Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Truth About Pat Tillman: Murder Is Not "Friendly Fire"

Posted by Guest Blogger at 11:00 AM on August 3, 2007.


RJ Eskow: Three bullet holes. In the forehead. From a M-16. That was ten yards away. That's not "friendly fire." That's murder.
kevinpat350
Tillmans

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Guest Blogger in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by RJ Eskow, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

Once again, the Administration is pulling the old magician's trick of misdirection, this time in the Pat Tillman case. And once again, the press is falling for it. Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers focused on "what they knew and when" -- to borrow the Watergate phrase -- rather than the core issue at the heart of the Pat Tillman matter, which is this:

Pat Tillman was almost certainly murdered, and fratricide is not "friendly fire."

Yet a Google News search on the terms "Tillman" and "friendly fire" yielded 1,044 hits today, all from the last 24 hours. That's after the facts behind the fratricide are widely known - and after a number of clues that suggest the entire command structure, from the White House on down, concealed a murder from the public and took no steps to investigate it.

There's your story.

Friendly fire is commonly understood to mean the accidental death of a U. S. soldier through weapons fired by U.S. or allied troops. (See this definition.) The facts in the Tillman case make friendly fire highly unlikely. He died from three bullet holes grouped together in his forehead, fired from a M-16 that was no more than ten yards away.

Three bullet holes. In the forehead. From a M-16. That was ten yards away.

That's not "friendly fire." That's murder. (Unless Cpl. Tillman stood up in the path of another soldier's fire, took three hits precisely in the forehead, then fell before being hit again.)

As abhorrent as it was for the Administration to delay telling the family, the handling of the fratricide question was even worse. A killer's trail went cold. Now we may never know the truth.

As for the narrative that Rumsfeld and Myers offered yesterday, let's look at it in detail - together with the known facts:

1. Pat Tillman dies. Medical examiners request a fratricide investigation sometime thereafter. Their request is denied.

2. Gen. McChrystal sends a cable to Gen. Abizaid and another general on April 22 urging them to notify the President of this probable fratricide "in order to preclude any unknowing statements by our country's leaders which might cause embarrassment if the circumstances of Cpl. Tillman's death becomes public."

3. Gen.Abizaid claims he didn't receive it for 10 or 12 days, because he was in Iraq. (They don't have email, or even secure pouches for urgent memos?) Defense Department records later show that Gen. Abizaid was not in Iraq, but was actually in Qatar and Afghanistan -where the killing occurred - during that 10 to 12 days.

4. Gen. Myers learns the true nature of Cpl. Tillman's death in late April, yet - according to his testimony - did not feel the need to inform either the Secretary of Defense or the President.

5. Military records show that dozens of officers knew of the true nature of the Lieutenant's death within days, yet senior officers and Pentagon officials still maintain they didn't know for weeks. (Surprisingly, they did not undertake a massive review of military procedures in order to determine how such a massive series of communications failures could occur - one that eerily affected every single senior officer with responsibility for this case simultaneously.)

6. The military continues to press the story that Tillman was killed while courageously leading a counterattack in an Afghan mountain pass. (Nice poetic touch, that "mountain pass" - good for recruitment.)

7. A national memorial service is held for Cpl Tillman several days later. The President and others talk about Cpl. Tillmans heroism in that mythical mountain pass - yet Gen. Myers, per his own testimony, still felt no need to inform either the SecDef or the President .

8. Rumsfeld says he was not told the truth until "some time after May 20," or approximately a month after Gen. Myers learned of the incident. Yet he seems strangely undisturbed to learn that the truth was known six weeks earlier and he wasn't informed.

9. Neither Rumsfeld nor the President felt the need to correct the record publicly upon learning the truth.

10. It wasn't until reporters filed a Freedom of Information Act that the following information became public on July 27: ""Army medical examiners were suspicious about the close proximity of the three bullet holes in Pat Tillman's forehead and tried without success to get authorities to investigate whether the former NFL player's death amounted to a crime."

Let's say it again, to be very clear: The White House and Pentagon withheld the facts about this killing until they were legally forced to reveal them months later by Freedom of Information laws. And they never ordered a criminal investigation.

As for the testimony by Myers and Rumsfeld: What they have described is a command structure that was brutally indifferent to the situation on the ground and uninterested in pursuing a murder. Gen. Myers, if he is to be believed, allowed the President and Secretary of Defense to pay tribute to a man as if he had died in combat, knowing full well their words were untrue.

Is that plausible, with everything we know about Rumsfeld? Remember, this is the micromanager who hectored generals on little details, arrogantly told them he knew more than they did about the military, and issued regular memos to a wide range of Pentagon personnel on a variety of topics, great and small.

We are also supposed to believe that Rumsfeld was so uninvolved in the human issues his troops faced that he wasn't informed of the facts on this case - and that once he found out, he was unconcerned about the delay in telling him the facts. And that the President wasn't disturbed enough to order an investigation into the killing. Nor did he or Rumsfeld inform the family, or the nation, that they had been misled - at a hero's funeral.

As the conservatives used to say in the 90's: Character matters. And that's if they're telling the truth ... Can you imagine what we could learn about their character if, as is very possible, they're still lying?

And make no mistake, the beat goes on:

"What doesn't make sense,'' (Rep) Waxman said, is that while there were hundreds of e-mails among 97 White House officials in the days after Tillman's death, there were none after the Pentagon announced he had been killed by friendly fire."
Waxman has concluded, reasonably enough, that it's very likely there is still an ongoing and systematic White House attempt to hide the truth about Cpl. Tillman's death. Nevertheless, the main media narrative appears to be "Rummy looked great and did well." And that Pat Tillman died from "friendly fire."

What else can anyone say? Except, of course, to thank Cpl. Tillman for his sacrifice - and promise to find the truth for his memory.

(Contribute here to the Pat Tillman Foundation)

Digg!


USDA Renews Approval of 46 Non-Organic Ingredients in "Organic" Foods
At the same time, the USDA withdrew approval for a type of food coloring and a food additive.
May 8, 2008.
GOP '08 Candidates Take Their Creepshow to the Iowa Stage
James Neffinger, Rachel Sklar and Drew Westen: This party is in trouble.
August 5, 2007.
Newspapers Join Forces Against the War
Max Follmer: Across the country more and more major newspapers are calling for some form of troop withdrawal from Iraq
August 4, 2007.
Gen. Wesley Clark: "We Are Not Questioning the Generals. Mr. President, We Are Questioning You!"
Taylor Marsh: Wesley Clark's exhilarating keynote speech at Yearly Kos brought the audience to its feet cheering.
August 3, 2007.
Is Hillary On Rupert Murdoch's Side?
Ari Berman: Sen. Clinton has been silent on Murdoch's purchase of the Wall Street Journal. Have his contributions to her campaign paid off for him?
August 3, 2007.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
tilman murder
Posted by: fredhb on Aug 3, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if anyone expects this administration to come clean about the murder of Tillman, you're gonna wait a long long time. Tillman was way to dangerous to allow him to live. I don't recall where I read it, but (I read that) he was reading Noam Chomsky and was VERY outspoken about the wrongness of invading Iraq. As a celebrity with voice, he was very dangerous to the war mongers. Note that his diaries were destroyed. The reasons he was killed will probably never see the light of day in the MM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support Our Troops!
Posted by: opeluboy on Aug 3, 2007 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You betcha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tillman
Posted by: janelynne on Aug 4, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ten yards away is about 2 car lengths away. Who saw the shooting, and who pulled the trigger. The witnesses who remember the last thing Tillman said are the ones who saw the three bullets go into his forehead. Friendly fire is about mistaken identity. That wouldn't put bullets in the forehead, because you would be facing the victim and know exactly who you were shooting from 2 car lengths away. Or maybe an m-16 went off eratically. If that is true, how could 3 bullets in a row hit the forehead of a bystander. Friendly fire is not an explanation, it is a firewall. What exactly happened? The Tillmans have the right to know and they should sue to get those details, if the details do not come up missing from the record.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please
Posted by: gregii on Aug 4, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...don't let this story die?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here, here! Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
waiting for the fall
Posted by: waitingforthefall on Aug 4, 2007 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately for Pat Tillman....and perhaps many many other erstwhile patriotic true-believers who got mixed up into this corporate war and never came home again under mysterious circumstances.....the truth got him killed. He was too smart for the role he chose to play in this usurption of the world's resources that is masquerading as a war on terror.

How long will it be before those who suspect the truth are not only eliminated on the corporate empire's foreign battlefields...but here at home as well??

This country...this corporate-ocracy...not unlike Moussoulini's facist Italy and Hitler's Nationaist Socialist Germany...is not worth spilling one drop of blood to defend in a false war that makes corporations rich...and leaves the duped American public broke, bleeding and fooled.....

Control of America must be returned to her voters...not the special interests, holders of our securities and the mega-rich....

Until then...men like Tillman...will be isolated and eliminated withing the ranks of our military lest they use their celebrity to leak the truth to the American people....the corrupted "elected" puppets who run this country at the whim of the rich that bought them off FEAR men like Tillman and the damage that their courage, ethos, celebrity status and consciences can do to this trillion-dollar charade that has destroyed our constitutional freedoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, anyone out there with weapons experience?
Posted by: ianfan on Aug 4, 2007 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm no expert and certainly extremely skeptical of everything surrounding this whole incident. However, while I see that the flag of a murder investigation is raised and without a doubt should have been pursued, I also see that the evidence could be consistant with friendly fire.

Straight from wikipedia: "Most M16 and M4-style weapons issued are capable of semi-automatic fire and 3-round burst." Okay, could a well trained rifleman put all three rounds from a burst on a target roughly the size of a watermelon from 30 feet? I kind of think so, but again I'm no expert. I'm also not sure of the fire rate, but it's likely within the kind of time frame that would allow something like this to happen before a person fell to the ground.

Yes, this definately should have been investigated and the facts (as with pretty much our entire government) should have been made transparent from the get-go. But again, other than the cover-up (including the lack of an investigation into possible fratricide) which could very reasonably be motivated by things other than out and out murder, I don't see definate wrong doing nor a lot here screaming that this could not have been friendly fire and must have been murder.

Well, you know, aside from the obvious tragedy. Really, I'm not trying to make light of the issue or make excuses for the obvious cover-up, but I also want to make sure people don't rush into conspiracy theory mode.

Not being 100% informed nor an expert I could certainly be wrong on this, but the basic story of a soldier misidentifying Tillman as hostile, taking aim and putting a three round burst on target, all occuring within a few seconds or less, doesn't sound outside the laws of physics.

Yes, I 100% think there should have been an investigation into whether it was misidentification or intentional murder, but the evidence doesn't say the friendly fire is ruled out here as I see it.

I really think people should be much more concerned with what really happened to LaVena Johnson than Pat Tillman. There you have a clear cover-up and screaming shouting raging signs of murder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]