Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

One in Three Returning Vets Suffer from Brain Injuries, Mental Health Problems

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 6:00 AM on April 18, 2008.


And many are not getting care -- it's a betrayal on an epic scale.

Last month, hundreds of veterans who had served in the "War on Terror" gathered at the Winter Soldier hearings in Washington. They had come from across the country to give testimony about what they'd experienced in Iraq and Afghanistan (and elsewhere).

They were young -- young enough to make this 38 year-old observer feel over the hill. Some fit the stereotype of the rough-and-ready American soldier -- the invincible John Rambos of American lore -- but most were average, some skinny. Many appeared small without the bulky body armor with which we're accustomed to seeing them in news reports.

They are our nation's kids. They might have been young men and women on any American campus -- there was the usual abundance of tattoos and piercings -- but there was a difference.

Many were broken, some grievously injured in battle, some missing limbs. All of the vets with whom I spoke had obvious psychic scars; several exhibited unconscious facial ticks as they spoke. As I talked to one young woman -- she couldn't have been more than 22 or 23 -- I thought to myself, 'oh, that's what those Vietnam vets mean when they talk about a thousand-yard stare.'

When we consider about the costs of these occupations, as tax-payers, we shouldn't forget that we're getting off cheaply. The Iraqi people have paid the dearest price for Bush's adventure in the Middle East, and, after them, it's been the 1.7 million Americans who have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan at one time or another over the past five years who have had to bear the greatest burden.

A new study brings that burden -- or part of it -- into sharp relief. From the Boston Globe:

The latest and most comprehensive study of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars has concluded that nearly 1 in every 5 veterans is suffering from depression or stress disorders and that many are not getting adequate care.

The study shows that mental disorders are more prevalent and lasting than previously known, surfacing belatedly and lingering after troops have been discharged into civilian and family life.

An estimated 300,000 veterans among the nearly 1.7 million who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan are battling depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. More than half of those people, according to the study conducted by the Rand Corp., are slipping through the cracks in the bureaucratic system, going without necessary treatment.

"We call it '360-365' combat," said Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. "What that means is veterans are completely surrounded by combat for one year. Nearly all of our soldiers are under fire, or being subjected mortar rounds, or roadside bombs, or witnessing the deaths of civilians or fellow soldiers."

In addition to PTSD rates, the Rand study found that 19.5 percent of people who had served in Iraq or Afghanistan suffered a concussion or another traumatic brain injury during their combat tour, a number similar to Army estimates.

Taken together, the study shows that 31 percent of those who have served in combat have suffered brain injuries, stress disorders, or both.

Failure to treat disorders adequately can cost the government billions of dollars, said Lisa H. Jaycox, another of the study's authors.

Some service members avoid a diagnosis of a mental health problem, fearing negative consequences, according to the study. These troops worry about damage to their military careers and relationships with co-workers. "When we asked folks what was limiting them from getting the help that they need, among the top barriers that were reported were really negative career repercussions," said Terri Tanielian, one of the study's authors.

The people who claim they support our troops are the ones who want to keep sending them into the meat grinder for nothing, indefinitely. They support the troops in the abstract, as political props to muster support for a war that makes them feel powerful by proxy and gives meaning to their meaningless existence as good little American consumers.

It's a betrayal on an epic scale.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Dow Dips Below 8,000; Anxiety, Anger at all Time Highs
The long-held dominant economic paradigm is under fire.
October 10, 2008.
Fixing the Financial Mess Would Be Easier if We Weren't Dealing with the World's Worst Scumbags
Corporate America has earned the 'crisis of legitimacy' in which it now finds itself.
October 9, 2008.
World Markets Tank in Wake of Bailout Passage; Dow Dips Below 10,000
The message is: this won't work ...
October 6, 2008.
Gas Lines Return to U.S.: Let's Party Like it's 1973!
Gas shortages hit Southeast cities.
October 1, 2008.
Paul Newman Dead at 83
The actor had battled cancer.
September 27, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Disgraceful and unforgiveable
Posted by: charemor1 on Apr 18, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is completely disgraceful and unforgiveable. When is Bush and Co going to be held responsible for the damage they have done to our country and our young people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRICE OF OIL SKYROCKETS!
Posted by: BradKennedy on Apr 18, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're quick to complain about paying $3.25 per gallon to fill our tanks with gasoline but, as this report shows, that is the smallest part of the true cost of securing control of other peoples' petroleum reserves.

Brad Kennedy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flags, Bibles and human cattle
Posted by: LMNOP on Apr 18, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eventually Americans may come to understand that the American government doesn't work for them or care about them, although I have serious doubts. In fact, America views its people like cattle equivalents with verbal skills that exist to be exploited - like Eloi. The two great feel-good American religions, both frauds, generate the myths that are helpful to this purpose: patriotism and Christianity.

American cattle are employed in the at home in the workplace and abroad in the military. Their heads are filled with the necessary notions on Fox News and in church.

They hear the incessant chatter about freedom and democracy and American goodness and greatness in preserving and promoting it all over the world. Few notice the disconnect between the cant and the reality. Consider Iraq, where we are spreading peace, freedom, democracy and deliverance from tyranny and terrorism. LOL. So they enlist, are sent overseas to capture oil lacking sufficient numbers and sufficient protection, their brains are rattled by explosions, they are exposed to traumatic stress that leaves them shell-shocked, and they are continually irradiated with depleted uranium everywhere. When the get home, they get a rat-infested room at Walter Reed if they get anything at all, and then it's adios, as their veterans benefits get cut further. But everyone supports the troops and has magnetic ribbons on their cars (more a few years back, but it's still a popular sentiment).

And in church, they are taught submission to authority and to be happy with bupkiss. American Christianity is a program for conditioning the masses to tolerate exploitation. Every single bit of its teaching is designed to convince exploited people to accept that role and tolerate that state.

They are taught that it is blessed to be meek, to be poor, and to be humble in stature; to work hard, not complain, never to steal and never to lie; that however unfair life seems, it is their privilege to suffer for Christ, God has a plan for them and that all wrongs will be righted in heaven. And if massah smacks them, they are to turn the other cheek and forgive him with a smile, to be longsuffering and slow to anger. They are to be grateful just to have food. They are always to see the good, and if they can't, to rest assured that God does. It's in his plan.

Patriotism and Christianity are promulgated by people like George Bush and Pat Robertson in concert with Fox News. There's your conspiratorial trifecta: the government, the church and the media. And Americans still trust all three, albeit with a little griping. Suckahs!

It's so tiresome and depressing. Americans will never learn. They're hell-bent on being used, and they can't be saved, what with their flags and Bibles still being waved and thumped everywhere, sucking down beer and proclaiming themselves to be number one, the freest and best country in the world. LOL.

A few will reject the American Kool-Aid, even fewer will evacuate. The rest will be used and abused, then discarded, and articles like this one will continue to appear in places like this site where almost nobody will read them, liberals repeatedly being aghast at the hypocrisy and lawlessness and inhumanity and the lack of accountability. Yawn. The beat goes on.

I think that if you haven't figured it out yet, you never will. Forget about trying to save America. It's mortally wounded and terminally ill. Save yourselves.

Jeremiah Wright said "God damn America". That won't be necessary. Nor are terrorists aiming at America from anywhere. What a hoax. All that America's enemies need to do is pull up a chair with some popcorn and watch. There's no need or reason to throw matches at a burning building, or to risk going to prison by hurting America. It's like shooting somebody after they've jumped off of a tall building while they are plummeting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Seriously. Literally Posted by: LMNOP
bad logic
Posted by: Ripcord on Apr 18, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wrong decision: preemptively invade Iraq

Bad Logic:
Stay the course

1) to support our troops or

2) because their sacrifice shouldn't be wasted

Ergo, whenever one makes a wrong decision
never change your course of action

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

article implies that Iraq is somehow curing 2 out of 3 soldiers
Posted by: PakiBoy on Apr 18, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a fact that every soldier that has gone to Iraq suffers from a pschopathic personality disorder. In other words has a mental health problem.

So the article makes a false claim that only 1 in 3 returning soldier has a mental health problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Too Simplistic? Posted by: db
» RE: Too Simplistic? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» I disagree Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: I disagree Posted by: Joshua Holland
» You think the hypocrits are tough on you? Posted by: photon's feather
» Leadership? Posted by: Cathyc
Obviously the politicians in Washington, especially Bush 43...
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 18, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
didn't learn a goddamn thing from the Vietnam War!

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Washington Corruption Posted by: Cathyc
What John Rendon's information war against U.S. veterans looks like:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 18, 2008 2:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'll need a little background: Rolling Stone: The Man Who Sold the War
That's by James Bamford, the very rupatable author of "Body of Secrets", who knows what he's talking about.

There was a need to coordinate the bogus intelligence and feed it to the news reporters and the public in an artful way, and that is where outfits like the Rendon Group came in:

Rendon is a man who fills a need that few people even know exists. . .the Pentagon had secretly awarded him a $16 million contract to target Iraq and other adversaries with propaganda. One of the most powerful people in Washington, Rendon is a leader in the strategic field known as "perception management," manipulating information -- and, by extension, the news media -- to achieve the desired result.

His firm, the Rendon Group, has made millions off government contracts since 1991, when it was hired by the CIA to help "create the conditions for the removal of Hussein from power." Working under this extraordinary transfer of secret authority, Rendon assembled a group of anti-Saddam militants, personally gave them their name -- the Iraqi National Congress -- and served as their media guru and "senior adviser" as they set out to engineer an uprising against Saddam. It was as if President John F. Kennedy had outsourced the Bay of Pigs operation to the advertising and public-relations firm of J. Walter Thompson.


These are the people who come up with ideas like dressing reporters in chemical suits and having them stumble around in front of cameras in order to sell the idea that Saddam is making WMDs. You can read all about their role in Iraq at Pentagon Moved to Fix Iraqi Media Before Invasion, May 2007

In that case, the Pentagon outsourced the PR effort to three groups: the Rendon Group, the Lincoln Group, and SAIC - "Science Applications International" (see I was a Lincoln Group PR intern in Iraq, alternet, sept 2006)

Now, there is something called the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 which bans domestic government propaganda. There is an effort by certain bloggers to get this act repealed so that Rendon&Co. can do in the U.S. what they do already - generate domestic propaganda using taxpayer funds - but do it legally. Google "Smith-Mundt" and "repeal" - you'll get the Heritage Foundation saying: "Obsolete Restrictions on Public Diplomacy Hurt U.S. Outreach..."

So, that's all just background. What possible examples of massive domestic propaganda on the soldier issue are there?

Case#1: Bush Meets with America Supports You Groups
By Paul X. Rutz / American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, June 26, 2006 - President Bush met with representatives from 14 grassroots troop support groups at the White House today to talk about how they can best support America's servicemembers. . ."


Government-sponsored astroturf at the White House?

America Supporting Americans, Freedom Alliance (Ollie North!), Give 2 the Troops, Little Patriots Embraced, Operation Ensuring Christmas, Operation First Response, Wounded Warrior Project, United We Serve, Packed with Pride..."

Packed with something...

That's probably John Rendon's answer to Iraq Veterans Against the War, delivered in a style that Rendon's true master, Josef Goebbels, would have deeply admired.

However, there's a big glaring hole in their strategy, isn't there? It's called an aggressive prosecutor using Smith-Mundt to send them all to prison. Gotta get that repealed before Bush leaves office...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, our poor vets!
Posted by: logansafi on Apr 18, 2008 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh look what this war is doing to our poor boys and girls in uniform. Oh it is traumatizing them. They are full of stress, resentments, and depression. They need treatment. They need care. They need love.

Oh this war is so very, very wrong. Look what it has done to our men in uniform. Look at the cost. It's not right. It's not fair. The civilians don't have to pay such a cost. Oh boo-hoo-hoo.

Let's see now? These vets at least get medical care. I have worked in facility after facility and many of our health care workers are working sicker than the elderly our medical dysfunctional system preys off. And they are working without medical benefits! But they are civilians you see? So their trauma is not as great as our heroic fighting boys and girls in the Armed to the teeth Forces. They don't have 'post trauma stress syndrome' like the uniformed always seem to do. These poor ex-GIS need comp!

Yawn... These attempts to relate to the military by some in the 'peace community' just seem so pathetic and flat.

'Oh just stop the invasion of Poland and Russia! Can't you see what it is doing to the good Aryan boys?'

Gag us. This is not the best approach to the military types at all, as it just feeds them with the same crap the Pentagon gives them all the time, about them being heroes and all. That, they hardly are. No, not at all. They are nothing more than participants in a giant welfare machine. A few get hurt at the bottom. That's all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, our poor vets! Posted by: Joshua Holland
Citizen therapy
Posted by: bigwhitewall on Apr 19, 2008 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We recently had a suicidal marine on site who had been discharged from Iraq with post traumatic stress disorder. He received no support from the military whatsoever. Luckily, through citizen therapy - expressing what he was feeling and supportive listening from peers - he stepped back from the edge. There are many thousands who never have this opportunity. Jenny Hyatt, Founder, bigwhitewall.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My son is not an abstraction or political prop
Posted by: KAEL on Apr 19, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am the mother of a US soldier serving on the tip of the US sword in Diyalu - in Stryker vehicles, the vehicles AQI and some Iraqis love to blow up. I found your piece surprisingly devoid of the usual anti-soldier rhetoric I sometimes find on the left. For that you deserve praise. But your completely uninformed statement "people who claim they support our troops are the ones who want to keep sending them into the meat grinder for nothing, indefinitely" showed that it is you that supports the troops in the abstract, "as political props to muster support for a war that makes them feel powerful by proxy and gives meaning to their meaningless existence as good little American consumers."

It is the left that while not shamed by but savy from their actions post-Vietnam, has toned it down this round. But they still feed our children into the maw of war by paying taxes and by funding the war, ala Obama, Clinton, and McCain, while not getting off their latte-laced asses and hitting the streets.

Just like Vietnam, when it wasn't til the lilly white butts of the middle class were commanded to miss some college to fight their country's war that they hit the streets, the left stays home and chatters about Iraq.

And the hypocrisy on the left is unexamined. At least the right speaks with an un-forked tongue. Besides taxes and funding for years, the left once argued that the war didn't have enough boots on the ground - then when thousands of Iraqi and Coalition lives were unarguably saved by more American boots on the ground, the left screamed failure of more boots and for pull out. After the left repeated ad nauseum Powell's words that if we break it, we own it, the left called for immediate pull out, Iraqis be damned.

As they did with returning soldiers, it is time for the intellectually honest left to rethink lumping those who support our soldiers into one class of people and then using us, including soldier's family members, as political fodder.

Our military and those who support our militaryare as diverse as any group in the country - and some of them have more at risk than your readers will ever take time to think about. My son would call you a POG - People other than Grunts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad for us, and them
Posted by: Bryan on Apr 19, 2008 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When our soldiers return and we see their damaged brains, torn bodies, and PTSD - that’s when the war becomes real for us. That’s when we pay attention. That’s when we see the price of Bush’s so-called preventive war. Those maimed kids are ours. Kids thrashed for no good reason by our elected government’s very poor and tragic choices. But don’t forget that our dead and injured are only a fraction of the gore. Don’t forget about the millions of Iraqi men, woman, and children who have died or been injured and still have to endure the Bush occupation. Try to image what their lives are like.

We elected the Bush government into power twice. As a society, we put Bush in power. As a society we bear the guilt. The blood of all these innocents is on our hands. What will we do about it now? Can we make amends? Only time will tell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yes... and no Posted by: photon's feather
Question
Posted by: willymack on Apr 19, 2008 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If one sector of our population after the other repeadly gets abused, ignored, swindled, hoodwinked, bamboozled, robbed, and lied to, each and every day, by the crooks in Washington, isn't it time for some payback? Even a cornered rat will fight for its life, so what the hell's wrong with US?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question..no brainer Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Question..no brainer Posted by: willymack
» RE: Question Posted by: photon's feather
Tell me why the military are unquestionably "heroes"
Posted by: Iraan Ozono on Apr 20, 2008 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They give any right for free decision based on their personal knowledge up and over to whoever or whatever force holds the "Commander-In-Chief" label and his (or her) sycophants, no matter how criminal, incompetent or insane. They can be "ordered" to torture or kill another person, having only "faith" or a belief that the order is justified to shield themselves from guilt for their act, or they must be conscience-free, ie. sociopathic. Else they must accept responsibility for those acts, with all of the emotional and mental disruption that must cause. Sometimes they will be able to do brave or noble acts of service, but more likely they will be used to secure a country for a corporate interest or an ideology empty of reason. Possibly they will be placed in a position to show great personal character, but more likely they will be damaged or destroyed for no good reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go..fire up the entitlment train!
Posted by: muzunguhowru on Apr 22, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things we have done in an an effort to atone for the sins committed against the conscripts and others who came home from Vietnam to get saddled with the guilt for the atrocities of Americas first losing war (Acts that should have been attributed to our leaders at the time) is to adopt the notion that every soldier is a hero and a victim.I felt similar sentiments for American service people who got sucked into this conflict on the front end five years ago. After 5 years of yellow ribbons, sickening country western songs, and related carrying on its time for a reality check.

1. Anyone currently serving has had to opportunity to leave the service honorably by now.
2. Anyone enlisting or accepting a commission today has to know what that are getting into.
3. The American Military force is 100% volunteer.
4. The American military force is 98%+ Republican. Military mess facilities in Iraq and elsewhere play Fox News and Rush Limbaugh 24/7. Why? It's what the troops prefer.
5. U.S troops are the highest paid military force in the world and enjoy of a network of social welfare benefits that would make a Norwegian jealous. Housing, preferential taxation, First dollar health care, subsidized shopping and on and on. This does not stop them from demanding more and more and more, even when the nature of their service does not and never will bring them anywhere near to harms way.

Now as we have seen in past, the entitlement train is revving up. The lobbying groups are lined up in the halls of congress demanding benefits and advancing myths like the homeless veterans and other fairy tales. Politicians of both parties trip over one another to pony up the goodies. As a veteran of combat service I feel ashamed and demeaned by what they do. My military service was choice then and so it is still...Its time to treat military people like grown ups..Adults make choices and accept the consequences. If you are going to take the taxpayers money and throw yourself in with the likes of George Bush and enthusiastically prosecute a pointless, immoral and illegal war, you need to accept the consequences Don't come crying and acting like a victim later on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sublime Insanity
Posted by: talkville on Apr 23, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not content to deal with and process the full implications of 'the Viet-Nam Syndrome' and feeling their own 'potency' threatened, they rose to Overcome It. Bush I 'accomplished this and inaugurated the New World Order to boot. Still, there were progeny yet still not quite sure of their virility, their manliness, their 'cojones': Cheney, Bush II and Co. thus again provided a war wherein 'our troops' could prove to all of us all this virility and competence and strength and fill us up with pride and vainglory and a special kind of 'patriotism'. Examples and exemplaries and models, the troops have gone forth to carry out the tasks of this well-provided War.

Lo! Those who complete their task, who return unable to perform those tasks because of wounds, mutilations, injuries galore are no longer in such good graces now with those who sent them forth. Now they are a burden, they are expensive and they no longer 'work'. Scuttle them, forget them and send them on the way in the cheapest and most efficient and expedited manner possible. What Virile, Macho, Potent and Virtuous Men these have turned out to be! Of all, these are the very ones who do NOT support the troops. In the olden days there were words to describe these types: anti-social, mal-adjusted, infantile. The quality of Language has been strained.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]