Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A call to put presidential debates on YouTube

Posted by Heather Gehlert at 2:15 PM on April 26, 2007.


Heather Gehlert: Making the Web more democratic ...

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Heather Gehlert in your
mailbox!

 

Eleven years ago, presidential candidates began relaying campaign messages on the Web. Four years later, in 2000, they started accepting campaign contributions online. And now, thanks to a recent bipartisan alliance, video footage of campaign speeches could become widely available on the Internet.

Large numbers of organizations and grassroots activists released letters this week to the Republican and Democratic National Committees, asking them to urge debate sponsors to make all debate video footage available for any member of the public to access, share, reuse and blog about freely.

C-SPAN has already announced that it will allow expanded use of its video, and now progressives and conservatives alike are hoping others will follow their lead.

"This is about the Internet empowering the little guy in our democracy," Adam Green, of MoveOn.org Civic Action, said in a statement. "The big TV networks should not be the only ones determining which sound bites are newsworthy after a debate -- everyday people should be able to put candidates positions on YouTube and share them with others without fear of breaking the law."

Right now, television networks retain exclusive rights to debate footage. In years past, this didn't matter because, even if people wanted to share video content, they did not have a forum to do so. But now, with highly trafficked Internet sites like YouTube, it simply doesn't make sense to keep that footage out of the public domain.

For anyone who wants to see the Web become more democratic, you can show your support for the proposal by calling the DNC (202-863-8000) or the RNC (202-863-8500).

Digg!

Heather Gehlert is a managing editor at AlterNet.


President Poised to Ban Toxic Chemicals in Kids' Toys
The legislation is a big win for consumers.
August 7, 2008.
How Toxic Is Your Car?
Don't let that "new car smell" fool you. Your car might be an indoor air pollution trap.
July 26, 2008.
Pushing Prescriptions: How the Drug Industry Sells Its Agenda at Your Expense
Big Pharma is controlling the FDA, politicians and the public airwaves to get to you.
July 18, 2008.
Big Oil Wants to Keep Toxins in Your Child's Toys
Kids should come before oil profits.
July 11, 2008.
National Day of Protest Against Health Insurance Corporations
Now is your chance to push back against health insurers that put profits before people.
June 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, we need more corporate support of campaigns. File-share them
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 26, 2007 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't let large, corporate entities which have proven their ability/willingness to censor speech (whether religious, political, rascist, democratic, etc) gain any more control over our elections. It is bad enough that they fund (and select) the candidates and broadcast their pro-forma 'debates' on their networks but now we are going to support them on the internet also? How about non-corporate websites posting the videos? How about people using encrypted file-sharing networks to share the video and/or audio? How about individuals posting the video/audio on their personal pages or servers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I second the... Posted by: Steven Wanzell