Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Eye-Popping Numbers: 220 Million People at Risk of Death

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 1:15 PM on September 18, 2008.


110 million ended up in imminent danger during the past two years.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Joshua Holland in your
mailbox!

 

Note: This is the blurb I sent out with this week's Corporate Accountability and Workplace newsletter. If you haven't signed up for it, you really should. I send subscribers our best econ coverage -- including stories that don't get onto the front page -- along with news of the latest studies, a little quote, a rant or a factoid of the week. Sign up here.

*****

I've written quite a bit about the economic pain so many American families are feeling -- about the mortgage crisis, stagnant wages amid spiraling costs, the assault on unions, the decline in upward mobility in the U.S. economy and the increasing difficulty people have of achieving the "American Dream."

I want to to take a moment, though, in the midst of our financial system's current meltdown, to consider the plight people in other, less affluent parts of the world, are facing in a time of global crisis. Wrap your head around this stunning fact: the number of people living on the "edge of emergency" -- nearing famine -- has doubled over just the past two years, according to Care International. That means that 110 million more human beings are on the brink of disaster today than in 2006.

The BBC reports, "too much money is being spent on short-term fixes during emergencies, rather than on longer-term prevention work."

"Care says a failure to resolve the underlying issues trapping people in extreme poverty has left millions now unable to cope with surging food prices. In countless previous emergencies, aid has often arrived too late, was short-term, and policies were targeted too heavily on saving lives rather than building resilience in the population, the report says."

I interviewed economist Dean Baker in 2005. He had been predicting that the housing bubble would burst for some time, and told me that he could see Americans' incomes dropping by as much as 40 percent, an eye-opening number. Nobody knows how deep the crisis will go, but if he's right, our average incomes would bottom out at about $27,000, give or take a grand.

According to the United Nations, 80 percent of the world's population lives on $10 per day or less.

Just a little perspective.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Secret Service: Sarah Palin's Rhetoric Led to Spike in Death Threats Against Obama
News of the obvious ...
November 8, 2008.
Krauthammer Bashes Wishy-Washy Conservatives Defecting from McCain
It's all about more war for Dr. Strangelove.
October 24, 2008.
Sorry, Barack, but Our Lifestyle Is Going to Have to Change
But you can't say that on the campaign trail ...
October 23, 2008.
Dow Dips Below 8,000; Anxiety, Anger at all Time Highs
The long-held dominant economic paradigm is under fire.
October 10, 2008.
Fixing the Financial Mess Would Be Easier if We Weren't Dealing with the World's Worst Scumbags
Corporate America has earned the 'crisis of legitimacy' in which it now finds itself.
October 9, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Perspective
Posted by: samd11 on Sep 18, 2008 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank-you, Mr. Holland. I have been very aware of how different our lives are when compared to the lives of those in other, less fortunate countries after travelling in Kenya and Egypt. Perspective is something that needs to be developed by travel and reading. Watching reality shows on T.V. just won't do it! Peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good work, Joshua!
Posted by: djnoll on Sep 20, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You do bring some perspective to this problem. I find myself this morning wondering though whether perspective is the right word, or if prophetic is more accurate.

I was discussing this week's financial meltdown with my 82 year old right-wing Republican mother this week, and she noted that she had heard about the rise of tent cities in several areas around the country. Apparently it started as people who had lost their homes to foreclosure had gone out to the outskirts of towns and cities and set up tents to live in. The towns began to realize that this was a cheap form of housing for the poor, so they are expanding these tent cities, including proper sanitation facilities, as a way of handling the increasing numbers of homeless as the result of job losses and foreclosures. She said it made her think of the Depression and the migrant camps that occurred then.

Unfortunately, perhaps what you have reported here is not so far from home?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Access to resources is the fundamental issue, not income
Posted by: daniel347x on Sep 20, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Inequality is arguably one of the primary roots of poverty, as well as breakdown of community (as globalization shatters local involvement in the political system) and the destruction of the planet's ecosystems.

Poverty is difficult to measure, because it includes quality-of-life issues in addition to issues of physical survival such as access to food, water, shelter, and medicine. Even with these measures, though, there are a vast number of people throughout the world who live in poverty or dire poverty.

However, income is more a measure of integration with the world's monetary economic system than it is a measure of privation. There are economic and social systems "under the radar", not yet usurped or controlled by capitalist globalization, that support many people throughout the world whose culture has not yet been forced into the global monetary economy - or those who have wrested control back and whose livelihoods are no longer completely tied to the monetary economy. Examples are common, from squatters in the land reclamation movement in Brazil to peasant movements in Columbia.

It is misleading and oversimplifying, though common on the Left, to overlook this urgent economic struggle and assume that monetary income equates directly to poverty and a low quality of life. Taking this mistaken approach interferes with our ability to tackle the global economic system and implies an underlying agreement with the global economic capitalist monetary system. There are some people who live on $4 a day in China who are healthier and have a better quality of life than some people in the slums of Baltimore who live on $40 a day.

The fundamental issue is about inequality, distribution of wealth, social control over capital, and the strength of alternative economic systems - not monetary income.

I think that is a more useful way to put things into perspective than the approach Joshua Holland has suggested.

Dan Nissenbaum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOTICE THAT WE HAVE NEARLY AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF MONEY TO ESTABLISH SOCIALISM
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Sep 21, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the rich. Re the current wall street bailouts, but socialism or social programs for the poor or the middle class would be sinful. When do we stand up on our hind legs and demand our rights. Eric Hoffer was amazed that the middle class was so passive.

How is it that we as a people allow social morals that are so nasty and perverted? Yet on the subject of private morals, often kept hidden, selfrighteousness has reached a level of obnoxiousness that is unbearable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.