Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why won't the media cover this outrageous October Surprise?

Posted by Joshua Holland at 2:20 PM on October 27, 2006.


This is simply unacceptable.
blogimagethumbsaddam
saddam

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Joshua Holland in your
mailbox!

 

Earlier in the week I wrote about the likely death sentence to be handed down in Saddam Hussein's show trial just two days before the mid-term elections. If you missed it, read it here.

When I wrote that, I didn't know for a fact that most observers expected the trial to take far longer. But, according to Scott Horton, an adjunct professor at the Columbia University Law School who has visited Baghdad several times, that does appear to be the case.

According to the Institute for Public Accuracy, Horton said yesterday:

Most observers expected the date would be much later, but it seems to have been moved up. It will be front page news in the papers on Monday -- the day before the election. This is designed to show some progress in Iraq. The American public will see Saddam condemned to death and see it as a positive thing.
When you look at polling figures, there have been three significant spike points. One was the date on which Saddam was captured. The second was the purple fingers election. The third was Zarqawi being killed. Based on those three, it's easy to project that they will get a mild bump out of this.
I'd add that these have been short-lived spikes. Longer than two days, but short-lived.
In my experience, everything that comes out of Baghdad is very carefully prepared for U.S. domestic consumption. … There is a team of American lawyers working as special legal advisers out of the U.S. embassy, who drive the tribunal. They have been involved in preparing the case and overseeing it from the beginning. The trial, which is shown on TV, has mild entertainment value for Iraqis, but they refer to it regularly as an American puppet theater.
Tom Englehardt pointed out in The Nation that the media haven't even taken note of the timing in their coverage. This kind of transparent manipulation of something as important as seeing justice served for the tens of thousands of Iraqis tortured and killed by Hussein for the sake of the GOP's prospects in the mid-term elections is simply outrageous. Reporters should be asking hard questions about it in Washington and in Baghdad -- this should be a major story.

It's a perfect opportunity to dig into the revelations contained in Michael Gordon's Cobra II about how everything done in the "Battle for Baghdad" was carefully scripted for U.S. domestic consumption, and in Rajiv Chandrasekaran's Emerald City about how the Green Zone is awash in Republican political appointees, many of whom have no visible qualifications for their posts beyond party loyalty. If the media were doing their jobs this craven act might back-fire on the Republicans as it should.

Can you take a minute and give me a hand? Beneath the fold are some selected media contacts. A brief, polite note asking them why they're not covering this issue -- why they're not asking the appropriate questions -- would be really helpful. Contact your local media as well. Reference Scott Horton's statement above.

And any members of the press can e-mail me for Horton's contact info.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Dogs Going Crazy as Their Soldiers Return Home
Priceless.
November 11, 2009.
At Least 5 Need Government-Run Health-Care at Bachmann's Angry Protests Against Government-Run Health-Care
Milbank.
November 6, 2009.
Report: Hasan Snapped Under Weight of Bullying, Anxiety Over Deployment
That's not stopping the usual suspects from crying "jihad."
November 6, 2009.
Who's Been Held Accountable for the Crimes of Bush's "War on Terror"? Four Italians ... Sort of
Certainly not those who ran our shadowy network of secret prisons, nor their superiors who created it.
November 5, 2009.
What Tuesday's Election Results Mean for the Bigger Political Picture: Nada
Everyone's spinning it otherwise, of course.
November 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It was reported in France
Posted by: rwa on Oct 27, 2006 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The verdict of President Saddam Hussein’s first trial and that of seven former Iraqi leaders- the Al Dujail case- due on October 16th has been postponed till November 5 in order "to complete verifications". Actually the postponement has been required by Bush’s public relations consultants in the hope that the announcement of the capital sentence on the Iraqi President, his half-brother, Barzan Al-Tikriti, former head of the secret services before 1984 and the Vice-President, Taha Yassin Ramadan, will help the Republicans secure more votes in the coming half-term elections to be held …two days later. Unless an unforeseen event, the sentences will be enforced within 30 days. By hanging. "

As is obvious, if you limit yourself to dmestic news sources, you are simply uninformed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It was reported in France Posted by: HeroesAll
» It's quite odd ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: It was reported in France Posted by: willymack
Don Rumsfeld, accessory to murder?
Posted by: lamar on Oct 27, 2006 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Hussein is guilty of mass murder for killing Kurds with the gas we sold him, does that make Donald Rumsfeld an accessory to genocide or something?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not in the major news because...
Posted by: Jeanne on Oct 27, 2006 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if it's already reported on now (or from weeks ago when it was first announced), it's old news by 11/5/06. Old news causes no spikes and it won't have the "surprise" factor that the "breaking news" announcement will have when it is "first" reported on 11/5. News is corporate controlled and so to maximize the effectiveness of this piece of theatre, it will have its grand opening when it will have the maximum effect. This way, perhaps, Saddam's conviction can be credited with the shocking reversal of Democrats' fortunes in the midterms as the Republicans maintain control of both houses of congress (as pre-ordained by the electronic vote counting).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The alibi! Posted by: citizenjoe
How about this ad
Posted by: jreal on Oct 27, 2006 9:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Republicans controlling our country."

"Dirty Lies, and Crooked Abuses of Authority."

"Iraq being used as a political game."

"Terrorism being used as a political game."

"Allegations of rigging elections."

"Memories of toying with a color coded terror chart just before elections."

"Republicans seem to think that jeopordizing our lives is a game."

"What's next? Will they jeopardize the lives of our troops fighting in Iraq by announcing the condemning to death of Sadam Hussein right before the elections."

"I hope not. But you never know with this group."

"It's really not too far fetched for these Republicans to jeopordize the lives of our troops in a hostile environment - in return for political gain."

"It's important to vote for serious people this time."

"The symbols and representatives of our country is no place for rotten tricksters."

"Get the Republicans out."

"It's imperative."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NY Times "covered" it
Posted by: drdrdrr on Oct 28, 2006 1:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree the timing is unacceptable, as is the quiet media. Clearly this story was not receiving the attention it is due...until now!

However it was at least reported in the NY Times on Oct 15 that Saddam's trial would be postponed from Oct 16 to Nov 5, in an article titled "5 Americans Killed in Iraq, Bringing Month’s Toll to 53." The article included the following paragraphs:

"The tribunal trying Saddam Hussein and his associates said Sunday that it was postponing the date for verdicts from Monday [Oct 16th], as originally planned, to Nov. 5, according to a senior court official who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the issue.

Other court officials have said in recent days that a major reason for the delay is that after nine months of hearings, the five judges in the case have failed to reach agreement on a sentence for Mr. Hussein and appeared to be undecided between a death sentence for him or a penalty of life imprisonment."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not really ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» As a life-long conservative... Posted by: ISlamIslam
Is this trial an act of discrimination?
Posted by: justaperson on Oct 28, 2006 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We singled out Saddam because we wanted a footprint in the Middle East & we wanted to have some control over the geo-politics of that region. I guess this is a justifiable reason for some people, but it seems blatantly commercial to me. The other tyrants in the world which are committing genocide daily, hold no interest for us. Why?

A war not fought to protect your homeland or honor, a war that has killed so many civilians, ruined another country, and cost the lives of our brave soldiers, seems suddenly dirty now.

Putting Saddam to death in a trial orchestrated by American interests can never feel like justice. It will not bring closure to anyone. Saddam should be incarcerated until a time when Iraq really is a soveriegn nation acting without foriegn (our) control. Then the Iraqis themselves can delberate and decide his future.

Certainly using his trial as an election tool stinks. But then so do so many of this administrations motives and actions.

Get out the vote...

Get out the vote...

Get out the vote...

That's all we can do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The trial is an alibi for voter fraud.
Posted by: citizenjoe on Oct 28, 2006 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone will tell you that making Saddam's conviction and sentencing take place two days before the Nov. elections is a propaganda gimmick of the Bush White House. Such events raise Republican popularity for a few days. Here a few days is just what they need, since one of those days in Nov 7. What everyone will not tell you is the deeper strategy which underlies this. We can be sure that predictions for Republican losses in many races will turn out to be inaccurate, just like those exit polls in 2004. This will be attributed by Bush and by the press that serves him as a result of Bush's last minute rise in popularity because of Saddam's conviction. Of course, its real cause will be extensive vote fraud by Republicans. Thanks to the trial in Baghdad, Bush and the servile press will dismiss the charges of fraud as so much sour grapes. The trial is an alibi for voter fraud.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well, you must admit, it is a brilliant move to use the death penalty.....
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 28, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... to distract from the issues and the election. While Rove is void of any conscience (better known as a psychopath) he is brilliant. I wonder if he is a reincarnated Goerbels. Bush's own base of religious followers has abandoned them based on reports I see. They don't intend to show up at the polls and vote this season. Its should prove interesting. Watch the foreign press to see what really happened. Its the only way to get the real news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprise???
Posted by: tocarr on Oct 28, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as we all know that this whole Iraq thing is just a Bush/Cheney
government (in the loosest sense of the word). so is the court
trying Saddam. it was appointed by the Bush/Cheney regime
to do it's bidding. Saddam should never have been be put on trial because we should never have invaded their country. however, if he had to be on trial it should have been in the world court.
now when are Bush/Cheney going to be put on trial with the rest of their regime?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hallow Commentaries...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Oct 28, 2006 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...It seems this is all the american voice has been reduced to... Here we are day after day voicing our strong feelings and oppinions on subjects like this, but what good does it do??? To my knowledge, it does very little... It gives us a place to complain to each other, but in the end who really listens???
**shruggs**
I guess I'm so dissolusioned with what used to be the democratic process I've just about given up... I will vote, but I've become paranoid even about that and wonder if my vote will actually be counted, or just thrown into a box after it is fed through "diebold's magic voting machine"... For all I know that damned thing is little more than a shredder... Afterall, I know I'll never see the ballot again after I put it in there...

Like so many things in politics these days, diebold's machines makes a tiny noise, some wheels turn, but nothing ever happens...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The more we talk about it.......
Posted by: Voicedude on Oct 28, 2006 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more we talk about it.......
- especially with folks we know on the right -
...... the less likely it'll be a surprise.

You see, if we know what the shifty action will be in advance and we let them all know that we know, then even Rush and Sean's biggest sheep will have to see that we are right and that it's all been manipulation. Look how they try to spin the Foley story around to make it a 'liberal plot'. Call 'em on from the get go - now after they've heard the accusations of manipulations - and they've got no choice but to see the truth. No choice. Just keep talking about it. If word gets out, it'll no longer be a surprise. If their 'surprise' has been telegraphed, it lacks punch. Keep talking about it. No one likes to feel manipulated, and the more we call their manipulations in advance the more they have no choice but to see we've been right all along. I know we've said this before (Downing St., Katrina, 9/11 memos, etc.), but that was while we were waiting for the shoe to drop. Tell everyone about the shoe dropping in advance and we look like magicians!

I know I keep pumping info on Faith Based manipulations (and David Kuo's 'Tempting Faith') with all my Christian friends, and and watch them slowly but surely back away from the charletans and false prophets.

KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT!

peace.

the rest of our lives starts Nov. 7th........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes but.... Posted by: ~Fiona~
» RE: Yes but.... Posted by: MT512
Joshua, you're TOO LATE.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 28, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You waited until the last minute to post this. Instead, this was reported last month.

OUTRAGE: SADDAM'S TRIAL WAS ADJOURNED BACK IN JULY - BUT HIS SENTENCING IS BEING HELD OFF UNTIL - YOU GUESSED IT - DAYS BEFORE THE FALL ELECTION

by Thomas J. Bico

editor-in-chief


Why do you have to wait until the last minute or until after the DAMAGE is done to post your outrage? And much as I want the Democrats to win especially James Webb, the insiders will do everything they can to STIFLE the Reformer D's just like the GOP insiders SMASHED the Reformer R's back in the 1990s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Joshua, you're TOO LATE. Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Joshua, you're TOO LATE. Posted by: maxpayne
» Harassing Hempnuts LOL! Posted by: YinRising
» RE: Harassing Hempnuts LOL! Posted by: Joshua Holland
» yeah, you're probably right. Posted by: YinRising
» Oh, and SD? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Calm down, mate Posted by: HeroesAll
» Bullshit ! Posted by: SDres11
» RE: Bullshit ! No, Posted by: Techubus
» You're right Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: thanks Posted by: Techubus
» Ooh, baby, give it to me Posted by: HeroesAll
» Maxpaye Posted by: Joshua Holland
» lmao, that's hilarious!!!!! Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: lmao, that's hilarious!!!!! Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: lmao, that's hilarious!!!!! Posted by: tclaverdure
» RE: lmao, that's hilarious!!!!! Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Don't change a thing Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Joshua, you're TOO LATE. Posted by: tclaverdure
» HEMP HEMP HEMP HEMP Posted by: IndyElliott
Paying for Votes
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Oct 28, 2006 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hussein trial is nothing more than window dressing for our continued presence in Iraq.

Too bad the Hussein experiment, meant to stave off Iranians back in the 80s, failed. Look what it got us.

Yet, to negate the drama, shortened lives and impossible debt because of this failure to accurately predict the future, we have to give tens/hundreds of millions of dollars to local/state/national candidates to 'get out the vote'. What the f*ck for?

We have to pay lots of good money to get people's attention to vote.

Does anyone else see a problem with this?

Paying TENS of millions to POLITICIANS to get people to vote for them.

It shouldn't be an auction. It should be a demand. We should demand that for people to live in a representative gov't that they learn about the issues and simply go to the freakin' polls and vote.

TENS of millions? Just to go and press a button? It's insane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paying for Votes Posted by: MT512
Davidco: It's not too late
Posted by: Davidco on Oct 28, 2006 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not too late for voters to connect the dots. What's good for the goose is good for the lame duck.

Saddam will be hanged for a tiny portion of the estimated 250,000+ http://hrw.org/wr2k4/3.htm 'disappearances' of Iraqi non-combatants engineered by his Ba' thist regime over a period of twenty-five years.

Bush, on the other hand, is directly responsible for over 601,000 violent civilian deaths 'collateral to' the 3+ year American Occupation of Iraq. http://www.counterpunch.org/warf10182006.html

This is not a partisan message. The number of innocent Iraqi civilian deaths caused over eight years by the Clinton regime of economic sanctions and no-fly bombings doubles the larger of the two estimates abovementioned. http://www.commondreams.org/views/022100-102.htm

How does one hang an oil-addicted, bi-partisan imperial foreign policy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Journalist's Creed and Hitler's Enabling Act's:
Posted by: mite on Oct 29, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that the public journal is a public trust... Well that belief is no more. A major problem with the Press is; news media's is corprate greed and there is no Journalist's Creed only profit and Fear.
The Nazis were funded and ultimately ushered into power by wealthy industrialists looking for government favors in the form of tax breaks, big subsides, and laws to weaken the rights of the workers, press, and liberty's- sound familar.
If we reference the (Patriot Act's, Military Commissions Act, Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988- H.R. 5210, P.L. 100-690,) and all the Executive Orders- NSA Directives; we would find that Hitlers right hand man said is true. i.e. the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
Freedom of the Press Loses 220-195 is an article by John Nichols (The Nation) published june 30, 2006, were one republican voted against this bill. House votes to dump state food safety laws by Zachary Coile (San Francisco Chronicle) March 9, 2006, measure passed by 283-139. Or how about his `North American Union' the merging of Canada, Mexico, and U.S. into one central government like the European Union, United Nations. etc.
I could go on and on; does our media ever run coverage for day after day or week after week, or month after month about these and other issues that destroy our country? No!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Media are NOT in the News Business
Posted by: Carl Street on Oct 29, 2006 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite the popular mythology (promoted by the media themselves) the Media are NOT in the news business; they are in the ADVERTISING business. When I was in college I spent my summers working for a large national media conglomerate. On one occasion when I questioned my boss about an editorial travesty (cover-up) he told me the following: "The ONLY reason we have editorial is to keep the ads from banging together". GET IT???

I know that must rankle all those journalist types; but get real. NO media takes on anything that will ultimately affect its income stream. As a public relations ploy the media likes to portray spunky, fearless investigative journalists because it is good for business to have the public believe they are being told the truth and that there are media watch dogs covering important stories. This promotes credibility and readership among the ignorant masses -- the same people who believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Calus.

But for those of us NOT resident on Gilligan's Island, the truth is starkly clear.

What about the occasional breaking story that appears to attack the status quo? there are two answers to that:
1. Occasional hits are the media equivalent of Las Vegas winners -- largely publicized because it keeps the suckers coming back; but only fools believe that Las Vegas is based on winners.
2. Stories are NOT action. By and large, stories result in public officials "taking responsiblity" but NEVER blame and there are few, if any, repercussions. Consider NO ONE has been fired or even demoted for 9-11 despite numerous stories detailing large scale dereliction and incompetence.

Occasionally, if the heat is too great, the PIP's (People in charge) will throw one of their own to the wolves as a human sacrifice to please the crowd; BUT NOTHING CHANGES. For them, that is just a cost of doing business.

Wake up and smell the coffee -- there are NO media people going to save your butt...

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proof of Kangaroo Court
Posted by: rwa on Oct 29, 2006 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it cannot definitively be said that the verdict was, in fact, postponed so that it would influence the November elections, the postponement suggests several obvious questions, which the media have yet to raise: Are there still witnesses that the judges need to recall? If so, and if there is no verdict yet, how can there be a date certain for the verdict? Perhaps the Democrats aren't challenging the postponement because doing so exposes the reality of phony conviction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demand that Bush "Request" a Postponement!
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Oct 29, 2006 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats should demand that the Administration "ask" the Iraqi judges to postpone the announcement of the verdict until after the U.S. election to avoid the “appearance” of impropriety, which will:

1. Undermine further Americans’ faith in our electoral system.

2. Give Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants valid grounds for appeal of a negative verdict. (The argument will go, “If the timing is politically influenced, why not the verdict itself?”)

The American press also have an obligation to point out this deeply cynical manipulation of the voting public and the Iraqi legal system, before the administration pulls it off.

Sunday will be too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Does Joshua Blame the Media?
Posted by: rwa on Oct 29, 2006 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic party could have made an issue out of this if they wanted to. Blame them.
What's more important to them, winning or maintaining the myth of the victor's justice?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Does Joshua Blame the Media? Posted by: Joshua Holland
Maliki Plays a High Card
Posted by: rwa on Oct 30, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yahoo.com:
Saddam verdict may be delayed: prosecutor By Mariam Karouny
Sun Oct 29, 3:41 PM ET

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A court trying Saddam Hussein for crimes against humanity could delay its verdict by a few days, the chief prosecutor said on Sunday, in a move that would shift the announcement until after U.S. midterm elections.

ADVERTISEMENT

The U.S.-backed court had been due to deliver a verdict on November 5, two days before U.S. elections in which President George W. Bush's Republicans fear they could lose control of Congress.

The chief prosecutor, Jaafar al-Moussawi, said the Iraqi High Tribunal was still working on the judgment. "We will know a day or two before the trial if they are ready to announce the verdict," Moussawi told Reuters.

Saddam could go to the gallows if he is found guilty over his role in the killing of 148 Shi'ite Muslims in the village of Dujail after a 1982 assassination attempt.

A guilty verdict could reflect positively on Bush as a vindication of his policy to overthrow Saddam in 2003. The former Iraqi president is also on trial separately on charges of genocide against the country's ethnic Kurds in the late 1980s.

U.S. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad denied Washington had any say over the timing of the verdict or the court's decisions, saying the American role was limited to logistics and security.

"The United States had nothing to do with the selection of the date and we don't know whether the judges have come to a judgment or not," Khalilzad told CNN in an interview.

News of the possible delay follows a week of public spats between U.S. officials and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.

Maliki's aides say he is furious at U.S. pressure on him ahead of the elections as the American public turns increasingly away from Bush's Iraq policy.

Saddam Hussein's chief lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi warned a death sentence against the former leader would plunge Iraq into a "full scale civil war and allow Iran to take over Iraq and will have dire consequences for the stability" of the region.

NO ABRUPT CHANGE

U.S. Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean said on Sunday there would not be an abrupt change of course on Iraq even if his party won control of Congress.

"The president will still be in charge of foreign policy and the military ... "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ace Wins
Posted by: rwa on Oct 30, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
London Telegraph:
Bush seeks to mend fences with Baghdad
By Oliver Poole, Iraq Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:40am GMT 30/10/2006

President George W Bush has sought to close the growing schism between US officials in Iraq and the country's prime minister by agreeing to greater Iraqi control over its armed forces...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wrote to Keith Olberman on Countdown
Posted by: sui_generis on Oct 30, 2006 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote to Keith Olberman on Countdown, and included a link to this. He seems more likely to start the ball rolling than most others.

If they don't get on top of this within the next few days, it's gonna be too late...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]