Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Where Does the New Army Secretary Stand on Don't Ask, Don't Tell?

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 11:30 AM on June 2, 2009.


Is McHugh open to changing the ban on gay servicemembers?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Ali Frick in your
mailbox!

 

Today, President Obama named Rep. John McHugh (R-NY) his Secretary of the Army. McHugh is the ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee, and represents a district that includes the Ft. Drum Army Base. He “brings patriotism and a pragmatism that has won him respect on both sides of the aisle,” Obama said of McHugh.

Notably, neither Obama nor McHugh mentioned the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, an issue McHugh will surely have to address. His congressional record provides few clues as to his position. McHugh has not signed on to co-sponsor to a House bill that would repeal the ban on gays serving in the military, and last year earned only a 15 percent rating from the Human Rights Campaign.

However, in opening and closing remarks during a hearing last year on the DADT, McHugh seemed open to changing the ban on gay servicemembers, asking for further hearings on the issue and chastising the military for having “refused to step forward” and testify on the matter:

 

[O]ur challenge is to examine and determine whether that conclusion of 1993 remains valid here in 2008. … I share the Chairlady’s disappointment that thus far the services have refused to step forward. I don’t see as an individual member how I fully and fairly consider this question and more importantly the issue of changing this question without the input of those in the active military who have the heavy responsibility of commanding our forces in time of war. [...]

Again, to underscore my opening comments about my disappointment in the military services because we have to at some point I would assume, come to a decision as to whose opinion prevails…And with all due deference, and respect, and appreciation to this panel and the five individuals who have appeared here, that kind of weighty decisions from my perspective ought to be based on a much broader foundation of input.

During the hearing, McHugh studiously avoided revealing his own views about the military’s discriminatory policies. With the Obama administration moving slowly on repealing the ban, it remains to be seen whether McHugh can help nudge the Army toward taking that “step forward” toward greater equality.

Update: Press Secretary Gibss says McHugh and Obama 'both don't think [DADT] is working for this country right now.'

Digg!

Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.


Republican Lawmaker Slams McCain: "I Don't Know That McCain Is That Influential" in the GOP
Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) suggested that the GOP has already tuned McCain out.
June 25, 2009.
Michael Steele Says Health Care's Easy ... and Adds Some Silly Fearmongering
The health police? Oh, please.
June 19, 2009.
Media Pretend That Latest Polls Show Obama's Policies Are Unpopular
The evidence says otherwise.
June 18, 2009.
Iran Soccer Stars Show Their Support for Protests on Televised Game
Iran's soccer team players wore green wristbands in support of the anti-government protesters, during a game broadcast on Iranian state TV yesterday.
June 17, 2009.
Updated: Obama on Iran: Given U.S.-Iranian Relations, We Shouldn't Be Seen as Meddling
Obama again pointed out that a more active U.S. role would make things worse.
June 16, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Now THIS POINT, says it all...............
Posted by: Prophit on Jun 4, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A quote from the article above...

"McHugh has not signed on to co-sponsor to a House bill that would repeal the ban on gays serving in the military, and last year earned only a 15 percent rating from the Human Rights Campaign."

A complete and unadulterated lack of human rights record. Now why does this not surprise me given he is a republican and given Obama has appointed him to FIT WITHIN THE NEST OF NEOCON REPUBLICANS RUNNING OUR MILITARY.

Why is that? Becuase the republicans/neocons are running our foreign policy and perpetual war agenda without consideration of human rights issues like TORTURE, RENDITION, MURDERING UNARMED CIVILIANS, CHILDREN, ETC...

That is exactly what we did in Iraq with Rumsfeld saying "if they continue to fight us, then its ok with me if we continue to wipe them out and until they are all gone". I thought then, it was genocide he was after. Clear the land either by death, or refugeeing them off the land.

SOUNDS LIKE GAZA and the Israel approach to the Palestinians... wipe them out, irradicate them either through murder or refugeeing them.

Funny how our foreign policy so parallels Israels as do our tactics and strategy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]