Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Is Petraeus "the Man Most Responsible" for Fallon's Resignation?

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 6:20 AM on March 14, 2008.


Fallon's "premature departure" at least partially "stemmed" from policy disagreements with Gen. Petraeus, "a favorite of the White House."

When Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced CentCom commander Adm. William Fallon’s resignation on Tuesday, he told the press that it was “a cumulative kind of thing,” not “any one issue” that led Fallon to leave his post. According to the New York Times’s Thom Shanker, “premature departure” at least partially “stemmed” from policy disagreements with Gen. David Petraeus, “a favorite of the White House“:

But there was no question that the admiral’s premature departure stemmed from what were perceived to be policy differences with the administration on Iran and Iraq, where his views competed with those of Gen. David H. Petraeus, the American commander in Iraq, who is a favorite of the White House.

Writing on the Washington Post’s website today, former intelligence analyst William Arkin posits that Petraeus is “the man most responsible for the departure of Fallon” because “the two were at odds on virtually every element of Iraq policy”:

Yesterday, I was hearing from Pentagon officials, high-ranking military officers and close observers of the building that the two were at odds on virtually every element of Iraq policy, which of course put Fallon on a collision course with the White House. In other words, Iran was the excuse but Iraq was the reason.

Arkin says Fallon believed “that the surge should [be] brought to a quick and successful conclusion.” But Petraeus had the White House, and “Fallon, despite his command and authority to set priorities and decide on what resources are needed, was frozen out.”

Most recently, the two top commanders disputed the length and purpose of the upcoming “pause” in troop withdrawals from Iraq this summer. Fallon thought it should be “temporary and brief” while Petraeus wants “to wait until as late as September to decide when to bring home more troops.”

Slate’s Fred Kaplan writes that Petraeus and Fallon “dislike each other and that their disagreements have been tense, sometimes fierce.” From this, he surmises that “Fallon’s departure” is a “signal that Petraeus has won that contest.”

UPDATE: For more on Fallon’s resignation, check out today’s Progress Report here.

Digg!

Matt Corley is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


John McCain Befuddled By Birth Control
Candidate can't keep his votes straight.
July 10, 2008.
New Jersey GOP Club Removes "Obama Loves America like O.J. loved Nicole" Banner From Website
Republican County committeeman Ed Kuck admits responsibility for posting the graphic on official website.
July 9, 2008.
How Bush's Top General Covered Up Torture
Gen. Richard Myers aborted legal inquiry into brutal interrogation techniques.
July 1, 2008.
McCain Advisor Claimed a Terrorist Attack Would Be a "Big Advantage" for Republican Campaign
McCain demurs.
June 23, 2008.
McCain Blogger Once Wrote: Who Cares if Bush Policies Increase Terrorism?
John McCain doesn't seem too worried, either...
June 17, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fallon's Choice
Posted by: WilliamF on Mar 14, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Admiral Fallon is a huge loss to the DOD and America. Of course Bush wouldn't recognize an effective commander if he saw one. How could he, he's never really been a part of the military community and when you dodge the draft and skip out on your unit it's hard to come up with the respect and understanding he should have for Admiral Fallon and other officers and enlisted personnel who have given their dedicated service to the citizens of this country. In my opinion and my opinion only Adm. Fallon didn't give the weasels a chance to discharge him. Seeing the writing on the wall he empowered himself and quit. That's how I see it and no truckload of Bush bullshit will change my opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW MUCH DO I WANT TO KNOW?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 14, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adm.Fallon isn't just some guy taking early retirement. The stakes must be very high. Bush/Cheney are about a continuous state of war and so is McCain. They are destroying the Democratic campaigns and people are beginning to buy into the ongoing war with no thought to consequences. Bush's speech to his religious gathering the other day was a disgrace. These people thrive on inflicting misery on as many people as possible. I guess Fallon got in the way of "progress". Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Admiral Fallon said last year...
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 14, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the US would not attack Iran as long as he was CENTCOM commander. That did not sit well with Petreus or the White House.

The question we need to ask is, "Why now?"

To me, the obvious answer is Bush expects to launch a war with Iran before the election.

My best guess would be in August... right about the time of the Democratic Convention. It would negate the publicity and attention that would go to the Democrats, and focus attention on "National Security" issues and "help" the Elephants. It's the only card they have to play. That's my prediction. (for whatever it's worth)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]