Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Loves Promoting Torture Promoters

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 3:06 PM on January 25, 2008.


The Bush Administration nominates one of its favorite pro-torture lawyers for a top DOJ post. Again.
bradbury190
Bradbury

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Liliana Segura in your
mailbox!

 

I know all eyes were on FISA, but also this week, the White House re-nominated one of its favorite pro-torture lawyers to a top DOJ post.

Steven G. Bradbury is, as reported by yesterday's New York Times, "the author of classified memorandums that gave approval to harsh interrogation techniques, including head slapping, exposure to cold and simulated drowning, even when used in combination." It's only natural that the Bush administration would want to promote such a man to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Council. But in this case, he pretty much already has the job. In fact, he's been running the office for two years -- Senate confirmation be damned.

I find this mystifying, and apparently, so do the Democrats, who have been protesting for months that Bradbury occupies his post illegally.

For some back story, this post -- conveniently titled, "Who Is Steve Bradbury?" -- might help. Among other things, it provides some of his greatest hits:

Throughout 2006, Bradbury argued forcefully that the Supreme Court's rejection of the administration's military tribunals in terrorism cases was incorrectly decided. He argued that Geneva Conventions language barring "humiliating and degrading treatment" was hopelessly vague, and subject to "uncertain and unpredictable application." He was a leading advocate of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which revoked habeas corpus for terrorism detainees. He authored an opinion immunizing ex-White House counsel Harriet Miers from testifying in the U.S. attorneys investigation…

A spokesman for Sen. Dick Durbin, who has been a leading critic of Bradbury's tenure, said yesterday that "the president has thumbed his nose at Congress" (again) by picking (again) "an individual who has been involved in authorizing some of the most controversial policies of this administration." Durbin, of course, is a member of the Senate Judiciary, which will have to, um, approve the nomination.

At least in theory.

Or something.

Digg!

Liliana Segura is an AlterNet staff writer and editor of the Rights & Liberties section.


Out-of-Control Rick Perry Overrides Rare Clemency Vote, Executes Man Who Killed No One
The TX Board of Pardons voted to spare the life of Robert Lee Thompson, who took part in a robbery that led to a murder. The killer is serving life. Perry chose to kill him anyway.
November 20, 2009.
Limbaugh Calls Palin Memoir "One of Most Substantive Policy Books I've Read"
Here's what to read instead.
November 13, 2009.
Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
November 9, 2009.
CNBC Reporter: NYC Marathon Winner Not Really American, "He's Like a Ringer You Hire to Work a Couple Hours at Your Office"
For the first time since 1982, a U.S. citizen won the New York City marathon. For sports writer Darren Rovell, "it's not as good as it sounds."
November 3, 2009.
In the U.S., Veterans Come Home From War Only To See Relatives Executed By the State
"I can go fight in another country to uphold peace and liberty ... but I can't uphold peace, liberty, and equality for my own brother."
October 27, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?