Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Supreme Court Justice David Souter to Retire

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 6:17 AM on May 1, 2009.


Although details are scarce, Supreme Court Justice David Souter reportedly plans to retire at the end of his term.
davidsouter

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Liliana Segura in your
mailbox!

 

Multiple news outlets are reporting that Supreme Court Judge David Souter will retire from the bench at the end of his term.

NPR reports:

NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter is planning to retire at the end of the current court term.
The vacancy will give President Obama his first chance to name a member of the high court and begin to shape its future direction.
At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court. In fact, he is in the younger half of the court's age range, with five justices older and just three younger. So far as anyone knows, he is in good health. But he has made clear to friends for some time that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire. Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Factors in his decision no doubt include the election of President Obama, who would be more likely to appoint a successor attuned to the principles Souter has followed as a moderate-to-liberal member of the court's more liberal bloc over the past two decades.
In addition, Souter was apparently satisfied that neither the court's oldest member, 89-year-old John Paul Stevens, nor its lone woman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had cancer surgery over the winter, wanted to retire at the end of this term. Not wanting to cause a second vacancy, Souter apparently had waited to learn his colleagues' plans before deciding his own.

NPR has more.

Justice Souter made headlines in recent years when Jeffrey Toobin, author of The Nine, revealed that, following the Court's fateful decision in Bush v. Gore, "it was not at all clear whether [Souter] would remain as a justice ... That the Court met in a city he loathed made the decision even harder. At the urging of a handful of close friends, he decided to stay on, but his attitude toward the Court was never the same."

As one legal analyst said, "Souter was a terrible disappointment to the first President Bush, who appointed him with hopes that he'd be a solid conservative like his contemporary nominee, Justice Clarence Thomas. But that never happened ... Souter went and stayed in the middle."

Digg!

Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and War on Iraq Special Coverage.


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
November 9, 2009.
CNBC Reporter: NYC Marathon Winner Not Really American, "He's Like a Ringer You Hire to Work a Couple Hours at Your Office"
For the first time since 1982, a U.S. citizen won the New York City marathon. For sports writer Darren Rovell, "it's not as good as it sounds."
November 3, 2009.
In the U.S., Veterans Come Home From War Only To See Relatives Executed By the State
"I can go fight in another country to uphold peace and liberty ... but I can't uphold peace, liberty, and equality for my own brother."
October 27, 2009.
Anti-Dobbs Movement Overshadows CNN's "Latino In America" Special
CNN's much publicized series was largely eclipsed by controversy over CNN's resident xenophobe, Lou Dobbs.
October 23, 2009.
Pat Buchanan's Latest Racist Rant: "Traditional Americans Are Losing Their Nation"
And by "traditional," he means "white."
October 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Whaddya know...
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 30, 2009 11:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, boy! The Wing-Nuts are up late tonight, strategizing and inputting shit for the slime machine that's starting to warm up. I can only imagine the onslaught that they will unleash! A Supreme Court nominee! They've been waiting and waiting for this chance. If we think they've been obstructionist lately, it's only been the beginning.

I remember distinctly before the election, the name of Cass Sunstein being bandied about during discussions of who Obama may appoint to the Court, if the chance came up.

Not good.

He got his law degree from Harvard. Taught at University of Chicago Law School and Harvard Law School. He clerked for Thurgood Marshall. He's married to Samantha Power.

From wikipedia:

"Sunstein is a proponent of judicial minimalism, arguing that judges should focus primarily on deciding the case at hand, and avoid making sweeping changes to the law or decisions that have broad-reaching effects. He is generally thought to be liberal despite publicly supporting some of George W. Bush's judicial nominees, including Michael W. McConnell and John G. Roberts. Much of his work also brings behavioral economics to bear on law, suggesting that the "rational actor" model will sometimes produce an inadequate understanding of how people will respond to legal intervention."

I would say he has the inside track, but isn't a sure thing.

I would suggest people go to the archives of AlterNet and look up the interview Amy Goodman did with Cass Sunstein and Glen Greenwald. Very enlightening.

It's called:

How Should the Next President Deal with the Bush White House's Crimes?
By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted July 26, 2008.

This is going to be very interesting...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whaddya know... Posted by: goldmarx
» RE: Whaddya know... Posted by: Quannah
Extradict for Prosecution Scalia for 'Punishment' Statement
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 1, 2009 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies do NOT derserve to be afforded the right to prosecution under Our laws. The committed Interantional War crimes and implicated all three branches of Gov't and numerous agencies and Offices.
although I am a great advocate for making SCOTUS a TRUE thrid Branch of Gov't- they too must be held accountable for Decisions and statement they make...Namely Scalia. He attempted to split the hair of 'Punishment' vs Torture. If you haven't been found guilty, all coercive methods used on you can not be considered 'Punishment'. In his mind Torture is Punishment, so since they had not been tried- they were not being punished,aka Tortured..What kind of Fucked up twisted logic is that?
I am sick of this false agrument about whether we should hold hearings, have a truth commission or assign a Special prosecutor....Sweethearts we Lost the Right to make such decisions when they choose to use those techniques. The International Red Cross- with no Political agenda to assert deemed these methods torture...It's out of our hands.
It's not just the Bushies on trial now but our military, our congress, our Office of the presidency, or entire Legal system, in fact our Demcoracy is in question when an Elected VP responds to the majorities demand to get out of Iraq with "So"!
Honestly I Cheer Obama's effort to provide prosecutable evidence to the international community. Now he just has to acknowledge we will extradict them as requested. this will not only allow US to save face, it will re affirm the Gov't is back under our control. We recognize and admit they were operating far beyond our laws and the international communities- and we will allow them to determine how justice will be served.The Bushies and all their minions do not deserve the rights or protections provided under our legal system since they are the ones who brought it's legitmacy into question.
Now if we want to prosecute them for any number of Treasonous acts- so be it. But this torture issue is out of our realm of jurisprudence. Made you bed boys and girls, lie back...the needle will only hurt for a moment (if you're lucky)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE FOREVER DECISIONS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 1, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't appoint judges who fill the needs we have today and disregard future needs when we don't know what they are. Bush's appointments are already 'out of style'. They are much too resricted and narrow in their thinking to mull over today's legal and ethical matters. Their pattern of decision making is cookie cutter style. These people don't change the local zoning laws. What they do is forever. If their personal beliefs interfere with their ability to interpret the constitution in a fair manner, they are not acceptable. Bush made a mockery of the court. I believe that Obama has far more respect for the institution and will act accordingly. It's not about what they're arguing about this week, what they do is forever. Judges with a narrow focus and inablity to look ahead are unacceptable. If the Crazy Right is getting crazier, that's to be expected. They should be ignored. Remember who got ignored when Bush make his appointments? They'll have to sit this one out and shut up. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Justice Souter
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on May 1, 2009 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for your years of public service on a historic RW court. You tried your best. I can't imagine the bull you had to endure!! Yes..go home and retire. You deserve it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you Justice Souter Posted by: VZEQICVA