Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

March in peace protest, get on the no-fly list

Posted by Joshua Holland at 8:52 AM on April 9, 2007.


Joshua Holland: Prominent legal scholar latest to discover he's now an Enemy of the State ...
secureflightfigure
no-fly prop

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Joshua Holland in your
mailbox!

 

Via Balkinization, we get another account of the Brazil-esque no-fly list in action, this time from Walter F. Murphy, professor emeritus at Princeton University. Blogger Mark Graber calls him "the most distinguished scholar of public law in political science." Here's what happened to the good prof on a recent academic trip …

"On 1 March 07, I was scheduled to fly on American Airlines to Newark, NJ, to attend an academic conference at Princeton University, designed to focus on my latest scholarly book, Constitutional Democracy, published by Johns Hopkins University Press this past Thanksgiving.

"When I tried to use the curb-side check in at the Sunport, I was denied a boarding pass because I was on the Terrorist Watch list. I was instructed to go inside and talk to a clerk. At this point, I should note that I am not only the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence (emeritus) but also a retired Marine colonel. I fought in the Korean War as a young lieutenant, was wounded, and decorated for heroism. I remained a professional soldier for more than five years and then accepted a commission as a reserve office, serving for an additional 19 years.

"I presented my credentials from the Marine Corps to a very polite clerk for American Airlines. One of the two people to whom I talked asked a question and offered a frightening comment: "Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that." I explained that I had not so marched but had, in September, 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the Web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the Constitution. "That'll do it," the man said.

"After carefully examining my credentials, the clerk asked if he could take them to TSA officials. I agreed. He returned about ten minutes later and said I could have a boarding pass, but added: "I must warn you, they're going to ransack your luggage." On my return flight, I had no problem with obtaining a boarding pass, but my luggage was "lost." Airlines do lose a lot of luggage and this "loss" could have been a mere coincidence. In light of previous events, however, I'm a tad skeptical.

"I confess to having been furious that any American citizen would be singled out for governmental harassment because he or she criticized any elected official, Democrat or Republican. That harassment is, in and of itself, a flagrant violation not only of the First Amendment but also of our entire scheme of constitutional government. This effort to punish a critic states my lecture's argument far more eloquently and forcefully than I ever could. Further, that an administration headed by two men who had "had other priorities" than to risk their own lives when their turn to fight for their country came up, should brand as a threat to the United States a person who did not run away but stood up and fought for his country and was wounded in battle, goes beyond the outrageous. Although less lethal, it is of the same evil ilk as punishing Ambassador Joseph Wilson for criticizing Bush's false claims by "outing" his wife, Valerie Plaime, thereby putting at risk her life as well as the lives of many people with whom she had had contact as an agent of the CIA. …

"I have a personal stake here, but so do all Americans who take their political system seriously. Thus I hope you and your colleagues will take some positive action to bring the Administration's conduct to the attention of a far larger, and more influential, audience than I could hope to reach."

For the record, Murphy's no liberal; he was a supporter of Sam Alito's nomination last year.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


At Least 5 Need Government-Run Health-Care at Bachmann's Angry Protests Against Government-Run Health-Care
Milbank.
November 6, 2009.
Report: Hasan Snapped Under Weight of Bullying, Anxiety Over Deployment
That's not stopping the usual suspects from crying "jihad."
November 6, 2009.
Who's Been Held Accountable for the Crimes of Bush's "War on Terror"? Four Italians ... Sort of
Certainly not those who ran our shadowy network of secret prisons, nor their superiors who created it.
November 5, 2009.
What Tuesday's Election Results Mean for the Bigger Political Picture: Nada
Everyone's spinning it otherwise, of course.
November 4, 2009.
"America's Toughest Dictator"? FBI Investigating Joe Arpaio for Using Office to Bully Opponents
The feds are reportedly looking at a pattern of law enforcement being used to intimidate political opponents.
November 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Proof.
Posted by: oregoncharles on Apr 9, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is clear proof that the No Fly List is being used to punish political enemies - and also to silence them: it's hard to appear around the country if you can't get on planes, or are harassed when flying.

It should be a very big deal; we'll see if the MSM picks up on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yep... of course.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 9, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every day I doubt more and more that Bush will step down at the end of his term.

Meanwhile these monsters are using our security systems for their political goals... rather than our safety.

I would encourage all to write their representatives about this to demand formal inquiries into such things happening. It will likely change little.. but its worth trying, at least.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yep... of course. Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Yep... of course. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Yep... of course. Posted by: katz22br
Due Process
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 9, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amendment 5 (Bill of Rights)
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

Amendment 14
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Somebody explain how putting someone on a No-Fly list without them being convicted of a crime does not violate the U.S. Constitution. The 5th Amendment applies to the United States Government and the 14th to the States.

By denying a citizen in good standing access to a flight without due process simply is a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Calling all lawyers...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Due Process Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
» RE: Due Process Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Due Process Posted by: theairboater
» RE: Due Process Posted by: katz22br
They must be held responsible
Posted by: ng1944 on Apr 9, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for all the crimes they had comitted.
If democrats can work with these criminals,
they are not better

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's Gotta Hurt -
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on Apr 9, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, if I was in this guy's position and someone told me I couldn't fly because I'd been in a peace march or criticized an elected official, I'd take it upon myself to find out whose idea it was to brand me like that, and then proceed to track that person down. I would then begin punching that person in the face until they were rendered unrecognizable.

What Murphy was put through is complete and total bullshit, and like he said, this is a far better example of how far down the crapper our government's gone than anything he could've put on paper. I'm sure glad he's speaking out about this now. This is what Americans need to be hearing - and fearing - about our government.

If the government ever drew a line between dissidents and terrorists, in the eyes of our overlords that line has surely blurred out of existence by now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That's Gotta Hurt - Posted by: gregii
» RE: That's Gotta Hurt - Posted by: gregii
» Just to be fair ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
How safe am I?
Posted by: huels3000 on Apr 9, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My newest concern is what I view on the web. I read alternet.net every day. I also enjoy conspiracy web sites, msnbc, cnn, etc. If I read a blog about Bush and his relationship with the middle-eastern oil kings, am I going to get flagged or kept off an airline? I am a Civics teacher, and it is my responsibility to teacher in a nonbiased why. That means I have to ignore what is really happening to keep conservative parents off my back. Gores Inconvenient Truth is not something I can show to students. I can't praise Keith Olbermann, or publicly despise Bill O'Reilly. I'm not searching my house for wire taps, but if I write an anti-Bush web posting, what will they do. It’s sad that in America I am worried about being watched because of my political intelligence and ability to spot a lie when I see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Safety in numbers ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Nothing to do with being paranoid ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
Anyone who has been political gets hit
Posted by: DrSuess on Apr 9, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in ancient history (1996), I helped get the Natural Law party on the ballot in several states, and ran as a US Senatorial candidate for them. When 911 happened, I was the only one I knew whose “mail suddenly went funny”. It took a week for letters to go across town- where it used to take a day, it took a month for letters from across the country to reach me- and to this day, I have never gotten my credit card and bank statements for the two months after 911. Basically, I went on a postal watch order- a low level way of hunting for a terrorist.
I seem to win the “lottery” for the “extra search” that occurs as you board the airplane all the time. They always explain to me that it is random- but I don’t believe them. As Bush’s reign has progressed, I became more and more certain that we had entered a police state, so I have avoided all peace rallies, and anything associated with it. I made the conscious decision to lower my profile.
Eventually Bush will become so unpopular that even his Republican supports will be glad to see him go. Bush has not made the life of people in America better- and the fact that he has supported programs that hurt many if not most Americans will come home to roast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 9, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I the only one wondering how much all this nonsense is costing? It's a high price to pay to make it legal to persecute people. Bottom line is: THEY DON'T CATCH ANYBODY. Terrorists don't go to anti war protests and similar functions. The Civics teacher makes a good pint. What the heck is he allowed to teach. Maybe we should stop funding this nonsense. It is expensive. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1984?
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Apr 9, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep on hearing things that say "1984 is coming true!". I know I might face a long hard sentence for breaking Godwin's law, but.

It sounds to me more like 1938 is coming true a second time around.

I humbly face my punishment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 1984? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: 1984? Posted by: drmflorida
» The problem with Godwin's Law Posted by: xconservative
Brazil-esque no-fly list?
Posted by: katz22br on Apr 9, 2007 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can only hope the "Brazil" intended in the reference was the one from Terry Gilliam's dystopic fiction. If it's not, please clarify...

Here and now, in reality-based Brazil, while we may have some trouble with crowded airports and late flights, mostly due to worker striking for better wages, we do not prevent people from boarding planes due to their political views and/or actions.

If in the past, Brazilians - as well as other Latin-Americans - were persecuted and even killed for those views and actions, it was mostly because our (non-)leaders of the time were doing Uncle Sam's bidding and working hard at transforming us into a bunch of sheep. Allegedly to counter the threat of Communism. Allegedly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Definitley Gilliam Posted by: eddie torres
» Yes, Gilliam's Brazil Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Yes, Gilliam's Brazil Posted by: katz22br
» Spoiled for choices Posted by: eddie torres
Dearie dearie me...
Posted by: eddie torres on Apr 9, 2007 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When good US conservatives are suddenly exposed to the light of day... and realize that the Bush White House operates US taxpayer-funded systems and institutions specifically for the benefit of friends and family... it's really a cryin' shame.

Won't somebody please think about the children, oops, I mean conservatives?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for repeal...
Posted by: edraven on Apr 10, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of the Patriot Act, and every one of the freedom limiting Bush actions. Passports to go to Mexico and Canada - - Who does that protect from terrorism. Get rid of the Bush baggage, then get rid of Bush. Waiting until 2008 just encourages him to think the people approve of his vile actions.

Oh, and by the way, let's stop killing Iraq civillians, and American troops.

Ed Graham

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would Sam Alito support Professor Murphy?
Posted by: surfreality on Apr 10, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From wikipedia: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) formally opposed Alito's nomination. The ACLU has only taken this step two other times in its entire history, the last time being with the nomination of Robert Bork who was rejected by a 58-42 vote in the Senate. In releasing their report on Alito ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero justified the decision saying that "At a time when our president has claimed unprecedented authority to spy on Americans and jail terrorism suspects indefinitely, America needs a Supreme Court justice who will uphold our precious civil liberties. Unfortunately, Judge Alito's record shows a willingness to support government actions that abridge individual freedoms."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two Things Struck Me As I Read This Article...
Posted by: djnoll on Apr 10, 2007 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One, that a person in this country, a hero and an academic, could be so abused by this government is appalling, but that he should be surprised is even more amazing. I know acadmeics are notoriously putdown for not living in the real world, but his man obviously has just learned what has been happening for the last six years in a very graphic way. It is apparent for all his knowledge, that his research has been very narrowly focused, and not exactly enlightening. In many ways, I am glad he was put through that process and has woken up to the dictatorship that now exists in this nation.

Two, it is time for the American People to march on Congress and demand redress from this government. I have posted on my website a New Declaration of Independence, and will have a link shortly where citizens can sign this Declaration. The goal is to get as many signatures as possible, and then deliver it to the Congress by the before the end of next January. I will be traveling the country this summer and next fall on my way to various university functions, and I will be travelling by car because I cannot fly due to health problems. I will publish my itinerary on my website and I hope that people will come out and meet with me and sign this new Declaration of Independence. Our Constitution allows for the peaceful freedom of assembly of our people, and allows us to petition Congress for redress of worngs against the People. It is time to take the first step in that process, since Congress is refusing just as Parliament did in 1775 to represent the people. Please go to my website and read this Declaration, and if you agree, please post a comment with your name, city and state as your way of signing. Thank you.

http://www.standanddeliveramerica.com

By the way, even if I could fly, based on this story, I am fairly sure that I am on a No Fly List so it would be a moot point anyway as the result of my website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Apr 10, 2007 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If George Washington had been declared a King, we wouldn't have the stupid shrub soiling the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JonA/WI
Posted by: JonA on Apr 10, 2007 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can be done with a President and Vice President that were mentaly disaranged when put into office.... and now, finding the few marbles they had for democracy.... have been lost with the greed for the personal control... and wealth... coming from oil. It is all about oil..... OIL. Remember, Bush/Chenny split up Iraq with the oil companies before the Iraq war was even started. These boys are sick! And they have become sicker with power! Put your strength to remove the power of those dishonest Republicans that still support this sickness. Put them out of office.... Next election. And for God's sake, do all in your power to stop this sensless war!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]