Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Please Stop The First Lady Bake-Off

Posted by Jill Filipovic, Feministe at 4:21 AM on April 21, 2008.


Why are candidate spouses still expected to swap recipes in the 21st century?
tomatopastasu1010608x

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Jill Filipovic in your
mailbox!

 

There are a lot of things I hate about election season, but the competition of which potential First Lady has the best recipes is perhaps my least favorite. So I’m actually kind of glad that “Farfalle-gate” has broken, and it turns out that Cindy McCain’s favorite family recipes were pulled directly from the Food Network — and that she didn’t even offer them up herself, some unpaid intern found them and claimed they were McCain family traditions. The whole thing is BS, and it makes me happy that Cindy didn’t waste ten minutes of her life transcribing her recipe for rosemary chicken (although, of course, she should have just said the whole thing was crap and given Rachel Ray the proper credit).

I like food as much as the next person — actually, I probably like food a whole lot more than the next person — but I don’t really understand why Americans care which First Lady has the best cookie recipe. And I really don’t understand this:

In the meantime, The Huffington Post reported that the passion fruit recipe had appeared under Mrs. McCain’s name in the Jan. 16 issue of The New York Sun, in an article that also included a recipe from Michelle Obama (apple cobbler) but not one from the spouse of the other Democratic presidential candidate. The article did include Hillary Rodham Clinton’s recipe for oatmeal chocolate chip cookies.

Cindy McCain, Michelle Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Which one of these is not like the others?

Which isn’t to say that Hillary Clinton is above recipe-swapping because she’s a real competitor and the other ladies are just wives. It’s to point out that the whole thing is stupid and sexist, and that it’s not about presidential spouses. It’s a country-wide reminder of a woman’s place, and a nice little national smack-down of feminism and gender equality.

Plus, people cook with recipes that are not their own. The only thing I use my own “recipe” for is gemelli pasta with sauteed garlic, crushed red pepper, black pepper, cilantro and asiago cheese (plus whatever else I have in the fridge that sounds good — chickpeas, avocado, parmesan etc). And I’m pretty sure I picked that up from my old room mate. Now, if I were in the race, I would totally submit the Barefoot Contessa’s recipe for steak au poivre, since that’s the only non-pasta, non-quesadilla thing I can cook — but I wouldn’t even try to convince the American people that it’s an old family secret. I would just send them directly to Ina Garten, and everyone would be the better for it.

Digg!

Jill Filipovic is a New York-based freelance writer and a law student at NYU. More of her writing is available online at her blog, Feministe.


Woman Convulses and Dies, Ignored, in Waiting Room of New York City Hospital
Esmin Green's final agony caught on surveillance camera. Staff looked on but failed to act.
July 3, 2008.
Craziest Smear Ever: Obama Worships His Monkey God Keychain
'Wingers say the darndest things.
June 30, 2008.
Fewer Albanians Are Becoming Sworn Virgins
An ancient gender-bending tradition is on the wane.
June 25, 2008.
Do Jerks Get Laid More?
Ev psych strikes again.
June 24, 2008.
Conservative Pundit Dennis Prager Fears the Whippersnapper Vote
“...when youth get involved in politics in large numbers, it is not a good thing...”
June 18, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I AGREE, IT'S BULLS--T
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 21, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, it is a lie. That's what I don't like. No one, including Mrs. McCain should be assuming that the rest of us are stupid. That's what lying is. She should just say that she doesn't bake and let it go at that. Neither do I. But please don't lie to me. About cookies or anything else. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It isn't just the recipe swap
Posted by: hagwind on Apr 21, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The triviality of most campaign coverage is mind-blowing, or mind-numbing, or just mindless. Haircuts! Tears! Clinton gets worried! Obama gets tough! Can Obama win against McCain? Can Clinton win against McCain? Straw poll in State X says Clinton is slipping! Survey in State Y says Obama is slipping! What a torrent of useless information.

What we've got is way too many reporters trying to fill way too many minutes or column inches with sights, sounds, and/or printed words, and the result bears about as much resemblance to news as ketchup does to a vegetable. And the stories they like best are the easy ones, the ones where you just add water and stir. Recipes, hell. These people wouldn't recognize food if it didn't come with a label attached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
that the only attention paid to women who feed their families
Posted by: e rice on Apr 21, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a ridiculous recipe swap also says something about the general contempt for the majority of people in this country.

why not suggestions for feeding the family on a shrinking budget with nutritionally worthless food? maybe because everyone involved with the political process doesn't have to do that? because most of the functionaries are paid better than most working people and can also take advantage of the privileges of their wealthy candidates?

because their concepts of women's concerns and interests are trapped in a fantasy that wasn't accurate even fifty years ago?

because they are insulated, ignorant jackasses?

and you expect these people to solve problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BULLSHIT
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Apr 21, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is the only thing that the people are being fed in this so-called "contest". The media's contempt for issues and facts is breathtaking, as well as monumental. "Duh Meedya" has been shown, in these campaigns (as possibly nowhere else), to be both racist and sexist. Thank you, Rupert Murdoch--I know that you OWN "Duh Meedya" (aka Time-Warner) lock stock and barrel, but can't you allow your perfectly-coiffed anchors JUST A TINY BIT of individuality in reporting on this campaign?

Ah well--maybe you do, and I just didn't hear it. After all, I haven't watched "Duh Nooz" for the longest time now. I get all my world information from the BBC. Isn't much--but is more than I get from any of your TV channels...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it is sexist bullshit alright , but........
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Apr 22, 2008 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was thinking since all of the canidates' wives seem to have contributed their very own recipes, how about having " MRS. BILL Rodham-Clinton" put on HIS apron, and then, cook us up something good like maybe his pecan pie or something like it??? after all, HE is the one whom wears the skirt in that family!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lovely.
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Apr 23, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ooooh...COOKIES! YAY!

(Wait...let me check the ol' BS level (don't worry: only stands for Blood Sugar)...OK. Nothing more or less. Certainly, nothing with any SUBSTANCE--ol' Rupert (aka Time/Warner et al) Murdoch, has subsumed our once-free press for good and all it seems.

Now, I want to hear the First Gentleman's recipe for Cookies. I bet he could come up with some REAL interesting ones. Even I had a halfway decent recipe, involving an extra half-cup of flour (in order to accomodate the cup of rum that I added to the cookies!) Elect me! ME! ME!!! I DEFINITELY got the BEST RECIPE for Chocolate chip cookies!

And now I'm going to re-do this Vanilla Sugar Cookie recipe thingie. They oughta taste swell with my special TRIPLE MARGARITA RECIPE, adding the liquid content!!! Y-u-m-m-m!!!! Can't wait...

(A few minutes later...) Ahhh! In they go--bake 15 minutes at 375 degrees---B-O-O-M!!!!

Oops!! (sitting on ground, holding head) I guess...I shouldn't have heated anything so hot...with...that much alcohol in it...(gasp)
expiring...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lovely. Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: Lovely. Posted by: Livemike
Hey I just want Bill's recipe for brownies.
Posted by: Livemike on Apr 25, 2008 2:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear they're so good after you eat a few you feel even hungrier!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]