Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Latest intelligence report yet another smoking gun on Bush

Posted by Bob Geiger at 8:31 AM on June 6, 2007.


Bob Geiger: Report shows White House warned of most Iraq-war problems
nicreport

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Bob Geiger in your
mailbox!

 

When Army Chief of Staff, General Eric Shinseki appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 25, 2003 to discuss preparations for a possible invasion of Iraq, he was asked by Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) to estimate the size of a successful occupation force after victory.

"Something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers are probably a figure that would be required," said Shinseki, a highly-decorated officer with almost four decades of service, including extensive combat duty in Vietnam. "We're talking about a post-hostilities control over a piece of geography that's fairly significant, with the kinds of ethnic tensions that could lead to other problems."

"It takes a significant ground force presence to maintain a safe and secure environment, to ensure that people are fed, that water is disturbed, all the normal responsibilities that go along with administering a situation like this."

Shinseki was immediately jumped by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. Rumsfeld said publicly that Shinseki was "far off the mark" in his prediction, while Wolfowitz called his views "wildly off the mark" and said, "I am reasonably certain that they will greet us as liberators, and that will help us to keep requirements down."

The Village Voice even reported that a "senior administration official" said that Shinseki's estimate was "bullshit from a Clintonite enamored of using the army for peacekeeping and not winning wars".

General Shinseki "retired" shortly thereafter, in June 2003, and it is widely speculated that he was forced out for contradicting Bush's take on what would be required by the Army in Iraq. Shinseki has confirmed only that he was indeed forced into retirement, while withholding comment about any specifics.

Which makes the report issued by the Senate Intelligence Committee before the Memorial Day holiday even more interesting because Prewar Intelligence Assessments About Postwar Iraq (PDF) shows not only that Shinseki was right about troop levels, but also -- as if more evidence is needed -- that the Bush administration ignored critical pre-war intelligence in their rush to invade Iraq.

Please go to BobGeiger.com to read the rest of this story.

Digg!

Bob Geiger is a political writer, specializing in coverage of the United States Senate for AlterNet and other Progressive web sites. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


Bush Arrives For Convention in St. Paul ... Nebraska?
Seems that the RNC really didn't want him there ...
September 2, 2008.
Notes From The Senate All-Nighter
Bob Geiger: The rhetoric is flying in the Capitol.
July 18, 2007.
Leahy: Bush is "Contemptuous of the Congress"
Bob Geiger: Judiciary Committee Chairman rips Bush stonewalling
July 10, 2007.
The GOP's Bill Clinton Double Standard
Bob Geiger: The same GOP senators who fought to impeach Clinton because of the Monica Lewinsky affair remain silent or call for a pardon of Libby, whose crimes amount to treason.
July 5, 2007.
No Joy This Fourth of July
Bob Geiger: How far we've fallen under Bush.
July 4, 2007.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Congress was under the control of the GOP in 2003.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 6, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be interested in knowing who, among the Fourth Estate if any, bothered to object. My fantasy is that when the White House cuts off the head of a righteous objector, the media should be screaming bloody murder.

Whatever happened to the respect for a "loyal opposition"? Oh, that's right: with Cheney and his hatchet men, that's been turned into an oxymoron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]