Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How Social Tech Fuels Iran's Election Revolution

Posted by Deanna Zandt, DeannaZandt.com at 8:50 AM on June 15, 2009.


It's less about celebrity and more about connection, humanity and the ability to inject values into the wider culture in a populist way.
iranianfistshaker

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Deanna Zandt in your
mailbox!

 

There's a ton of great material out there on the nuances of the Iranian election and protests, and I just want to quickly throw some thoughts into the ring.

First, from an American media perspective, here was another great moment for folks to demand what they wanted to see covered on national news media. What a moment of media dissonance: As protests erupted -- and in some cases, turned violent --  in the streets of Tehran and elsewhere in Iran, major broadcast media in the U.S. had little to no news on the events at all. By using the hashtag1 #CNNfail to collect all of the dissatisfaction on Twitter, Americans were able to shift the focus of the conversation and eventually influence CNN's decision makers to start covering stories by Sunday.

It's reminiscent of #AmazonFAIL (when Amazon accidentally delisted 58,000 books, fueling a social media revolt), in the sense that within a pretty short time frame (less than 24 hours), major news organizations simply could not ignore the story unfolding -- via reportage and commentary -- on social media. I remind folks to think about how this sort of situation would have unfolded even five years ago: Bloggers would blog, perhaps media watchdog organizations would get a grassroots campaign together, and maybe within a week, if we were lucky, we'd see some influence. Now, with so many people participating in the conversation, we have immense power to quickly shift both focus and perception.

This is why, when it comes to politics and advocacy work, it's important to look at a bigger picture beyond just who's using Facebook to get votes, or which representatives of governments tweet with pizazz. It's less about celebrity and more about connection, humanity and the ability to inject our values into the wider culture in a fundamentally populist way.

Another fascinating angle of this story is the bootstrapping of access to technology after the Iranian government began blocking access. Facebook was blocked in late May, when reformist candidate Moussavi had around 5,200 supporters. Not long into the protests this weekend, access to major portions of the Internet (including Twitter), as well as SMS texting, were blocked. Not to be stopped, protesters within Iran are receiving information about accessing proxy servers from folks setting them up outside of the country, and stories continue to flood out.

Honestly, there is just no blocking The Internet, y'all. What the Iranian government is trying to do is, in effect, akin to trying to stop water or electricity from flowing. There is so much infrastructure in place at this point, they'd basically have to blow up most of it to stop people from accessing the outside world. Of course, I wouldn't put it past Ahmadinejad, now that I think about it ...

1 What's a hashtag? It's a keyword that people add to their tweets, so that conversations around a particular topic can be easily tracked.

Digg!


Empowerment Through Technology: Do You Tech?
If you're a woman (broadly and inclusively defined and intended), and you're interested in how technology can fuel social change, come join us.
May 8, 2009.
Even More AmazonFAIL: 'It was the French! Seriously!' How Not to Handle a Social Media Rampage
Amazon is blaming their PR nightmare on their French brethren.
April 14, 2009.
More on AmazonFAIL: Hackers, Misogyny, Homophobia and You
This is the kind of story that sends me down the rabbit hole of musing for days.
April 13, 2009.
Amazon.com Provokes Online Firestorm Over "Banned" Books
Using blogs, Facebook and Twitter, angry authors and readers go on attack for apparent censorship -- company claims "glitch."
April 13, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's more likely
Posted by: laoma on Jun 17, 2009 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the US Government would do this sort of thing:
"there is just no blocking The Internet, y'all. What the Iranian government is trying to do is, in effect, akin to trying to stop water or electricity from flowing. There is so much infrastructure in place at this point, they'd basically have to blow up most of it to stop people from accessing the outside world."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perspectives and clarity
Posted by: talkville on Jun 17, 2009 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cause and effect are not independent of one another. At one moment what is causal will bring effects, at another those effects will become causal. It's a dialectic process.

We have historically experienced, are experiencing and in all likelihood will continue to experience the truly planetary fallout within our social relations of the rise of religious zealotry and its continuing effects. Zealotry is a strong and forceful impulse with its emotional, psychological and material effects readily apparent. Plusses and minusses -- positive and negative follow..... never just one or the other. It's a dialectic process.

Lately, we seem to be witnessing a secular analog with the powerful rise of computing and its related means of dissemination on a planetary scale.

What real social relations does 'populism' refer to?

What is meant when "injecting" one or another substance into the communications network? What does it mean in terms of politics, economy and class relations in real -- deadly serious and materially and psychologically consequential -- social relations? Real bodies, real blood, real shattered bones, real deaths, real dislocations, real psychological fragmentations result from participation in particular, local and very, very real social relations in not one but many parts of the world. Plusses and minusses. And then there's zealotry.... with respect to religious beliefs and with respect to technological capacities and extensions. One of faith, the other of rationalism.

When one 'injects', intervenes, interjects, participates and takes 'debates' by means of all our technological apparatus without fully understanding the stakes involved at one or another time during times of sharpened class, gender and racial struggles, it is not only the positive that counts.... By such means imperial, colonization and subjugation projects proceed.... And the stakes are by no means insignificant to real bodies and minds. Plusses and minusses. It's dialectic.

I'm no luddite, but one thing is sure: the technological power available to all sectors, locally and globally, within the social order is not an all positive thing. It's a dialectic. And "Technology" is neither god nor devil; it's an immense tool in the hands of fallible human beings -- so powerful that sometimes it just might spin out of our control and begin to work independently... And that is not good news for the popular and proletarian classes for sure! Not only its devices but the users of those devices can be diverted to desired ends -- not always salutary for the many; immensely useful to the few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]