Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Main Message of the RNC? The GOP Loathes Itself

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 5:41 AM on September 4, 2008.


The former mayor of New York City railed against "cosmopolitans." The Harvard-trained, former governor of Massachusetts railed against eastern elites.

Going into their convention, the Republican Party faced a rather daunting challenge. The nation wants change, and a conservative Republican president has been in office for eight years. He's failed miserably, and the former head of the NRCC recently compared the Republican brand to dog food. It's similar to the predicament facing the party in 1992.

What to do? If the last couple of nights are any indication, the GOP has decided to simply pretend that they haven't been in power for most of the decade.

Three days into the Republican National Convention, it is clear that the G.O.P. has settled on a message: "Washington is not working." The phrase is included in virtually every speech and every statement in St Paul.

We agree completely that Washington is in desperate need of renewal and reform. We're not even going to quibble about the fact that Barack Obama said it first. The problem is that American voters have yet to hear -- from John McCain or his warm-up acts -- any serious ideas on what, exactly, is wrong with Washington, apart from the fact that a Democrat might win the White House, never mind how to truly fix it.

The difficulty for the Republican ticket in talking about change and reform and acting like insurgents is that they have been running Washington -- the White House and Congress -- for most of the last eight years.

Sarah Palin, the vice presidential nominee, was a combative and witty relief at a torpid convention. But it was bizarre hearing the running mate of a 26-year veteran of Congress, a woman who was picked to placate the right-wing elite, mocking "the permanent political establishment in Washington."

And we couldn't imagine what Mitt Romney was thinking when he denounced "liberal Washington" and then, at the convention of the party that brought you unimpeded presidential spying, declared: "It's time for the party of big ideas, not the party of Big Brother!"

Watching the speeches, and the contortions Republicans have to go through to avoid mentioning the current president (and ostensible head of their party), it's like getting stuck in a "Twilight Zone" episode. The multi-millionaire former mayor of New York railed against "cosmopolitans." The multi-millionaire, Harvard-trained, former governor of Massachusetts railed against "eastern elites." Just 48 hours after the party's nominee insisted the convention would be less partisan, we're bombarded with the most ugly and nasty partisanship of any party gathering in years.

Welcome to The Ironic Convention, 2008.

At one point last night, Romney argued, "We need change all right -- change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington!" It was a fairly common sentiment. I have this nagging urge to put a post-it note on the convention podium that reads, "Psst, Republicans, you've controlled the White House for eight years, and Congress for six of the last eight years. You've humiliated yourselves and discredited the conservative governing philosophy forever. Love, Steve."

Seriously, what's the message of the week in St. Paul? That Republican governing works? No. That Republicans have a legitimate policy agenda? No. That the next four years should be different from the last eight? No. It's simple: "Your house may be on fire, but don't trust that man standing outside with a hose, because he doesn't share your values."

In this sense, this convention is just like the one from 1992, with Republicans pretending that they haven't been in charge, and blaming Democrats for the Republican failures in the most divisive, pathological way possible.

Who's buying this nonsense?

Digg!


Roadblock Republicans Start Throwing Around the F-Word
The Senate minority Republicans are already talking about filibusters. And lots of 'em.
November 22, 2008.
Obama's (Rumored) Pick for Secretary of the Treasury Makes Wall Street Happy
He's going to be the Secretary of the Treasury in the midst of a financial crisis, so it's probably worth taking the time to get to know him.
November 21, 2008.
Obama's Team Makes Good on Threat of Bipartisanship
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel spent a day on the Hill doing Republican outreach.
November 21, 2008.
Karl Rove the Hypocrite Doles Out Advice for Obama
I'm trying to pick my favorite part of Rove's latest column in the Wall Street Journal. There are so many gems to choose from.
November 20, 2008.
The Coming Econ-ocalypse: Job Markets Tank
I don't want to alarm anyone, but the job market appears to be in pretty horrendous shape.
November 20, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republicans are idiots and scum
Posted by: leTerrassier on Sep 4, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they're still going to win. I would put money on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And so are American voters Posted by: SteveO
My thoughts exactly
Posted by: gallery on Sep 4, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In between gulps of wine, I was stunned by what I heard coming out of the mouths of these clowns last night.
And then it got progressively worse and was capped by Palins infuriating, lie filled speech. All I could think of when she was done was, time to step up and get what's coming to you. The gloves are off.

These people need to be publicly stripped of any credibility they have left so that the country can see how truly empty and corrupted their party platform has become, and then they need to be barred forever from any position in public office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: election fraud Posted by: Lauren
» RE: election fraud Posted by: Basenjis
up until last night,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Sep 4, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would've said that Mitt Romney was the last true intellectual heavyweight in the GOP. Now, however...hahahahahahahahahahaha, did he just list a bunch of disastrous Bush policies and say the Dems were responsible?

Race to the bottom, indeed!

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: up until last night, Posted by: alan1111
nit picking
Posted by: Lauren on Sep 4, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to note the Republicans have still been in charge of the congress for 8 years, not 6. The Democrats caved to them every time, that IS still in charge.

If the Democrats had truly been in charge we would have had an impeachment and President Pelosi would be running for re-election.


I consider this factoid to be so obvious as to be self evident.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nit picking Posted by: JSquercia
millionaire
Posted by: drewpopo99 on Sep 4, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
awesome! A hot debate is taking place at millionaire site Richromances.com now among hollywood celebrities and beaitiful people. Many guys said they were super-excited about it~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1984...
Posted by: tink1969 on Sep 5, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a section in the book 1984 where a politician is giving a speech about the current enemy. Part-way through the speech he's notified that the enemy has changed and the old ally is the new enemy and the old enemy is the new ally. He immediately switches gears, to the point of blaming the propaganda denouncing the old enemy/new ally as a trick performed by the new enemy/old ally.

And the people believe him.

It's the same thing. Rebrand the problems as belonging to the Liberals and ignore the fact that it was the Conservatives who caused the problems. Shift the blame and make sure that the slime on your hands sticks to the other guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]