Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How Jack Cafferty can save America

Posted by Cenk Uygur at 12:00 PM on February 13, 2006.


Cable news sets the frame for the rest of the mainstream media, and Cafferty should play a more prominent role.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Cenk Uygur in your
mailbox!

 

Jack Cafferty can change America. The number one problem in the country right now isn't the Iraq War, the grotesque budget deficits, the NSA Warrantless Spying Scandal or even the rampant corruption running roughshod through Congress. It is the lack of balance on cable news. I'll tell you why.

CNN, MSNBC and Fox News Channel are watched by a tiny amount of the population -- the audience of the worst rated nightly news program on the networks (CBS) triples the audience of the best rated primetime program on cable news (The O'Reilly Factor).

Despite this glaring fact, the cable news stations have an inordinate influence on the country.

Why? Because they are broadcast 24/7 in every other news organization in the country. Every newspaper, magazine, local television news and radio station in America is tuned into these three stations every single minute of the day.

So, what the cable news hosts talk about becomes what the country talks about. All of these newsrooms throughout America are inadvertently led to believe the cable news talk show hosts have a beat on what the average American thinks about.

They drive the conversation. They decide what the topics are, they decide how the issues get framed, what questions get asked, what the controversies are, and ultimately, they decide what is important.

The former head of NBC News, Neil Shapiro, just six months ago, said this on a Dateline story:

"I think we do stories that people care about. And there's no doubt that when a story gets, has, and reaches such talkability that everybody's talking about, that it's on Talk Radio, that it's on cable -- that if we as a network news division feel like we can weigh in, we can advance the story -- we should. "

That's another way of saying the major news networks follow the lead of the talk show hosts on the radio and cable news. And over 90% of those are conservatives. They set the bait and the other news operations fall in line because that's what "everyone is talking about."

No matter how important any issue is or how right the opposition might be, if the cable news guys don't cover it, it gets buried. A couple of papers might run a story about it, a magazine might do a piece, and then it's done. Because there is no "national conversation" about it.

The Republicans just put Tom DeLay on the Appropriations Committee that is charged with doling out money in the House and a subcommittee that overlooks the Justice Department investigation of Jack Abramoff. That should be giant news and completely scandalous. But as long as Fox News Channel doesn't want to cover it, and the other two play along, almost no one will talk about it. And more importantly, the American people for the most part won't even hear about it.

Every issue the Democrats have dies an unceremonious death on cable news. So, all these scandals don't matter worth a lick if you can't get Americans to realize they're happening.

How many Americans know that there was a gay prostitute in the White House posing as a reporter to ask the administration friendly questions? How many Americans realize the Pentagon hired a PR group to sell America and the world on the Iraq War years before they launched an invasion? And the list goes on and on.

So, how can Jack Cafferty change all this? He is a rare truth teller on cable news. He gets a couple of minutes a day on CNN to do "The Cafferty File." And every time it is a breath of fresh air - a man speaking truth to power. If CNN would just give Cafferty his own show in primetime, where he can frame the conversation, he can choose the topics and he can ask the right questions, we can turn this whole thing around.

If Cafferty gets good ratings, there will be ten more like him within the year. And if we could get balance on cable news in America, viewers can finally hear the whole story and make up their minds for themselves.

For the last ten years, Americans have been jury members in a trial where only one side had an advocate. It is no wonder they have made the decisions they have. When the British paper asked how so many Americans could be so dumb after the 2004 election, I think they had it wrong. Most Americans aren't dumb or malicious, they simply have no idea what's happening to them.

Are average Republicans really in favor of Senator Grassley sneaking an extra $22 billion out of their pockets and putting it straight into the pockets of the HMOs? Are average Republicans really in favor of a House Majority Leader who hands out tobacco checks on the House floor? Are average Republicans really in favor of an administration that knew there were no links between Iraq and al-Qaeda and said there were anyway?

I know it might be hard for some of you who are knee-deep in these issues to realize that most Americans are not at all aware of any of these things, but they really aren't. Very few people are willing to hand over their hard earned paychecks to corrupt lobbyists. They just don't know any better.

I think we are making the simplest request of all time - give us one strong voice who is an advocate for 50% of the country that votes Democratic on a regular basis. I don't know Jack Cafferty's politics. I don't know if he's a Democrat, and I suspect he would be uncomfortable being classified as a partisan on either side. But it is clear from his reporting that he at least understands the depths of America's problems and is willing to speak up about the real issues in this country.

Is just one show, from a person who is already employed by CNN, too much to ask for? Why is it okay to have dozens of conservative talk show hosts on cable news and not okay to have just one on the opposite side?

Are Republicans and conservatives afraid that Jack Cafferty could take on and beat Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough, Tucker Carlson, Neil Cavuto, John Gibson and all of the rest just by himself? Are they that cowardly? Are they so insecure that they cannot countenance just one dissenting voice? Are their arguments and positions so weak that they could not withstand a challenge from just one strong voice on the opposite side?

I have never met Jack Cafferty in my life and I suspect my call to arms on his behalf will take him by surprise. I have no vested interest in him. In fact, I am a talk show host who might have to compete with him one day. I don't even know where he stands politically. All I know is he speaks the truth, loudly and clearly. And the country desperately needs that at this time.

I ask all other bloggers, others involved in the media, public interest groups, and most importantly, all of you readers to join this fight. It is imperative that we get balance back on cable news, so that we can get balance back in the national conversation.

Please watch these clips of Cafferty on CNN and see if that doesn't sound like a strong voice for justice to you:

Cafferty on the new House Majority Leader, John Boehner.

Cafferty on Hurricane Katrina response.

Cafferty on scandals plaguing the administration.

Please write the head of programming at CNN and ask for balance on their network. They just hired three new conservative talkers in the last month, Glenn Beck, Bill Bennett and J.C. Watts. Ask him to promote just one person on the other side. I nominate Jack Cafferty.

Here's the e-mail to CNN's President, Jonathan Klein: jon.klein@turner.com.

Digg!

Cenk Uygur is co-host of The Young Turks, the first liberal radio show to air nationwide.


The Most Racist Comments About Mexicans Ever Allowed On-Air
Jay Severin’s insanely racist rant -- and what you can do about it.
May 4, 2009.
What if Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Had Died?
If anyone outside of a politician had ordered these beatings, they would already be in the middle of a criminal trial.
April 23, 2009.
When Will We Reach the Tipping Point on Guns?
How many shootings does there have to be in the news before we wonder about the wisdom of allowing just about anyone to get a gun in America?
April 6, 2009.
The Flaw in the System: The Bankers Don't Care About the Banks
The self-interest of bank executives that led to our financial crisis.
March 3, 2009.
Rush Limbaugh 177, Barack Obama 0
"People will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy."
January 30, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It seems so simple, but . . .
Posted by: Knowmad on Feb 13, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea of putting a hardline truth-teller like JC in the limelight is likely something everyone who has ever had the misfortune to hear O'Reilly or Coulter or Novak has wished for. The problem is, CNN and virtually every other medium capable of reaching the masses is part of a corporation, and we all know what that means.

Here's a question: Whatever happened to the excellent daily show "Crossfire" once Novak, Carlson and the other GOP simpletons started getting regularly thrashed by Begala, Carville and the progressives due to the administration's gross incompotence and corruption?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keith Olbermann
Posted by: kww355 on Feb 14, 2006 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cafferty is very good, but Keith Olbermann is better. In a vast wasteland of continuous conservative crap on MSNBC, Olbermann's show is a refreshing oasis.

If you've seen his show, you know it's not all "hard news". But I discovered all the examples that were given ( Delay, the planted reporter at WH press briefings,etc. ) by watching Countdown.

I often wonder just why I never hear these stories from the MSM. Olbermann covers them and "tells it like it is".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money Talks
Posted by: Summer on Feb 14, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We could write the advertisers who sponsor Fox News and ask for them to influence more balanced news and tell them we can no longer buy their products if they sponsor Fox the way it is. Companies will advertise if they are making money from it and will quit if they find it is hurting them.

The thing about Fox is they show all these murders going on that gets people to watch them. Fox also has a lot of opinion shows. They have very little real news and it is biased. They blur it all together to where you don't know where the news begins and propaganda ends. They do lie sometimes, but mostly they leave out anything that will make a liberal look good or give the Democratic side of any controversy.

They said on Fox the other day, that the main focus during the election will be terrorism. The reason Fox is going to focus on that is because it is Bush's main playing card. Fear of terrorism.

The average person doesn't stand a chance with the lobbyists and the news both working for the corporations.

It may be the corporations sponsoring Fox News is a way to "give" to the Republicans without having to say they give over the limit. If you think about it, Fox is one big advertisement for the Republicans. CNN is not too far behind. CNN aren't as brazen about it as Fox is.

Maybe that would be the way to put a stop to it. Prove Fox is an advertisement for Republicans and their sponsors are going over the limit for campaign contributions.

There is such a thing as equal time, isn't there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Money Talks Posted by: krose
WELL, I JUST WENT THROUGH THIS ON THE HUFFINGTON POST
Posted by: krose on Feb 14, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT I GUESS I HAVE TO DO IT AGAIN! Cafferty is not saving ANYBODY, especially AMERICA!!! He is really a POMPOUS ASS, who once in a while says a few straight lines that make some sense. I had a long correspondence with him in December, 2005, in which he proved to me of his RIGHT-WING BIAS. He calls himself "An equal opportunity offender," and basically he is that. He tries to keep both sides from complaining too much, in an effort at keeping his job. But he will NEVER go to bat for us, and we will NEVER BE ABLE TO TRUST HIM COMPLETELY!

The only person in the TV news media that we can trust to some degree, in my opinion, is Keith Olbermann, however he is only unleashed by his MASTERS just so far. He comes on "STRAIGHT-SHOOTING," and then peters off into his dopey "Oddball" segment, so that there is less than a half an hour of real "meat" to his program!

Then there is a new program on MSNBC, hidden on the
weekends, which is promising, called "Weekends with Maury and Connie" (Maury Povich and Connie Chung). It is really quite liberal, but I am sure it won't last, even though I have been sending e-mails to the NBC "brass" asking them to put in on in place of Rita Cosby, Joe Scarboro, or that horrible Tucker Carlson!

The bottom line is that NO ONE CAN SAVE AMERICA but "WE THE PEOPLE!" We must CONNECT with EACHOTHER through forums like this, and "DEMOCRATS.COM," and "DAILY KOS," become active in "MEDIA MATTERS.ORG," doing their daily assignments, read the truth through such sites as the "HUFFINGTON POST.COM" and "TRUTHOUT.ORG," become involved in ELECTION REFORM, WORK IN THE 2006 ELECTIONS, CONTACT OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, and if all of the above do not work, we must think about something NEW, DIFFERENT, and maybe even RADICAL! MAYBE, IF OUR ELECTIONS AGAIN SEEM CORRUPT, AS THEY WERE IN 2006, IT WILL BE TIME FOR US TO DO AS THEY DID IN THE UKRAINE, WHEN THE SAME THING HAPPENED TO THEM! THEY MARCHED IN THE STREETS AND TOOK BACK THEIR COUNTRY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OOPS!
Posted by: krose on Feb 14, 2006 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I MEANT TO SAY...........

IF OUR ELECTIONS ARE AS CORRUPT IN 2006, AS THEY WERE IN 2004..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OOPS! Posted by: Prophit
Daily Show
Posted by: jwg on Feb 14, 2006 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us rely on the Daily Show to cut through the B'shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your hero, oh my
Posted by: NY'er on Feb 14, 2006 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google: "Cafferty Bicycle". That's your savior?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your hero, oh my Posted by: krose
ACTUALLY, YOU CAN JUST GOOGLE:
Posted by: krose on Feb 14, 2006 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"JACK CAFFERTY," AND COME UP WITH 197,000 ENTRIES, including the "HIT & RUN" Bicycle incident of 2003 and accusations of anti-Japanese and anti-Arab/Muslim speech. Apparantly our "little Jack" has had his share of complaints rolling into CNN for a long time! ONCE AGAIN, JACK CAFFERTY IS NO SAVIOR! ONLY "WE THE PEOPLE" CAN SAVE AMERICA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TV-What TV?
Posted by: signsong@earthlink.com on Feb 15, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It may not be of much use to the general population, but it's done wonders for my own sanity-I turned off my TV a few years ago, and I miss it like I miss having pnuemonia. I understand that the writer would like to try and influence the policies of right wing media executives, politely pleading for a tiny slice of the pie for our side, but folks, it's a heavy boulder to push. Do you really have time to devote to this? If anything, send a letter to the big cheeses, saying "Your network, or your station, stinks for the following reasons, and I'm not watching AT ALL, and of course, not buying any of the stuff you sell in between the "news". I realize most people are getting their so called news from TV, but it's like smoking-you're not going to get them to make healthy cigarettes, so QUIT!
Writing to network executives threatening to boycott certain products if they don't throw us a liberal-flavored biscuit once in awhlie is going to take a generation of effort. We don't have time. Turn off your TV, throw it away, cover it up , whatever.But tell these geeks what you're doing. And, you get to keep the money you used to hand over to the cable company, and you get out and meet your neighbors too. You know, you've seen them, they're out walking in the neighborhood because they aren't glued to the idiot box.
Get your news from sources like Pacifica Radio. Well honed blogs like this one are great. Write your own stories. Write a song and sing it at your workplace at break time. Once we stop feeding the hand that bites us, we'll have our hands free to do better things. Turn off the damn TV!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TV-What TV? Posted by: Knowmad
Your so right about what Americans DON'T know in this country.
Posted by: Prophit on Feb 15, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other day I was in a health food store and a young woman was there. She couldn't have been over 29 to 30years old. We were talking and I mentioned the Avian Bird Flu and how to keep from getting it.

Here is what she asked me: "What is the Avian Bird Flu"?

I couldn't believe it. Its amazing how ignorant most Americans are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cenk ,wishfull thinking?
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed on Feb 16, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the sentiments in your column as usually the case.Didn't Phil Donahue try that fairly recently?The corporate medias don't want fair and balanced,thats why Fox and the BS "factor" dominate.I agree with the commentor who said to turn off the TV,or if you are lucky enough to have cable or satellite TV ,watch LinkTV, Democracy Now,listen ,to Pacifica etc. Between the lines,on WPKN can be streamed,or the Radio Nation .Your show ,The Young Turks,Air America(if you can stand the advts.)The blogs; Huff Po ,Alternet ,Truthout ,TruthDig ,Dailly Kos.Theres your fair and balanced.You can even fish for Trolls under the bridges.That way you can get the same right wing crap as they have on Fox(in case you miss it!)just for balance.KILL THE TUBE ITS WATCHING YOU! Pepper it with your 12 guage,run it over with your Hummer(while O'Rielly is on).Be creative ! Safe hunting!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]