Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

George Clooney demands that UN take action in Darfur

Posted by David DeGraw at 3:43 PM on September 14, 2006.


The actor gave a passionate speech today, demanding the UN put a stop to 'the first genocide of the 21st century.'
Clooney demands UN take action in Darfur

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get David DeGraw in your
mailbox!

 

George Clooney gave a passionate speech at a UN Security Council briefing today, demanding that they send peacekeepers to Darfur, Sudan to put a stop to "the first genocide of the 21st century."

In the past three years, the "Janjaweed," a militia sponsored by the Sudanese government, has killed over 400,000 people, created 2.5 million refugees, and left 3.5 million dependent on humanitarian aide. Thus far, some of them have benefited by an African Union peacekeeping mandate. But the mandate expires on September 30th, and the Sudanese government will not permit UN forces to come in and replace them.

Clooney stressed the urgency of the situation:

"The first of October will leave these people with nothing. Whatever the reason, it is not good enough... 2.5 million refugees who depend on that aide will die… After September 30th you won't need the UN. You'll simply need men with shovels and bleached white linen and head stones.

This genocide will be on your watch. How you deal with it will be your legacy - your Rwanda, your Cambodia, your Auschwitz.…

Time is of the essence."

Digg!

David DeGraw is AlterNet's video blogger.


Take Action: Patriotism over Profit Week [VIDEO]
Turn your living room into a theater and salon...
October 6, 2006.
Colbert gives Republicans midterm election advice
Stephen Colbert has a foolproof way for the Republicans to win.
September 20, 2006.
Daily Show: Bush v Ahmadinejad
Jon Stewart covers the UN smackdown between George "Soprano" Bush and Mahmoud "little kid nuclear" Ahmadinejad.
September 20, 2006.
Countdown: Halliburton CEO has made over $100 million since war began
Keith Olbermann discusses "obscene war profiteering" with IRAQ FOR SALE director Robert Greenwald.
September 19, 2006.
Colbert on Bush's twisted torture logic
Stephen Colbert breaks down Bush's logic on torture.
September 18, 2006.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I agree with Charley Reese
Posted by: Torgo on Sep 14, 2006 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of Our Business

"In the 1930s, a tougher breed of Americans didn't just demonstrate. They formed the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, went to Spain and fought in the Spanish Civil War...Today's liberals are made of softer stuff. They don't want to fight or get shot at. They are too wealthy and live too comfortable a life. They want some poor American kid making $1,200 a month to go to the African desert and get killed."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Libertarians are liberals, Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Libertarians are liberals, Posted by: chacha55
» RE: Libertarians are liberals, Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: I agree with Charley Reese Posted by: achilles
The Sudanese don't want outsiders
Posted by: bookwoman on Sep 15, 2006 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Clooney. However, the last I heard the Administration in the Sudan didn't want the U.N. or anyone else in Darfur. The feeling is that if they are left alone, they will be able to complete the genocide they are perpetrating in less than a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As usual
Posted by: Gregor on Sep 15, 2006 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No genocide should be happening. People shouldn't be slaughtered like cattle (which is sick in itself) or mice or bugs. But apparently they are. And even in our own country. People are being slaughtered. Well okay, not quite as dramatically, but yet as persistently. So where o where does this compassion of ours come to rest. To help our own first? To help others first? To help corporation interests first? I have to think that it is corporate interests we will help first. And it seems to me big corporations now have a toehold in Darfur and surrounding areas, so I would have to think they are launching the drive to peace down there...Or maybe they launched the insurrection and it got out of hand. Who can say. So as usual, why clean up our own act before we help others and it is because the corporations don't really have a stake in helping their own countries. Sure they give grants, they run around applauding how much money they throw at schools, but generally it is to create more consumers. And they do have a stake in the global arena, so they can always hire people from other countries. So I think Darfur is just one more symptom in a vast array of problems we in our selfish interests invest in. And really, if these countries would just get a backbone and get off their butts and do something, but maybe they figured out they have to help themselves first. It never fails, some fool gets into power and total makes a mockery of governing and gets rich while others die in that country and then there is a revolution. Ho Hum. YOu would think in this century with an agency like the UN they could figure out the countries that would go into crisis like Darfur and be a little pro-active. But yet, they don't. Change will happen alright, but it won't be humans that effect it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]