Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fight back against health insurance lies

Posted by Robert Greenwald at 2:00 PM on August 6, 2009.


What does UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Hemsley have to lose if Congress passes real healthcare reform this year?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Robert Greenwald in your
mailbox!

 

What does UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Hemsley have to lose if Congress passes real healthcare reform this year?

Well, for starters, Hemsley’s nearly three quarters of a billion dollars in unexercised stock options might lose a few pennies on the dollar if insurance providers like UnitedHealth Group are forced to actually pay for the treatment that patients need.

What does Isabella, a four year-old girl in Winsconsin who is physically incapable of eating and has had to be tube fed her entire life, have to gain from healthcare reform?  The treatment she needs to live a normal life.

The chance for Isabella to become a normal, healthy child depends on Congress passing healthcare reform this year.  But Stephen Hemsley opposes reform, and after making the equivalent of $4,096,815 each and every week of this year, it doesn’t take an expert to figure out why.

Welcome to the American health insurance industry.  Instead of helping policyholders attain the health security they need for themselves and their families, insurance companies like UnitedHealth Group are sending lobbyists to Washington, DC to twist the arms of lawmakers to oppose reform of the status quo.

Why?  Because maintaining the status quo means continuing to allow huge insurance corporations like UnitedHealth Group to treat the physical livelihoods of average Americans as commodities to exploit for shareholder profits and outsized executive compensation packages.  It means continuing to let working class people suffer and die so that wealthy insurance executives can live in $7.8 million mansions like Hemsley’s Minnesota home.

Help Brave New Films expose the truth about what the status quo means for insurance executives, and what it means for the rest of us.  And if you or a loved one has been victimized by the unscrupulous practices of CIGNA, Aetna, WellPoint, Humana or Coventry, tell us your story.

With your help, we’ll make sure that in the future, our premium dollars pay for treatment for patients like Isabella, and not to line the pockets of billionaires like Hemsley.

Join the campaign at http://sickforprofit.com

Digg!

Robert Greenwald is a producer, director and political activist. His new media company, Brave New Films, is currently focused on making short videos like the FOX Attacks (FoxAttacks.com) and The REAL McCain (TheRealMcCain.com), which educate and empower viewers to take action and have been seen by millions.


The Dow and the Down and Out
The top 1 percent owns more wealth then the bottom 90 percent. CEOs of large corporations earn 400 times what their workers make. That is not what America is supposed to be about.
October 16, 2009.
Sick for Profit: Greenwald Tears Into Insurance Company CEOs
Robert Greenwald appears on MSNBC to talk about "Sick For Profit", a campaign to expose the greed of big health insurance companies.
August 14, 2009.
Sick for Profit: Robert Greenwald on MSNBC
Robert Greenwald appears on the Ed Show to talk about Sick For Profit, a new campaign to expose the greed of big health insurance companies.
August 13, 2009.
Senator Sanders Unfiltered: My New Online Show from Brave New Films
I hope you’ll join me for my new show, Senator Sanders Unfiltered produced by Brave New Films. Follow my show on Twitter at SandersShow.
August 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Re-broadcast Bill Moyer's Journal
Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 6, 2009 9:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why can't we get a re-broadcast of Bill Moyer's Journal -- the episode with Wendell Potter -- on one of the networks? That, in a nutshell, already produced and ready to go, would certainly enlighten those who are confused by what they are seeing and hearing.

Is it not possible? I saw it on PBS, but I imagine only 1% of TV viewers ever watch anything on PBS. It needs to reach a wider audience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Go to Bill Moyers website Posted by: harpy
Thank you thank you thank you
Posted by: bthespoon on Aug 7, 2009 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been thinking a film like this should have been in the can and ready to roll as soon as SICKO was done making the rounds, and then another and another until the American public finally wakes and wisens up.

Several times I've tried to convince Al Gore to make another film like "Inconvenient Truth" but about health care in America (call it "The Cruelest Lie").

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT?
Posted by: rider3 on Aug 7, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy makes "$4,096,815 each and every week of this year"? This fact alone is criminal. No one deserves pay like that. The Repuglican's stance on this issue is so selfish. I guess only the very rich are entitled to healthcare. These people disgust me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Only In America
Posted by: liblady2008 on Aug 7, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system we have now is facilitating monumental suffering and unnecessary deaths - all to create obscene profits for insurance companies and drug makers. It is immoral. It's so clear to those of us who actually pay attention, and not to Faux News.

The bills now winding their way through congress are misguided and while they may do some good, in the end it's just throwing even more cash to the leeches who have profited on our suffering.

There are easy ways to provide free or nearly free care to all, ways that would only seriously impact people who can easily afford it and still be very well off. But the congress, and I mean including a very high percentage of democrats therein, will not throw the entitled under the bus to help the masses until we get money out of politics.

The big obstacle precluding any real change is that way too many folks are misinformed or uninformed/oblivious. Things are going to need to get a whole lot worse for a lot more people to jar enough of them to care enough to help bring about palpable, fundamental change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pimps & whores
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 7, 2009 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time to stop these pimps & their prostitutes in Congress! First, real a public option for all on health-care, next, time to reform financing for "our" Congresspeople! This pay-to-play crap needs to end NOW, for OUR DEMOCRACY TO LIVE!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

UK NHS
Posted by: Amisja on Aug 7, 2009 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm British and live in UK but did live in Arizona for many years and my sons where born there. I can give some inclining of both types of health care systems. Firstly my daughter was born in UK. I had a complete pre-natal care from the day I found out I was pregnant, care of a lovely midwife (who I could choose) right up until she was born. My hospital stay was up to 10 days but many Mums choose to go home as soon as possible. If there any complications at all the stay can be extended for as long as necessary. My midwife came to see me daily to help me with breast feeding and well all the gooey stuff we go through after child-birth. She comes to see us for up to 21 days post-natalily at home. Then she hands over to a 'health visitor' who makes a couple of manditory visits at home, but then we can see her in the clinic as much or as little as we need until the child is school age. There are NO up-front costs...nothing...not a penny ever.
My older son was born in Arizona. Both he and I were very sick during the labour and he was not thought to live (He's a huge great 13yr old now!) After 19hrs labour I had to have an emergency c-section. 6hrs later I was told my insurance was up and I would have to leave hospital. I was horrified. My parents were disgusted. I literally couldn't walk. Isaac (my boy) was in neo-natal intensive care and I wasn't even allowed to stay with him. They fed him formula milk even though I expressly told the nurses I wanted to breast feed him. I was given no help following this. I was frightened, in a foreign country but there was simply no help. Did we pay less for this service, well I really don't think so. You know (and this is 13yrs ago as I said) the health insurance premiums (which of course still meant out of pocket costs) came to about a third of my hubby's salary. Of course we pay more in taxes, but its so worth it...really it is. Whilst I was in USA I was so frieghtened something serious would happen to my hubby or one of the kids. We were broke, it would have finished us off. Here at least I NEVER even think about it. I can see my doctor any time I want. I can choose any GP in the country (well its obviously most practical to see the one nearest to us but you do have that choice!) If we need to be seen by a consultant then you can choose which one you want to see. There are problems of course. The NHS isn't perfect, but no one is making money out of it. Ocassionally people are refused treatment, but this is so rare it makes the national news and virtually every ocassion these decisions are overturned upon appeal.
I work for the NHS (I'm a mental health nurse) but this does not mean I am here to sell you all a tale. I just want to say Michael Moore didn't lie, Drs here are paid well (nurses are paid pretty badly but oh well!!) We aren't all living in soviet style housing and queuing for hours for a loaf of bread. There really aren't 10yr waiting lists for in-growing toe nail ops. The healthcare was the biggest reason I came back to UK (my American hubby is diabetic and therefore has a pre-existing condition, he was treated the first week we arrived here, no questions asked.)
I hope this healthcare bill goes through, I hope the public option stays in it. It'd be nice for my children to spend a little time in the country of their birth but as it is, I'd feel really insecure about returning back to USA
(Hope this didn't sound like a dig it wasn't to)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: UK NHS Posted by: Morell
Does 1 Terminal Senior = 7 dead babies?
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 9, 2009 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gotta thank all the Seniors who are willing to subject the younger generations to substandard healthcare, just to assure they can still get those doses of Viagra.
Dear Granny,
The US Infant mortality rate is ranked 29th in the World- damn near 3rd world levels, 7 out of 100 Die. And since your days of being 'Frutiful and multiplying' are over, perhaps your hubby's boner med is not a priority even in the eyes of God.
Your descendants

I love hearing these old folks with socialized medicine and one foot in the Grave, spouting off about their taxes. SOB who do you think is carrying your dusty ass on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security??
Interesting that this current batch of seniors are the same ones who cheered on Reagans attempt to derail medicare, but later helped defeat Bush's plan to put it on the stock market and off the national bill, and now consider any discussion about reforming the system as a political third rail. Why such a drastic change in attitude...The penny pinching Bombers hit 65. This group didn't want to pay a dime for Granny or Mom, but expects the younger generations to lavish them with products and services in their 'golden' years.
Do they not realize that their claim healthcare is fine, rings self serving? That they are against Gov't take over of healthcare ridiculously hypocritical?
So Granny I'm glad you are satisifed with your Publically funded healthcare system, pleased you have the opportunity to be sustained on ventilators, feeding tubes, 24 hour care during your final curtain call....I just wish the rest of US had that option too, esp those lost 7 Babies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My response to the Hemsleys of the world would be a bullet if I knew where they lived.
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 10, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre-existing condition...
Posted by: COinms on Aug 11, 2009 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being human is a pre-existing condition!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]