Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

House Overrides Bush's Veto on Farm Bill

Posted by Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! at 3:47 AM on May 22, 2008.


100 Republicans joined Democrats to override Bush's lame-duck veto of the bill.

Republicans are so eager to distance themselves from Bush that even some of the very worst rubber stamps of the past 7 years will do anything to create a faux record to show the voters how they "stood up and opposed Bush." Today, more House Republicans voted to override Bush's veto of the farm bill than voted to sustain their clueless leader. The overall vote to override passed 316-108 with 100 Republicans joined the Democrats to finally stand up to the despised lame duck. Of course a handful of the most craven and repulsive Blue Dogs stuck with Bush on this-- as with everything-- especially Melissa Bean (IL), Jim Matheson (UT), Jim Cooper (TN), and Jane Harman (CA). The House needs a two-thirds majority to override a veto. They got it-- and more.

Senator Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat who heads the Senate Agriculture Committee, explained the bill’s bipartisan popularity shortly after the Senate approved it last week: “This is really a farm bill for everyone.”

Indeed, one could argue that the term “farm bill” is a stretch. Although it contains billions of dollars in subsidies for farmers, the five-year package provides far more money for nutrition programs like food stamps, and for land conservation and alternative-fuel programs.

Before Wednesday, only one of Mr. Bush’s vetoes had been overridden. Last November, Congress approved a $23.2 billion water-projects measure over his objection. That bill addressed Everglades restoration, flood control in California, hurricane recovery efforts and so many popular projects for individual states that most lawmakers did not want to vote “no.”

Let's hope this is the start of a new trend-- since Bush plans on vetoing everything that comes out of Congress from now 'til the end of his term. Ironically, this isn't a black and white issue and Bush-- although a hypocrite when he denounced subsidizing wealthy farms, his regime's middle name-- is right about some of the reasons the pork-laden bill sucked. But it's a result of compromise that would take a real leader to overcome, something that there is a dearth of among our current governing class. Alan Grayson, the Blue America-endorsed progressive in Orlando may sense the same thing. When I asked him, just now, about rubber stamp incumbent Ric Keller's vote to sustain Bush's veto-- which is generally judged as bad for Florida farmers-- Alan went right to the question of Keller's leadership qualities: "Whenever there is a choice between doing what's right, and doing what President Bush wants, you can be sure what Ric Keller will do."

In case you're counting, here's how the bill breaks down:

  • $200 billion- Food stamps and other domestic nutrition programs (66%)

  • $43 billion- Subsidies for rice, cotton, corn, soybeans, wheat and other crops (14%)

  • $27 billion- Conservation programs to set aside or protect environmentally sensitive farmland (9%)

  • $23 billion- Crop insurance (8%)

Among the lunatic fringe Republicans who stuck with Bush-- aside from Ric Keller in Florida-- were members of the rubber stamp brigade like David Dreier (CA), Virginia Foxx (NC), Michelle Bachmann (MN), Scott Garrett (NJ), Frank Wolf (VA), Patrick McHenry (NC), Mean Jean Schmidt (OH), Ken Calvert (CA), Virgil Goode (VA), Charlie Dent (PA), John Shadegg (AZ), Jerry Lewis (CA), Darrell Issa (CA), Dave Reichert (WA), Daniel Lungren (CA), Heather Wilson (NM), Mike Pence (IN), and, as always, Dana Rohrabacher (CA).

Digg!


Lieberman at the RNC: Lied When He Said He's a Dem and Never Stopped
Watched Joe Lieberman's speech so you didn't have to.
September 3, 2008.
Insurance Should Benefit Consumers; Not Corporate Managers and Campaign Contributors
Insurance is broken in America. Time to fix it.
June 12, 2008.
Republicans Obstructing Relief in Housing Crisis
A bipartisan coalition of governors are prodding the GOP to move on easing the housing crisis.
May 29, 2008.
Recount: HBO's Election 2000 Nostalgia
With it's new movie, Recount, HBO digs up old wounds.
May 27, 2008.
There Is No Such Thing As Clean Coal
The Coal industry is spending $35 million to convince us otherwise.
May 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeah!!! Spending more money on credit that we don't have
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on May 22, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is a hypocrite because he is perfectly fine spending money we don't have on Iraq but this is a bad bill.

We don't have the money, we are just borrowing more money to pass bills like this one.

Then we wonder why our dollar is in the crapper and gas prices are through the roof.

Even Bush can be right once in a while. As they say, a broken clock is right twice a day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Update
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 22, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Update: Because of a clerical error that omitted a section of the bill sent to Bush, the House must vote again on the bill.

I say, why bother voting again? Bush won't know the difference between the incomplete bill and the complete bill anyway. Why waste tax-payer money voting a second time?... It's not like Bush can READ or anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i've never said this before...
Posted by: somegirl on May 23, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but i agree with bush on this one.
this is an awful piece of legislation with massive corporate welfare payments for the rich. this is exactly the kind of thing that historically has given dems a bad name.

too bad he didn't veto the bail out for the mortgage industry thieves too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO VICTORY
Posted by: markw4786 on May 25, 2008 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As usual, the agri-giant-pigs made out like bandits. ADM, CARGILL making record profits, get tax payers $$$$$$. Call your Senator and Congressman and thank them for "helping" these pigs. RALPH NADER LOOKS BETTER AND BETER AND BETTER...............................
FDR is folling in his grave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]