet, turn on downtrodden browns and blacks. Those with the law and money on their side always win.
Do you feel that 50-plus years of cop shows in TV-land are mere "accident?" How about TV as subtle propaganda vehicle for the national idolatry, cop-worship? i.e. worship of power symbols and the uniformed individuals who wield it on the streets. Start with Eliot Ness and his Untouchables through Dragnet through Adam-12 through NYPD through SWAT through The F.B.I. through CSI. You get the picture. Week after week, TV season after TV season, re-run after re-run: We adore our cop shows, we adore our cops...
And just now some people are beginning to realize that their authentic TV American "idols" can actually lose their temper in real life and shoot them like dogs?
If impeachment is "off the table" for war criminals, why shouldn't their "representatives" on the street also have "conviction off the table?" And don't get me started on the current imperial zeitgeist that allows all women (American and Iraqi) to be raped with impunity in a war zone...
God Save the Republic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]