Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Rejects McCain's Gas Tax Proposal

Posted by Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! at 2:26 PM on April 29, 2008.


Even George Bush isn't buying what McCain is selling at the gas pump.

When I saw the name on the article I thought it was by John McCain's embedded publicist at the Washington Post. Then I realized it was in the NY Times and saw it was John Broder, not the Post's pathetic old hack with the same last name. The story highlights what Broder calls Democratic division over McCain's cynical summer gas tax holiday. As soon as Obama pointed out that it was a bad idea, Hillary jumped in to support their respective campaign's common enemy: the American people.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton lined up with Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, in endorsing a plan to suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline, 18.4 cents a gallon, for the summer travel season. But Senator Barack Obama, Mrs. Clinton’s Democratic rival, spoke out firmly against the proposal, saying it would save consumers little and do nothing to curtail oil consumption and imports.

While Mr. Obama’s view is shared by environmentalists and many independent energy analysts, his position allowed Mrs. Clinton to draw a contrast with her opponent in appealing to the hard-hit middle-class families and older Americans who have proven to be the bedrock of her support. She has accused Mr. Obama of being out of touch with ordinary Americans who are struggling to meet their mortgages and gas up their cars and trucks.

Mrs. Clinton said at a rally on Monday morning in Graham, N.C., that she would introduce legislation to impose a windfall-profits tax on oil companies and use the revenue to suspend the gasoline tax temporarily.

Above I referred to McCain as cynical, which he certainly is, but in the interest of fair play, I might add that Mrs. Clinton's cynicism is every bit as virulent as his. I'm so sure Miss McConnell, who has obstructed everything the Democrats have tried to do and even every bipartisan proposal to ease the energy crisis, is going to allow a windfall-profit tax on one of the Republican Party's biggest corporate donors, the oil and gas industry. And Bush is just frothing at the mouth to sign it, right? Look, McCain has made a record of not even voting for the most dire national security needs-- like safety in our ports and equipment for our troops in the field-- if it meant closing corporate tax loopholes or doing away with even a fraction of the tax breaks for people making over a $1,000,000 a year. So... this is a total non-starter.

Bush's "economic speech" this morning was one of the most nakedly partisan rants I've heard from the bumbling idiot in months.

"It's a tough time for our economy," he muttered. "Across our country, many Americans are understandably anxious about issues affecting their pocketbook, from gas and food prices to mortgage and tuition bills. They're looking to their elected leaders in Congress for action. Unfortunately, on many of these issues, all they're getting is delay." The Bush Economic Miracle was replaced by the Bush Recession, in his mind at least, by Democratic foot dragging on his incredibly unsound economic agenda-- an agenda that has been disastrous for the economy and for the American people. But what does this imbecile know? Two weeks ago he seemed flabbergasted when some mentioned that the price of gas was near $4/gallon. [I wish it would go back to that in L.A., where it is heading towards $5/gallon, thanks to the Bush-Cheney Energy Plan to enrich the few at the expense of the rest of us.] Would he like to leave the country with a full fledged Depression instead of a Recession?

But even the doltish Bush isn't stupid enough to buy into McCain's and Hillary's gas price cynicism. When a reporter asked Bush about the McCain-Hillary plan he just smirked, babbled some noncommittal answer-- not wanting to mention that McCain is even more clueless than he is-- and said he didn't want to inject himself into the ongoing presidential race.

The presidential race? McCain and the Hilldog are talking about this summer and this summer, alas, we'll have the same jerk in the White House who first stole the election in 2000. He doesn't want to inject himself? He's the only one who could sign or veto this "proposal," which is strictly campaign fodder, as even Bush recognized.

Meanwhile, not everything is getting more expensive every day. Housing prices dropped in February at the fastest rate ever, a widely watched index showed on Tuesday, reflecting that the housing slump is gaining momentum and showing no signs of letting up.

Digg!


Insurance Should Benefit Consumers; Not Corporate Managers and Campaign Contributors
Insurance is broken in America. Time to fix it.
June 12, 2008.
Republicans Obstructing Relief in Housing Crisis
A bipartisan coalition of governors are prodding the GOP to move on easing the housing crisis.
May 29, 2008.
Recount: HBO's Election 2000 Nostalgia
With it's new movie, Recount, HBO digs up old wounds.
May 27, 2008.
There Is No Such Thing As Clean Coal
The Coal industry is spending $35 million to convince us otherwise.
May 23, 2008.
House Overrides Bush's Veto on Farm Bill
100 Republicans joined Democrats to override Bush's lame-duck veto of the bill.
May 22, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nationalize the American Oil Companies..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Apr 29, 2008 2:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This would accomplish almost nothing and Clinton's idea of a wind fall profits tax doesn't lower the cost of gasoline to consumers one bit..

We need to cut gasoline costs by 30-33%..!

If we Nationalize the American Oil Companies we can do this and then have $50-60 Billion per year for alternative energy and new technologies ad this would also create an economic boom that would effect every American..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple economics...
Posted by: RobNLA on Apr 29, 2008 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Decrease demand, decrease the price.

Gas for automobiles is how consumers are most directly impacted. So have the government fund companies that can retrofit existing gas only vehicles so that they can operate as hybrids.

Then once good methods have been worked out, offer consumers tax breaks to convert their vehicles.

Second, offer funds to expand research into solar cell and battery technology.
With greater efficiency, comabined these two technologies could substantially reduce the amount of fuel required to run vehicles and provide electricity in homes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gas tax holiday?
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 29, 2008 8:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone else remember I-35? Bridge? Falling into the Mississippi?

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» exactly Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Is it just me
Posted by: ikonoklast on Apr 29, 2008 8:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or is there really no difference between Clintonian Democracy and the Republican lunacy? McCain or Hillary: is there a difference I should be aware of? They both look like ruin to me.

"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» they both look like ruin to me Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
I will never, ever, agree with bush on anything
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Apr 30, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the idea that the gas tax should be reduced is ludicrous. How could anyone suggest that driving is something that should be encouraged!

The way to prevent rich people from driving while everybody else can't is to tax them to the point that they are no longer rich, not to keep gas prices low (by world standards) so that everybody can drive more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boom!
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on May 3, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am reminded of James Thurber's story about a new mother who decided to shield her infant from the "frightening" boom of thunder by clapping her hands, trilling out a mommy-style "Boooom!", and otherwise trying to cover the thunder with fun distractions.

Thurber then took the trouble to make his point clear, by stating that those who seek to insulate their children from momentary frights can make them oblivious to real dangers.

Removing the gas tax is stupid in several ways:
1. It bulwarks our general state of denial. We are never going to see cheap gasoline again. We are probably not going to see $3/gallon Regular Gas again -- certainly not for any extended period. Even without gas taxes, we will hit $5/gal gas soon. (Think not? Just do a Google search for $5 per gallon gas.) We need to start facing the pain and making the best choices now, not bending reality to buy a couple of months of false hope and extended denial.
2. In pushing this "bipartisan" Centrist lunacy, Hillary plays into the Reaganite/Bushite con-game that "all taxes are bad", and sends a signal that those taxes are not needed -- at a time when the BushCons continue to strip our government of billions.
3. If Hillary wants to pass a windfall profits tax, then she should get to it NOW, without trading away anything. Even if she intends to use a quid-pro-quo as leverage (and why would it work?), she shouldn't start the game with all her cards face-up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]