Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dodd Declares He Won't Support Mukasey, Fellow Democrats Follow His Lead

Posted by Marc Cooper at 6:52 AM on October 30, 2007.


Marc Cooper: "That is about as basic as it gets," Dodd said. "You must obey the law. Everyone must."

This post, written by Marc Cooper, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

Kudos to Chris Dodd whose third-tier-nothing-to-lose presidential campaign has sprouted him a robust pair of cojones. Dodd became the most prominent Democrat, and the first among the presidential candidates, to declare he will vote against Bush nominee Michael Mukasey's confirmation as Attorney General.

Angered by Mukasey's Senate testimony last week in which the former federal judge and prosecutor floated a legal "theory" that the President of the United States could, indeed, stand above constitutional statutes, Dodd declared on Monday:

"That is about as basic as it gets," Dodd said. "You must obey the law. Everyone must."

Dodd, along with a slew of other legal and political observers were also dismayed when Mukasey dodged Senators' questions last week about whether or not so-called waterboarding was, in fact, a form of torture. After eluding any straight answer, Mukasey wound up making the incredulous statement that he wasn't quite sure what was meant by the term.

Over the weekend, some leading Senate Democrats ranging from Dianne Feinstein of California to Carl Levin of Michigan engaged in their own form of equivocation, warning they might vote against Mukasey if he doesn't properly clarify his views when he responds to written questions from the Senate later this week.

But Dodd's bold stepping-out on this issue, rejecting any mulligan for a nominee who refuses to call torture by its proper name, seems like it might force the hand of fellow Democrats who might start looking rather silly if they don't turn thumbs down on the newly proposed AG. Within hours of Dodd's statement, fellow candidate and Delaware Senator Joe Biden also said he had made up his mind to vote nay. Campaign spokesmen for John Edwards and Bill Richardson also joined the chorus. And by late Monday night, the campaign of Barack Obama piled on, telling The New York Sun:

"Judge Mukasey has failed to send a clear signal that he understands the legal and moral issues that are at stake for our country, and so I cannot support him." Mr. Obama said even a clarification from Judge Mukasey would be insufficient. "No nominee for attorney general should need a second chance to oppose torture and the unnecessary violation of civil liberties," he said.

After this barrage, Mukasey's nomination might be dead in the water -- if you'll excuse the pun.

UPDATE Hillary Clinton announces intention to oppose Mukasey. Read about it here.

Digg!

Marc Cooper has covered international and domestic politics for the last three decades. His articles and essays have appeared in dozens of publications ranging from The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Playboy to Rolling Stone, the L.A. Times and the Village Voice.


Senate Candidate Wants to Change His Name to "Pro-Life"
It may seem weird at first glance, but wouldn't it be great if all anti-choice politicians would identify themselves as clearly?
March 28, 2008.
Why McCain Owes The New York Times a Thank You Card
The Times, in fact, couldn't have found a moment more favorable for Johnny Mack to let this fearsome cat out of the bag.
February 22, 2008.
Ron Paul Can Spoil McCain's Comeback
A strong showing by Paul tonight could severely damage McCain's overall strategy.
January 3, 2008.
Meltdown in Iowa: Huckabee Publicly Attacks Negative Campaigning With Negative Ad
Huckabee was forced to abruptly end his press conference as the questioning of his motives by an amused press corps only seemed to build.
December 31, 2007.
Hillary's Final Strategy: Be Afraid
Barack Obama and John Edwards might want to change the world. But Hillary Clinton wants to protect you against it.
December 30, 2007.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Presidential Oath
Posted by: edpaz on Oct 30, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The oath that every President takes "I swear to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States" places him under the constutional authority. No one is above the law, even King George.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still not a peep from Hillary, Fred, and Rudy?
Posted by: Moore Hognutz on Oct 30, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always considered the Clintons to be closet Republicans, the most likable kind, unless they happen to be dropping bombs on you.

But Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Senator, so she does get to vote for Judge Mukasey if she wants to, and maybe she will. Like Speaker Pelosi's 'impeachment-is-off-the-table.' Got a problem with that? Nooo. Them buxom babes got job security and gazillions in corporate money, and they can say or do what they damn please.

Seriously, the less known about the actual mechanics of waterboarding, the better I like it. I don't care for the idea of my neighbor kids knowing how to waterboard one another. I can easily guess where that would lead.

Still, I would like to know what selected Republicans have to say about torture, as it relates to intelligence gathering, fair punishment, long-term effects on the victims and the torturer, and, tragically, so forth. Seems a worthwhile topic.

As for the President being above the law, well, I'd like to hear about that, too. Fred Thompson will tell us that we took care of that in 1974, but some of us weren't born then, and don't remember Nixon's resignation. Speaker Pelosi has generously given us her uplifting opnion -- I'd like to encourage other voices to speak up -- it would surely be an entertainment better than the gutless ones we've got now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sauce for the goose
Posted by: Vik on Oct 30, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, if waterboarding is good enough for the WWII Japanese and the Gestapo, it ought to be good enough for "us!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sauce for the goose Posted by: Axiom69
jareilly
Posted by: jareilly on Oct 30, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bet big on a recess appointment for Mukasey, but thanks to Chris Dodd anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Am I mistaken?
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 30, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I may be mistaken but didn't the Congressional Democrats reccomend Mukasey as an alternative to Gonzales when Bush first nominated him? I thought thats why Bush chose Mukasey because there wouldn't be a huge partisan fight over the nomination.
If I'm wrong then correct me but if I'm right it just goes to show that politicians think the public has only a short memory and this "fight" over the nomination is just more partisan bickering and a scramble for a sound bite on the evening news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Say no to the Dude
Posted by: janelynne on Oct 30, 2007 3:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The early buzz on Mukasey was that he would be a fair judge. But the more he is questioned on specifics, the more right wing radical he seems. Does anyone remember when law was the rule, and demogoguery was demogoguery? Mukasey seems downright scarey to me, just the same ole same ole neocon radical that is ubiquitous in the media, on the Supreme Court, in the Congress, in the White House. How about saying no to this dude....Mukasey is NOT who can be trusted to comprehend what the law is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The early buzz on anyone Bush nominates is gonna be favorable
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Oct 30, 2007 10:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they aren't wearing jackboots and a swastika. Such is the state of our MSM.

Fact is, first he lied and claimed he didn't know what waterboarding was. Then it was defined for this fascist - and he still equivocated.

Maybe this one time, a wingnut appointee won't get away with his perjury and he will be forced to withdraw. Reid has demonstrated that he knows how to prevent a recess appointment the last time congress went into recess - so this time there is no excuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]