Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Formula One Racing Head with a Nazi Fetish: the Craziest Sex Scandal Yet

Posted by Jill Filipovic, Feministe at 3:11 PM on April 3, 2008.


And here I thought we couldn’t do any better than "Evangelical mega-church preacher does crystal meth with male prostitutes."

What. The. Fuck. And here I thought we couldn’t do any better than “Evangelical mega-church preacher does crystal meth with male prostitutes.”

(Sidenote: You know a sex scandal is insane when the first thing you think of is an Overheard in New York quote).

I’m not going to quote at length from the article because the whole thing just makes me feel too weird,* but the gist of it is that the head of Formula One’s governing body was caught on video with five prostitutes playing concentration camp fetish games. And don’t worry, the cracker-jack reporters at ABC news explain that “While the Nazi concept is not unusual in sadomasochistic circles, playing both sides in such a kinky ritual is unusual, say sex experts.”

He played both sides? Well in that case, he really is a pervert!

In an interesting twist (as if there had to be anything else), the guy’s father was the founder of the British Union of Fascists and a supporter of Adolph Hitler. It’s almost the perfect storm of sex scandals — if only he were a right-wing politician playing Nazi dress-up with dudes it would seal the deal.

And, sweet Jesus, there is a video. I haven’t watched it because I’m not such a fan of that stuff, but I’m going to guess that it is neither work-safe nor for the faint of heart.

It’s kind of an amazing confluence of all things offensive in one place.

I don’t want to hate on perverts too much, because ain’t nothing wrong with doin’ the dirty (and making it extra-dirty to your tastes) in the privacy of your own home. I could kind of care less if people want to whip each other or play some boudoir version of Dungeons & Dragons or do whatever the hell else people do to get off. I don’t think that the guy who oversees Formula One necessarily needs to resign because he has some really out-there sexual habits. I realize that human beings are complex creatures and we all do some weird shit, often involving sex. So before anyone jumps down my throat, I am totally not taking a stand against kinky or pervy sex. Kink and perv away.

But… isn’t the Holocaust kind of off-limits, even in private? Or am I just being a judgmental prig here?

Thanks to Noam for the links.

_____________________

*I get all tripped up in trying to balance my gut-level disgust at the clearly problematic use of the Holocaust as an event to sexually fetishize, and my political belief that consensual private sexual activity should be, as a general rule, private. I really try not to judge other peoples’ sexual choices (and usually I don’t care enough to judge, unless they involve me), and obviously I still think that this guy should (legally) be able to do whatever the heck he wants in his bedroom, but this just throws me.

Digg!

Jill Filipovic is a New York-based freelance writer and a law student at NYU. More of her writing is available online at her blog, Feministe.


Woman Convulses and Dies, Ignored, in Waiting Room of New York City Hospital
Esmin Green's final agony caught on surveillance camera. Staff looked on but failed to act.
July 3, 2008.
Craziest Smear Ever: Obama Worships His Monkey God Keychain
'Wingers say the darndest things.
June 30, 2008.
Fewer Albanians Are Becoming Sworn Virgins
An ancient gender-bending tradition is on the wane.
June 25, 2008.
Do Jerks Get Laid More?
Ev psych strikes again.
June 24, 2008.
Conservative Pundit Dennis Prager Fears the Whippersnapper Vote
“...when youth get involved in politics in large numbers, it is not a good thing...”
June 18, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What you see is not what you get
Posted by: sfdude on Apr 3, 2008 5:30 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is: the participants in the Kink may not all be conscious. BDSM fetish circles in San Francisco are interlaced with 'hypno-sex', i.e. use of NLP-like hypnosis tricks to put victims in hypnosis before the kink occurs. Otherwise quite dignified people are turned into barking dogs on all fours, or 'pet sl*ts' at the snap of fingers or mention of prearranged keywords earlier dispensed under hypnosis. 'Bottoms' are sometimes also programmed to scream in retort that they are doing it all of free will, that 'no one can make you do anything you don't want to do', but they are manipulated nonetheless, and programmed with alibis for coverups.
Why all this trouble, you ask? Is it all for lust and power?
No. Victims are sometimes used like robots to do things under hypnosis they would not otherwise do. In essence this turns them into fallguys or fallgals, as they carried out possibly illegal or unethical actions that their 'masters' told them to.
Is this new? No. The old Nazis did it too.... read Jonathan Bloch's "KGB/CIA" or Sigrid Schultz "Germany Will Try It Again", or Glenn Infield "Secrets of the SS".
What you are describing is a 'recreation' that sometimes overlaps with the nastiest sort of political or corporate manipulation and sabotage, once called Bluebird or MK-Ultra, and taught to the nasty side of the CIA by old Gestapo Nazis who used the techniques extensively during the Third Reich.
It's Human Puppetry. Voluntary at first, perhaps in some cases, but when the going gets rough, and victims change their minds, see what happens to anyone who tries to escape from the 'Concentration Camp'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please... Posted by: whathaway
Not our business
Posted by: Cwood on Apr 3, 2008 5:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe we should all have some sense and realize that this isn't our business. The guy has some unusual sexual fantasies, that would be pretty offensive to a lot of people, but he's keeping it private and it is in no way political. People with these kinds of fetishes can't exactly help it. Do you think you choose this kind of thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tell me, Ms. Filipovic, what is the relevance of this article?
Posted by: joeunix on Apr 3, 2008 6:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Other than your own prurient interest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get Over Yourself Posted by: Adam Howard
» RE: Get Over Yourself Posted by: joeunix
Somewhere out there tonight,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 3, 2008 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mel Brooks is kicking himself.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a TEST Comment
Posted by: salman22 on Apr 4, 2008 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a TEST Comment
Salman Khan
Salman Khan
http://www.google.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rules
Posted by: drsivana99 on Apr 4, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wherever you learned journalism, did they not mention to you that it is totally customary when you write a story about a particular person to give the name of that person? This is really more than a mere formality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rules Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» It's MAX MOSELEY Posted by: zipper696
TO: Ms Filipovic
Posted by: luckypuck on Apr 4, 2008 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So . . . what? Your conscience would be assuaged if he dressed up as a Muslim in Gitmo? Oh, my. Think of THOSE possibilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is NOT the craziest sex scandle yet!
Posted by: galen.dp on Apr 4, 2008 2:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Formula One Racing Head with a Nazi Fetish: the Craziest Sex Scandal Yet

And here I thought we couldn’t do any better than "Evangelical mega-church preacher does crystal meth with male prostitutes."


I have to ask how is it that the private fetish play of the head of Formula One Racing tops Haggard's hypocrisy?

This guy is not claiming to be a moral and pure religious leader, preaching to his flock about the "sins" of gay sex while partaking of it himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]