Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Hillary Harassed by Sexists Saying "Iron My Shirt"

Posted by Cara Kulwicki, The Curvature at 7:03 AM on January 10, 2008.


And the AP says it "might" be sexist?

Click for larger version

I woke up this morning, turned on the computer, opened my web browser and this is the first headline that I saw: Protesters ask Clinton to Iron Shirts.

That’s how you know it’s going to be a good day.

Must. Breathe.

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign stop was interrupted Monday when two men stood in the crowd and began screaming, “Iron my shirt!” during one of her final appearances before the New Hampshire primary.

Clinton, a former first lady running to become the nation’s first female president, laughed at the seemingly sexist protest that suggested a woman’s place is doing the laundry and not running the country.

“Ah, the remnants of sexism — alive and well,” Clinton said to applause in a school auditorium.

The two men were removed from the hall after raising a pair of signs that said, “Iron my shirt!” They also shouted the same slogan. [. . .]

“As I think has been abundantly demonstrated, I am also running to break through the highest and hardest glass ceiling,” she said.

Clinton later joked about the incident as she invited questions.

“If there’s anyone left in the auditorium who wants to learn how to iron a shirt, I’ll talk about that,” she said with a smile.

Oh, really AP reporter Philip Elliot? The protest was seemingly sexist? Wow, I didn’t see that one coming. After all, these things can be so hard to tell.

I can’t yet decide if I’m impressed or annoyed by Clinton’s casual and affable response. I know; she didn’t have a choice. An angrier, more feminist reaction might have worked for New Hampshire audiences, but wouldn’t have gone over well on a national stage. And yesterday, the media had already gained enough sexist fodder to use against her. So. Impressed, I guess.

Now the biggest question: will any of the other candidates feel compelled to make a snarky remark about the incident?

Digg!

Cara Kulwicki is the founder of The Curvature, where she blogs daily about a wide range of feminist issues.


"Ono" They Didn't
Right-wing propagandists have used John Lennon's "Imagine" in a film without permission. Yoko Ono fights back.
April 28, 2008.
Bush Official: Doctor's Right to Withold Info Greater Than Patient's Right to Receive It
The Bush Administration has already said that doctors should be able to deny medical care to women. Now they want to deny information, too.
March 27, 2008.
Maryland School District Violates Pregnant Students' Rights
Informing parents of a student's pregnancy is bad policy for pregnant women and for families -- but it's standard anti-choice politicking.
February 8, 2008.
Sexual Violence Escalates in Kenya
As violence in Kenya reaches epidemic proportions, rape is again used as a tool of war against women and girls.
January 29, 2008.
Roe Under Attack, Now More Than Ever
2007 was a particularly bad year for reproductive freedom. In 2008, voting pro-choice is crucial in order to move past Roe's limitations.
January 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I think her reaction was perfect
Posted by: goeswithness on Jan 10, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you get angry, it implies that the other person has power over you. It implies that you need their approval or permission to move on. To get angry would have been to lose her control of the situation. It would have been wrong to ignore it - she needs to step up to the plate and not be intimidated by it. What she did was basically say "yeah, you're an idiot, but you can't slow me down."

She's not my candidate, but I have to admit I admire her savvy in dealing with the pressures.

You are right about the report. "Seemingly" sexist? Is he afraid he's going to get sued?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fools With Wrinkly Shirts
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 10, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I heard about this I had to laugh. Unless the protesters were plants from the Clinton campaign, what they shouted made them look like real idiots. "Iron my shirt!"??? I mean, if they were REAL anti-Hillary sexists, as opposed to Clinton-backers in disguise, couldn't they come up with something better to yell that would not make them look SSSOOO idiotic?
Why couldn't they have heckled Clinton on the real issues, such as her vote to go to war in Iraq? Hey, even if they had instead yelled something about the "murder" of Vince Foster they would have looked far less foolish. The whole things rings kind of funny to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

iron my shirts
Posted by: bitsfick on Jan 10, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do men like that ever get laid? Not being able to speak from a woman's point of view, but still I have to wonder what kind of woman would want a sexist pig like that climbing on top of her. What kind of lovers must they be, when their their idea of foreplay is "hey bitch iron my shirt? The only reason they are telling a woman to iron their shirts is because no one makes a blow up doll that can do laundry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No, they don't get laid... Posted by: Cooltruth
» No Posted by: goeswithness
» They probably do Posted by: SalB
"Why? Can't you iron your own shirt?"
Posted by: Cooltruth on Jan 10, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what she ought to have said to wrinkley shirt. She could stand to hone up her thinking on her feet skills a little to get a better handle on the situation. What if his favorite male candidate got some dork with a sign that said "Mow My Lawn" showing up at their rallies?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexism in american politics
Posted by: peacelf on Jan 10, 2008 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, there are some men who would rather see women ironing clothes than running a country. However, this overt sexism is nothing compared to the covert sexism rampant in america.

The predominance of white males in power in america goes beyond simple physical gender identification. Indeed, the white patriarchal power structure remains intact despite the alternative gender or skin color of the individual pursuing power. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are perfect examples of white patriarchal power moving beyond gender and race.

That Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama do not challenge racism and sexism inherent in patriarchal white supremacy america is endemic of how much power white males have. It is less about what IS said, than about what ISN'T said during the campaign. Hillary's "silence" on issues of gender roles, white male power, the inequalities created by a perponderance of power in the hands of a few, sexism, racism, unequal pay, the disproportionate distribution of wealth, etc. etc. etc. more than implies that she is part of the system, not a countervailing force for change. The same goes for Obama.

One could argue that it is necessary at this point in history for a woman or person of color to run for office and "play by the [white male power] rules" in order to break new ground, break the glass ceiling, etc. I have succumb to that argument many times, but I still have hope that a genuinely caring, compassionate candidate--one who listens to the will of the people!--will move beyond the white male owned mainstream media's selection-control process and become a viable candidate for president.

Until then, the Hillaries and Baracks will just be a side show to distract us from white patriarchal supremacy. And, the unlikely challengers to white male power, the Kuciniches, will be reduced to nonentities by the powerful forces garnered against real social, political and economic change.

peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» RE: HOOK LINE AND SINKER Posted by: Timba
» RE: HOOK LINE AND SINKER Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
Put up job.
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jan 10, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, yes, there really are men that clueless out there.

I still think the Clinton campaign paid them to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MY THOUGHT EXACTLY! Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
Conveinent Sexists...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jan 10, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder how much Hillary or Gloria Steinem paid those sexists..I could use some extra pocket money..!

Ok so I am cynical Machiavellian even..

Is that wrong..?

Who cares..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conveinent Sexists... Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
pdennany
Posted by: Pop on Jan 10, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Iron my Shirt" dirt balls were planted, and had the desired effect. Mission accomplished.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I call BS! That is a blatent setup!
Posted by: Ras3hilton on Jan 10, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's nothing wrong with a woman being president, in fact I would love to see it happen. I would gladly vote for a woman, just not that woman.

Can't we get past this knee jerk reactionism to every claim of sexism? Of course the entire world is ruled by patriarchy. Yes, we know. But to vote in another Clinton, is a shallow and misguided attempt to correct millenia worth of sexism.

And it won't correct anything. It will be business as usual. Which is scary.

I'll tell you, whether you want to hear it or not, Hillary is playing her strongest card over and over. And I'm not giving her any sympathy. Dirty tricks is par for the course and this is the perfect one because if you make that accusation it gets immediately turned back around on you. That whole ordeal (and the numerous others)is a frame up-Clinton style.

And her husband was a crappy leader too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Those "hecklers" are about as genuine as
Posted by: CharliePatton on Jan 10, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeff Rense's wig.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You have to wonder.
Posted by: Longdream on Jan 10, 2008 4:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would her response have been if the room hadn't been full of press?

Assholes: "Iron My Shirt!"

Hillary: "Kiss My Ass!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexism in the poll results
Posted by: janelynne on Jan 11, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew Kohut said on NPR yeasterday, when trying to explain the lousy poll predictions, that the people who voted for Hillary in New Hampshire "were less educated and poorer." (presumably dumb poor women.)
Then a woman called in the talk show and said that perhaps lots of women voted for Hillary in secret because they didn't want to tell their husbands.
Whoever says there is no sexism in all of this isn't paying attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]