Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bushwacked -- the Sequel: Jobs Down, Unemployment Up

Posted by Daniel DiRito, The All Spin Zone at 1:22 PM on April 4, 2008.


Two Bush presidencies is more than enough. John McCain's would be a third.

By all accounts, George W. Bush was determined to win reelection and thus avoid a repeat of his father’s embarrassing defeat. Unfortunately, they say the sins of the father shall be visited upon the son. If true, the declining economy at the close of this Bush administration may well be a revisiting of his father’s misfortune. While George W. Bush may have charted a different course than his father, he appears to be arriving at the same destination.

While the promise of the senior Bush to enact no new taxes is thought to have been a key component of his downfall; the cutting of taxes by his son was touted as the ultimate economic elixir. Given the economic status at the end of both Bush administrations, it seems to have been a difference without a distinction.

It’s likely that the slow slog towards recession has now become a snowball racing rapidly down a slippery slope; headed for an unknown destination. Despite the repeated assurances from the Bush administration that a sound economy underlies the current downturn, the ride to the bottom may be a long one and it may end with a thunderous thud. When it’s all said and done, the consequences of this Bush administration may mirror the misfortunes that befell the GOP in the wake of the prior Bush administration.

From Reuters:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — Employers cut payrolls for a third month in a row in March and the unemployment rate jumped to a 2-1/2 year high, more evidence that a housing downturn and credit crisis may have pushed the economy into a recession.
The Labor Department on Friday reported that March non-farm payrolls fell 80,000, biggest decline in five years.
It also said the March unemployment rate jumped to 5.1% from 4.8%, highest since a matching rate in September 2005.

Adding to the bleak picture, the department revised the first two months of the year’s job losses to a total of 152,000 from a previous estimate of 85,000.

The March job report was more bleak than expected. Economists had forecast a decline of 60,000 in non-farm payrolls and a rise in the unemployment rate to 5%.
“There doesn’t appear to be any silver lining. It shows that we’re right in the middle of a recession that will probably take a while,” said Carl Lantz, U.S. interest rate strategist at Credit Suisse in New York.
“Our expectation is that it will be a longer recession than the last two and we’re just in the beginning,” Lantz added.

It has taken George W. Bush two terms to reach an endpoint that will undoubtedly be seen as very similar to that of his father’s presidency. Both men watched as the economy tanked…unaware of the plight of the working class. The first Bush didn’t know the price of milk - the second seemed oblivious to the rising cost of gas. During their presidencies, both men invaded Iraq - the first Bush having the good sense to limit the scope of the incursion - the second determined to one-up daddy regardless of the cost.

In 1988, when Anne Richards spoke her oft quoted words about the senior Bush, “Poor George. He can’t help it. He was born with a silver foot in his mouth”; little did we know how prescient her observation would be with regards to the second Bush. In recalling the expression, “The acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree”, one could also argue that the electorate bears responsibility for succumbing to another well known idiom…the one that posits, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me”.

Sadly, a new poll provides a grim assessment of the degree to which voters may be experiencing buyers remorse. Unfortunately, what’s done is done…and we’re left to hope that the damage can be undone.

From The New York Times:
Americans are more dissatisfied with the country’s direction than at any time since the New York Times/CBS News poll began asking about the subject in the early 1990s, according to the latest poll.
In the poll, 81 percent of respondents said they believed “things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track,” up from 69 percent a year ago and 35 percent in early 2002.
Although the public mood has been darkening since the early days of the war in Iraq, it has taken a new turn for the worse in the last few months, as the economy has seemed to slip into recession. There is now nearly a national consensus that the country faces significant problems.
A majority of nearly every demographic and political group — Democrats and Republicans, men and women, residents of cities and rural areas, college graduates and those who finished only high school — say the United States is headed in the wrong direction. Seventy-eight percent of respondents said the country was worse off than five years ago; just 4 percent said it was better off.

In the end, there is also an abundance of irony to be found in the two Bush presidencies. The former president Bush spoke of mobilizing 1,000 points of light…the latter nearly succeeded in turning off all of the lights. When the senior Bush called Americans to service, it was impossible to know that his son would enlist 1,000’s of young Americans in the prosecution of an ill-advised war.

When the current president pledged to unite us, we should have realized that the ability to unite emanates from the capacity and the willingness to hear, understand, and appreciate the views of others. When he pledged compassionate conservatism, we missed the numerous indications that compassion would only flow to those who adopted his brand of conservatism. Hence, compassion modified by conservatism is more likely an ideology of intransigence than an expression of empathy.

As we await the passage of the second Bush administration, it should be abundantly clear to voters that we can ill-afford a third Bushwhacking. Hopefully voters won’t be fooled by the cleverness of the GOP to choose another Bush as their candidate. Lest there be any confusion, I’m not talking about an eventual Jeb Bush candidacy…I’m talking about none other than John “W” McCain.

Cross-posted at Thought Theater

Digg!

Daniel DiRito is a blogger of The All Spin Zone


WHO Updates AIDS Model - Christian Conservatives Go Crazy
Conservatives continue to inappropriately attach moral judgments to a medical issue.
June 11, 2008.
Faith vs. Science: The Consequences of What We Teach Our Children
Is America beginning to reap what it's sewn with faith-based education?
June 5, 2008.
Court Ruling Puts "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" On Notice
An appellate court ruing may signal the end of "don't ask, don't tell."
May 22, 2008.
Red-Faced GOP Turns Blue Over Mississippi Loss
Democratic candidates continue to win elections even in the reddest of red states
May 14, 2008.
Conservatives to Provoke Confrontation with IRS Over Clergy Endorsements
The religious right wants to defy the IRS code that requires churches to fore go making partisan political endorsements.
May 12, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And it's only going to get worse.
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 4, 2008 1:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have been lying to us about the economy for two years now, and they can't lie their way out of the truth any longer. (Doesn't mean they won't continue to try, though.)

Since the unemployment numbers that they use for government statistics only count those who are currently collecting unemployment insurance, the real rate is at least twice the number listed... closer to 10-12%. It doesn't include those who have exhausted their benefits, those who aren't eligible to begin with, those under-employed, or those only working part-time.

It's all a racket. Things are far, far worse than they have been telling us. And it will take a long, long time before we begin to recover from the damage wrought by this criminal and his administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another point Posted by: ReallyBearish
The two Bushes are not comparable
Posted by: Hans B on Apr 4, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The elder Bush presided over a recession, but the economy as a whole was sound. He had engaged in deficit spending but not as much as Reagan, in fact it might be said that he started turning the thing around. (I would argue that the recession which cost him his reelection was due to the bills of the Reagan era coming due during his presidency.) The international standing of the US improved during his administration, not least because he was the first - and last - US president to force a stop to settlement activity in the West Bank.

The younger Bush is exactly the opposite: his policies were designed to hide underlying problems as long as possible so that they would blow up in the face of the next president. His deficit spending was disastrous even without taking his foolish and cruel wars into account. His miscalculation was that the bills started coming due a little earlier than he expected. And he took the international standing of the US from the high point where Clinton left it down to the lowest level it has ever been.

I have never been a fan of Bush I, but he was a better president than most post-WWII Republicans, and incomparably better than his son.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush has laid the country low--Who knew?
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Apr 4, 2008 6:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody with an IQ above room temperature has seen this coming since the 2000 campaigns and is surprised it has taken this long. The patent nonsense spouted by GW Bush and his coterie of arrogant but profoundly ignorant and nearly always wrong advisers has laid us low in the economy, military affairs, foreign relations, the environment, healthcare, the rule of law, our obligations under international law, human rights, civil rights and nearly every other sphere one cares to name. The Republicans, aided and abetted by most evangelical Christians, have made a mockery of both our Constitution and the teachings of Jesus in the name of patriotism and Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is how the Republicans "manage" the economy.
Posted by: joeunix on Apr 4, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
eWeek an IT industry publication for Information Technology professionals March 24, 2008 issue stated in an article titled "Steering clear of trouble", "...analysts interviewed by eWeek said they don't believe the technology industry will see much of a downturn. Businesses will still need their technology, and some troubling aspects of the economy, such as the increasingly weak dollar, could be a boon for tech companies...'Tech is still maintaining its strength', said Ward Carter, president of mergers and acquisitions advisory company Corum Group. 'We're still seeing lots of deals getting done. Further softening in the economy is another question, but I haven't seen it in IT spending projections. Carl Steidmann, chief economist for Deloitte Research said he agrees. 'Outside financial and credit services, not all that much has changed.' Steidmann said."

My understanding of Republican "economic management" theory tells me that unemployment rates below 4.5% make the Republicans very uncomfortable.

Why?

Because an unemployment rate at or below 4.5% indicates that "full employment" is nearly achieved.

Under these conditions, workers begin to bid up their pay rate and this, as you know, is ABSOLUTELY INTOLERABLE for the corporate CEOs who derive ever increasing profits from the ability to bid workers' wages down when the unemployment rate rises above 5.0%, or so.

Thus, the Republicans will do everything in their power to take pressure off what they consider to be an overheating economy.

I know this sounds counterintuitive, but the Federal Reserve will begin to fiddle with short term bond rates to achieve a so-called "inverse yield curve" (resulting in higher short-term borrowing rates), which will ultimately result in a higher rate of unemployment. This in turn will provide employers the "incentive" to begin to bid workers wages down, which is ideal in the mind's of CEOs and "conservative" economic managers.

Sadly, higher unemployment rates should be expected over the next 18 months or so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Presidents have surprisingly little to do with what we lump in as...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 4, 2008 8:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..."the economy".

This article is reminiscent of the attacks on Carter...

...Minus one tremendously stupid, costly war on some chick named tara.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on Apr 5, 2008 10:07 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush I is the only republican president since Eisenhower who is not guilty of impeachable offenses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: oxheadone Posted by: Quannah
Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Apr 6, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OLIVER STONE NEEDS TO MAKE A FILM BASED ON MY BOOK TITLE.....BULLSHIT ARTIST IN THE CHINA SHOP.....THE FREE TRADE BAMBOOZALING OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY JUMPS THE SHARK

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans? What Republicans?
Posted by: willymack on Apr 6, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They've been shoved aside by a gang of greedy moral degenerates, their title subsumed by the same. There are a few real repubs still around, but they've been neutralized, same as the Democrats. Imagine a whole country taken over by an organized crime family like the Mafia, only one far more brutal, greedy, and destructive than the "mob" at the height of its power, and you'll have some idea of the pickle we're in at present.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is well aware of the price of gas
Posted by: bettyn on Apr 7, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and he and his buddies just LOVE it. Houston is BOOMTOWN once more, and the whole gang is rolling in dough. They don't CARE about the problems the rest of us are having.
Remember when Texans were riding around in the '70's and early '80's with bumper stickers that read: "Let A Yankee Freeze in the Dark"?
(Of course, that turned into "Please Give Me One More Oil Boom! I Promise Not To Piss It all Away!" by the late '80's. Looks like they got their wish, didn't they?)
The rest of the country can do to themselves what Dick Cheney suggested Pat Leahy do to himself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Better Future ?
Posted by: indepentent on Apr 7, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ABetterFuture wrote:
Presidents have surprisingly little to do with what we lump in as economy?
???????????????????????
Bush has had everything to do with our present economy!

It's called the Illegal Iraqi War!

A better future you say?
Not likely any time in the near future thanks to BushCO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]