Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fox’s Oliver North Blames Times Square Bombing on Pelosi and House Democrats

Posted by Satyam Khanna, Think Progress at 11:14 AM on March 7, 2008.


North’s comments are a sad attempt to politicize a tragic bombing.
Fox’s Oliver North Blames Times Square Bombings On Pelosi And House Democrats

Yesterday, a “shadowy figure on a bicycle” planted a small bomb that shattered the glass facade of the military recruiting station in Times Square in New York City. An investigation into the incident has begun.

Fox News’ Ollie North, however, has found his scapegoat. This morning, he said the incident may have been prevented had the House and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) granted a renewal of the Protect America Act:

Last month, of course, the U.S. House of Representatives under the direction of Nancy Pelosi went on vacation rather than voting on the Protect America Act, which provided for wiretapping of terrorists making phone calls into and out of the United States to foreign places.

And I note that it would have been a lot easier, perhaps, to find out who did this, or even to know that they were planning it, had we been able to intercept those communications.

North’s comments are a sad attempt to politicize a tragic bombing. In reality, surveillance that began under the law will be able to continue, and intelligence officials can initiate new surveillance against suspected terrorists by simply getting a warrant through the FISA court. The warrants can even be obtained after the surveillance has begun. North, however, conveniently failed to mention this.

Conservatives have stalled Congress from negotiating on the PAA. Last week, Senate GOP leaders blocked another extension of the PAA. In fact, the Politico reported this week that some Republicans are boycotting the negotation meetings.

North’s statements echo CNN’s Glenn Beck, who said recently, “Nancy Pelosi will end up killing Americans.”

Digg!

Satyam Khanna is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


McCain Jokes About Killing Iranians With American Tobacco Exports
"Joke" earns candidate a poke in the back from Mrs. McCain.
July 9, 2008.
Rep. Waxman Threatens to Hold Contempt Vote on AG Mukasey
Mukasey must produce FBI interview with Cheney, or face the consequences.
July 8, 2008.
McCain Advisor Charlie Black Defended Infamous Racist Ad
"I advised Jesse Helms to do what he's always done," Black said.
July 7, 2008.
Sy Hersh: U.S. Escalating Covert Ops in Iran
CIA and JSOC running unprecedented cross-border ops to destabilize Iran.
June 30, 2008.
Today in Chutzpah: Rove Rips NYT for Outing CIA Agent!
Rove being "pretty disingenuous," McClellan admits.
June 25, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A shadowy figure on a bicycle?
Posted by: sliver on Mar 7, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where was Floyd Landis at that time? He may have had something to do with it, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why?
Posted by: charemor1 on Mar 7, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't this shithead Oliver North in prison for shredding documents and lying back in the Reagan years?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ollie North
Posted by: badkitty on Mar 7, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ollie North never had any problems breaking laws when he worked for Reagan. I have no idea why he's so upset about this, when the things he did in Iran Contra caused so much more damage. But, since I'm not really up on the news, was anyone hurt? Was just glass broken? Any evidence that it was a foreign terrorist whose phone calls might have been intercepted from overseas? It seems pretty mickey mouse to me, but maybe I just don't have as many facts as Ollie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Overseas Terrorist Plot Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Overseas Terrorist Plot Posted by: rinthy
So he's gunning for...
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Mar 7, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...inclusion on Olbermann's worst person in the world tonight? There's no bad press, Ollie.

Fight the Youth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you should always expect horseshit
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 7, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to come from a horse's ass


a traitor in and out of uniform. and just another cog in the fox fraud squad- garbage in, garbage out, etc . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do I have to say Semper Fi to this Imbecile if I meet him?
Posted by: Corpsman1 on Mar 7, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a form Navy/Marine corpsman, I still have to call North a total dunce. What a dope to make such assertions. He is totally off his rocker...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once an ASS
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Mar 7, 2008 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Always an Ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coincidence? Shocking.
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 7, 2008 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the House Dems have signaled that they will give in completely to Bush AGAIN with a "compromise" on FISA, giving Big Telecom immunity and Bush his expanded spying powers.
(Shocking!)

And, as for the recruitment center bombing, the whole things strikes me as fishy, almost like (cough cough) someone who wants the expanded spying powers and telecom immunity might have been behind this in actuality.
Funny how the bombing happened just as the House was considering giving Bush everything he wants in regards to FISA, almost like someone was telling the House Dems not to slip up, and telling them to be very afraid.
And, oh yeah, I think Ollie knows who really was behind the bombing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More likely that this event was staged to support S.1959
Posted by: LeftWright on Mar 7, 2008 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(the Senate version of H.R. 1955) now under consideration in the Senate by a committee on which Sen. Obama sits.

Any of you rabid Obama supporters willing to ask your candidate where he stands on this odious bit of legislation?

(May we all get to see the day when Mr. North gets his very own orange jumpsuit)

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

did anyone notice the false anti-clinton story posted by alternet?
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Mar 7, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the "NAFTAgate" story a few back is false.
it was not the clinton camp that secretly reached out to the Canadian government to assure them that they were lying to the american public with regards to changing NAFTA, it was the Obama camp.
so clinon did not "frame" obama, and clinton did not lie, it was actually Obama that was misleading the voters about his position, and he sent Goolsbie to reassure the "conservative" (canadian republicans) govt that he had no intentions of doing what he had promised publicly.

and even better, it was the "conservative" (republican) gov't that then mislead the press into believing it was a clinton aide and not an obama aide (goolsbie): why are the canadian conservatives (republicans) trying to help derail the clinton campaign while having private consultations with obama?

here is the story

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ollie North probably knows the bomber himself.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 7, 2008 5:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black propaganda operations in New York? Or just some idiot out for kicks?

Same difference, really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton did not want the guns-and-drugs connection to Mena to come out
Posted by: wagadog on Mar 7, 2008 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone I knew in grad school who had been an Air National Guardsman in AR said he'd physically loaded/unloaded coke and guns at Mena, planes coming to and from Nicaragua. He told me this in the mid-80's well before there were any "conspiracy theories" like "Iran Contra" that, oh just turned out to be quite true.

Of course Clinton dropped the investigation. It would have implicated him, since he was governor of Arkansas during the Iran-Contra activity.

And we're supposed to vote for his aging head boo-ton. Riiiight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seems the traitor Ollie,
Posted by: drfun on Mar 7, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't recall the illegal and impeachable offenses he committed under Reagan with Iran-Contra.
He was the 80's version as a "Merchant of Death".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Because...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 7, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We really should get all of our political analysis from felons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Republican Tool
Posted by: tornadorider2002 on Mar 7, 2008 6:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jesus Tapdancing Christ! Only low IQ, fearful dimwits and bible-humping cement heads watch Fox news...or should I say, FAUX news. I would certainly develop brain cancer if I relied on Fox for my information, because there's only so much toxic crap that one can ingest before bad things internally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOX loves the terrorists
Posted by: aalif ba ta tha on Mar 7, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just imagine if it was a Democrat who sold arms to IRAN in the 80s, FOX would still be spinning the story and every Joe Six-pack in America would be cursing those hate America terrorist-loving liberals. Ollie North does it and he gets a god damn red carpet. FOX is the dumb preaching to the dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

North is a traitor.
Posted by: leland61 on Mar 7, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ollie North is a traitor and has committed treason. What I'd like to know is why he is not in prison for life?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Just In
Posted by: Kevbo on Mar 8, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ollie condemns left-wing bicycle manufacturers for providing transport to terrorists.

Bush offers Schwinn and Huffy immunity for assistance in warrantless investigation into American cycling habits.

Bike Messengers: Messengers Of Terror?

Ollie North: Obama's bicycle riding in youth training for recruiting office bombing?

Ollie North: Obama or OBOMBa?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"a tragic bombing?"
Posted by: kingharvest on Mar 8, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How in the world can anyone call this a 'tragic bombing." A bomb in Iraq that kills hundreds, I'd call that a tragic bombing. A "bomb" that breaks a window?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "a tragic bombing?" Posted by: Tim Brown
Midway54
Posted by: Midway54 on Mar 8, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lollie was in the right place to spout his usual bilge: Fox Newstwisters Channel.

When he was operating in Reagan's White House basement busily engaged in breaking the law contained in the Boland Amendment that prohibited all U.S. assistance to the alleged freedom fighters in Nicaragua, Lollie wore a suit. In due time, the shredding machines were working at full throttle. When he appeared before the joint congressional committee hearing into the Iran-Contra affair, he wore his Marine uniform adorned with medals and assumed a pouty, determined, patriotic Boy Scout image as he testified. He was indicted for his part in the scandal, but the indictment was overturned by the DC Circuit because his testimonial evidence presented to support the indictment fell within the immunity granted to him by the Committee. His contempt for the law as a Marine officer was outrageous. Currently, he is just another of the rightwinger propagandists in the Fox cesspool, and like the rest of them is an idol of the Dupes and other crackpots at large in the Country who gather regularly at the TV for their daily brainwashing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Democrats went on vacation and "terrorism" happened?
Posted by: Tim Brown on Mar 8, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does that mean if W. didn't go on vacation then 9/11 would never have happened?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does anyone care
Posted by: Schroeder on Mar 8, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what what Ollie North, Mr. lying Iran-Contra, corrupt republican has to say about anything? He exemplifies what is wrong with main stream media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE MAKE IT EASY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 8, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't necessary for anyone to tap phones or hack computers for e-mail to find out what Americans are up to. Just turn on the television and the news reporters are spilling their guts 24/7. The speculation and reporting of the bombing in Times Square makes us look plain stupid. The only thing missing from the video is Charlie Chaplin. Don't we deserve a little more respect? And what about the Marines? Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shameless plug
Posted by: 2dogarage on Mar 8, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the warrantless surveillance right wing agenda. He then goes on to say that he thinks it's probably a case of vandalism and not terrorism...

What a shmuck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do we expect?
Posted by: Longdream on Mar 8, 2008 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is Ollie North.

The guy who described the Iran-Contra deal as "Neat!"

Maybe we can get him to endorse Clinton, like Rush does. That will fix her wagon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do we expect? Posted by: Schroeder
Ever since Iran-Contra
Posted by: surfreality on Mar 8, 2008 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've labeled my office shredder "Ollie".

Now he says this:
"Last month, of course, the U.S. House of Representatives under the direction of Nancy Pelosi went on vacation rather than voting on the Protect America Act, which provided for wiretapping of terrorists making phone calls into and out of the United States to foreign places.

And I note that it would have been a lot easier, perhaps, to find out who did this, or even to know that they were planning it, had we been able to intercept those communications."

It is hardly likely that this was a foreign act. So it seems to me like this is an implicit admission from Ollie that he's in favor of wire tapping everybody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bdcocker
Posted by: antman on Mar 9, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't realize Olie North was already out of prison! Oh, that's right I don't recall at this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A paid hack on a libelous Faux teletubbie
Posted by: Bearzerker on Mar 10, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... look at the source, and the paid informant...

do people still watch Fox?...
I thought we were boycotting them still?
them and all those that advertise on Fox news programming

well I am anyways, and have been for a few years now...
who's with me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my time
Posted by: tirebiter on Mar 13, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was going to write a piece about north , but it's so pathetic, it's just not worth it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]