even with that dangerous contraception part taken out, why not put it back in in the senate version? It seems clear that Republicans just want to vote against everything Obama does (just like the did with Clinton), so why not just do what is right and add contraception assistance back to the package?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Democrats 2012 Re-Election Stimulus Package ...

Over 60% of the vaunted "Stimulus Package" won't even take effect for over 18 months ... just prior to and just in time for the 2012 elections. All the help, temporary help, for states could be passed without the tax cuts and these "shovel ready" boondoggles.

What we need from this government is a permanent commitment , not a patch-work of political temporary fixes. The economic model of 70% consumption based on debt and trade deficits is finished, kaput. We must work towards a new economic model, towards sustainability. What we are getting is a vain and dangerous attempt at resurrecting a failed idea , growth via conspicuous consumption.

We need Medicare for All ! Medicare for All can be implemented within weeks of the Bills passage and almost completely phased in within a year ... This helps the under and uninsured, business, state and local government, decreases bankruptcies ( 50% of all bankruptcies are all or in part due to medical bills ), and makes our products more competitive at home and abroad.

Don't be fooled, the Stimulus is too little too late unless you are running for office in 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's way past due time to quit balkanizing issues by gender; I speak as an older woman who has been married, divorced, raised a child and worked all my life. Men are our friends.

What's good for women is also recognized by thinking men as good for them and for children. Once we start examining issues in this way, change may come more rapidly.

Emphasizing the "feminist" view of life at this point in our evolution widens any schism between men and women. In my experience, most men are just as eager to see women advance and receive support, as are women.

Let's include men, not repel them by gender-specific language.

Birth control is an issue for both sexes, so is health insurance and education for children, food stamps and employment.

One area in which women could assert their personal power is through restraint on family size. A major shackle women place on themselves is producing a number of children beyond their means to support if they were suddenly on their own.

This does no service to the women, the men in their lives or, most of all, the children.

I suggest that more women start viewing men as allies rather than adversarial creatures.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does it include f@#king Matt Damon?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Omission of the birth control package directly impacts two-wage earner households with a man laid off. This guy will assuage his hurt feelings and devastated income with extra sex, and no, he will not suit up. His beer and bong will come out of household funds before contraception, and the sole wage-earner will end up with an unplanned pregnancy and the additional 20+ years of expenses this entails.

As long as contraceptive assistance is not a part of the economic stimulus package, it is not woman-friendly except to the upper classes, and they are a distinct minority of American women.

So this is minority-friendly government--stockbrokers, bankers, and their ladies, economically stimulated and insulated from the recession by the extorted taxes of their poorer majority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what has happened to NOW and the self respecting women who have who spent almost several decades working for available contraception for women? why, oh why do women continue to allow themselves to breed children who they cannot support and for whom they have no healthcare insurance or assistance? what are the current female leaders, especially their political counterparts, doing to hammer home these questions and help more women understand the importance of demanding contraception? It appears that the philosophical landscape regarding responsible child bearing is going down the tubes - as long as we continue to reproduce irresponsibly, we will always experience a humane and economic enigma owing to the fact that we will never be able to convince our political representatives - even the so called progressives - to vote for enough dollars for services which will make it possible to provide healthcare, education, food, housing and all the basic components which are necessary for a reasonable civilized existence. It is understood that the religious right and other religious groups have their own agendas for reproduction, but they just "aint gonna work"! We have become not just a nation of irresponsible material excesses - we have also become a nation of irresponsible sexual reproductive excess - notice, please, the great numbers of starving people throughout the world and their plight - there is more to say on this subject; books could be written about it - ladies of the USA, PLEASE take back your lives. Demand and work for contraception as vigorously as you would for food stamps and healthcare.
It's in your own best interest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]