Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Are Bush, Pawlenty and Norquist Accessories to Murder in the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse?

Posted by Guest Blogger at 12:27 AM on August 3, 2007.


Howie Klein: With Republicans in charge, you get the inability for a society to act effectively and efficiently in the case of unforseen tragedies like Katrina or you get bridges with structural problems not being attended to.

This post, written by Howie Klein, originally appeared on Down With Tyranny!

I just went upstairs to get dressed for my morning hike and CNN was on. I saw Minnesota Tim Pawlenty speaking. He made a vapid, shallow political speech about the goodness of Minnesotans, upon whose goodwill his career depends. He also talked about the debris removal process. For the sake of the safety of all Americans-- in Minnesota and elsewhere-- that process should include the removal of every elected official who subscribes to the Republican Party ideology voiced by Republican Party Chief Propagandist Grover Norquist (AKA- "Field Marshall of The Bush Plan")

"I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."

If you want Republicans in government, you get the inability for a society to act effectively and efficiently in the case of unforseen tragedies like Katrina or you get bridges with structural problems not being attended to. And low taxes for the very wealthy. You get greed and avarice run wild and contempt for the common good.

As my friend Pachacutec mentioned this morning, "Republican government is structurally deficient. It must be replaced. It kills." Was the bridge structurally deficient? Yes, according to today's StarTribune.

The highway bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River on Wednesday was rated as "structurally deficient" two years ago and possibly in need of replacement.
That rating was contained in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory database.

...Many other bridges nationwide carry the same designation that the I-35W bridge received.

Minnesota's right-wing governor, Tim Pawlenty, who vetoed a bill requesting funds for highway repairs and who refused to authorize funds for structural repairs on the bridge, denied this morning that inspections in 2005 and 2006 found any deficiencies. I wonder if second degree murder charges can be brought against him. I doubt it.

Bush would have been crossing that bridge in 3 weeks when he arrived for a fundraiser for right-wing Senator Norm Coleman, a rubber stamp hack Minnesotans are sick and tired of. Bush will be speaking at a fundraising dinner for wealthy Minnesotans happy they didn't have to pay taxes (that might have saved the lives lost in yesterday's bridge catastrophe). Of course, who needs taxes, Republicans-- and the Democrats who think like them-- think you can just you can just raise traffic fines to fix deteriorating highway infrastructure. [Please take special note of the comment at that link.]

An editorial in today's Popular Mechanics makes clear we should get used to things like bridges collapsing if we as a society don't want to spend the money to repair infrastructure. Anti-tax (which amounts, in effect, to anti-society) wingnuts have expressed dismay that a major bridge could just fall down in the United States. I guess they missed this one in California three days ago or this problem over Carr's Creek in New York last year. This one in downtown Albany wasn't quite as bad, but that was a miracle. And the famous collapse of a 100 foot deck of the Mianus River Bridge (I-95) near Greenwich, CT was so long ago... 1983... and only 3 people died.

Our politicians will continue collecting campaign contributions and other bribes from the wealthy, cutting their taxes and endangering our lives for as long as we let them. Just keep voting for Republicans and for Democrats who vote like Republicans. I heard Bush on the radio a few minutes ago. He offered Minnesotans his prayers. He should be impeached.

IF ONLY THE TAX CUTTERS KNEW SOONER

"Minnesota officials were warned as early as 1990 that the bridge that plummeted into the Mississippi River was 'structurally deficient,' yet they relied on a strategy of patchwork fixes and stepped-up inspections." But Pawlenty is running around like a chicken without a head trying to close barn doors now.

Digg!

The guest bloggers are a pool of people that blog for AlterNet and share their content. Got a tip? Send it to peek@alternet.org.


USDA Renews Approval of 46 Non-Organic Ingredients in "Organic" Foods
At the same time, the USDA withdrew approval for a type of food coloring and a food additive.
May 8, 2008.
GOP '08 Candidates Take Their Creepshow to the Iowa Stage
James Neffinger, Rachel Sklar and Drew Westen: This party is in trouble.
August 5, 2007.
Newspapers Join Forces Against the War
Max Follmer: Across the country more and more major newspapers are calling for some form of troop withdrawal from Iraq
August 4, 2007.
Gen. Wesley Clark: "We Are Not Questioning the Generals. Mr. President, We Are Questioning You!"
Taylor Marsh: Wesley Clark's exhilarating keynote speech at Yearly Kos brought the audience to its feet cheering.
August 3, 2007.
Is Hillary On Rupert Murdoch's Side?
Ari Berman: Sen. Clinton has been silent on Murdoch's purchase of the Wall Street Journal. Have his contributions to her campaign paid off for him?
August 3, 2007.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Excuse for more "TOLL WAYS" and "PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIPS"?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Aug 3, 2007 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not saying it was a conspiracy but guaranteed you'll see more push for "toll roads" and PPP to fix our infrastructure from the Republicans (and probably some Democrats who also see the dollar signs). This Republican response is assured and as disingenuous as the Demcrats blaming Bush for a bridge build decades ago and declared 'deficient' in 1990 if not earlier according to the reports. The Federal government has ALREADY passed a law promoting 'privatisation' and 'ppps' and 'tolls'. IS ANYONE AWARE OF THIS. Check out this scary website.
linked text

Maybe we SHOULDN'T repair the bridges (at least to the level of use/loads they are taking now which ensure more consumption and use.) Instead we should rethink our 'traffic' patterns and consumer culture and, maybe, improve our life, eat better food, keep more jobs at home, and help the environment!!
Reasons for Federal highways:
1) to improve transportation of food and products to help America's companies and corporate farms. The highways allow production to take place further away from the consumer. Use cheap labour in S.Texas and drive the product up to Minnesota (or, more likely, make it in China and truck it all over to the WalMarts and Costcos.) Of course, this comes at the expense of hurting the small farmers, small business, local business, the environment, etc.

2) the army admired Hitler's 'autobahn' system which allowed easy movement of troops, armaments, herding of civilians, and mobility of shock-troops and police in cases of 'emergencies' or 'political dissent'.

3) construction contracts provided great money to private construction companies, labour in important voter constituencies, kick-backs, no-bid corruptions, and legal 'pork'. These help politicans who rely on large corporations to keep them in office.

4) aggrandisement of Federal power at the expense of the State and Local governments. Anytime Federal regulators and legislators get to spend more money it expands their influence, helps them keep their jobs, and expand their power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Popular Mechanics?
Posted by: sliver on Aug 3, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next we'll be hearing that Popular Mechanics is another example of the liberal media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE AREN'T FOLLOWING THE MONEY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 3, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's not shortage of it. But much of it is misdirected and just plain stolen. The Garden State Parkway in New Jersey was completed in 1955 and is less that 200 Mi. long. The tolls were to be discontinued as soon as it was paid for. Toll booths have probably tripled since then (50 Yr. +). The road is long since paid for. The question is, who's on the payroll? I think that question applies to so many things. Schools are at the top of the list. Where does the money go? Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Using a tragedy to try to paint opposition politics darkly is pathetic.
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Aug 3, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fault of the collapse lies with ALL of the people in the area who were aware of infrastructure problems for the last 20 years, not just one political party. Just as the fault of the New Orleans flooding lies with the people of New Orleans who ignored a problem that they were well aware of for at least the last fifty years.

There will be more problems like this in years to come and we will all be at fault regardless of our political stripes. Pick a piece of local infrastructure that you know is falling apart and start making noise about it. I have one and I have been making noise about it for years, it being a bridge maybe I will listened to now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bridge collapse/Bridge to no where
Posted by: Schroeder on Aug 3, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Americans need to insist that Congress actually create a real "Ethics" bill which bans any and all earmarks except for those that will benefit the Nation, as a whole, i.e., Interstate travel, Airline safety, Mass Transit, Fuel efficiency, etc., etc.,. We should not have earmarks that pay for pet projects in ANY community unless it is clear that the entire nation benefits. For example, a swimming pool in small town USA benefits only that smalltown USA. They are the ones who should pay for it. A bridge to no where benefits only those 5 people who live where the bridge might take them. They are the ones who should pay. And I'm the liberal??? We do need to maintain our infrastructure and we need to have the money to do just that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is about bombs and billionaires
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 3, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not bridges. The infrastructure of this country is crumbling all around us and New Orleans has basically drowned, but you don't hear this administration talking about fixing ANYTHING except elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Katrina Unforeseen??? Nonsense!!!
Posted by: Malcolm Calder on Aug 3, 2007 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saying Katrina was "unforeseen" is like Condi Rice's assertions that "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," as an "answer" to charges that the Bush Set (B.S.) knew that al Qaeda were planning to attack inside the US and failed to act adequately to prevent or prepare for it. It might not have been "Katrina", but "Jose" or "Lee", instead. Maybe 2004 or 2006. If we identify "Katrina" as exactly one certain set of circumstances then, yes, it was unforeseen.
But before Katrina hit with its category 4 fury, the [Army Corps of Engineers] had listed the potential of a powerful direct hit on New Orleans among a handful of top catastrophic disasters, which also include a major earthquake in San Francisco.

...Meanwhile, across the Country funds for Public Works and Public Services were being cut, as the money was channeled by the B.S & their Congress into tax "relief" for the Super-Rich and blood-money for Iraq. Including funds for such things as Education, Health and...oh yeah: Infrastructure.

In 2004 the B.S. Congress rejected a $4 million request by the Corps to fund a study for a plan to upgrade the levees to withstand a Category-4 or -5 Hurricane.

"From 2001 through 2005, the Bush administration battled with Congress to cut a total of approximately 67% from the budgetary requests from the Army Corps of Engineers for levee augmentation projects in the New Orleans area, but ultimately settled with Congress on a 50% cut in these budgetary requests."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Republican Problem
Posted by: magistre on Aug 3, 2007 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is and always has been their attitude: "If your not rich,your at fault,your to blame, you don't deserve to live!" And if you disagree with them, they'll shoot you in the face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make drivers pay a fine for driving off a collapsing bridge
Posted by: eddie torres on Aug 3, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking a little more closely at the comment from the DownWithTyranny! "raising traffic fines" link:

'Proud American' posts: "If the dumbasses would only obey the speed limits, get liability insurance, not get DWI's or otherwise break the law, [license suspension] would not be an issue, now would it? Wise up you bunch of Anti-American idiots! Laws are made for a reason and those that disobey them pay the price. REPUBLICANS IN 2008! WOO! HOO!"

Well, if only enough lawbreakers can be forced to liquidate their assets and sell their children, they can be forced to pay to replace all the money siphoned out of the public treasuries over the last 25 years. And then they can be thrown in a privately-owned prison. Woo hoo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushco, Ventura, Pawlenty. All products of three way elections!
Posted by: johngary66 on Aug 3, 2007 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's it going to take for people to understand that third parties almost always hurt progressives. Those that complain both party's are the same are DEAD wrong. When I see those posters here I think, impostor. That's what they want you to think so that you will keep supporting third party spoilers. Who do you think they help? The democratic party definately needs new people . We won't get them by whining! Do something positive. There are many groups you can join.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Appropriations from Congress
Posted by: appleton14 on Aug 5, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read that prior to Hurricane Katrina, Congress had appropriated monies for rebuilding the levees in New Orleans--millions and millions, I believe. However, once it reached the State of Louisana (a state not exactly known for its honest politicians) it was spent on other things; one of which was a new state Supreme Court building.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]