Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mexico update9: Calderón set to win official count by a hair; López Obrador demands recount

Posted by Joshua Holland at 8:00 AM on July 6, 2006.


Charges, reports and potential challenges.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Joshua Holland in your
mailbox!

 

I'll update this as developments warrant and bump it to the top.

I crashed at around 4 am with López Obrador clinging to a quarter-point lead. That turned around while I snoozed and Calderón's lead -- 0.45% -- just exceeded the 0.44% of ballots that remain to be counted. He'll win the official count.

Now the action begins.

López Obrador will demand a ballot-by-ballot recount. Mexico's election authority, the IFE, says the tally was perfect, and that there's no need. Calderón, who's claimed victory since Sunday, will paint López Obrador as a hothead who's unwilling to accept the will of the people.

But López Obrador has consistently said that he'll honor the results of a fair count, even if he were to lose by a single vote.

Most observers say the process has generally been clean, and the authorities have worked hard to maintain people's confidence. But there have also been persistent reports of irregularities, some quite serious.

Ted Lewis, head of the Global Exchange observer mission, told El Universal that his team witnessed vote buying first-hand in the states of Oaxaca and San Luis Potosí. Earlier this week El Universal reported the discovery of ten ballot boxes from a poor Mexico City neighborhood in a dumpster.

These kinds of scattered reports would not be significant if either candidate had scored a 5-point win, but with the margin of victory looking like it'll be around a half-point, all of the issues raised will be viewed as proof-positive that the fix was in. It looks like Mexico is headed for a drawn-out fight over the presidency.

The most troubling report I've seen so far is this:

But more alarming than the vote-buying, Lewis said, were discrepancies in the vote count found by statistical specialists working for Global Exchange and its Mexican partner Alianza Cívica (Civic Alliance), which also observed the polling process.
"We´re not at the point where we´re ready to say electoral fraud but we´re really quite disturbed," Lewis said. "We didn´t expect to see this level of irregularity."
He said the groups´ experts had found that the number of votes for Congress in various instances exceeded the number of votes for the presidency in states where López Obrador reportedly won, while the opposite was true in states where Calderón was the victor.
López Obrador has called for protests this Saturday, as he was expected to do in this circumstance.

I'll have more later (I've got to run). Also, more on the way about Greg Palast's … "reporting."

The Institute for Policies Studies' Chuck Collins, who observed the elections with Global Exchange, has been an invaluable resource for me, and I'd like to give him a big shout out. I owe him a beer in a big way.

***

La Jornada and La Reforma are both still updating their totals. As of 12:45 pm am EST, Lopez Obrador clings to a lead of 0.85 precent, with a bit more than 93% percent of the count completed. I'm going to try to take a cat-nap, which means at least a 50% chance I'll crash for the night. Night owls stay tuned to those sites.

***

At 10:12 PM Eastern time, the IFE suspended the count announcements of vote totals that were released every ten minutes during the day. Luis Carlos Ugalde, the head of the institute, said the count will continue all night if need be, and the final results will be released as soon as possible. Just under 90% of the official tally is completed and Lopez Obrador holds onto a 1.25% lead. I've made inquiries into what's happening and will update if needed. The announcement, in Spanish, is in the comments.

***

At 10:03 PM Eastern time, La Jornada reported Lopez Obrador ahead by 1.65 percent with just over 86% of the official count complete.

AMLO's lead has been deteriorating slowly but steadily all night. The tension is killing me!

***

At 8:16 PM Eastern time, La Jornada reported Lopez Obrador ahead by 2.04 percent with a hair less than 80% of the official count complete. Oh, man, this is getting interesting. La Jornada's site is swamped and just crashed under the weight of all the traffic, but I'll be sitting here hitting "refresh" until I get the final tally.

***

La Journada is now reporting Lopez Obrador ahead by 2.55 percent with 62 percent of the count completed. See below for context.

***

Over on the front page, Chuck Collins has it exactly right: the corporate media is creating it's own narrative. I have seen twenty papers referring to the official count, now underway, as a "recount." That's not accurate; this is the first official count and everything up to now has been based on the preliminary count.

Bloomberg is reporting that with a little more than half the count finished, Lopez Obrador leads Calderon by 2.7 percent (37.1 to 34.4%).

If that were to stand, it would be the first time anywhere in Latin America that the official count reversed the preliminary tally. The biggest difference between the preliminary count and the official tally that's ever been recorded was 0.4 percent.

It also wouldn't be the end; the candidates would simply switch places with Lopez Obrador the presumptive winner and Calderon demanding a recount.

And this is really important: it's an interesting story but it's meaningless because we don't know which districts have been counted so far. Think about it in American terms; if the first half of your count had lots of "blue" states and few "red" states, it would look like a Dem victory, but could very well turn around in the second half. If districts that leaned heavily to Lopez Obrador have been disproportionately represented and Calderon districts are still to come, we could very well see the official tally match the preliminary count (I know this is a bit confusing).

Meanwhile the markets are tanking on the news. Check Bloomberg:

Mexican stocks, bonds and currency tumbled on concern that Lopez Obrador, who vowed in his campaign to boost social spending to aid the poor, will hold on to this lead in the recount, snatching victory away from Calderon.
Aside from the fact that it's not a friggin' recount, think about what they're saying. As the guys at the Center for Economic Policy and Research point out (PDF), Mexico's enjoyed total growth of 17% over the past 25 years -- 0.68% per year. Lopez Obrador's policies couldn't possibly do worse.

The markets are Craaazy.

***

As I noted below, Lopez Obrador's most serious claim so far is that there are 3 million votes that weren't counted in the preliminary tally. Luis Carlos Ugalde, head of the IFE, said there were 2.58 million "damaged" votes, and promised they'd be included in the official count. There are reports that their addition narrows Calderon's presumptive lead -- also based on the preliminary count -- from around one percent to 0.64 percent, but I can't figure out the methodology used for that projection, so take it with a grain of salt.

El Universal reported that 10 ballot boxes and a polling station report were found in a garbage dump in a poor neighborhood in Mexico City.

Reuters reports that "activists demonstrated outside offices of the government's prosecutor for electoral crimes, shouting against fraud and hanging a huge banner which said: 'Ugalde: You deserve jail.'"

The Washington Post reports, ominously and with its usual lack of context, that Emilio Serrano, a legislator from the PRD, said in an interview that violence is possible if the vote-tampering allegations are proved.

"We are not afraid to die in the fight," Serrano said. "We in the public are tired of the lies and the abuses, which have been demonstrated over the length of our history." The missing context is that Lopez Obrador has pledged unequivocally to respect the results of a fair count. Watch for the media frame that Calderon clearly won and the "leftist firebrand" has no reason to question the results, in keeping with the 'Latin American leftists versus democracy' meme that's so popular today.

That said, things are continuing to heat up. IPS' Chuck Collins, who'll be updating his own reporting soon, tells me that the teachers' strike in Oaxaca that I mentioned last week -- now a broader social movement -- is becoming quite dramatic.

Oaxaca, a PRI stronghold, went PRD on Sunday, confirming for many that the current governor, Ulises Ruiz, won his last race by fraudulent means. That further delegitimizes Ruiz, whose resignation the teachers, joined by indigenous rights groups and others, are demanding.

Collins says "the governor is holed up in a hotel conference room with his top staffers in the affluent suburb of San Felipe de Agua where he lives. He was photographed voting on Sunday, but has otherwise been conspicuously absent the last month.

"Today, there are blockades of major streets and stores --with the teachers/popular coalition using buses to block."

The "Popular Assembly" -- the broad coalition that has been organizing the mega-marches -- has set up a parallel government and has occupied Oaxaca's former State House -- which has been a museum in recent years -- on the Zocalo today.

"They will declare themselves 'in charge' of the state," Collins says. They're calling for a statewide general strike this Friday.

****

In Mexico, each precinct does its own count, which is attached to the sealed ballot box and sent to the Federal Election Institute (IFE) [Correction: only the summaries are sent to IFE; the ballot boxes remain sealed in the districts]. All of the preliminary tallies are based on the precincts' counts. The official count will begin tomorrow, and is expected to last for up to a week.

It looks likely that there will be challenges. Manuel Camacho Solís, a top adviser to López Obrador, said Monday that "Our perception is that there have been very important irregularities."

Both candidates continue to claim victory -- the Mexican press has repeatedly said that the situation represents a "worst case scenario."

A preliminary, uncertified count showed PAN candidate Felipe Calderon with a 400,000-vote lead. Lopez Obrador's camp is charging that there was "vote-shaving" at some voting stations, especially in his home state of Tabasco. Lopez Obrador alleges that as many as three million votes are missing, citing a discrepancy between estimated projected turnout and preliminary counts. He stopped short of calling the elections fraudulent, but is already calling for a ballot-by-ballot recount. He hasn't yet asked his supporters to take it to the streets, as many expect him to do if Calderon ends up with a narrow lead.

The Washington Post reports that both parties are lawyering up, and all of the papers are talking about a legal process reminiscent of that which followed the 2000 Florida impasse. In Mexico, however, there's more breathing room -- the president doesn't take office for five months -- so there won't be pressure to cut the process short. The vote is almost certain to end up in the Federal Judicial Electoral Tribunal, a court that has the ultimate say on the winner. The whole thing could drag on for months; election authorities aren't required to certify the vote until September 6.

The process will put Mexico's electoral institutions, which have undergone dramatic reforms during the past ten years, to the test. Will they be transparent enough to deal with a nail-biter? Polls show that the IFE is one of the country's most trusted institutions, but that may not hold up if things get ugly and a lot of charges are flying around. Some PRD officials are accusing the IFE of "bias."

Whatever the final outcome, it's likely that the close vote and a sharply divided legislature will make it difficult for the eventual winner to govern. One analyst called it a "recipe for gridlock."

The head of the EU observer mission said yesterday that the results of Mexican elections were "so far reliable" and they ruled out widespread fraud in the elections, although they noted scattered irregularities.

The elections were monitored by thousands of foreign observers, and most of the monitoring organizations have yet to submit reports on their findings. When they do, we'll have a clearer picture of what transpired, from an on-the-ground perspective.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


At Least 5 Need Government-Run Health-Care at Bachmann's Angry Protests Against Government-Run Health-Care
Milbank.
November 6, 2009.
Report: Hasan Snapped Under Weight of Bullying, Anxiety Over Deployment
That's not stopping the usual suspects from crying "jihad."
November 6, 2009.
Who's Been Held Accountable for the Crimes of Bush's "War on Terror"? Four Italians ... Sort of
Certainly not those who ran our shadowy network of secret prisons, nor their superiors who created it.
November 5, 2009.
What Tuesday's Election Results Mean for the Bigger Political Picture: Nada
Everyone's spinning it otherwise, of course.
November 4, 2009.
"America's Toughest Dictator"? FBI Investigating Joe Arpaio for Using Office to Bully Opponents
The feds are reportedly looking at a pattern of law enforcement being used to intimidate political opponents.
November 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Clear and present side-stepping
Posted by: fifthworld on Jul 4, 2006 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The count could be long, complicated, and ugly, and yet Joshua won't deign to consider any parallel here, such as the scenario portrayed by Palast, with U.S. 2000, or 04. As if it's something our election-rigging companies, urged on by the fascists, couldn't have had a hand in engineering. Well, we'll find out, eventually, I'm sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clear and present side-stepping Posted by: Joshua Holland
» 1988 ????????????? Posted by: YinRising
» RE: 1988 ????????????? Posted by: JDMB
Difference between 'estimated turnout' and the actual vote.
Posted by: jonwilson on Jul 4, 2006 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Lopez Obrador alleges that as many as three million votes are missing, citing a discrepancy between estimated turnout and preliminary counts."

What the heck kind of ‘logic’ is this?

I know a lot of people wish polls were always right, as Bush would have lost both elections but polls are polls, and they aren’t always right.

To say that three million votes were 'stolen' because polling didn't correctly predict the exact turnout is absurd. Clearly the dude who made this statement has a very weak case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More complicated than that ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
The Fix is On!!!!
Posted by: YinRising on Jul 5, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For English only readers, be vary wary of the filters that the information you recieve is passing through.
The link for the San Francisco Chronical's website was using the phrase "leftist candidate eats his words" to describe the retraction of AMLO's declaration of victory. Would they use that tone towards Calderon?
Huffington post had 1 link to a story about the election and then completely scrubed the sited of any mention of the contention within 12 hours. Like the election never existed, while 3 day old bullshit about __ was regurgetated.
Drudgereport already announced "conservative" as the winner. On their banner headline.

Virtually no enlish media or corporate owned spanish media is reminding people of the scandalous desafuero last year, the violent political repression in Atenco just 2 months ago, or the investigation that was started LAST WEEK into Calderon and possible illegal use of voter rolls that were hidden on his website.

Now, Delegado Zero is reporting that his sources indicate possible collusion between Fox and the IFE.

Remember, had their not been a populist revolt last year in response to the desafuero, we wouldn't be talking about a possible election theft, because they would have already stolen it!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

exit polls
Posted by: epppie on Jul 5, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll bet that if the Pubs lose Congress in November, we'll suddenly hear lots about exit polls in the media, anomalies, election fraud, on and on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: exit polls Posted by: kryptx
long hard
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 5, 2006 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now here is a real long hard slog: getting a correct vote out of the Mexican election where the Bushies and some Mexicans are trying to steal the election from Obrador. But no matter how long it takes it needs to be done right with a true result else we may see a real example of literal class warfare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: long hard Posted by: sidewinder
AMLO has already conceded that there was no rampant fraud
Posted by: jules_siegel on Jul 5, 2006 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's as close to a tie as you can get, with Felipe Calderón, the businessman's candidate, leading Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the friend of the poor, by a margin of 0.6%. There were irregularities that may have favored Felipe Calderón, but no evidence of widespread fraud. The full count has not yet been completed.

The PRI did so poorly that Dulce María Sauri, a major party leader, predicted that it would now fall apart and militants would move to other parties. I think this overstates the case. The PRI now holds the balance of power in the Mexican Congress. Neither the PRD or the PAN have a majority. The new government will therefore be a coalition or it won't be able to govern.

According to the New York Times, "Mr. López Obrador and members of his Democratic Revolutionary Party say they do not believe that there was rampant fraud. But they added that they believed that there were enough errors and irregularities to throw the election their way."

Almost entirely ignored in all the speculative hysteria about fraud was the fact that the irregularities and discrepancies are significant only because the election is so close, and that is the fault of no one except Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who started out with an 80% favorability rating, a million people marching for him in Mexico City, and somehow wound up in a nose-to-nose squeaker with a colorless bureaucrat who is a testimonial to the power of television over reality.

Summing up: Everyone knew by the end of June this was going to be a close election, and we all knew that there would be claims of fraud if that turned out to be true. Now comes the real test. The accusations have to be verified across the board. Well, all the paper is there and it can be examined and shown to the public to prove the charges, if true. Mexico has a very clear legal structure for dealing with election disputes.

That's the route López Obrador is taking. It's the correct one and as a result, my confidence in him has gone up. Can the Instituto Federal Electoral and the election court resolve the doubts to the satisfaction of the Mexican public? If they can't, the crisis begins. At the moment, Mexico is tensely awaiting the outcome, but maintaining social peace.

Yesterday I spoke with Justo May Correa, a local journalist with a reputation for extreme skepticism when it comes to official information, who is the correspondent for El Universal. His webpage is here.

He said that at the moment we have no choice except to trust in the strength of Mexican electoral institutions. He vehemently discarded any speculation about fraud perpetrated at the level of Instituto Federal Electoral. He said that the members of this commission are not political appointees, but were chosen by representatives of all parties, and that he felt that they were above suspicion until proven otherwise.

He did not think that the country was in crisis and he laughed when I mentioned chaos. He said that the vote would be thoroughly reviewed, and that people should pay attention to that process and do their best to make sure it's honest.

I want to reiterate the fact that Justo is not an establishment guy in any way at all. I did not get the feeling that he favored the PAN. So this is a Mexican journalist and he is telling me the same thing that I am telling people here. Calm down and wait for the process to unfold fully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mr. Siegal and Irony Posted by: YinRising
Good coverage
Posted by: kryptx on Jul 5, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for keeping up with the Mexican elections, Joshua. It's an important topic that I'm sure I wouldn't have heard anything about if it weren't for your updates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mexico vote
Posted by: scearfo on Jul 5, 2006 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joshua: You have let the reader know what these acronyms stand for, i.e.:
"Luis Carlos Ugalde, head of the IFE" -- Emilio Serrano, a legislator from the PRD" -- "IPS' Chuck Collins"-- Oaxaca, a PRI stronghold, went PRD on Sunday. . ."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ALPHABET SOUP Posted by: Joshua Holland
JDorama
Posted by: HeroesAll on Jul 5, 2006 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, man, this election looks just like a Japanese TV drama series: I'm waiting with bated breath for the next installment. Will KimuTaku regain his memory? Will the mysterious 2 or 3 million votes be included? Will there be social unrest, protest, fraud, economic chaos, rains of fish? Will there be a challenge, a recount, a riot? Will the US step in?

Onya, Joshua, this one's a nailbiter. Just one question, though: the BBC was talking about Subcommandante Marcos the other day (Monday, here). And I haven't heard anything from anywhere else about the Zapatistas: was the Beeb making things up? Or are they just maintaining a very low profile at the moment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Can't hear if you don't listen Posted by: YinRising
Update:
Posted by: JDMB on Jul 5, 2006 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IFE has recessed for the evening, will resume the count tomorrow; count stands at 89.36% votes tallied, AMLO lead down to 1.28%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANNOUNCED HOLD ...
Posted by: Joshua Holland on Jul 5, 2006 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A las 9:12 de la noche de este miércoles, el consejero presidente del Instituto Federal Electoral, Luis Carlos Ugalde, declaró en receso la sesión permanente del consejo general de este organismo, la cual se reanudará una vez concluida la totalidad de los cómputos en los 300 distritos electoreles.

Ugalde explicó que una vez concluidos todos los cómputos, el consejo general del IFE sesionará e informará al país sobre los resultados finales de la votación para presidente de la República, incluso si eso ocurriera durante la madrugada.

Anunció que aún falta concluir el cómputo en algunos distritos del país, específicamente de los estados de Baja California Norte, Nuevo León, Sonora y Sinaloa.

Aseveró que los cómputos distritales se han realizado conforme a la ley y en la presencia de todos los partidos políticos. Agregó que cuando existió causa legal, los paquetes electorales fueron abiertos para verificar los votos.

Advirtió que los informes seguirán fluyendo cada tres horas.

En estos momentos, el país requiere cordura y responsabilidad de todos los actores políticos, dijo al refrendar que el IFE es la única institución que dará a conocer el resultado oficial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Translation
Posted by: JDMB on Jul 5, 2006 9:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a professional translator, I couldn't resist:
At 9:12 PM this Wednesday evening, the Chairman of the Federal Electoral Institute, Luis Carlos Ugalde, declared a recess of the permanent session of the board of this organism, which will reconvene upon the conclusion of the totality of the count in the 300 electoral districts.

Ugalde explained that once the count has been concluded, IFE's board will meet and inform the country on the final results of the vote for president of the Republic, even if this were to occur at dawn.

He announced that the count is still to be concluded in some districts in the country, specifically in the states of Baja California Norte, Nuevo León, Sonora and Sinaloa [northern states that went heavily for Calderón over López Obrador].

He asserted that the district counts have been carried put in accordance with the law and in the presence of all the political parties. He added that when there was legal cause, the electoral packets were opened to verify the votes.

He warned that the reports would continue to flow every three hours.

In this moment, the country requires levelheadedness and reponsibility from all political actors, he said as he emphasized that IFE is the only institution that will announce the official result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Translation Posted by: Joshua Holland
» The Fix is On!!!! Posted by: YinRising
» RE: The Fix is On!!!! Posted by: JDMB
» RE: The Fix is On!!!! Posted by: vivachavez
» RE: The Fix is On!!!! Posted by: YinRising
AMLO is losing, will challenge the election
Posted by: JDMB on Jul 6, 2006 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AMLO just announced (8:37 AM Mexico City time) that he will challenge the election results; with 99.39% of votes tallied he's dropped out of the lead, 35.39% to Calderón's 35.80%, with remaining precints in mostly PAN strongholds. He's already called for a massive demonstration on Saturday, and this is precisely what was generally feared: that he wouldn't accept a defeat (he never has) and will resort to civil unrest (he always has) to get his way.

And in case you were wondering: no, I don't like him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's their country
Posted by: ghoster on Jul 6, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is their country so what ever happens it is their problem, this country has enough problems on it's plate and if as usual the elections are manipulated and corrupt what else is new? Secondly the population has over the years assumed that the elections are always corrupt. These days with so many young people fed up with the way the system works, and are willing to change it anyway that works. Watch for more events on the horizon, especially if the military takes sides in this. No other force has the capacity to forestall a revolution. Otherwise it is going to be a show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are voters just flipping coins?
Posted by: yoursfaithfully on Jul 6, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there may be irregularities, it's disturbing to see how many elections lately end in near draws. While the media portrays this as a serious ideological division, another possible scenario is an absence of ideological division. When voters are split 50/50 on a pair of candiates, it may suggest that the voters are just guessing.

For example, when you take a True/False test, if you don't know the answers, you'll score a 50%, on average. I believe seeing that phenomenon in voting suggests political disengagement: people just don't know the answer to our modern political crises, so they guess. This may be (and likely is) the result of intentional confusion on the part of right-wing political machines and the media, or it could be because people just don't care enough to become engaged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I. F. Stone
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jul 7, 2006 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“All governments are run by liars and nothing they say should be believed.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]