Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Taxpayers Bail Out Bear Stearns; JP Morgan Buys for $2/Share Discount

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 5:19 AM on March 17, 2008.


In the past 72 hours, the ultimate financial scam has been perpetrated on the American public.

A couple of months back, I wrote the following:

The unprecedented wealth transfer from poor and middle income families to the uber rich is nearly complete. The folks at the bottom of the GOP-led financial pyramid scheme are nearly bled dry, and the pyramid is about to collapse. To sustain itself a little longer, the folks at the top of the pyramid will have to start an Amway-style ritual of financial cannibalism amongst themselves. I think that (to an extent) this is exactly what we're seeing in the stock markets and big financial houses as the true meltdown begins...

On Friday, it was announced that JP Morgan Chase Bank was acting as an intermediary to bail out the financial investment bank Bear Stearns, and essentially funneled billions of dollars from the U.S. Federal Reserve (read: you and me) to those who had entrusted their investment fortunes to Bear Sterns.

I don't even know where to start on this one. How about here?

So the only possible justification for such Fed action is to engineer an orderly rather than a disorderly shutdown of this institution. But unfortunately the Fed is behaving as if Bear Stearns is illiquid but solvent. That is delusional and the official sector support of an otherwise insolvent institution will end up - like many other recent Fed actions - being paid for by the US tax-payer...

On Friday, Bear Stearns stock closed at $30 / share, down nearly 50% from the prior day.

Today, J.P. Morgan Chase agreed to buy Bear Stearns for $2 / share. You read that right.

$2 / share.

But almost as importantly (riffing on the link above), it was also announced that the Federal Reserve will now extend their "lender of last resort" protection not just to banks, but to investment houses. So, the next time a Bear Sterns (or Merrill Lynch) gets into trouble because of bad investments, the U.S. Federal Reserve will bail them out. Or more correctly, their well-heeled institutional investors.

I freely admit I know very little about the inner workings of the banking and investment industries. But even a financial neophyte like me can understand that the Fed appears to be engaging in a totally knee jerk reaction to a liquidity crisis of a single, poorly risk-managed company.

This is getting really scary. I can't imagine that the markets will react well to this when they open on Monday.

Digg!

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Proposed Ban on "Porn" Angers Soldiers
Should congress ban the sale of Playboy and Penthouse at U.S. military installations?
May 7, 2008.
GOP Rep: 9/11 Was 'Simply' a Plane Crash
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) has created a bit of a firestorm with his remarks this past Tuesday on establishing a healthcare fund for 9/11 workers.
April 3, 2008.
Dem Senator's Hubby Caught in Hooker Bust
Hooker. Big Beaver Road. Exit 69. Could a Sen. Debbie Stabenow's husband have possibly been caught in a worse place during a prostitution sting?
April 2, 2008.
11-Year-Old Girl Dies When Parents Choose Prayer Instead of Medical Care
Should the parents be charged with, at a minimum, child abuse?
March 28, 2008.
Three Years Ago This Week: Terri Schiavo
A brain dead woman in Florida became a symbol of all that was wrong with the marriage between the GOP and the fundamentalist Christians.
March 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So Much For The 'Free Market" Eh?
Posted by: left_libertarian on Mar 17, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makes me wanna laugh and cry.

'Free Market' my a$$

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So taxpayer money first bails out Bear's executives, then JP Morgan comes in
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Mar 17, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to pick up the scraps of the company and make some money for itself.

The government has forgotten that tax money is not their private property to be used however they like. It is a public trust - and the people who allocate it are public servants.

These servants deserve a nice caning on their bare hides for being bad servants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the financial 9/11 has begun
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 17, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
pull up yer waders. it's gonna get deep.

--If you view the current crisis as a massive margin call on a heavily indebted United States, then the case for falling prices is even clearer. Lenders are demanding that borrowers either put up more collateral to secure their borrowings…or reduce debts by selling assets to raise cash. Assets to be sold include property and shares, and that includes resources shares too, and perhaps even precious metals like gold and silver.

--This kind of deal bails out the owners of the bad debt (the investment banks and mortgage lenders). It keeps the financial system alive. It prevents the further sale of assets and the loss of depositor’s money. And it prevents a complete collapse of confidence in the financial sector, as happened in the Great Depression. But it does it all at a great cost: the viability of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11 continued . . . (mission accomplished! can the amero be far behind?)
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 17, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
--This brings us to the last big consequence of the weekend’s events: dollar supremacy. For yeas the American government has been spending more than it taxes in it taxes. It’s been free to do so because Asian savers have happily recycled their trade-surplus dollars back into American financial assets.

--But in this margin call on America, the U.S. government may be the biggest loser of all. It is going to have to pay a lot more to borrow. As global investors shun U.S. stock and bond markets because of the falling dollar, interest rates on long-term U.S. bond will have to go up. The U.S. government doesn’t have any collateral to offer foreign lenders. It can only pay whatever the market demands in order to lend money to a government that has a US$9 trillion debt.

--The U.S. government has posted a kind of collateral in its borrowings with the rest of the world. That collateral is the future wages and salary of American workers. It’s American tax dollar that pay the interest on sovereign American debt.

--Americans will be working harder than ever to pay foreign bond holders. First, they’ll have to pay more to borrow now for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the big social spending promises at home. But most of America’s obligations to foreign investors are in three- and ten-year notes.

--In fact, the U.S. must annually roll over (re-finance) about US$1 trillion in bonds and notes to keep the government open for business. The cost of financing that borrowing is about to go way up. It will be a real, immediate impact on the American economy. The consequences of years of deficit spending by the government are about to hit home in the United States.

(information swiped from the Daily Reckoning Australia)

we've been sucked dry and the hull will soon be cast aside. pfft! gay marriage? it's always been about the money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A way to settle debts Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» Thanks, Kaptain! Posted by: Quannah
» *wink* Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Turn out the lights
Posted by: blondesprite on Mar 17, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the party is over. Go to the Independent.co.uk
Headline this morning: Wall Street fears for next Great Depression

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Turn out the lights Posted by: Quannah
Your missing the most important point...
Posted by: genefire on Mar 17, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Federal Reserve Bank isn't "Federal" at all. They are a group of banks with a secret board and can't be audited. Our government is owned by them.
We pay interests to them for every dollar printed.
Our debt is because of them. Our entire government is in on it. Don't take my word for it look it up PLEASE!
One more shocker for you while I'm at it. The IRS is an arm of the IMF..managed by the UN. IRS is illegal as hell and until you know this fact you continue to make unfounded assumptions. Research what I just posted here and you'll discover that its only the tip of the iceberg.

Anyway, I just wanted to share that rather you believe it or not is up to you. I wish i were wrong but I'm not.

Also, I was wondering why no one here is posting anything about the testimonies of the "Winter Soldiers" this past weekend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Winter soldiers Posted by: 2dogarage
The Federal Reserve Bank is not federal...
Posted by: genefire on Mar 17, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its a private entity and the board is SECRET. They can't be audited. The print money out of thin air(FIAT money) and charge us, the taxpayers, interest. This is where our debt really comes from.
Remember they are a group of private banks that can't be audited by our government. Every dollar printed from nothing is charged to the ameican tax payers...look it up! Also our congress is aware of this fact which brings on an entirely different conversation so I'll stop here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Socialize the risk,
Posted by: Koondog on Mar 17, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
privatize the profit and outsource the responsibility. I stole this comment from another poster, which is one of the most succinctly accurate statements I've ever read about what is going on. Makes it easy to remember the blueprint by which the average person is getting completely screwed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's hiding in all of this?
Posted by: Doubtom on Mar 17, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two great depressions in one lifetime? Wow, I must really be special!

Perhaps another great depression is exactly what this nation needs to awaken the people to the huge scam that is unregulated capitalism. Many of us were youngsters during the last great depression and remember only too well that the hardships were not borne equally by all the citizens. In fact JP Morgan was the same company that the first Roosevelt, Theodor, railed against in the early 1900s when he attacked the corporations for their corrupting influence. The fact that JP Morgan,(now married to Chase) figures prominently in the current financial meltdown, fairly well illustrates my point. None of those corrupt corporations were hurt during the first great depression and you may be sure that they will ride this latest one out smartly. I hope that the people have finally had enough of this slave/cannon fodder status and decide to revolt and put the only individual into the presidency who sees this all very clearly, Ralph Nader. None of the other candidates will tackle the corrupt corporations. The two major parties are inextricably joined to the corporate structure and the election of either major party's candidate will insure more of the same.
We are ignorant, we are blind and we are knee-deep in propaganda!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

James Cayne - CEO
Posted by: LouisFallert on Mar 17, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$28.4 million a year in compensation from a company that just sold for $236 million because of what happened on his watch.

"One person who does not have to worry is James Cayne, the recently departed chief executive of Bear Stearns. According to the New York Times, he walked with $232 million in compensation over the period from 1993 to 2006. This is just another example of how the global economy rewards extraordinary talent."

The Fed’s Forced Marriage of Bear Stearns and J.P. Morgan
By Dean Baker - March 17, 2008, 9:07AM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: James Cayne - CEO Posted by: JSquercia
And we paid for this...
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 17, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really pisses me off that taxpayers are paying for this bailout. I wonder how many billions of dollars they have made in this sub-prime debacle over the past few years? Yet we have to bail them out.

This is fucked up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

loot, loot, loot
Posted by: gregii on Mar 17, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, most of this is from memory – which places some of the exact figures I quote below in at least some minimal doubt – but my report of the theory is accurate - and my memory of the numbers is not too far off, I assure you.

When the stock market collapsed in 1929, the top 2% of US wealthiest owned something in the range of (or in excess of) 60% of our National wealth. FDR “cured” the depression by redistributing the wealth to the working class, receiving his biggest boost from the advent of WWII. At the end of WWII the top 2% held only about 18% of the Nation’s wealth. When Ronald Reagan came into office that number had crept up to 24%. When he left office 8 years later it had reached about 35-40%. The trend was given a huge boost by his administration. I can't find numbers today that cover the top 2% - only the top 1% which now own 38% according to:(http://multinationalmonitor.or g/mm2003/03may/may03interviewswolff.html) (you will have to paste this url together: it is too long for alternate's software!)

On Utube, 1% control 37% of wealth - and also indicates the top 10% owns 72%: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VHNXTBwj80) UTube also states "...these figures are over a decade old - it is even more concentrated now."

The Great Depression spawned an economic theory in Academia: when the control of a nation’s wealth by its wealthiest 2% reaches 40%, the risk of depression increases significantly and requires attention to be reduced. When the control reaches 50% depression is imminent.

I can't imagine a Republican President or Republican Congress moving to reduce these numbers: not to avoid another depression - not even to "cure" one.

They appear responsible only to their wealthy constituents - who project entitlement to their wealth.

To me it suggests our national stupidity that the Federal Reserve Board has been endowed with the power to loot the taxpayers on behalf of the wealthy without accountability - not even to congress. It strikes me as unconstitutional and illegal?

Have we already lost our country? Move over Merle Haggard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

loot, loot, loot
Posted by: gregii on Mar 17, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, most of this is from memory – which places some of the exact figures I quote below in at least some minimal doubt – but my report of the theory is accurate - and my memory of the numbers is not too far off, I assure you.

When the stock market collapsed in 1929, the top 2% of US wealthiest owned something in the range of (or in excess of) 60% of our National wealth. FDR “cured” the depression by redistributing the wealth to the working class, receiving his biggest boost from the advent of WWII. At the end of WWII the top 2% held only about 18% of the Nation’s wealth. When Ronald Reagan came into office that number had crept up to 24%. When he left office 8 years later it had reached about 35-40%. The trend was given a huge boost by his administration. I can't find numbers today that cover the top 2% - only the top 1% which now own 38% according to:(http://multinationalmonitor.or g/mm2003/03may/may03interviewswolff.html) (you will have to paste this url together: it is too long for alternate's software!)

On Utube, 1% control 37% of wealth - and also indicates the top 10% owns 72%: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VHNXTBwj80) UTube also states "...these figures are over a decade old - it is even more concentrated now."

The Great Depression spawned an economic theory in Academia: when the control of a nation’s wealth by its wealthiest 2% reaches 40%, the risk of depression increases significantly and requires attention to be reduced. When the control reaches 50% depression is imminent.

I can't imagine a Republican President or Republican Congress moving to reduce these numbers: not to avoid another depression - not even to "cure" one.

They appear responsible only to their wealthy constituents - who project entitlement to their wealth.

To me it suggests our national stupidity that the Federal Reserve Board has been endowed with the power to loot the taxpayers on behalf of the wealthy without accountability - not even to congress. It strikes me as unconstitutional and illegal?

Have we already lost our country? Move over Merle Haggard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sub Prime Solution..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 17, 2008 2:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have the perfect and simple Solution for the Sub Prime Mortgage crisis and it won't cost Tax Payers a dime...

All we need do is Peg the Sub Prime Mortgages at 3% above Prime and forgive all penalties to date 1/2 of which or more are illegal anyway as reported..

This will save all tax payers from bailing out either the lenders or the borrowers and only they are involved..

Also there are up to 8.8 million coming possible foreclosures on the horizon that we know of and that's 20-30 million people effected even more considering these are families and these evictions and foreclosures will wreck havoc on the already stressed and limited and over inflated rental market so negatively effecting those who can't even dream of home ownership..!

All this misery is averted by pegging these sub prime mortgages at 3% above whatever is the prime lending rate..

This could be reviewed after say five years or so as the market adjusts and so these people can maybe sell and then get regular fixed rate mortgages or have equity possibly or just let it ride until the market does stabilize..if ever..

This doesn't solve or undo the destruction to America Bush and Cheney and our corporations have done to America by far or solve every problem of our failing economy but it solves the sub prime mortgage section of it..

We must return to usery laws with limits under 20% interest it's immoral and economically stupid to have this law of the jungle attitude as the banks are simply killing to golden goose..

So talk it up and get on the phone to your worthless corrupt lying Congressional representative and corrupt treasonous sold out Senators who hate the Constitution and Bill of Rights and tell them no bail out just peg the sub primes at 3% above prime and problem..! solved..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice! Posted by: 2dogarage
THIS IS OBSCENE
Posted by: stoicnag on Mar 17, 2008 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can bail out Bear Stearns but we can't bail out New Orleans?

I'm surprised the administration hasn't come up with some new Code-Orange fear-mongering to distract us from this bail-out B.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of wealth transfer. . .
Posted by: stoicnag on Mar 17, 2008 8:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the oil companies make record profits, the price of oil and gasoline is driving up the price of groceries, which I suspect will hit the poor and middle class harder than it will the rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]